55 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An integrated approach of flood risk assessment in the eastern part of Dhaka City A. Gain et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1911-7
2. A Flexible Rolling Triboelectric Nanogenerator with a Bionic Gill Cover Structure for Low‐Velocity Water Flow Energy Harvesting J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202409864
3. Flooding risk analysis: A case study of Muscat Governorate, Sultanate of Oman T. Al-Awadhi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1396441
4. Pluvial Flood Risk Assessment Tool (PFRA) for Rainwater Management and Adaptation to Climate Change in Newly Urbanised Areas S. Szewrański et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040386
5. Soft-bionic-fishtail structured triboelectric nanogenerator driven by flow-induced vibration for low-velocity water flow energy harvesting S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-4715-6
6. FloodRisk: a collaborative, free and open-source software for flood risk analysis R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1388854
7. Wildfire risk to critical infrastructure: A systematic review highlighting the need for cross-sector collaboration S. Dossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2026.100818
8. An ensemble risk assessment model for urban rainstorm disasters based on random forest and deep belief nets: a case study of Nanjing, China J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04630-y
9. Assessment of the flood damage reduction effect of climate change adaptation policies under temperature increase scenarios S. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10105-9
10. Use of management frameworks and risk assessment for flood handling in some countries: A meta-analysis D. Utami & V. Febriyanti https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012047
11. Mapping and Assessment of Flood Risk in an Urban Arid Environment: Wadi Qows Downstream Area, Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia M. Hamza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-026-01249-6
12. Hierarchical structure-based biomimetic triboelectric-electromagnetic hybrid generator for river monitoring T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.161035
13. Evaluating the Effects of Low Impact Development Practices on Urban Flooding under Different Rainfall Intensities Z. Zhu & X. Chen https://doi.org/10.3390/w9070548
14. Managing residual flood risk: Lessons learned from experiences in Taiwan H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100337
15. Importance of cost-benefit evaluation in the selection of flood control infrastructures I. García-Ledesma et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2025.2476581
16. The need for municipal action planning against flood risk: the risk-informed journey of the municipality of Oliva (Spain) J. Porta-Sancho et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2016.6849
17. Analysis of flood modeling through innovative geomatic methods S. Zazo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.011
18. HydroPredicT_Extreme: A probabilistic method for the prediction of extremal high-flow hydrological events J. Molina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127929
19. An integrated quantitative framework to support design of resilient alternatives to manage urban flood risks M. Miguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12514
20. A regenerative urban stormwater management methodology: the journey of a Mediterranean city S. Perales-Momparler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.039
21. Review article: Climate change impacts on dam safety J. Fluixá-Sanmartín et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2471-2018
22. A participatory system dynamics modeling approach to facilitate collaborative flood risk management: A case study in the Bradano River (Italy) A. Perrone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124354
23. Enhancing Low-Velocity Water Flow Energy Harvesting of Triboelectric–Electromagnetic Generator via Biomimetic-Fin Strategy and Swing-Rotation Mechanism S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01908
24. Flash Flood Risk Assessment Due to a Possible Dam Break in Urban Arid Environment, the New Um Al-Khair Dam Case Study, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia M. Hamza & A. Saegh https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021074
25. Investigation of flow-induced vibration and energy extraction of a bluff body with different immersed depths and cross section shapes T. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223422
26. Triboelectric-electromagnetic hybrid generator with bionic flapping wing and synergistic energy conversion mechanism for low-velocity water flow energy harvesting J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.174918
27. Loss of Life in River and Flash Floods in Europe: Evaluation of Deterministic Approaches and Implications for Risk Assessment D. Bekić https://doi.org/10.3390/w18091011
28. Enhancing local action planning through quantitative flood risk analysis: a case study in Spain J. Castillo-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1699-2016
29. Facing and managing natural disasters in the Sporades islands, Greece P. Karanikola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-995-2014
30. A GIS-based model to estimate flood consequences and the degree of accessibility and operability of strategic emergency response structures in urban areas R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2847-2014
31. A Study on Setting Disaster-Prevention Rainfall by Rainfall Duration in Urban Areas Considering Natural Disaster Damage: Focusing on South Korea Y. Song & M. Park https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030642
32. Macroscale impact assessment of flood damage reduction from climate change adaptation policies H. Jee et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12969
33. Beneath the surface: Exploring relationship between pluvial floods and income disparities for residential basements in Seoul, South Korea C. Vuong Tai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105501
34. Integrating LiDAR-derived DEM, rainfall radar data, and SAR imagery for 2D HEC-RAS modelling to assess the severity of pluvial flash floods induced by Storm Boris in SE Romania A. Mihu-Pintilie et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2488190
35. Convertible-dielectric triboelectric nanogenerator for chaotic water-current energy harvesting F. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.164874
36. A new framework for distributed storage tanks placement based on a resilience characteristic metric and reduced modelling M. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118098
37. Risk-informed local action planning against flooding: lessons learnt and way forward for a case study in Spain J. Castillo-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160711011
38. Bionic dragonfly staggered flapping hydrofoils triboelectric-electromagnetic hybrid generator for low-speed water flow energy harvesting L. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109783
39. A fuzzy framework for risk analysis of dam-break flood in climate change scenarios A. Goel & V. Srinivas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105322
40. Evidence-based disaster risk management: A scoping review focusing on risk, resilience and vulnerability assessment H. Tehler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100335
41. Efficient GIS-based model-driven method for flood risk management and its application in central China Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-331-2014
42. Pluvial Flash Flood Hazard and Risk Mapping in Croatia: Case Study in the Gospić Catchment N. Krvavica et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021197
43. The value of integrating information from multiple hazards for flood risk analysis and management J. Castillo-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-379-2014
44. Improving flood risk analysis for effectively supporting the implementation of flood risk management plans: The case study of “Serio” Valley R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.017
45. Implementing a Flood Vulnerability Index in urban coastal areas with industrial activity C. Giannakidou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03629-w
46. Statistical model for economic damage from pluvial floods in Japan using rainfall data and socioeconomic parameters R. Bhattarai et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1063-2016
47. A Triboelectric–Electromagnetic Hybrid Generator for Harvesting River Energy and Wind Energy for River Ecosystem Monitoring T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c02743
48. Mapping social vulnerability to floods. A comprehensive framework using a vulnerability index approach and PCA analysis I. Ajtai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110838
49. Collaborative Strategies for Sustainable EU Flood Risk Management: FOSS and Geospatial Tools—Challenges and Opportunities for Operative Risk Analysis R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4042704
50. Assessing flood and waterlogging vulnerability and community governance in urban villages in the context of climate change: A case study of 89 urban villages in Shanghai S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106377
51. Flood Hazard Assessment Supported by Reduced Cost Aerial Precision Photogrammetry S. Zazo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101566
52. Triboelectric-electromagnetic hybrid generator with Savonius flapping wing for low-velocity water flow energy harvesting J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122512
53. Flood mapping using LIDAR DEM. Limitations of the 1-D modeling highlighted by the 2-D approach P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1606-0
54. A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy) A. Sperotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150
55. Possibilities of Controlling the River Outlets by Weirs on the Example of Noteć Bystra River J. Wicher-Dysarz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062369