57 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Primary Disruptions of Extreme Storms and Floods on Critical Entities Under the Framework of the CER EU Directive: The Case of Storm Daniel in Greece M. Diakakis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080967
2. INSYDE: a synthetic, probabilistic flood damage model based on explicit cost analysis F. Dottori et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2577-2016
3. Quantification of flood risk mitigation benefits: A building-scale damage assessment through the RASOR platform C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.017
4. Flood risk assessment and coping capacity of floods in central Vietnam T. Vu & R. Ranzi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.06.001
5. Improved building-specific flood risk assessment and implications of depth-damage function selection E. Gnan et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.919726
6. An innovative micro-scale approach for vulnerability and flood risk assessment with the application to property-level protection adoptions B. Rehan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3175-5
7. Community flood vulnerability and risk assessment: An empirical predictive modeling approach Y. Wang & A. Sebastian https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12739
8. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: a holistic graph-based assessment approach for natural hazard risk of complex systems M. Arosio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-521-2020
9. Improvements and Operational Application of a Zero-Order Quick Assessment Model for Flood Damage: A Case Study in Italy L. Manselli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030373
10. Econometric modelling for estimating direct flood damage to firms: a micro-scale approach using post-event records in Italy M. Ballocci et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-251-2026
11. Calculating Economic Flood Damage through Microscale Risk Maps and Data Generalization: A Pilot Study in Southern Italy G. Festa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106286
12. Estimating Financial Flood Damages in Residential and Commercial Regions: A Global Depth-Damage Approach S. Koohi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-025-04390-5
13. Sensitivity of flood loss estimates to building representation and flow depth attribution methods in micro-scale flood modelling M. Bermúdez & A. Zischg https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3270-7
14. Flood risk assessment in art cities: the exemplary case of Florence (Italy) C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12226
15. How urban layout and pedestrian evacuation behaviours can influence flood risk assessment in riverine historic built environments G. Bernardini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102876
16. A comparison of building value models for flood risk analysis V. Röthlisberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2431-2018
17. The role of residual risk on flood damage assessment: A continuous hydrologic-hydraulic modelling approach for the historical city of Rome, Italy A. Fiori et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101506
18. A catastrophe model approach for flood risk assessment of Italian municipalities S. Perazzini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06060-y
19. Nature-based solutions as urban adaptation to climate risk: Framework for economic evaluation as decision support tool S. Sahay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106037
20. Modelling the impact of sea-level rise on urban flood probability in SE China J. Griffiths et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2018.02.012
21. Delimitation of flood areas based on a calibrated a DEM and geoprocessing: case study on the Uruguay River, Itaqui, southern Brazil P. Araújo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-237-2019
22. Accounting public and individual flood protection measures in damage assessment: A novel approach for quantitative assessment of vulnerability and flood risk associated with local engineering adaptation options B. Rehan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.061
23. Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: Framework and application to mainland Portugal R. Figueiredo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.007
24. Flood impacts on individual well-being: insights from a post-event survey across differently exposed groups in Marche region, Italy S. Rrokaj et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08045-5
25. Low cost, multiscale and multi-sensor application for flooded area mapping D. Giordan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1493-2018
26. A Public–Private Insurance Model for Disaster Risk Management: An Application to Italy S. Perazzini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-022-00210-6
27. Impacts of the eastern route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project emergency operation on flooding and drainage in water-receiving areas: an empirical case in China K. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-555-2019
28. High-quality observation of surface imperviousness for urban runoff modelling using UAV imagery P. Tokarczyk et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4215-2015
29. Three-dimensional flood routing of a dam break based on a high-precision digital model of a dense urban area X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2734-x
30. Indirect flood impacts and cascade risk across interdependent linear infrastructures C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1955-2021
31. Multi-risk assessment in a historical city C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05125-6
32. Principles of processing and three-dimensional modelling through lidar data for applied research of the urban environment D. Serohin https://doi.org/10.26565/2410-7360-2022-57-17
33. Flood hazard mapping in Southern Brazil: a combination of flow frequency analysis and the HAND model G. Speckhann et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1409896
34. Indirect Impact Assessment of Pluvial Flooding in Urban Areas Using a Graph-Based Approach: The Mexico City Case Study M. Arosio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061753
35. On the Exploitation of Remote Sensing Technologies for the Monitoring of Coastal and River Delta Regions Q. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102384
36. Using hydro‐morphological assessment parameters to estimate the flood‐induced vulnerability of watercourses ‐ a methodological approach across three spatial scales in Germany and the Czech Republic S. Garack & R. Ortlepp https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3921
37. Flood impacts on a water distribution network C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2109-2017
38. Accounting for uncertainty in real-time flood inundation mapping using HAND model: Iowa case study Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05215-z
39. River Flash Flood Economical Loss and its Uncertainty in Developing Countries K. Amirmoradi & A. Shokoohi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03653-3
40. Street-scale hydrodynamic estimation from social media videos: A systematic approach to urban floods data collection M. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105419
41. Development and assessment of uni- and multivariable flood loss models for Emilia-Romagna (Italy) F. Carisi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2057-2018
42. How Can Cities Respond to Flood Disaster Risks under Multi-Scenario Simulation? A Case Study of Xiamen, China Y. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040618
43. Flood Damage Assessment in HAZUS Using Various Resolution of Data and One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional HEC-RAS Depth Grids E. Ghimire & S. Sharma https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000430
44. Investigation of accidents in the infrastructure triggered by debris flows in Russia E. Petrova https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05518-1
45. Building level flood exposure analysis using a hydrodynamic model R. Bertsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105490
46. Societal and environmental interconnections: future directions for flood inundation models Z. Li & S. Gorelick https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae21f4
47. Natural hazard impacts on transport infrastructure in Russia E. Petrova https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1969-2020
48. Developing a framework for the assessment of current and future flood risk in Venice, Italy J. Schlumberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2381-2022
49. Participatory risk assessment of pluvial floods in four towns of Niger M. Tiepolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103454
50. Flood damage curves: new insights from the 2010 flood in Veneto, Italy A. Scorzini & E. Frank https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12163
51. Three‐dimensional hydraulic characterisation of the Arno River in Florence C. Peruzzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12490
52. Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review W. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.001
53. Scenario-based community flood risk assessment: a case study of Taining county town, Fujian province, China W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2187-2
54. Combined fluvial and pluvial urban flood hazard analysis: concept development and application to Can Tho city, Mekong Delta, Vietnam H. Apel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-941-2016
55. An integrated fluvial and flash pluvial model using 2D high-resolution sub-grid and particle swarm optimization-based random forest approaches in GIS H. Rizeei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0078-8
56. Scan Line Void Filling of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds for Hydroflattening DEM W. Yan https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3089288
57. The changing pattern of urban flooding in Guangzhou, China H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.358