the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Active faults sources for the Pátzcuaro–Acambay fault system (Mexico): fractal analysis of slip rates and magnitudes M_{w} estimated from fault length
Avith MendozaPonce
Angel FigueroaSoto
Diana SoriaCaballero
Víctor Hugo GarduñoMonroy
The Pátzcuaro–Acambay fault system (PAFS), located in the central part of the TransMexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB), is delimited by an active transtensive deformation area associated with the oblique subduction zone between the Cocos and North American plates, with a convergence speed of 55 mm yr^{−1} at the latitude of the state of Michoacán, Mexico. Part of the oblique convergence is transferred to this fault system, where the slip rates range from 0.009 to 2.78 mm yr^{−1}. This has caused historic earthquakes in Central Mexico, such as the Acambay quake (M_{s}=6.9) on 19 November 1912 with surface rupture, and another in Maravatío in 1979 with M_{s}=5.6. Also, paleoseismic analyses are showing Quaternary movements in some faults, with moderate to large magnitudes. Notably, this zone is seismically active, but lacks a dense local seismic network, and more importantly, its neotectonic movements have received very little attention. The present research encompasses three investigations carried out in the PAFS. First, the estimation of the maximum possible earthquake magnitudes, based on 316 fault lengths mapped on a 15 m digital elevation model, by means of three empirical relationships. In addition, the Hurst exponent H_{w} and its persistence, estimated for magnitudes M_{w} (spatial domain) and for 32 sliprate data (time domain) by the wavelet variance analysis. Finally, the validity of the intrinsic definition of active fault proposed here. The average results for the estimation of the maximum and minimum magnitudes expected for this fault population are $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{7}$. Also, supported by the results of H at the spatial domain, this paper strongly suggests that the PAFS is classified in three different zones (western PAFS, central PAFS, and eastern PAFS) in terms of their roughness (${H}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{0.7},{H}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{0.5},{H}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{0.8}$ respectively), showing different dynamics in seismotectonic activity and; the time domain, with a strong persistence H_{w}=0.949, suggests that the periodicities of slip rates are close in time (process with memory). The fractal capacity dimension (D_{b}) is also estimated for the sliprate series using the boxcounting method. Inverse correlation between D_{b} and low sliprate concentration was observed. The resulting D_{b}=1.86 is related to a lesser concentration of low sliprates in the PAFS, suggesting that larger faults accommodate the strain more efficiently (length ≥3 km). Thus, in terms of fractal analysis, we can conclude that these 316 faults are seismically active, because they fulfill the intrinsic definition of active faults for the PAFS.
 Article
(14224 KB) 
Supplement
(308 KB)  BibTeX
 EndNote
The state of Michoacán in Mexico is an area of high seismic activity, not only due to subduction events, such as the devastating earthquake of 19 September 1985 (M_{w}=8.1), but also because of the existence of crustal faults in the interior. Historically, several earthquakes have affected populations such as Pátzcuaro and Araró (in 1845 and 1858), Zinapécuaro and Tlalpujahua (in the 19th century), Acambay (in 1912), and Maravatío (in 1979). More recently, in 2007, a set of earthquakes ($\mathrm{2.5}<{M}_{\mathrm{w}}<\mathrm{3.0}$) occurred in the vicinity of the city of Morelia, as a consequence of the movement of the active fault named La Paloma. The major problem here, in central Mexico, is that we are incapable of using seismic and geodesic data of coseismic slip during earthquakes, because we lack a dense local seismic and geodesic network. Indeed, along the PAFS there are only two broad band stations of the Mexican Seismological Service (SSN) in the cities of Morelia (lat:19.646812, long:−101.227135) and Acambay (lat:19.9845, long:−99.8823). Moreover, the existing paleoseismological studies are too scarce in relation to the number of existing faults.
Above all, this reveals the need to define the intracontinental structures that are susceptible to generating moderate and strong seismic events, and delimit the damaged area that can produce such events, especially in the center of Mexico, which presents highly populated zones. Of course we used the excellent manifestation and geomorphology of faults, and we analyzed the magnitudes M_{w} derived from fault dimensions and the sliprate estimations of earlier studies, as well as spatial distribution by Fractal Analysis. In principle, this branch of mathematics gives us a way of describing, measuring, and predicting seismic activity by means of the Hurst exponent and the fractal dimension. We used two main databases: (a) 316 average magnitudes M_{w} calculated from the surface rupture length on a 15 m digital elevation model, and (b) 32 slip rates recorded in the literature.
Thus, the goals of this investigation are (1) the estimation of the maximum possible earthquake magnitudes by three empirical relations; (2) the definition of a microregionalization of the PAFS using the Hurst exponent based on M_{w} magnitudes; and (3) the validation of our proposed intrinsic definition of active fault sources for the PAFS by fractal analysis and semivariograms. Consequently, we are proposing the investigation of the dynamics of the Pátzcuaro–Acambay area, in order to improve territory planning and reduce seismic hazards.
The TransMexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) is an active continental volcanic arc that spans cross Mexico with an approximate east–west orientation. The TMVB developed within an extensional tectonics setting resulting from the subduction of the Rivera and Cocos plates beneath the North American plate. The central TMVB is characterized by the Tula–Chapala fault zone (Johnson and Harrison, 1990), where the kinematics is extensional and transtensional from the Miocene (Johnson and Harrison, 1989; MartínezReyes and NietoSamaniego, 1990; GarduñoMonroy et al., 2009) with a left strike slip component (Suter et al., 1992, 1995, 2001; Ego and Ansan, 2002; Norini et al., 2006).
Specifically, we will focus on the central and eastern parts of the Tula–Chapala fault zone, i.e., the PAFS (Figs. 1, 2). The PAFS is defined as a population of several hundreds of normal faults, oriented east–west and northeast–southwest, comprising the cities between Pátzcuaro and Acambay (102^{∘}–99^{∘} W). Its kinematics is summarized as a leftlateral transtensional system with σ3 trending northwest–southeast and σ2 trending northeast–southwest (Suter et al., 1992, 1995, 2001; Ego and Ansan, 2002; Mennella, 2011). Moreover, according to Mennella (2011) there are three major fault sets in the PAFS, the first and oldest being the northnorthwest–southsoutheast system, expressed mainly by the Tzitzio–Valle de Santiago fault. The other two systems configured lake areas and have the morphology of seismically active faults with east–west and eastnortheast–westsouthwest strikes. Their kinematics show clear evidence from the Miocene (17 Ma) with leftstrike slip faulting, that later became to normal with a leftlateral component (Suter et al., 2001; Ego and Ansan, 2002; Mennella, 2011). In the northnorthwest–southsoutheast faults, this stress field generates a reactivation as oblique faults with normal rightlateral component. This deformation always keeps the σ3 moving from 360 to 340^{∘} N.
The Pátzcuaro–Acambay fault system can be divided into three zones with different geological and geophysical settings: (1) the western PAFS, between Pátzcuaro and the Tzitzio–Valle de Santiago fault, is an area where three different scenarios have coexisted. First, the andesitic basements of the Miocene (>19 Ma) were in contact with a volcanic sequence characterized by alternation of andesites and ignimbrites, varying in age from 19 to 7 Ma. These volcanic sequences were contemporary with a sinistral strikeslip faulting with east–west and northeast–southwest structures, which later moved like normal faults (from 12 to 7 My), to finally turn into normal faults with a strike slip component (see focal mechanisms, Fig. 2). The complete western zone has a geometry of listric faults with lengths from 3 to 33 km, generating rotations of the Miocene lithological units that allow the rise of hydrothermal fluids. Since the Miocene, this faulting has caused grabens and semigrabens, causing the formation of lakes. These lake depressions are controlled by old northnorthwest–southsoutheast faults, which act as relay zones today. So, the coexistence of these faults, lacustrine depressions and hydrothermal manifestations make up the second scenario. The last scenario is where monogenetic volcanism is controlled by existing faults; indeed, this volcanism is abundant, and presents northeast–southwest alignments (Michoacán–Guanajuato Volcanic Field). (2) The central PAFS extends between the northnorthwest–southsouthwesttrending Tzitzio–Valle de Santiago fault and Maravatío. This sector is basically occupied by the Los Azufres geothermal field, which is defined as a volcanic complex with andesitic volcanoes, rhyolitic and dacitic domes, and an important thickness of pyroclastic flows and monogenetic volcanism. In the past million years, magmatic processes have developed, affected by east–west faulting, which also controls the hydrothermal manifestations. Petrological studies show a magmatic chamber located between 4.3 and 9.5 km of depth at the El Guangoche dome (Rangel et al., 2018), probably modifying the fragile ductile limit of the crust. Surely this modification is responsible for shorter fault lengths ranging from 3 to 26 km. Finally, (3) the eastern PAFS is mainly formed by the Acambay graben. Its limit with the central zone is defined by the Maravatío area, where the graben is wider (18 km) and the foot wall in the southern sector is formed by Jurassic basement rocks. The hanging wall displays monogenetic volcanism aligned in preferential northwest–southeast and east–west directions, parallel to the fault where the 1979 earthquake generated (5.6 M_{s}). On the other hand, the eastern limit is narrower (14 km), and occupied by complex volcanoes such as the San Pedro volcano, and by small monogenetic volcanoes, all affected by the east–west fault system that generated the 1912 Acambay earthquake (6.9 M_{s}). This magnitude is in accordance with fault lengths and with the paleoseismic study of Lacan et al. (2018), in which the longest fault found (47 km) is defined as capable of generating large seismic events (6.9 M_{w}). These faults have translational movements and do not generate tilts in the Miocene sequences, as is the case in the Cuitzeo area, therefore, they do not comprise a geothermal flow.
2.1 Paleoseismicity in the PAFS
Although the seismotectonic context of the PAFS is summarized as an active leftlateral strikeslip system, seismic hazard studies are still considered incomplete. The reason for this is the scarcity of data regarding the slip rates and recurrence periods of the prehistoric and historical activity of the fault segments within the system. The faults studied with a paleoseismological approach at the eastern portion of the PAFS are (1) the Acambay–Tixmadejé fault (Urbina and Camacho, 1913; Suter et al., 1995, 1996), where the record of at least five rupture events allowed to the reckoning of the recurrence interval of 3600 years, meaning slip rates of 0.17 mm yr^{−1} and potential magnitudes between $\mathrm{6.8}\ge {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\ge \mathrm{7}$. (2) The Pastores fault, with a recurrence interval of 10 000–15 000 years and 1100–2600 years (short and long time span), with slip rates of 0.03 to 0.23–0.37 mm yr^{−1} and potential magnitudes from 6.6 to 6.8 M_{w} (Suter et al., 1992; Langridge et al., 2013; Ortuño et al., 2015). (3) For the San Mateo fault, SunyePuchol et al. (2015) found a recurrence interval of 11 570 years, a slip rate of 0.085 mm yr^{−1} and potential magnitudes between $\mathrm{6.43}\ge {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\ge \mathrm{6.76}$. (4) The Venta de Bravo fault is capable of producing earthquakes with magnitudes of M_{w}≥6.9, with a slip rate of 0.22–0.24 mm yr^{−1} and a recurrence interval between 1940 and 2390 years (Lacan et al., 2018). Finally, (5) for the Temascalcingo fault, a current study by VelázquezBucio (2018) reports a slip rate of 0.017 mm yr^{−1} and a recurrence of 28 901 years with a paleomagnitude of 6.5 M_{w}. In addition, Ortuño et al., 2018 reports slip rates ranging from 0.06±0.02 (minimum long term) to 0.12±0.02 mm yr^{−1} (maximum value of average shortterm).
Other studies using softsediment deformations related to seismic activity (seismites) have also been carried out in the basins of the State of Mexico, such as Tierras Blancas (RodríguezPascua et al., 2010) and Ixtlahuaca controlled by the Perales fault (Benente, 2005; VelázquezBucio et al., 2013, 2015), which allowed to estimate the potentiality of the nearby faults, obtaining magnitudes of ≥6M_{w}.
In the state of Michoacán, paleoseismology studies have been concentrated on Pátzcuaro, Morelia and Cuitzeo, where almost a dozen faults were studied in detail (GarduñoMonroy et al., 2001; 2009; Suter, 2016). For these structures, sliprates were obtained in a range of 0.009–2.78 mm yr^{−1} (long and short time span, respectively), recurrence intervals of 1200–100 000 years (long and short time span, respectively) and magnitudes between $\mathrm{5.8}\ge {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\ge \mathrm{7.1}$. Moreover, at the northwest of Morelia, the structure named Teremendo fault is studied by SoriaCaballero (2018). Paleoseismic data show sliprates of 0.11 mm yr^{−1}, a time recurrence of 7726 years, and potential magnitudes of $\mathrm{5.9}\ge {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\ge \mathrm{6.8}$.
2.2 Historical and instrumental seismicity in the PAFS
The Acambay earthquake (M_{s}=6.9) occurred on 19 November 1912, in the eastern PAFS (Urbina and Camacho, 1913; Suter et al., 1996). The quake killed more than 150 people and caused the destruction of entire villages. During this event, at least three faults showed surface rupture (Urbina and Camacho, 1913): the Acambay–Tixmadejé fault (D_{max}=50 cm), the Temascalcingo fault (D_{max}=30 cm), and the Pastores fault ($\mathrm{29}\le {D}_{\mathrm{max}}\le \mathrm{37}$ cm; Ortuño et al., 2015). Subsequently, in 1979, another earthquake with 5.6M_{s} magnitude and 8.2 km depth (AstizDelgado, 1980), caused major damage in Maravatío. In the western zone of the PAFS, some earthquakes have affected populations such as Pátzcuaro and Araró (in 1845 and 1858), and Zinapécuaro and Tlalpujahua (also in the 19th century).
Currently, the eastern PAFS is active with microseismicity, which is documented in the literature (Ego and Ansan, 2002; CamposEnríquez et al., et al., 2015; Ortuño et al., 2015), and is characterized by a leftlateral transtensive deformation with northwest–southeast to northnorthwest–southsoutheast orientation. Regarding the west of the PAFS, very close to the city of Morelia, a sequence of seven earthquakes occurred ($\mathrm{2.5}<{M}_{\mathrm{w}}<\mathrm{3.0}$) with focal mechanisms corresponding to normal faulting with leftlateral components. This set of tremors took place in a 33 h interval in October 2007, and were recorded by two local stations located within the city (Singh et al., 2012). It is very likely that this sequence of earthquakes was related to the La Paloma fault, considered active, because it affects Holocene deposits (GarduñoMonroy et al., 2009; Suter, 2016). The rupture of a small segment of this fault can generate earthquakes with magnitudes up to 5M_{w} (Singh et al., 2012).
The seismic catalog, covering from 1912 to 2018, was obtained from the Seismological Service of Mexico (Servicio Sismológico Nacional, SSN; Fig. 2). The data is available on their web page: http://www.ssn.unam.mx/ (last access: 20 July 2018). The focal mechanism parameters were reported previously by AstizDelgado (1980), Suter et al. (1992, 1995), Langridge et al. (2000), Singh et al. (2011, 2012), RodríguezPascua et al. (2012).
2.3 GPS measurements
The multitemporal comparative study (1998–2003 to 2011) of the dynamics in the eastern zone of the PAFS is presented only by EspinosaRodríguez et al. (2016). The vertical tectonic movements show rates ranging from +7.3 to +12.8 mm yr^{−1} in the northern horst of Santa María Tixmadejé, while in the central graben of Acambay they are very weak, of +0.4 to +0.5 mm yr^{−1}.
3.1 Mapping the Pátzcuaro–Acambay fault system
A fault database was constructed on a 15 m DEM. We used the imagery provided by the Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI, acronym in Spanish). We identified and defined fault segments on a geographic information system (GIS) on the basis of the excellent morphological evidences. The criterion for the tracing of fault segments was the union of small traces to form a larger one, but only if the geomorphological continuity was clear. The lengths of fault trajectories, which are the main object of study, corresponded to the lengths of mountain front sinuosity, and the scarp was measured at the maximum hillslope value for each fault. We also used the length information of the faults digitalized around the Cuitzeo basin by project 17 of the Centro Mexicano de Innovación en Energía Geotérmica (CeMIEGeo, acronym in Spanish), based in Morelia, Mexico. The assumed error for the morphometric parameters measured here was not relevant for our analysis because the lowest fault length (3000 m) is lower than the map resolution (15 m). Additionally, we are suggesting fault names based on the names of the nearest towns, in order to homogenize nomenclature for researchers interested in correcting or completing the existing database.
Our database consists of 316 faults of ≥3 km length (Fig. 2) and comprises the following characteristics: fault name; fault length (meters); fault scarp height (meters); begin UTM coordinates (X_{1}, Y_{1}); end UTM coordinates (X2, Y2); intermediate point UTM coordinates (X_{m}, Y_{m}) for each trajectory; close locality name; distance between locality and fault zone (meters); M_{w} (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994); M_{w} (Anderson et al., 1996); and M_{w} (Wesnousky, 2008).
3.2 Estimation of the maximum magnitudes
Maximum and minimum earthquake magnitudes were calculated for the same fault section with three magnitudescaling relationships. We assessed fault relationships by the surface rupture length (SRL), using Wells and Coppersmith's empirical regression model (1994) for normal faults (${M}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{4.86}+\mathrm{1.32}{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathrm{10}}\left(\mathrm{SRL}\right)$); we also used the equivalent regression model proposed by Wesnousky (2008; ${M}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{6.12}+\mathrm{0.47}{\mathrm{log}}_{\mathrm{10}}\left(\mathrm{SRL}\right)$); finally, we included the model proposed by Anderson et al. (1996; ${M}_{\mathrm{w}}=\mathrm{5.12}+\mathrm{1.16}\mathrm{log}\left(\mathrm{SRL}\right)\mathrm{0.2}\mathrm{log}\left(S\right)$), where S is the slip rate.
3.3 Slip rates and their cumulative distribution
Before applying paleoseismology in Mexico, the slip rates were calculated with the accumulated displacements in the escarpment of each segment and the age of the displaced lithological units. In this sense, we are considering displacement rates of 2, 0.05, and 0.16 mm yr^{−1} for some faults in the PAFS, such as Venta de Bravo, C. El Aguila lava and the Cuitzeo faults, respectively (Suter et al., 1992, 2001). Currently, the paleoseismic analyses of these and other faults of the PAFS have allowed the refining of the sliprate estimates made by Langridge et al. (2000), GarduñoMonroy et al. (2009), SunyePuchol et al. (2015), Ortuño et al. (2015), Lacan et al. (2018), Ortuño et al. (2018), VelázquezBucio (2018) and SoriaCaballero (2018). Finally, we were able to analyze 32 sliprate data derived from these earlier studies (Table 1).
In order to characterize the persistence of the sliprate series, we constructed a cumulative sliprate plot, organized from east to west, since most of the microseismicity is concentrated in the eastern PAFS, near the Acambay graben (RodríguezPérez and Zúñiga, 2017). This cumulative plot obeys the wellknown devil's staircase fractal (Fig. 4a). The devil's staircase is a nonconstant but continuously increasing function. It is defined mathematically as the integral of a Cantor set, whose iterative construction implies that the devil's staircase is a selfsimilar object. Thus, the fault movements are the physical manifestation of a fractal behavior.
4.1 Selfsimilar behavior in earth science
In several works, the geometrical description of patterns of earthquakes, fractures and volcanoes is studied using the selfsimilar property of fractals. This selfsimilarity is fulfilled when the objects look geometrically equal on any scale, and is characterized by inverse power laws (Ishimoto and Ida, 1939; Gutenberg and Richter, 1944, 1954; Mandelbrot, 1983; Bak and Tang, 1989; Korvin 1992; Turcotte, 1992; Ghosh and Daemen, 1993; Mazzarini et al., 2010; PérezLópez et al., 2011), where the exponent corresponds to the value of the fractal dimension (i.e., Bak et al., 1987; Tang and Marangoni, 2006). Fractals are irregular, rough, and fragmented objects which display selfsimilarity (roughness is invariant when scaling). A typical example of fractals is the coastline (coastline paradox). The standard technique to scrutinize scale invariance and estimate fractal dimension is the box counting method.
Selfsimilarity was studied by NietoSamaniego et al. (2005) in the Los Planes fault, Baja California Sur, Mexico, using a detailed fractal analysis of fracture arrays. Their sampled fracture traces have box dimensions between 1.51 and 1.87. Moreover, they proved, for a map of any size, that box dimension is in inverse relation with fracture concentration and in direct relation with fracture density (Renshaw, 1997). They have estimated the fracture concentration as the mean distance between centers of fractures divided by the average fracture lengths (Smirnov and Zavyalov, 1997), which characterizes the interactions between adjacent fractures. Smirnov and Zavyalov (1997) evaluated the critical value of the concentration of ruptures from the standpoint of physics. The failure concentration criterion is a measure of the loss of stability in a set of cracks under stress. If the cracks lose stability, they grow and coalesce to form larger fractures. As a result, they are sufficiently close to one another, and consequently, a high concentration of cracks appears in certain volumes. Other studies have also shown that the total fracture length is directly proportional to the amount of deformation, i.e., large fractures can accommodate more deformation than small ones (Poulimenos, 2000; Cowie et al., 1995; Ackermann et al., 2001).
4.2 The Hurst exponent
The predictability of time series began with the original work of Harold Edwin Hurst (1951). He focused on the analysis of fluctuating fluvial time series by analyzing the standard deviation of accumulated water flow. Thus, Hurst established the Nile river's rain and drought cycles. These statistics handle the progression of observations in time. The correlation of the past and the future in the observational time series can be described by the Hurst exponent, $\mathrm{0}\le H\le \mathrm{1}$. For independent random processes, with no correlations among samples, H=0.5. For H>0.5, the observational time series is persistence, which means, on average, that the increasing (decreasing) trend in the past induces the continued increasing (decreasing) trend in the future. Persistent time series have a long memory, and a longterm correlation exists between current and future events. On the other hand, when H<0.5, the sequence is characterized by antipersistent behavior. This means that an increasing (decreasing) trend in the past causes a decreasing (increasing) trend in the future. It can be expressed as a time series regression (Xu and Burton, 2006). The concepts of persistent and antipersistent memories in time are welldefined for nonlinear processes (Feder, 1988).
The Hurst exponent not only works in the time domain, but also in the spatial domain to measure the roughness expressed in quantitative amounts (fractal dimensions and Hurst exponents). The interest in roughness studies has been motivated by Mandelbrot's work, in which he was faced with “The challenge to explain why so many rough facets of nature are scaleinvariant”. In particular, the fault roughness can be studied using a fractal analysis (by means of the Hurst exponent or fractal dimension), as presented by Power et al. (1987); Schmittbuhl et al. (1993); Mandelbrot (2002). Also, the roughness of the magnitudes was calculated by means of the fractal image informatics toolbox (Oleschko et al., 2008). The roughness of earthquakes as a powerful tool to characterize the main features of seismicity and give insight into the inner dynamics of seismotectonic activity was studied by Telesca et al. (2001). For the magnitude estimations M_{w}, we created a firmagram as a plot for the discrete values of M_{w} vs. the fault number. This compressed graph allows us to visualize the entire data density distribution and the peaks and valleys which are the result of irregularities and fluctuations in time series. The firmagram roughness for the three zones of the PAFS (western, central, and eastern PAFS) can be measured, among others, by the Hurst exponent (see Fig. 3).
We used the Hurst exponent as the measure of roughness for the sliprate series (time domain) and for the magnitudes M_{w} distributed along the PAFS (spatial domain). To estimate the Hurst exponent we used the wavelet transform (Rehman and Siddiqi, 2009), wherein the characteristic measure is the wavelet exponent, H_{w} (Malamud and Turcotte, 1999).
4.3 Wavelet variance analysis
The wavelet transform, introduced by Grossmann and Morlet (1984), is a filter function which is passed over time series and provides information on both space and frequency domains. A family of wavelets can be constructed from a function known as a “mother wavelet”, which is confined in a finite interval. Then, “daughter wavelets” are formed by translation and contraction. The transform has a fractal basis, and the variance of wavelets obeys a power law, from which you can calculate the fractal dimension. In general, wavelet variance analysis is the most satisfactory measure of the persistence or antipersistence strength when only a small number of samples are available (Simonsen et al., 1998). We consequently selected this method because there are but few available sliprate samples along the PAFS.
4.4 Box dimension
The box counting method is the standard technique to prove the fractal behavior (scale invariance) and also a common way of estimating the fractal dimension. In order to obtain the fractal dimension of the sliprate distribution for active faults, we have used the box counting 2D algorithm (Walsh and Watterson, 1993), to obtain the boxdimension (D_{b}) in the following relationship:
where N(e) is the number of boxes of linear size e necessary to cover a data set of points or objects distributed on a twodimensional plane. The basis of this technique is to measure D_{b} by counting the boxes containing at least one point of the structure. Figure 4b plots the logarithm of N(e) on the vertical axis vs. the logarithm of e on the horizontal axis. If the set is indeed fractal, this plot will follow a straight line with a negative slope that equals −D_{b}. For the box dimension calculation, we used the Benoit 1.3 software (TruSoft, 1999).
4.5 Variograms
Commonly, natural phenomena exhibit anisotropic behavior such as seismic anisotropy, mineral veins, groundwater contaminant plumes, porosity, permeability, and other petrophysical characteristics, where the studied properties depend on the direction. In practice, variograms are studied in different directions to determine the presence or absence of anisotropy. Mathematically, a variogram represents the semivariance of data as a function of the distance that separates a pair of observations (Journel and Huijbregts, 1978). Generally, it is a function which increases with the distance and is canceled when the distance equals zero.
The spatial structure and anisotropy are revealed by the variogram surface. If the pattern forms an elliptic shape, it indicates the direction of best and poor correlations. Once the anisotropic feature is identified (often presented by an angle spectrum), the directional variograms are computed. A directional variogram can be obtained by calculating variogram at different distances and angles. The isotropic variogram obtained must exhibits a very good spatial structure and it is fitted with theoretical model, such as spherical or exponential functions. We used this variogram analysis to obtain the preferential direction of the faults that we propose as active, and to prove that these structures are optimally oriented in relation to the current stress field in the central TMVB (σ2= northeast–southwest; see Fig. 5).
4.6 Intensity scale (ESI 07)
The Environmental Seismic Intensity scale ESI 07 (Michetti et al., 2007) is a new intensity scale, with 12 degrees of intensity, based only on earthquake environmental effects (EEEs). The ESI 07 scale integrates traditional intensity scales, and allows to define seismic intensity based on the entire scenario of effects. According to the ESI 07, all the paleoseismologically investigated faults of the PAFS are capable of generating Class B events (assessment of seismic intensity levels IX to X), with frequent and characteristic geomorphological and geological evidence.
4.7 Active fault definition
Finally, this work contributes with an intrinsic definition of active fault sources within the PAFS. Active faults are those that are groundrupturing with slip rates of approximately 0.001 mm yr^{−1}, associated seismic activity, at least in the last 10 000 years, and are optimally oriented in relation to the current stress field (see focal mechanisms, slip rates of coseismic faults and semivariograms). The active fault planes must be related to earthquakes of a minimum magnitude of M_{w}≥5.5, or capable of generating rupture lengths greater than or equal to 3 km. If the active fault presents seismicity with these characteristics, it will be considered a seismogenetic fault.
To assess the impact that moderate to strong seismic events can cause on cities in central Mexico, we defined the intracontinental faults capable of generating moderate to strong earthquakes by incorporating quantitative parameters (fractal dimension, Hurst exponent, and anisotropy). In this paper, we examined persistence on sliprate time series and roughness on M_{w} series. We can manage these statistical techniques because this fault population presents a selfsimilar behavior. This means that the log–log plot of frequency vs. lengths for the PAFS obeys an inverse power law (distribution on a straight line), but is characterized by a bimodal selfsimilar scaling law with two slope values. This bimodality may reveal the existence of at least two different fracture processes in the fault system. A key step in this study was to delineate different zones of deformation processes using the temporal and spatial Hurst analysis. The results in the spatial domain strongly suggest that the PAFS is classified in three different zones (western PAFS, central PAFS and eastern PAFS) in terms of their roughness (H_{w}=0.7, H_{w}=0.5, and H_{w}=0.8 respectively; Fig. 3), with their corresponding magnitudes ($\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{6.9}$; $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{6.7}$; 5$.5\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{7.0}$). For the time domain, with a strong persistence of H_{w}=0.949, the result suggests that the periodicities of sliprates are close in time. The fractal capacity dimension (D_{b}) is also estimated for the sliprate series. We found that D_{b}=1.86 is related to a lesser concentration of low slip rates in the PAFS, suggesting that larger faults accommodate the strain more efficiently (length ≥3 km).
We can prove, in terms of fractal analysis, that the 316 faults studied for the PAFS are seismically active. In terms of variogram analysis, an anisotropic direction was identified in 80^{∘} eastnortheast direction (Fig. 5), so these faults are optimally oriented in relation to the current stress. Moreover, they can generate average maximum and minimum magnitudes between $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{7}$, which according to the Environmental Seismic Intensity scale ESI 07 correspond to a wide affected area ($\mathrm{1000}\le {\mathrm{km}}^{\mathrm{2}}\le \mathrm{5000}$). The size of this area means that movements in any of the PAFS faults would affect some of the most populated cities of central Mexico, such as Mexico City (population 9000000 ), Ecatepec (∼1 600 000), Toluca (>800 000), Acambaro (>100 000), Maravatío (>80 000), Zinapécuaro (>50 000), Morelia (> 10000000), Pátzcuaro (∼ 80 000), among others.
In order to characterize the seismic potential of the PAFS, the analysis of the three empirical relations results of active faults was summarized as follows: (1) the model proposed by Anderson et al. (1996) always yields lower results than the other relationships; however, (2) the highest magnitudes are obtained with the relationship of Wesnousky (2008); (3) the average magnitudes are obtained with Wells and Coppersmith (1994). We have observed that all three relationships work for the PAFS. However, in this paper, we reported the maximum and minimum earthquake magnitudes estimated by Wells and Coppersmith (1994), because this method is best suited for areas with crustal thickness >15 km and avoids overestimating the magnitudes.
The M_{w} distribution organized from east to west is detailed on the Firmagram (Fig. 3). Moreover, we can observe the variability of the Hurst exponent along the PAFS, from H=0.8 (eastern zone), H=0.5 (central zone), to H=0.7 (western zone). The result strongly suggests a microregionalization of the PAFS into three main zones. This microregionalization is of paramount importance in seismic hazard analysis and in the understanding of fault dynamics. The persistence values (H>0.5) are related to the predictability of future seismic events based on the existing correlation with past events. They are widely consistent with the instrumental seismicity, because the eastern zone is the most active, followed by the western segment of the PAFS. Meanwhile, the central PAFS corresponds to a random process. As a consequence, there is a dependence and causality between H and the PAFS dynamics. The differences between each zone are as follows.

Eastern PAFS. This zone is the most active sector, based on H=0.8 and the obtained magnitudes of $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{7.0}$. This is evidenced by the paleoseismological studies and the instrumental seismicity. Regarding persistence, these earthquake magnitudes are susceptible to groundrupturing, showing an increasing trend towards the future. Coupled with the results of (a) VelázquezBucio (2018), it appears that several segments of the Acambay graben are already at their time zero and could break any time and (b) Arzate et al. (2018) found that the central graben fault system converge at a depth of ∼18 km, that fact represents the possibility of occurrence of earthquakes rupturing along various faults of the Acambay graben as observed for the 1912 earthquake (Langridge et al., 2000; Suter et al., 2015; Ortuño et al., 2018). This configures an area with high seismic hazard.

Central PAFS. H=0.5 shows a Brownian process, no trend, for magnitudes between $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{6.7}$. We suggest here that H could be related to shorter fault lengths, and consequently there is a lesser amount of deformation in the area. This result can be related to the emplacement of the Los Azufres geothermal field and its magmatic chamber, located between 4.3 and 9.5 km of depth at the El Guangoche dome. Moreover, the east–west Pátzcuaro–Acambay fault system is affecting the 1 Ma rhyolitic and dacitic domes (Agua Fría), but also the andesitic volcanism, and controlling the distribution of monogenetic volcanism in the area. So, the observed value of H depends on, among other things, the brittle–ductile limit of the crust. All these facts allow for validating that the central zone differs tectonically from the eastern and western sectors, and is characterized by a seismic gap similar to that of the Tzitzio–Valle de Santiago fault.

Western PAFS. Persistent values of H∼0.7 have been reported by other authors (e. g. Scholz, 1997; Schmittbuhl et al., 2006). In our case, this value is consistent with the persistence of earthquake magnitudes ranging between $\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{6.9}$ (faulting processes with memory). In fact, the paleoseismological studies by GarduñoMonroy et al. (2009) and SoriaCaballero (2018), indicated similar magnitudes for historic earthquakes in the zones of Zacapu, Pátzcuaro, Morelia, and Cuitzeo. Therefore, the western PAFS is a high seismic hazard zone too, but to a lesser degree than the eastern zone.
For the sliprate time series we reported values of H=0.949 and D_{b}=1.86. The Hurst exponent shows a strong persistence, meaning close periodicities in time for groundrupturing in the PAFS. D_{b}=1.86 is consistent with the values obtained by NietoSamaniego et al. (2005; D_{b}=1.87 upper limit), who proved that the box dimension is in inverse relation to fracture concentration and in direct relation to fracture density. The high value of the fractal dimension might indicate the possibility of a major earthquake (Aviles et al., 1987) in the PAFS faults. The high D_{b}=1.86 value obtained depends inversely on the failure concentration criterion, which indicates that the critical fault concentration, based on the stability of two faults in a stress field, is directly proportional to the factor (L∕l), where L is the size of the region and l the mean fault length (Smirnov and Zavyalov, 1997). So, low critical fault concentration corresponds to short fault lengths: it is wellknown that lesser amounts of deformation are directly proportional to short faults lengths and low slip rates. Therefore, short faults lengths in the PAFS accommodate little deformation, suggesting that fault lengths of ≥3 km accommodate the deformation of the PAFS more efficiently.
Finally, supported by D_{b} and H_{w}, we can neatly determine the lower limit (3 km) of fault lengths for the PAFS. However, we cannot establish a definite upper limit due the faults hidden under Holocene deposits, not identifiable on a 15 m digital elevation. We nevertheless estimated an upper limit of fault lengths (38 km) as a first approximation.
Spatiotemporal methods were applied to fault data, and the fractal behavior observed for the entire PAFS allowed to define which segments can be designated as active faults. Therefore, an active fault is defined as a plane that presents groundrupturing with slip rates of approximately 0.001 mm yr^{−1}, and associated seismic activity at least in the last 10 000 years. Moreover, active faults are optimally oriented to the current stress field, and the active fault planes must be related to earthquakes with a minimum magnitude of M_{w}≥5.5, or capable of generating rupture lengths greater than or equal to 3 km. The temporal sliprate distribution for the PAFS displays a fractal behavior, with strong persistent characteristics (H=0.949). In this context, we have a statistical measure of the memory of sliprate series, and we can infer the predictability of these temporal series, to conclude that the entire fault system is active. Moreover, we were able to define a microregionalization of the PAFS using the relationship established between H and the PAFS dynamics. H=0.5 for M_{w} behaves like a Brownian process (Central PAFS), and H>0.5 for M_{w} has a trend (eastern PAFS and western PAFS). The result reveals the eastern PAFS as the most active zone. With regard to the regional structures and their relationships with magmatism or hydrothermal processes, it is clear that there are three zones within the PAFS, where faults with different geometries and also different magmatic processes were observed, surely related to the values of H_{w} obtained for each zone. In particular, the estimation of maximum and minimum earthquake magnitudes ($\mathrm{5.5}\le {M}_{\mathrm{w}}\le \mathrm{7.0}$) is likely to affect a large area ($\mathrm{1000}\le {\mathrm{km}}^{\mathrm{2}}\le \mathrm{5000}$) in the central region of Mexico, where there are many cities with high population density. As discussed earlier, assessing seismic hazard and improving of the vulnerability studies is acutely necessary in the central portion of Mexico. Finally, we conclude that the PAFS fulfills the intrinsic definition of active fault. The PAFS is likely to cause future social concern. As such, we strongly believe that the area must continue to be investigated by multidisciplinary studies in order to improve territorial planning and reduce seismic hazard in central Mexico.
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess1831212018supplement.
AMP built the GISbased database of active faults, supervised by VGM and DSC. AMP and AFS performed the fractal analysis and the estimations of the maximum magnitudes, as well as the discussion of the results. AMP and AFS took the lead in writing the manuscript. DCS contributed with the intensity scale values for the active faults in the PAFS and together with VGM helped shape the research. VGM also performed the review of the tectonics in the PAFS and helped supervise the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
SSN data were obtained by the Servicio Sismológico Nacional (México),
station maintenance, data acquisition and distribution is thanks to its
personnel. This work was partially funded by the P17CeMIEGeo and PT5.2 GEMex
projects of the Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, and by
CONACYT scholarship no. 234243 (Avith MendozaPonce). We really thank all the
referees who contributed for their time, effort, and suggestions to making a
better manuscript.
Edited by: Maria Ana Baptista
Reviewed by: Pierre Lacan, Mustapha Meghraoui,
and M. Ersen Aksoy
Ackermann, R. V., Schlische, R. W., and Withjack, M. O.: The Geometric and Statistical Evolution of Normal Fault Systems: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Mechanical Layer Thickness on Scaling Laws, J. Struct. Geol., 23, 1803–1819, 2001.
Anderson, J. G., Wesnousky, S. G., and Stirling, M. W.: Earthquake size as a function of fault slip rate, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 683–690, 1996.
Arzate, J., Lacan P., CorboCamargo, F., ArangoGalván C., Felix Maldonado, R., Pacheco, J., and León Loya, R.: Crustal structure of the eastern Acambay graben (Central Mexico) from integrated geophysical data, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, in press, 2018.
AstizDelgado, L. M.: Sismicidad en Acambay, Estado de México – el temblor del 22 de febrero de 1979, México, D.F., UNAM, Facultad de Ingeniería, unpublished thesis, 130 pp., 1980.
Aviles, C. A., Scholz, C. H., and Boatwright, J.: Fractal analysis applied to characteristic segments of San Andreas fault, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 331–334, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB01p00331, 1987.
Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K.: SelfOrganized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 381–384, 1987.
Bak, P. and Tang, C.: Earthquakes as a SelfOrganized Critical Phenomenon, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 15635–15637, 1989.
Benente, L.: Analisi stratigrafica e strutturale del bacino lacustre di Ixtlahuaca de RayonArco Vulcanico Messicano, e implicazioni paleosismologiche, Corso di Laurea in Scienze Geologiche, Facoltà di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia, 181 pp., 2005.
CamposEnríquez, J. O., LermoSamaniego, J. F., AntayhuaVera, Y. T., Chavacán, M., and RamónMárquez, V. M.: The Aztlán Fault System: control on the emplacement of the Chichinautzin Range volcanism, southern Mexico Basin, Mexico, Seismic and gravity characterization, Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 67, 315–335, 2015.
Cowie, P. A., Sornette, D., and Vanneste, C.: Multifractal Scaling Properties of Growing Fault Population, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 457–469, 1995.
Ego, F. and Ansan, V.: Why is the Central TransMexican Volcanic Belt (102^{∘} 99^{∘}W) in transtensive deformation?, Tectonophysics, 359, 189–208, https://doi.org/10.1016/S00401951(02)005115, 2002.
EspinosaRodríguez, L. M., HernándezSantana, J. R., and MéndezLinares, A. P.: Evidencia geodésica de movimientos verticales recientes en la zona sismogeneradora de Acambay, México, Minería y Geología, 32, available at: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=223548649007> ISSN (last access: 6 November 2018), 2016.
Feder, J.: Fractals (physics of solids and liquids), New York, Plenu, 9, https://doi.org/10.1007/9781489921246, 1988.
GarduñoMonroy, V. H., ArreygueRocha, E., IsradeAlcantara, I., and RodríguezTorres, G.: Efectos de las Fallas asociadas a sobreexplotación de acuíferos y la presencia de fallas potencialmente sísmicas en Morelia, Michoacán, México, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 18, 37–54, 2001.
GarduñoMonroy, V. H., PérezLopez, R., IsradeAlcantara, I., RodríguezPascua, M. A., Szynkaruk, E., HernándezMadrigal, V. M., and Mora Chaparro, J. C.: Paleoseismology of the southwestern PátzcuaroAcambay fault system, central Mexico, Geofísica Internacional, 48, 319–335, 2009.
Ghosh, A. and Daemen, J. J. K.: Fractal Characteristics of Rock Discontinuities, Eng. Geol., 34, 1–9, 1993.
Grossmann, A. and Morlet, J.: Decomposition of Hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15, 723–736, 1984.
Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.: Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 34, 185–188, https://doi.org/10.1038/156371a0, 1944.
Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.: Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, 2nd ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, EUA, 1954.
Hurst, H. E.: Longterm storage capacity of reservoirs, T. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 116, 770–808, 1951.
Ishimoto, M. and Ida, K.: Observations sur les seisms enregistrés par le microseismograph construit dernièrement (I), Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst. Univ. of Tokyo, 17, 443–478, 1939.
Johnson, C. A. and Harrison, C. G. A.: Tectonics and volcanism in central Mexico: A Lansat Thematic Mapper perspective, Remote Sens. Environ., 28, 273–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/00344257(89)901193, 1989.
Johnson, C. A. and Harrison, C. G. A.: Neotectonics in central Mexico, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 64, 187–210, https://doi.org/10.1016/00319201(90)90037X, 1990.
Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, C. J.: Mining geostatistics, London Academic Press 1978.
Korvin, G.: Fractal Model in the Earth Sciences, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992
Lacan, P., Ortuño, M., Audin, L., Perea, H., Baize, S., AguirreDíaz, G., and Zúñiga, F. R.: Sedimentary evidence of historical and prehistorical earthquakes along the Venta de Bravo Fault System, Acambay Graben (Central Mexico), Sedimentary Geology, 365, 62–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.12.008, 2018.
Langridge, R. M., Weldon, R. J., Moya, J. C., and Suárez, G.: Paleoseismology of the 1912 Acambay earthquake and the AcambayTixmadejé fault, TransMexican volcanic belt, J. Geophys. Res.Sol. Ea., 105, 3019–3037, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JB900239, 2000.
Langridge, R. M., Persaud, M., Zúñiga, R. F., de Jesús AguirreDíaz, G., Villamor, P., and Lacan, P.: Preliminary paleoseismic results from the Pastores fault and its role in the seismic hazard of the Acambay graben, TransMexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 30, 463–481, 2013.
Malamud, B. D. and Turcotte, D. L.: Selfaffine time series: measures of weak and strong persistence, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 80, 173–196, https://doi.org/10.1016/S03783758(98)002493, 1999.
Mandelbrot, B.: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Company, New York, 1983.
Mandelbrot, B.: Gaussian SelfAffinity and fractals, SpringerVerlag, New York, 654 pp., 2002.
Martínez Reyes, J. and NietoSamaniego, A. F.: Efectos geoloógicos de la tectoónica reciente en la parte central de México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Geología, Revista, 9, 33–50, 1990.
Mazzarini, F., Ferrari, L., and Isola, I.: Selfsimilar clustering of cinder cones and crust thickness in the MichoacanGuanajuato and Sierra de Chichinautzin volcanic fileds, TransMexican Volcanic Field, Tectonophysics, 488, 55–64, 2010.
Mennella, L.: Sismotectónica del sector occidental del sistema MoreliaAcambay, México, a partir del análisis de poblaciones de fallas, Master Thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, 2011.
Michetti, A. M., Esposito, E., Guerrieri, L., Porfido, S., Serva, L., Tatevossian, R., Vittori, E., Audemard, F., Azuma, T., Clague, J., Comerci, V., Gürpinar, A., McCalpin, J., Mohammadioun, B., Mörmer, N. A., Ota, Y., and Roghozin, E.: Environmental Seismisc Intensity Scale 2007ESI 2007, in: Memorie descrittive della Carta Geologica d'Italia, edited by: Guerrieri, L. and Vittori, E., Rome, APAT, 74, 7–54, 2007.
NietoSamaniego, A. F., AlanizAlvarez, S. A., Tolson, G., Oleschko, K., Korvin, G., Xu, S. S., and PérezVenzor, J. A.: Spatial distribution, scaling and selfsimilar behavior of fracture arrays in the Los Planes Fault, Baja California Sur, Mexico, Pure Appl. Geophys., 162, 805–826, https://doi.org/10.1007/s000240042642y, 2005.
Norini, G., Groppelli, G., Lagmay, A. M. F., and Capra, L.: Recent leftoblique slip faulting in the central eastern TransMexican Volcanic Belt: Seismic hazard and geodynamic implications, Tectonics, 25, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005TC0018772006, 2006.
Oleschko, K., Parrot, J. F., Korvin, G., Esteves, M., Vauclin, M., TorresArgüelles, V., and Cherkasov, S.: Fractal image informatics: from SEM to DEM, In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1009, 74–93, AIP, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2937302, 2008.
Ortuño, M., Zúñiga, F. R., AguirreDíaz, G. J., CarreónFreyre, D., Cerca, M., and Roverato, M.: Holocene paleoearthquakes recorded at the transfer zone of two major faults: The Pastores and Venta de Bravo faults (TransMexican Volcanic Belt), Geosphere, 11, 160–184, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01071.1, 2015.
Ortuño, M., Corominasa, O., Villamor, P., Zúñiga, F. R., Lacan, P., AguirreDíaz, G., Pereade, H., Štěpančíková, P., and RamírezHerrera, M. A.: Evidence of recent ruptures in the central faults of the Acambay Graben (central Mexico), Geomorphology, in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.07.010, 2018.
PérezLópez, R., Legrand, D., GarduñoMonroy, V. H., RodríguezPascua, M. A., and GinerRobles, J. L.: Scaling laws of the sizedistribution of monogenetic volcanoes within the Michoacán Guanajuato Volcanic Field (México), J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 201, 65–72, 2011.
Poulimenos, G.: Scaling Properties of Normal Fault Populations in the Western Corinth Graben, Greece: Implications for Fault Growth in Large Strain Settings, J. Struct. Geol., 22, 307–322, 2000.
Power, W. L., Tullis, T. E., Brown, S. R., Boitnott, G. N., and Scholz, C. H.: Roughness of natural fault surfaces, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 29–32, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL014i001p00029, 1987.
Rangel, E., Arce, J. L., and Macías, J. L.: Storage conditions of the ∼29 ka rhyolitic Guangoche White Pumice Sequence, Los Azufres Volcanic Field, Central Mexico, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 358, 132–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.03.016, 2018.
Renshaw, C. E.: Mechanical Controls on the Spatial Density of Openingmode Fracture Networks, Geology, 25, 923–926, 1997.
Rehman, S. and Siddiqi, A. H.: Wavelet based Hurst exponent and fractal dimensional analysis of Saudi climatic dynamics, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 40, 1081–1090, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.08.063, 2009.
RodríguezPérez, Q. and Zúñiga, F. R.: Seismicity characterization of the MaravatíoAcambay and Actopan regions, Central Mexico, J. S. Am. Earth Sci., 76, 264–275, 2017.
RodríguezPascua, M. A., GarduñoMonroy, V. H., IsradeAlcántara, I., and PérezLópez, R.: Estimation of the paleoepicentral area from the spatial gradient of deformation in lacustrine seismites (Tierras Blancas Basin, Mexico): Quaternary International, 219, 66–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.11.006, 2010.
RodríguezPascua, M. A., GarduñoMonroy V. H., PérezLópez, R., PeruchaAtienza, M. A., and IsradeAlcántara, I.: The Acambay earthquake of 1912, revisited 100 years after, in Paleoseismology and archaeosesimology meeting:,Morelia, Mexico, 3rd INQUAIGCP567 International Workshop on Active Tectonics, Proceedings, 157–160, 2012.
Schmittbuhl, J., Gentier, S., and Roux, S.: Field measurements of the roughness of fault surfaces, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 639–641, 1993.
Schmittbuhl, J., Chambon, G., Hansen, A., and Bouchon, M.: Are stress distributions along faults the signature of asperity squeeze?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025952, 2006.
Scholz, C. H.: The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1997.
Simonsen, I., Hansen, A., and Nes, O. M.: Determination of the Hurst exponent by use of wavelet transforms, Phys. Rev. E, 58, 2779, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.2779, 1998.
Singh, S. K., Iglesias, A., Ordaz, M., PerezCampos, X., and Quintanar, L.: Estimation of Ground Motion in Mexico City from a Repeat of the M ∼ 7.0 Acambay Earthquake of 1912, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am, 101, 2015–2028, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120100317, 2011.
Singh, S. K., Iglesias, A., Garduño, V. H., Quintanar, L., and Ordaz, M.: A source study of the October, 2007 earthquake sequence of Pátzcuaro, Mexico and groundmotion estimation from larger earthquakes in the region, Geofísica Internacional, 51, 73–86, 2012.
Smirnov, V. and Zaviyalov, A.: Incorporating the fractal Distribution of Faults as a Measure of Failure concentration, Volc. Seis., 18, 447–452, OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) Amsterdam B. V. published under license by Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1997.
SoriaCaballero, D. C., GarduñoMonroy, V. H., Alcalá, M., and Grassi, L.: Paleoseismic analysis of the La AlbercaTeremendo fault: evidence of quaternary crustal seismic activity using pedological analysis, submitted, 2018.
SunyePuchol, I., Lacan, P., Ortuño, M., Villamor, P., Audin, L., Zúñiga, F. R., and Lawton, T. F.: La falla San Mateo: nuevas evidencias paleosismológicas de fallamiento activo en el graben de Acambay, México, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 32, 361–376, 2015.
Suter, M.: Structure and Holocene Rupture of the Morelia Fault, TransMexican Volcanic Belt, and their Significance for SeismicHazard Assessment, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 106, 2376–2388, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120160092, 2016.
Suter, M., Quintero, O., and Johnson, C. A.: Active faults and state of stress in the central part of the TransMexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico 1. The Venta de Bravo fault, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11983–11993, https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00428, 1992.
Suter, M., Quintero, O., López, M., AguirreDíaz, G. J., and Farrar, E.: The Acambay graben: Active intraarc extension in the TransMexican Volcanic Belt, Tectonics, 14, 1245–1262, https://doi.org/10.1029/95TC01930, 1995.
Suter, M., CarrilloMartínez, M., and QuinteroLegorreta, O.: Macroseismic study of earthquakes in the central and eastern parts of the TransMexican Volcanic Belt, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86, 1952–1963, 1996.
Suter, M., LópezMartínez, M., QuinteroLegorreta, O., and CarrilloMartínez, M.: Quaternary intraarc extension in the central TransMexican volcanic belt, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 113, 693–703, https://doi.org/10.1130/00167606(2001)113<0693:QIAEIT>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Tang, D. and Marangoni, A. G.: 3D Fractal dimension of fat crystal networks, Chem. Phys. Lett., 433, 248–252, 2006.
Telesca, L., Cuomo, V., Lapenna, V., and Macchiato, M.: Identifying space–time clustering properties of the 1983–1997 Irpinia–Basilicata (southern Italy) seismicity, Tectonophysics, 330, 93–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/S00401951(00)002213, 2001.
TruSoft: Intern. Inc., Benoit 1.3 Software, 1999.
Turcotte, D. L.: Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
Urbina, F. and Camacho, H.: La zona megaseismica AcambayTixmadejé, Estado de México, conmovida el 19 de noviembre de 1912, Boletín del Instituto Geológico de México, 52, 320–329, 1913.
VelázquezBucio, M. M., Michetti, A. M., Benente, L., Groppelli, G., GarduñoMonroy, V. H., Filonzi, S., RodríguezPascua, M. A., PérezLópez, R., and Chunga, K.: ESI2007 assessment of paleoseismic features in the Acambay and Ixtlahuaca graben, Mexico: evidence for capability along the Perales Fault. En: Proceedings of the 4th International INQUA Meeting on Paleoseismology, Active Tectonics and Archeoseismology (PATA), 9–14 October 2013, Aachen, Germany, 285–289, 2013.
VelázquezBucio, M. M., Benente, L., GarduñoMonroy, V. H., Michetti, A. M., and Groppelli, G.: Evidence of seismogenic activity of Perales fault in the Ixtlahuaca Basin, Mexico, En: Proceedings of the 6th International INQUA Meeting on Paleoseismology, Active Tectonics and Archeoseismology (PATA), 19–24 April 2015, Pescina, Fucino Basin, Italy, 504–508, 2015.
VeláquezBucio, M.: Estatrigrafía cosísmica en seuencias lacustres del Holoceno en el graben de Acambay, Estado de México y evaluación del peligro sísmico, PhD Thesis, Universidad Naconal Autónoma de México, 2018.
Walsh, J. J. and Watterson, J.: Fractal analysis of fracture patterns using the standard boxcounting technique: valid and,invalid methodologies, J. Struct. Geol., 15, 1509–1512, https://doi.org/10.1016/01918141(93)900108, 1993.
Wells, D. L. and Coppersmith, K. J.: New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 84, 974–1002, 1994.
Wesnousky, S. G.: Displacement and geometrical characteristics of earthquake surface ruptures: Issues and implications for seismichazard analysis and the process of earthquake rupture, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 98, 1609–1632, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120070111, 2008.
Xu, Y. and Burton, P. W.: Time varying seismicity in Greece: Hurst's analysis and Monte Carlo simulation applied to a new earthquake catalogue for Greece, Tectonophysics, 423, 125–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.006, 2006.