Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1449–1456, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1449-2015
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1449–1456, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1449-2015

Brief communication 30 Jun 2015

Brief communication | 30 Jun 2015

Brief Communication: The dark side of risk and crisis communication: legal conflicts and responsibility allocation

A. Scolobig A. Scolobig
  • Climate Policy Group; Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH-Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract. Inadequate, misinterpreted, or missing risk and crisis communication may be a reason for practitioners, and sometimes science advisors, to become the subjects of criminal investigations. This work discusses the legal consequences of inadequate risk communication in these situations. After presenting some cases, the discussion focuses on three critical issues: the development of effective communication protocols; the role, tasks, and responsibilities of science advisors; and the collateral effects of practitioners' defensive behaviours. For example, if the avoidance of personal liability becomes a primary objective for practitioners, it may clash with other objectives, such as the protection of vulnerable communities or the transparency of decision making. The conclusion presents some ideas for future research on the legal aspects of risk communication.

Download
Short summary
This work discusses the legal consequences of risk and crisis communication. It focuses on three critical issues: the development of effective communication protocols; the role, tasks and responsibilities of science advisors; and the collateral effects of practitioners’ defensive behaviours. The conclusion presents some ideas for future research on the legal aspects of risk communication.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint