26 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. On a report that the 2012 M 6.0 earthquake in Italy was predicted after seeing an unusual cloud formation J. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1061-2015
2. Rain rate and radon daughters’ activity C. Bottardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117728
3. Questioning whether there was a short-term interaction between the 6 February 2023 earthquakes and air quality parameters in Türkiye Ü. Alver Şahin & B. Kaynak https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140616
4. Thermal Anomalies Around the Time of Nepal Earthquakes M 7.8 April 25, 2015 And M 7.3 May 12, 2015 P. Hazra et al. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGEE.2017010104
5. Seismo ionospheric anomalies in Turkey associated with M  ≥ 6.0 earthquakes detected by GPS stations and GIM TEC M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.03.005
6. A Retrospective Analysis about the Italy Emilia M6.0 Earthquake Prediction G. Guo https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2021.102005
7. The Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling of Multiple Geophysical Parameters Approximately 3 Hours Prior to the 2022 M6.8 Luding Earthquake C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13120356
8. A new South American network to study the atmospheric electric field and its variations related to geophysical phenomena J. Tacza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2014.09.001
9. Mathematical Simulation of the Ionospheric Electric Field as a Part of the Global Electric Circuit V. Denisenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-018-9499-6
10. A New Instrumental Array in Sichuan, China, to Monitor Vibrations and Perturbations of the Lithosphere, Atmosphere, and Ionosphere C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09665-1
11. Some Recent Key Aspects of the DC Global Electric Circuit M. Rycroft https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030348
12. A Multi-parametric Climatological Approach to Study the 2016 Amatrice–Norcia (Central Italy) Earthquake Preparatory Phase A. Piscini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1597-8
13. Analysis of observations backing up the existence of VLF and ionospheric TEC anomalies before the Mw6.1 earthquake in Greece, January 26, 2014 F. Sanchez-Dulcet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.07.002
14. Analysis of Atmospheric Precursors at the Time of the Earthquake Using Satellite Images S. Salimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-02023-9
15. A Statistical Study of Lightning Activities and M ≥ 5.0 Earthquakes in Taiwan During 1993–2004 J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9342-2
16. Ion Transport from Soil to Air and Electric Field Amplitude of the Boundary Layer A. Muhammad et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793223600613
17. On the Relation Between Anomalous Clouds and Earthquakes in Italian Land G. Guangmeng https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.812540
18. Determining the time constant of the global atmospheric electric circuit through modelling and observations M. Rycroft et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106267
19. Forecasting natural hazards, performance of scientists, ethics, and the need for transparency F. Guzzetti https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2015.1030664
20. Conduction current and extraneous electric current in the global electric circuit A. Namgaladze & M. Karpov https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793115050231
21. Is There an Earthquake Weather? M. Parrot & J. Pinçon https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.92005
22. A Review of What Can Be Learnt from Tweeks and Related Topics M. Rycroft https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020152
23. Geosystemics View of Earthquakes A. De Santis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21040412
24. Aerosols and seismo-ionosphere coupling: A review A. Namgaladze et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.014
25. Geospace perturbations induced by the Earth: The state of the art and future trends A. De Santis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.05.004
26. Space-Based Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5