73 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Integrated debris flow hazard assessment in critical infrastructure zones: a case study of the 2022 Cubatão event, Serra do Mar, Brazil V. Veloso et al.
2. Initiation and Flow Conditions of Contemporary Flows in Martian Gullies T. de Haas et al.
3. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al.
4. The catastrophic debris flow in the Qinling Mountains of Xi’an, Shaanxi province, China, from 11 August 2023 D. Yang et al.
5. From snowmelt to disaster: modeling debris flow dynamics in the Shatoobar Nala watershed, Hunza, Pakistan H. Khan et al.
6. Predicting storm-triggered debris flow events: application to the 2009 Ionian Peloritan disaster (Sicily, Italy) M. Cama et al.
7. Forecasting the Frequency and Magnitude of Postfire Debris Flows Across Southern California J. Kean & D. Staley
8. Learning Debris Flow Dynamics with a Deep Learning Fourier Neural Operator: Application to the Rendinara–Morino Area M. Secchi et al.
9. Comparing single‐phase, non‐Newtonian approaches with experimental results: Validating flume‐scale mud and debris flow in HEC‐RAS S. Gibson et al.
10. Torrential Hazard Prevention in Alpine Small Basin through Historical, Empirical and Geomorphological Cross Analysis in NW Italy L. Turconi et al.
11. El rol de los términos de fricción y cohesión en la modelización bidimensional de fluidos no Newtonianos: avalanchas de nieve densa M. Sanz-Ramos et al.
12. Numerical Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of the Pitztal Valley Debris Flow Event M. Naqvi et al.
13. A Study of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Trend Prediction Using a Rule-Based Discrete Grid Model Y. Duan et al.
14. Numerical Simulation of Tailings Flow from Dam Failure over Complex Terrain Y. Yang et al.
15. Comparative analysis of μ(I) and Voellmy-type grain flow rheologies in geophysical mass flows: insights from theoretical and real case studies Y. Zhuang et al.
16. Assessment of Potential Landslide Scenarios Using Morphometry, Geomorphological Constraints, and Run-Out Analysis: A Case Study from Central Apennines (Italy) G. Paglia et al.
17. Influence of flow resistance stresses on debris flow runout S. Lee & C. Song
18. Effects of defense-structure system for bridge piers on two-phase debris flow wakes Z. Chen et al.
19. Safeguarding Cultural Heritage: Integrating laser scanning, InSAR, vibration monitoring and rockfall/granular flow runout modelling at the Temple of Hatshepsut, Egypt B. Jacobs et al.
20. Optimizing and validating the Gravitational Process Path model for regional debris-flow runout modelling J. Goetz et al.
21. Numerical simulation of debris-flow impact on multiple check dams using the material point method Y. Yang et al.
22. Modelling future lahars controlled by different volcanic eruption scenarios at Cotopaxi (Ecuador) calibrated with the massively destructive 1877 lahar T. Frimberger et al.
23. Modelling of debris-flow deposition: Terrain slope, mobility coefficient, and back-calculated basal friction coefficient D. Rickenmann et al.
24. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al.
25. Multi-Source Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping for Huaraz, Cordillera Blanca, Peru H. Frey et al.
26. Debris Flow Modelling Using RAMMS Model in the Alpine Environment With Focus on the Model Parameters and Main Characteristics M. Mikoš & N. Bezak
27. Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment A. Yildiz et al.
28. Pore pressure evolution and entrainment mechanism of convex unsaturated colluvial beds with divergent compositions under debris flow overriding P. Li et al.
29. Tree-Based Machine Learning and Flow Simulation for Debris Flow Susceptibility, Runout Propagation, and Dynamics in the Higher Himalayas H. Daud et al.
30. Cluster landslides and associated damage in the Dima Hasao district of Assam, India due to heavy rainfall in May 2022 P. Roy et al.
31. Effects of interactions between transient granular flows and macroscopically rough beds and their implications for bulk flow dynamics C. Choi & S. Goodwin
32. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of mud flow from a tailing dam failure across complex terrain D. Yu et al.
33. Implications of landslide runout modeling for vulnerability assessment: Benchmarking from a case study in the andean region M. Alvarez Jaimes et al.
34. An analysis of rheological models for lahar modelling with Iber M. Sanz-Ramos et al.
35. Stress anisotropy in natural debris flows during impacting a monitoring structure G. Nagl et al.
36. UAV-based topography and RAMMS-DF simulation for debris flow impact assessment: Insights from the typhoon Molave in Phuoc Thanh commune of Vietnam Q. Bui et al.
37. Data Mining and Statistical Approaches in Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modelling Using Airborne LiDAR Data U. Lay et al.
38. Application of the debris-flow hazard index for pipelines in the context of the hydrogeological disaster of February 2023 in São Sebastião, Serra do Mar, Brazil V. Veloso et al.
39. Predictive simulation of concurrent debris flows: How slope failure locations affect predicted damage K. Yamanoi et al.
40. Debris flows in Lebai gully along the Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet: characterization, causes, and dynamic prediction of potential debris flows M. Zhang et al.
41. Measurements of debris flow entrainment and dynamics H. Vicari et al.
42. Numerical modelling of dense snow avalanches with a well-balanced scheme based on the 2D shallow water equations M. Sanz-Ramos et al.
43. Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models H. Zhao & J. Kowalski
44. Rockfall and Debris Flow Hazard Assessment in the SW Escarpment of Montagna del Morrone Ridge (Abruzzo, Central Italy) M. Calista et al.
45. Study of the 2012 lahar on Iztaccíhuatl Volcano (Central Mexico) based on geomorphology, botanical evidence and 2D modeling J. Figueroa-García et al.
46. A dilatant, two-layer debris flow model validated by flow density measurements at the Swiss illgraben test site G. Meyrat et al.
47. Analyzing landslide-induced debris flow and flow-bridge interaction by using a hybrid model of depth-averaged model and discrete element method W. Shiu et al.
48. A multi-step hazard assessment for debris-flow prone areas influenced by hydroclimatic events V. Cabral et al.
49. Time and path prediction of landslides using InSAR and flow model P. Roy et al.
50. Evaluating Catchment-Scale Physically Based Modeling of Sediment Deposition During an Extreme Rainfall Event S. Emtehani et al.
51. Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al.
52. Runout modelling and hazard assessment of Tangni debris flow in Garhwal Himalayas, India R. Dash et al.
53. Influence of rheology on landslide-dammed lake impoundment and sediment trapping: Back-analysis of the Hintersee landslide dam A. Argentin et al.
54. Assessment of barrier location effect on debris flow based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation on 3D terrains S. Choi et al.
55. Enhancing debris flow run-out hazard assessment through probabilistic post-event back analysis P. Zeng et al.
56. Deciphering controls for debris‐flow erosion derived from a LiDAR‐recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Roßbichelbach, Germany) A. Dietrich & M. Krautblatter
57. A robust debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in Santa Teresa, Peru H. Frey et al.
58. Breaking Limits of Remote Sensing by Deep Learning From Simulated Data for Flood and Debris-Flow Mapping N. Yokoya et al.
59. Integrated debris flow hazard and risk assessment using UAV data and RAMMS, a case study in northern Pakistan N. Ahmad et al.
60. How memory effects, check dams, and channel geometry control erosion and deposition by debris flows T. de Haas et al.
61. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains C. Moos et al.
62. Preliminary results of numerical modelling of debris flow ‐ case study Leva reka, Serbia J. KRUŠIĆ et al.
63. Variable hydrograph inputs for a numerical debris-flow runout model A. Mitchell et al.
64. Impact of a Random Sequence of Debris Flows on Torrential Fan Formation N. Bezak et al.
65. Derivation of voellmy model parameters for landslide runout based on co-seismic rock avalanche inventory J. Huang & D. Zekkos
66. The Value of Using Multiple Hydrometeorological Variables to Predict Temporal Debris Flow Susceptibility in an Alpine Environment D. Prenner et al.
67. A Comprehensive Review on Debris Flow Landslide Assessment Using Rapid Mass Movement Simulation (RAMMS) S. Kumar et al.
68. Hazard zonation for rock avalanche and subsequent debris flow propagation in a frontally confined context based on the analysis of numerical simulations and empirical models C. Wolff et al.
69. Emulator-based global sensitivity analysis for flow-like landslide run-out models H. Zhao et al.
70. Exploring new methods to analyse spatial impact distributions on debris‐flow fans using data from south‐western British Columbia S. Zubrycky et al.
71. Controls on the formation and size of potential landslide dams and dammed lakes in the Austrian Alps A. Argentin et al.
72. Reconstructing the Snow Avalanche of Coll de Pal 2018 (SE Pyrenees) M. Sanz-Ramos et al.
73. Analysing debris flow impact in Upper Svaneti, Georgia: investigating triggering factors and runout dynamics A. Mehrpajouh & J. Engel