62 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Initiation and Flow Conditions of Contemporary Flows in Martian Gullies T. de Haas et al. 10.1029/2018JE005899
2. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al. 10.1029/2021JF006245
3. Predicting storm-triggered debris flow events: application to the 2009 Ionian Peloritan disaster (Sicily, Italy) M. Cama et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-1785-2015
4. Forecasting the Frequency and Magnitude of Postfire Debris Flows Across Southern California J. Kean & D. Staley 10.1029/2020EF001735
5. Comparing single‐phase, non‐Newtonian approaches with experimental results: Validating flume‐scale mud and debris flow in HEC‐RAS S. Gibson et al. 10.1002/esp.5044
6. Torrential Hazard Prevention in Alpine Small Basin through Historical, Empirical and Geomorphological Cross Analysis in NW Italy L. Turconi et al. 10.3390/land11050699
7. El rol de los términos de fricción y cohesión en la modelización bidimensional de fluidos no Newtonianos: avalanchas de nieve densa M. Sanz-Ramos et al. 10.4995/ia.2023.20080
8. Numerical Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of the Pitztal Valley Debris Flow Event M. Naqvi et al. 10.3390/geosciences13120378
9. A Study of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Trend Prediction Using a Rule-Based Discrete Grid Model Y. Duan et al. 10.3390/rs16244740
10. Numerical Simulation of Tailings Flow from Dam Failure over Complex Terrain Y. Yang et al. 10.3390/ma15062288
11. Comparative analysis of μ(I) and Voellmy-type grain flow rheologies in geophysical mass flows: insights from theoretical and real case studies Y. Zhuang et al. 10.5194/nhess-25-1901-2025
12. Influence of flow resistance stresses on debris flow runout S. Lee & C. Song 10.1007/s12665-018-7604-2
13. Effects of defense-structure system for bridge piers on two-phase debris flow wakes Z. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11440-021-01296-5
14. Optimizing and validating the Gravitational Process Path model for regional debris-flow runout modelling J. Goetz et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-2543-2021
15. Modelling future lahars controlled by different volcanic eruption scenarios at Cotopaxi (Ecuador) calibrated with the massively destructive 1877 lahar T. Frimberger et al. 10.1002/esp.5056
16. Modelling of debris-flow deposition: Terrain slope, mobility coefficient, and back-calculated basal friction coefficient D. Rickenmann et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341507013
17. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
18. Multi-Source Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping for Huaraz, Cordillera Blanca, Peru H. Frey et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00210
19. Debris Flow Modelling Using RAMMS Model in the Alpine Environment With Focus on the Model Parameters and Main Characteristics M. Mikoš & N. Bezak 10.3389/feart.2020.605061
20. Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment A. Yildiz et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.1032438
21. Pore pressure evolution and entrainment mechanism of convex unsaturated colluvial beds with divergent compositions under debris flow overriding P. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.03.040
22. Tree-Based Machine Learning and Flow Simulation for Debris Flow Susceptibility, Runout Propagation, and Dynamics in the Higher Himalayas H. Daud et al. 10.1007/s11004-025-10196-3
23. Cluster landslides and associated damage in the Dima Hasao district of Assam, India due to heavy rainfall in May 2022 P. Roy et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01977-6
24. Effects of interactions between transient granular flows and macroscopically rough beds and their implications for bulk flow dynamics C. Choi & G. Goodwin 10.1139/cgj-2020-0160
25. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of mud flow from a tailing dam failure across complex terrain D. Yu et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-727-2020
26. Stress anisotropy in natural debris flows during impacting a monitoring structure G. Nagl et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01779-2
27. Data Mining and Statistical Approaches in Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modelling Using Airborne LiDAR Data U. Lay et al. 10.3390/s19163451
28. Application of the debris-flow hazard index for pipelines in the context of the hydrogeological disaster of February 2023 in São Sebastião, Serra do Mar, Brazil V. Veloso et al. 10.1007/s10346-024-02319-4
29. Predictive simulation of concurrent debris flows: How slope failure locations affect predicted damage K. Yamanoi et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12776
30. Debris flows in Lebai gully along the Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet: characterization, causes, and dynamic prediction of potential debris flows M. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s12665-022-10694-1
31. Measurements of debris flow entrainment and dynamics H. Vicari et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341501028
32. Numerical modelling of dense snow avalanches with a well-balanced scheme based on the 2D shallow water equations M. Sanz-Ramos et al. 10.1017/jog.2023.48
33. Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models H. Zhao & J. Kowalski 10.1007/s10346-022-01857-z
34. Rockfall and Debris Flow Hazard Assessment in the SW Escarpment of Montagna del Morrone Ridge (Abruzzo, Central Italy) M. Calista et al. 10.3390/w12041206
35. A dilatant, two-layer debris flow model validated by flow density measurements at the Swiss illgraben test site G. Meyrat et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01733-2
36. Analyzing landslide-induced debris flow and flow-bridge interaction by using a hybrid model of depth-averaged model and discrete element method W. Shiu et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01963-y
37. A multi-step hazard assessment for debris-flow prone areas influenced by hydroclimatic events V. Cabral et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106961
38. Time and path prediction of landslides using InSAR and flow model P. Roy et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2022.112899
39. Numerical Modeling and a Parametric Study of Various Mass Flows Based on a Multi-Phase Computational Framework M. Naqvi et al. 10.3390/geotechnics2030025
40. Runout modelling and hazard assessment of Tangni debris flow in Garhwal Himalayas, India R. Dash et al. 10.1007/s12665-021-09637-z
41. Influence of rheology on landslide-dammed lake impoundment and sediment trapping: Back-analysis of the Hintersee landslide dam A. Argentin et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108363
42. Assessment of barrier location effect on debris flow based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation on 3D terrains S. Choi et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01477-5
43. Deciphering controls for debris‐flow erosion derived from a LiDAR‐recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Roßbichelbach, Germany) A. Dietrich & M. Krautblatter 10.1002/esp.4578
44. A robust debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in Santa Teresa, Peru H. Frey et al. 10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z
45. Breaking Limits of Remote Sensing by Deep Learning From Simulated Data for Flood and Debris-Flow Mapping N. Yokoya et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3035469
46. Integrated debris flow hazard and risk assessment using UAV data and RAMMS, a case study in northern Pakistan N. Ahmad et al. 10.1007/s11069-024-06862-0
47. How memory effects, check dams, and channel geometry control erosion and deposition by debris flows T. de Haas et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-71016-8
48. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains C. Moos et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.011
49. Preliminary results of numerical modelling of debris flow ‐ case study Leva reka, Serbia J. KRUŠIĆ et al. 10.1002/cepa.753
50. Variable hydrograph inputs for a numerical debris-flow runout model A. Mitchell et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-1627-2022
51. Impact of a Random Sequence of Debris Flows on Torrential Fan Formation N. Bezak et al. 10.3390/geosciences9020064
52. The Value of Using Multiple Hydrometeorological Variables to Predict Temporal Debris Flow Susceptibility in an Alpine Environment D. Prenner et al. 10.1029/2018WR022985
53. A Comprehensive Review on Debris Flow Landslide Assessment Using Rapid Mass Movement Simulation (RAMMS) S. Kumar et al. 10.1007/s10706-024-02887-1
54. Hazard zonation for rock avalanche and subsequent debris flow propagation in a frontally confined context based on the analysis of numerical simulations and empirical models C. Wolff et al. 10.1007/s11069-025-07342-9
55. Emulator-based global sensitivity analysis for flow-like landslide run-out models H. Zhao et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01690-w
56. Exploring new methods to analyse spatial impact distributions on debris‐flow fans using data from south‐western British Columbia S. Zubrycky et al. 10.1002/esp.5184
57. Controls on the formation and size of potential landslide dams and dammed lakes in the Austrian Alps A. Argentin et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-1615-2021
58. Reconstructing the Snow Avalanche of Coll de Pal 2018 (SE Pyrenees) M. Sanz-Ramos et al. 10.3390/geohazards2030011
59. Debris flow hazard assessment by means of numerical simulations: implications for the Rotolon creek valley (Northern Italy) T. Salvatici et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4197-7
60. Evaluation concepts to compare observed and simulated deposition areas of mass movements M. Heiser et al. 10.1007/s10596-016-9609-9
61. Debris flow entrainment rates in non-uniform channels with convex and concave slopes P. Li et al. 10.1080/00221686.2017.1313321
62. A rockslide-induced debris flow caused the catastrophic 2024 Wayanad disaster in Kerala, India P. Roy et al. 10.1007/s10346-025-02484-0