Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
Research article
 | 
02 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 02 Dec 2019

Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case

Michèle Marti, Michael Stauffacher, and Stefan Wiemer

Viewed

Total article views: 3,078 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,065 931 82 3,078 99 93
  • HTML: 2,065
  • PDF: 931
  • XML: 82
  • Total: 3,078
  • BibTeX: 99
  • EndNote: 93
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Jul 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,078 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,673 with geography defined and 405 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 09 May 2025
Download
Short summary
Maps are an established way to illustrate natural hazards and regularly used to communicate with non-experts. However, there is evidence that they are frequently misconceived. Using a real case, our study shows that applying or disregarding best practices in visualization, editing, and presentation significantly impacts the comprehensibility of seismic hazard information. We suggest scrutinizing current natural-hazard communication strategies and empirically testing new products.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint