54 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Seismic Hazard and Site Suitability Evaluation Based on Multicriteria Decision Analysis S. Moustafa et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186937
2. Spatial multi-criteria decision making approach for wind farm site selection: A case study in Balıkesir, Turkey S. Yildiz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114158
3. A GIS-BASED MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION IN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER MANAGEMENT USING GRANULAR COMPUTING F. Khamespanah et al. https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2016.1199139
4. A spatial multicriteria decision-making method for natural gas transmission pipeline routing V. Yildirim et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1173071
5. Alternative suitable landfill site selection using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems: a case study in Istanbul D. Güler & T. Yomralıoğlu https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7039-1
6. GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria approach for optimal site selection of fire stations in Istanbul, Turkey P. Nyimbili & T. Erden https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100860
7. Integrated ANN-cross-validation and AHP-TOPSIS model to improve earthquake risk assessment R. Jena & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101723
8. Earthquake hazard and risk assessment using machine learning approaches at Palu, Indonesia R. Jena et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141582
9. Determination of earthquake-risky areas in Yalova City Center (Marmara region, Turkey) using GIS-based multicriteria decision-making techniques (analytical hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) K. Yavuz Kumlu & Ş. Tüdeş https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03583-7
10. Earthquake Risk Assessment Using GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP): The Case of Bitlis Province (Türkiye) M. Aydın et al. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1306580
11. Modelling of cave-in occurrence using AHP and GIS A. Malinowska & K. Dziarek https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1945-2014
12. Net earthquake hazard and elements at risk (NEaR) map creation for city of Istanbul via spatial multi-criteria decision analysis H. Karaman & T. Erden https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1099-2
13. Sustainability factors influencing para rubber resources for the implementation of circular economy in Songkhla province, southern Thailand J. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2124551
14. Evaluation of geo-factor weights with ESWA and AHP techniques for GIS-based seismic hazard modeling of Thiruvananthapuram city S. Ellappa Subramani & M. Velapgy https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-025-12321-2
15. Entropy analysis for identifying significant parameters for seismic soil liquefaction A. Dalvi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2013.805255
16. A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis model for earthquake vulnerability assessment using Choquet integral and game theory M. Moradi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2822-6
17. Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Artificial Neural Networks based on GIS: A case study of Sanandaj in Iran P. Yariyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705
18. Seismicity clusters and vulnerability in the Himalayas by machine learning and integrated MCDM models S. Malakar & A. Rai https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10946-1
19. Multicriteria seismic hazard assessment in Puerto Vallarta metropolitan area, Mexico K. Flores et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04308-x
20. Elementary empirical model to assess seismic soil liquefaction S. Pathak & A. Dalvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0723-x
21. Geospatial Multicriteria Analysis for Earthquake Risk Assessment: Case Study of Fujairah City in the UAE D. Al-Dogom et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638316
22. Fuzzy AHP Integrated with GIS Analyses for Drought Risk Assessment: A Case Study from Upper Phetchaburi River Basin, Thailand S. Wijitkosum & T. Sriburi https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050939
23. Exploring of Wind Energy Potential and Optimal Site Selection for Wind Energy Plants Installations in Erzurum/Turkey Based on Multicriteria Site Selection G. Şahin et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/er/2629977
24. A Hybrid Approach Integrating Entropy-AHP and GIS for Suitability Assessment of Urban Emergency Facilities P. Nyimbili & T. Erden https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070419
25. Seismic hazard analysis of China’s islands based on Bayesian network J. Jia & S. Deng https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-07005-1
26. Spatial decision support systems (SDSS) and software applications for earthquake disaster management with special reference to Turkey P. Nyimbili & T. Erden https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3089-7
27. Natural Hazards and Social Vulnerability of Place: The Strength-Based Approach Applied to Wollongong, Australia R. Ogie & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-0224-y
28. Site Selection of Natural Gas Emergency Response Team Centers in Istanbul Metropolitan Area Based on GIS and FAHP M. Sarıkaya et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110571
29. Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis P. Nyimbili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3262-7
30. Evaluation of Birecik Basin Flood Detection with GIS Assisted AHP Methods V. Aslan https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1271-x
31. Seismic risk assessment of transportation networks for the impending Istanbul earthquake with GIS-based MCDM approach K. Alemdar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07199-y
32. A neutrosophic MACONT-LOPCOW decision support model for emergency logistics center selection during humanitarian crises Ö. Görçün et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2026.115404
33. GIS-based fuzzy MCDA approach for siting refugee camp: A case study for southeastern Turkey C. Çetinkaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.004
34. Erzurum Kentsel Yayılım Alanında Deprem Tehlikesi ve Yapısal Hasar Risk Potansiyelinin CBS Tabanlı AHP Analizine Dayalı Olarak Belirlenmesi M. Demir & N. Altaş https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1868404
35. Spatial Analysis of Earthquake Risk in Şanlıurfa City Center O. Nasanlı & D. Kejanlı https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards7020045
36. Cluster Analysis for the Study of Stress Patterns in the Vrancea-Zone (SE-Carpathians) L. Czirok et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03159-w
37. Kars kentinde deprem hasar risk potansiyeli taşıyan alanların CBS tabanlı AHP analizlerine dayalı olarak belirlenmesi M. DEMİR & N. ALTAŞ https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1375650
38. The Application of AHP to Determine the Priority Drainage System on Flood Mitigation in Surabaya – Indonesia Y. Savitri et al. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2022.p0431
39. Explainable Ensemble Learning for Rapid Seismic Damage Assessment: A Comprehensive Benchmark Using Real Data from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes C. Bıçakcı et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16132660
40. A GIS-Based Fuzzy Decision Making Model for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment in Areas with Incomplete Data M. Sadrykia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6040119
41. Identifying the Planning Priorities for Green Infrastructure within Urban Environments Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Y. Shin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135468
42. Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0642-x
43. AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making for forest sustainability of lower Himalayan foothills in northern circle, India—a case study . Anuradha & S. Gupta https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10510-0
44. Developing an open geographic data model and analysis tools for disaster management: landslide case A. Aydinoglu & M. Bilgin https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-335-2015
45. Multicriteria seismic hazard and social vulnerability assessment in the Puerto Vallarta metropolitan area, Mexico: toward a comprehensive seismic risk analysis D. Jaimes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05783-0
46. Beyond the richter scale: a fuzzy inference system approach for measuring objective earthquake risk S. Mohammadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06786-9
47. Using Dempster–Shafer theory to model earthquake events M. Mokarram et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04066-w
48. A GIS-based volcanic hazard and risk assessment of eruptions sourced within Valles Caldera, New Mexico R. Alcorn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.09.005
49. Earthquake vulnerability assessment of the built environment in the city of Srinagar, Kashmir Himalaya, using a geographic information system M. Fayaz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1593-2023
50. Investigation of GIS-based Analytical Hierarchy Process for Multi-Criteria Earthquake Risk Assessment: The Case Study of Kahramanmaras Province M. Atik & O. Safi https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1457292
51. Direct and Indirect Economic Losses Using Typhoon-Flood Disaster Analysis: An Application to Guangdong Province, China Z. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218980
52. Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kullanarak Eşen Çayı Havzası’nda Taşkın Riski Değerlendirmesi ve Haritalandırılması E. Karakoca & A. Ünver https://doi.org/10.29128/geomatik.1542251
53. Post-earthquake ignition vulnerability assessment of Küçükçekmece District S. Yildiz & H. Karaman https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3357-2013
54. Investigation of wildfire risk and its mapping using GIS-integrated AHP method: a case study over Hoshangabad Forest Division in Central India M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05225-w