Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
Research article
 | 
07 Apr 2015
Research article |  | 07 Apr 2015

A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event

L. M. Stancanelli and E. Foti

Viewed

Total article views: 2,527 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,256 1,163 108 2,527 455 109 84
  • HTML: 1,256
  • PDF: 1,163
  • XML: 108
  • Total: 2,527
  • Supplement: 455
  • BibTeX: 109
  • EndNote: 84
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Nov 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Nov 2014)

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
The performances of a mono-phase model and of a two-phase model have been evaluated carrying out a blind test. As a benchmark test the event that struck Sicily (2009) was chosen. Prediction accuracies have been evaluated determining statistical indicators and applying the ROC approach. For the simulated event the two-phase model is more accurate than the mono-phase one, though both models show limits when applied in a highly urbanized area, where some constrains cannot be properly reproduced.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint