Articles | Volume 17, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1203-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1203-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Editorial to the special issue on resilience and vulnerability assessments in natural hazard and risk analysis
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of
Mountain Risk Engineering, Vienna, Austria
Margreth Keiler
University of Bern, Institute of Geography, Bern, Switzerland
Thomas Glade
University of Vienna, Department of Geography and Regional Research,
Vienna, Austria
Related authors
Hedieh Soltanpour, Kamal Serrhini, Joel C. Gill, Sven Fuchs, and Solmaz Mohadjer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2743–2763, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2743-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2743-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We applied the Maximum Entropy model to characterise multi-hazard scenarios in a karst environment, focusing on flood-triggered sinkholes in Val d'Orléans, France. Karst terrains as multi-hazard forming areas, have received little attention in multi-hazard literature. Our study developed a multi-hazard susceptibility map to forecast the spatial distribution of these hazards. The findings improve understanding of hazard interactions and demonstrate the model's utility in multi-hazard analysis.
Sven Fuchs, Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Margreth Keiler, Lars Nyberg, Maria Papathoma-Köhle, and Annemarie Polderman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1785–1794, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1785-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1785-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The 2025 California wildfires revealed persistent gaps between what we know about reducing disaster risk and what communities actually do. Limited awareness, weak resources, misaligned incentives, and complex rules leave people exposed. Similar patterns appear in floods, earthquakes and other disasters worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for stronger institutions, clearer policies, and active community engagement to build fair, practical, and lasting resilience.
Wolfgang Schwanghart, Ankit Agarwal, Kristen Cook, Ugur Ozturk, Roopam Shukla, and Sven Fuchs
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3291–3297, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3291-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3291-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Himalayan landscape is particularly susceptible to extreme events, which interfere with increasing populations and the expansion of settlements and infrastructure. This preface introduces and summarizes the nine papers that are part of the special issue,
Estimating and predicting natural hazards and vulnerabilities in the Himalayan region.
Hedieh Soltanpour, Kamal Serrhini, Joel C. Gill, Sven Fuchs, and Solmaz Mohadjer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2743–2763, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2743-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2743-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We applied the Maximum Entropy model to characterise multi-hazard scenarios in a karst environment, focusing on flood-triggered sinkholes in Val d'Orléans, France. Karst terrains as multi-hazard forming areas, have received little attention in multi-hazard literature. Our study developed a multi-hazard susceptibility map to forecast the spatial distribution of these hazards. The findings improve understanding of hazard interactions and demonstrate the model's utility in multi-hazard analysis.
Sven Fuchs, Konstantinos Karagiorgos, Margreth Keiler, Lars Nyberg, Maria Papathoma-Köhle, and Annemarie Polderman
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1785–1794, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1785-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-1785-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The 2025 California wildfires revealed persistent gaps between what we know about reducing disaster risk and what communities actually do. Limited awareness, weak resources, misaligned incentives, and complex rules leave people exposed. Similar patterns appear in floods, earthquakes and other disasters worldwide, highlighting the urgent need for stronger institutions, clearer policies, and active community engagement to build fair, practical, and lasting resilience.
Vesna Coutureau, Tabea Bork-Hüffer, and Margreth Keiler
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 703–708, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-703-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-703-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
People with disabilities are highly vulnerable to disasters but underrepresented in risk management. A pilot study in Tyrol, Austria, assessed flood exposure and preparedness in disability facilities. Spatial analysis showed significant flood risk, while interviews revealed gaps in awareness and planning. The study urges disability-inclusive disaster management with accessible info, targeted measures, and integration of disability perspectives to enhance resilience.
Wolfgang Schwanghart, Ankit Agarwal, Kristen Cook, Ugur Ozturk, Roopam Shukla, and Sven Fuchs
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3291–3297, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3291-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3291-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Himalayan landscape is particularly susceptible to extreme events, which interfere with increasing populations and the expansion of settlements and infrastructure. This preface introduces and summarizes the nine papers that are part of the special issue,
Estimating and predicting natural hazards and vulnerabilities in the Himalayan region.
Mauro Fischer, Mario Kummert, Reto Aeschbacher, Christoph Graf, Alexis Rüeger, Philippe Schoeneich, Markus Zimmermann, and Margreth Keiler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1190, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1190, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Due to climate change, the hazard for debris flows originating in glacier forefields or areas dominated by seasonal to perennial frost is increasing. Hazard assessment for this type of debris flows is especially difficult as records of past events are typically scarce or inexistent. We therefore developed a multi-methods approach for scenario building and runout modelling for pro- and periglacial debris flows triggered by precipitation events and applied it to a catchment in the Swiss Alps.
Cited articles
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. M., Carreño, M. L., Barbat, A. H., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Keiler, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., and Welle, T.: Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework, Nat. Hazards, 67, 193–211, 2013.
Castillo-Rodríguez, J. T., Escuder-Bueno, I., Perales-Momparler, S., and Porta-Sancho, J. R.: Enhancing local action planning through quantitative flood risk analysis: a case study in Spain, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1699–1718, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1699-2016, 2016.
Ciurean, R. L., Schröter D., and Glade, T.: Conceptual frameworks of vulnerability assessments for natural disasters reduction, in: Approaches to disaster management – examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters, edited by: Tiefenbacher J., InTech, Rijeka, 3–32, 2013.
Cutter, S., Boruff, B., and Shirley, W.: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards, Soc. Sci. Quart., 84, 242–261, 2003.
Dressler, G., Müller, B., Frank, K., and Kuhlicke, C.: Towards thresholds of disaster management performance under demographic change: exploring functional relationships using agent-based modeling, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2287–2301, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2287-2016, 2016.
Eidsvig, U., Papathoma-Köhle, M., Du, J., Vangelsten, B. V., and Glade T.: Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment, Eng. Geol., 181, 15–26, 2014.
Eidsvig, U. M. K., Kristensen, K., and Vangelsten, B. V.: Assessing the risk posed by natural hazards to infrastructures, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 481–504, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-481-2017, 2017.
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Bilir, T. E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K. L., Estrada, Y. O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R., and White, L. L.: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1132 pp., 2014.
Fuchs, S., Kuhlicke, C., and Meyer, V.: Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards – the challenge of integration, Nat. Hazards, 58, 609–619, 2011.
Fuchs, S., Birkmann, J., and Glade, T.: Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges, Nat. Hazards, 64, 1969–1975, 2012.
Fuchs, S., Keiler, M., and Zischg, A.: A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2127–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015, 2015.
Fuchs, S. and Glade, T.: Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard risk – a dynamic perspective, Nat. Hazards, 82, 1–5, 2016.
Fuchs, S., Röthlisberger, V., Thaler, T., Zischg, A., and Keiler, M.: Natural hazard management from a coevolutionary perspective: Exposure and policy response in the European Alps, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, 382–392, 2017.
Garcia, R. A. C., Oliveira, S. C., and Zêzere, J. L.: Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2769–2782, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016, 2016.
Glade, T. and Birkmann, J.: Assessment of different dimensions of vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change, Special Volume in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2009.
Greiving, S. and Glade, T.: Risk governance in: Encyclopedia of natural hazards, edited by: Bobrowsky P. T., Springer, New York, 863–870, 2013.
Hufschmidt, G. and Glade, T.: Vulnerability analysis in geomorphic risk assessment, in: Geomorphological hazards and disaster prevention, edited by: Alcántara-Ayala, I. and Goudie, A. S., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 233–243, 2010.
Keating, A., Campbell, K., Szoenyi, M., McQuistan, C., Nash, D., and Burer, M.: Development and testing of a community flood resilience measurement tool, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 77–101, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017, 2017.
Keiler, M. and Fuchs, S.: Vulnerability and exposure to geomorphic hazards – some insights from mountain regions, in: Geomorphology and society, edited by: Meadows, M. and Lin, J.-C., Springer, Tokyo, 165–180, 2016.
Keiler, M., Zischg, A., Fuchs, S., Hama, M., and Stötter, J.: Avalanche related damage potential – changes of persons and mobile values since the mid-twentieth century, case study Galtür, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 49–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-49-2005, 2005.
Keiler, M., Sailer, R., Jörg, P., Weber, C., Fuchs, S., Zischg, A., and Sauermoser, S.: Avalanche risk assessment – a multi-temporal approach, results from Galtür, Austria, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 637–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-637-2006, 2006.
Keiler, M., Knight, J., and Harrison, S.: Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 368, 2461–2479, 2010.
Komarov, A. Y., Seliverstov, Y. G., Glazovskaya, T. G., and Turchaninova, A. S.: Risk assessment in the North Caucasus ski resorts, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2227–2234, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2227-2016, 2016.
Malek, Z., Boerboom, L., and Glade, T.: Future forest cover change scenarios with implications for landslide risk: An example from Buzau Subcarpathians, Romania, J. Environ. Manage., 56, 1228–1243, 2015.
Papathoma-Köhle, M.: Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1771–1790, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016, 2016.
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Gems, B., Sturm, M., and Fuchs, S.: Matrices, curves and indicators: a review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows, Earth-Sci. Rev., 171, 272–288, 2017.
Rygel, L., O'Sullivan, D., and Yarnal, B.: A method for constructing a social vulnerability index, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 741–764, 2006.
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1535 pp., 2013.
Sudmeier-Rieux, K.: Resilience – an emerging paradigm of danger or of hope?, Disaster Prevention and Management, 23, 67–80, 2014.
Thaler, T., Priest, S., and Fuchs, S.: Evolving interregional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria, Reg. Environ. Change, 16, 841–853, 2016.
Totschnig, R., Sedlacek, W., and Fuchs, S.: A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport, Nat. Hazards, 58, 681–703, 2011.
Willis, I. and Fitton, J.: A review of multivariate social vulnerability methodologies: a case study of the River Parrett catchment, UK, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1387–1399, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1387-2016, 2016.
Willis, I., Gibin, M., Barros, J., and Webber, R.: Applying neighbourhood classification systems to natural hazards: a case study of Mt Vesuvius, Nat. Hazards, 70, 1–22, 2010.
Altmetrics