92 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Can the Quality of the Potential Flood Risk Maps be Evaluated? A Case Study of the Social Risks of Floods in Central Spain J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061284
2. Impacts of urbanization on flooding of a coastal urban catchment: a case study of Mumbai City, India P. Zope et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1356-4
3. Analisa Risiko Banjir untuk Mendukung Pembangunan Bekelanjutan di Kawasan Pesisir Pantai Kota Semarang D. Ulfiana & U. Sari https://doi.org/10.14710/ruang.6.2.102-111
4. Urban pluvial flood risk assessment combining static and dynamic perspectives based on indicator method and hydrodynamic model H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08253-z
5. A Sustainable Water Resources Management Assessment Framework (SWRM-AF) for Arid and Semi-Arid Regions—Part 2: Refining the Conceptual Framework Using the Delphi Technique B. Alsaeed et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114463
6. Risk management of extreme events under climate change X. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.209
7. Sustainability-Based Flood Hazard Mapping of the Swannanoa River Watershed E. Ahmadisharaf et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101735
8. A state-of-the-art approach to assessing relative multi-dimensional vulnerabilities for urban flood resilience in the UK A. Woods et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105827
9. A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in disaster management F. Manyaga et al. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v2i2.197
10. Flood Risk Assessment Using TELEMAC-2D Models Integrated with Multi-Index Analysis in Shenzhen River Basin, China G. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162513
11. Urban Heat Island vulnerability mapping using advanced GIS data and tools P. Sidiqui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-02005-w
12. Extreme analysis of typhoons disaster in mainland China with insurance management K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104411
13. Dimensions and drivers of social vulnerability to flood risk in Manafwa catchment, Eastern Uganda G. Erima et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2493353
14. Assessment of Urban Flood Risk Factors Using Monte Carlo Analytical Hierarchy Process K. Koc & Z. Işık https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000516
15. A Hybrid Approach Using GIS-Based Fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS Assessing Flood Hazards along the South-Central Coast of Vietnam H. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207142
16. Comparative Multi-Criteria Assessment of Hydrological Vulnerability—Case Study: Drainage Basins in the Northeast Region of Romania A. Albulescu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081302
17. Nuisance flood risk: Defining a new horizon in urban flood risk management through hydrodynamic flood hazard modelling and indicator-based vulnerability assessment D. Thakur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105969
18. Flood Exposure and Social Vulnerability Analysis in Rural Areas of Developing Countries: An Empirical Study of Charsadda District, Pakistan A. Hamidi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071176
19. Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches Y. Kim & E. Chung https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0879-0
20. Spatial probabilistic multi-criteria decision making for assessment of flood management alternatives E. Ahmadisharaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.031
21. Flood risk assessment using deep learning integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis B. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106899
22. Fuzzy VIKOR approach for assessing the vulnerability of the water supply to climate change and variability in South Korea Y. Kim & E. Chung https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.040
23. Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam B. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815
24. Assessing the Health Vulnerability Caused by Climate and Air Pollution in Korea Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS H. Bae et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102894
25. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS S. Mahdevari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.076
26. Assessing the Hazard Degree of Wadi Malham Basin in Saudi Arabia and Its Impact on North Train Railway Infrastructure F. Alqreai & H. Altuwaijri https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12090380
27. Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art M. de Brito & M. Evers https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016
28. Social, economic and environmental assessment of urban sub-catchment flood risks using a multi-criteria approach: A case study in Mumbai City, India S. Pathak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125216
29. Assessment of social vulnerability to floods based on fuzzy logic in a Mediterranean dense urban area: Palma, Mallorca, Spain A. Moragues et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105594
30. Analyzing Vietnam's national disaster loss database for flood risk assessment using multiple linear regression-TOPSIS C. Luu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101153
31. A new mountain flood vulnerability index (MFVI) for the assessment of flood vulnerability A. Karmaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00575-z
32. Intercomparison of multiple statistical downscaling methods: multi-criteria model selection for South Korea H. Eum et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1312-9
33. An Approach of Social Vulnerability Assessment to Urban Flood G. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.4.43
34. An Approach to Drought Vulnerability Assessment Focused on Groundwater Wells in Upland Cultivation Areas of South Korea H. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091783
35. A GIS-Based Assessment of Flood Hazard through Track Records over the 1886–2022 Period in Greece N. Evelpidou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11110226
36. Determining Vulnerability Indicators of Buildings for Sea-Level Rise and Floods in Urban Coastal Areas İ. Çal & A. Ciravoğlu https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010027
37. History of floods in Greece: causes and measures for protection A. Angelakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03898-w
38. Advances in weather and climate extreme studies: a systematic comparative review K. Kafi & Z. Ponrahono https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-024-00079-1
39. A Spatially Explicit Multi-Criteria Analysis Method on Solving Spatial Heterogeneity Problems for Flood Hazard Assessment Y. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-1993-6
40. Evaluating the Effects of Inundation Duration and Velocity on Selection of Flood Management Alternatives Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making E. Ahmadisharaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0956-4
41. Flood hazard assessment in the Kujukuri Plain of Chiba Prefecture, Japan, based on GIS and multicriteria decision analysis H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1699-5
42. Decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainties M. Tseng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.024
43. Flood Prioritization of Dehbar Watersheds in Khorasan Razavi Province using TOPSIS Model, Morphometric Analysis and Regional Flood Frequency Analysis M. Mohammadi et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.13.25.188
44. Flood Vulnerability Analysis by Fuzzy Spatial Multi Criteria Decision Making A. Radmehr & S. Araghinejad https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1068-x
45. Prioritization of Flood Vulnerability Criteria in Qirokarzin City, Fars Province, Iran M. Hemmati et al. https://doi.org/10.61186/jorar.16.4.205
46. A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis System for Prioritizing Sites and Types of Low Impact Development Practices: Case of Korea J. Song & E. Chung https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040291
47. Experts' Perceptions of Water Security in Central Asia: results from a Delphi study A. Assubayeva https://doi.org/10.29258/CAJWR/2021-R1.v7-1/50-69.eng
48. Hybrid climate datasets from a climate data evaluation system and their impacts on hydrologic simulations for the Athabasca River basin in Canada H. Eum & A. Gupta https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5151-2019
49. Application of a hybrid Delphi and aggregation–disaggregation procedure for group decision-making A. Bregar https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-018-0094-3
50. Multiple flood vulnerability assessment approach based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and coordinated development degree model W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.085
51. Coastal erosion and flooding risk assessment based on grid scale: A case study of six coastal metropolitan areas X. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174393
52. A cascading flash flood guidance system: development and application in Yunnan Province, China Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2535-2
53. An Integrated Delphi-AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach toward Ranking and Selection of Renewable Energy Resources in Pakistan Y. Solangi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7020118
54. Parametric Assessment of Water Use Vulnerability Variations Using SWAT and Fuzzy TOPSIS Coupled with Entropy K. Won et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912052
55. Sea level rise and land use change impacts on coastal vulnerability in Sandakan under IPCC AR6 scenarios Z. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2026.102046
56. A synergistic approach towards understanding flood risks over coastal multi-hazard environments: Appraisal of bivariate flood risk mapping through flood hazard, and socio-economic-cum-physical vulnerability dimensions D. Thakur & M. Mohanty https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166423
57. Robust spatial flood vulnerability assessment for Han River using fuzzy TOPSIS with α-cut level set G. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.089
58. Framework to prioritize watersheds for diffuse pollution management in the Republic of Korea: application of multi-criteria analysis using the Delphi method G. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2767-2019
59. Hydrological impacts of land use–land cover change and detention basins on urban flood hazard: a case study of Poisar River basin, Mumbai, India P. Zope et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2816-4
60. Risk mapping of Indian coastal districts using IPCC-AR5 framework and multi-attribute decision-making approach K. Malakar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112948
61. Urban resilience assessment: a best–worst method for component prioritization H. Armin et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2025-0087
62. Multi-Criteria Assessment of Spatial Robust Water Resource Vulnerability Using the TOPSIS Method Coupled with Objective and Subjective Weights in the Han River Basin E. Chung et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010029
63. Spatial modeling of flood probability using geo-environmental variables and machine learning models, case study: Tajan watershed, Iran M. Avand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.02.011
64. Towards a flood vulnerability assessment of watershed using integration of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, analytical network process, and fuzzy theories F. Hosseini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14534-w
65. Extreme precipitation-based vulnerability assessment of road-crossing drainage structures in forested watersheds using an integrated environmental modeling approach S. Panda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105413
66. A novel multi-objective optimization framework to allocate support funds for flash flood reduction based on multiple vulnerability assessment W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127144
67. Risk Assessment for Recreational Activities in the Coastal Ocean H. Chuang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040604
68. Selection of Hydrologically Vulnerable Areas in Urban Regions Using Techniques for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162455
69. Revolutionizing local water governance indicators: A combined Fuzzy Delphi and AHP methodological framework S. Asadi & A. Alibaygi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2026.101306
70. A systematic review on approaches and methods used for flood vulnerability assessment: framework for future research S. Rehman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03567-z
71. A systematic literature review of multicriteria and multi-objective models applied in risk management A. de Almeida et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpw021
72. Impacts of land use–land cover change and urbanization on flooding: A case study of Oshiwara River Basin in Mumbai, India P. Zope et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.009
73. An Overview of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Application in Managing Water-Related Disaster Events: Analyzing 20 Years of Literature for Flood and Drought Events M. Abdullah et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101358
74. Modeling the Flood Hazard Potential in the Aji Chai basin using Data Mining Algorithms T. Rahimpour & M. Rezaei Moghaddam https://doi.org/10.61186/jeer.14.4.19
75. Eco-Environmental Quality Assessment in China’s 35 Major Cities Based On Remote Sensing Ecological Index H. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2911627
76. A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in Tehran, Iran M. Moghadas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
77. Group decision-making approach for flood vulnerability identification using the fuzzy VIKOR method G. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-863-2015
78. Sustainable risk management strategy selection using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach A. Edjossan-Sossou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101474
79. Spatial and temporal changes in flood hazard potential at coastal lowland area: a case study in the Kujukuri Plain, Japan H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2495-6
80. Integrating spherical fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS technique to identify indicators for sustainable maintenance management in the oil and gas industry E. Olugu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.11.003
81. A new flood risk assessment framework for evaluating the effectiveness of policies to improve urban flood resilience M. Hammond et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1508598
82. Robustness, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of the TOPSIS Method for Quantitative Climate Change Vulnerability: a Case Study of Flood Damage J. Song & E. Chung https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1451-2
83. Big Data in Criteria Selection and Identification in Managing Flood Disaster Events Based on Macro Domain PESTEL Analysis: Case Study of Malaysia Adaptation Index M. Abdullah et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6010025
84. Assessment of flood adaptive capacity of urban areas in Thailand N. Thanvisitthpon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106363
85. Prioritization of flood vulnerability, coping capacity and exposure indicators through the Delphi technique: A case study in Taquari-Antas basin, Brazil M. de Brito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.027
86. Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands A. Fekete https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1
87. Robust Prioritization of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies Using the VIKOR Method with Objective Weights Y. Kim & E. Chung https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12291
88. Integrated socio-environmental vulnerability assessment of coastal hazards using data-driven and multi-criteria analysis approaches A. Tanim et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15237-z
89. A spatial-temporal vulnerability assessment to support the building of community resilience against power outage impacts T. Münzberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.027
90. Comparison of Flood Vulnerability Assessments to Climate Change by Construction Frameworks for a Composite Indicator J. Lee & H. Choi https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030768
91. Assessing vulnerability of buildings to hydro-meteorological hazards using an expert based approach – An application in Nehoiu Valley, Romania A. Godfrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
92. Framework of Spatial Flood Risk Assessment for a Case Study in Quang Binh Province, Vietnam C. Luu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073058