Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
Research article
 | 
02 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 02 Dec 2019

Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case

Michèle Marti, Michael Stauffacher, and Stefan Wiemer

Viewed

Total article views: 4,323 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,869 1,253 201 4,323 237 266
  • HTML: 2,869
  • PDF: 1,253
  • XML: 201
  • Total: 4,323
  • BibTeX: 237
  • EndNote: 266
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,323 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,875 with geography defined and 448 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 18 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Maps are an established way to illustrate natural hazards and regularly used to communicate with non-experts. However, there is evidence that they are frequently misconceived. Using a real case, our study shows that applying or disregarding best practices in visualization, editing, and presentation significantly impacts the comprehensibility of seismic hazard information. We suggest scrutinizing current natural-hazard communication strategies and empirically testing new products.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint