117 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Analysis of steel baffle installed on footing with dowels for resisting boulder impact C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106956
2. Dynamic process of a typical slope debris flow: a case study of the wujia gully, Zengda, Sichuan Province, China Y. Shunyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05194-7
3. Failure criteria of unreinforced masonry walls of rural buildings under the impact of flash floods in mountainous regions G. Si et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-022-7491-6
4. Simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow considering material entrainment N. Zhang & T. Matsushima https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.10.005
5. Analysis on the mechanism and dynamics of frequent debris flows in typical alpine gorges areas—a case study of Yizhong river in Deqin County, Yunnan, China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1418763
6. An integrated hydrodynamic model for runoff-generated debris flows with novel formulation of bed erosion and deposition X. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107310
7. Velocity effect on the impact dynamics of high-speed granular avalanches based on centrifuge modeling and DEM simulations B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119083
8. Experimental assessment of channel narrowness effects on debris-flow erosion L. Ning et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03742-6
9. Assessment of the vulnerability of buildings destroyed during postfire debris flow events in Kule village, Yajiang County, China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2717-2026
10. Preliminary Study on the Damping Effect of a Lateral Damping Buffer under a Debris Flow Load Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7020201
11. Progressive damage processes and quantitative vulnerability assessment of buildings under debris flow and mudflow impacts B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121113
12. Physics of building vulnerability to debris flows, floods and earth flows H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105611
13. Rainfall occurrence and its relation to flood damage in China from 2000 to 2015 L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-4931-4
14. Quantitative analysis of artificial dam failure effects on debris flows – A case study of the Zhouqu ‘8.8’ debris flow in northwestern China Y. Chong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148439
15. A deep learning approach to improve built asset operations and disaster management in critical events: an integrative simulation model for quicker decision making C. Galera-Zarco & G. Floros https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05247-z
16. Regional prioritisation of flood risk in mountainous areas M. Rogelis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-833-2016
17. Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain H. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7
18. Experimental Study on the Performance of Polyurethane-Steel Sandwich Structure under Debris Flow P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7101018
19. Types and causes of debris flow damage to drainage channels in the Wenchuan earthquake area J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3045-x
20. Extending the Particle Finite Element Method for sediment transport simulation N. Galano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113772
21. Lahar risk assessment from source identification to potential impact analysis: the case of Vulcano Island, Italy A. Gattuso et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-021-00107-6
22. Mechanisms of structural damage under earth mass flow impact: Insights into torsion-triggered collapse J. Jiang & P. Shen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106380
23. The kinematics of bidisperse granular roll waves S. Viroulet et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.348
24. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
25. A quantitative assessment framework for the physical vulnerability of building to subaerial landslide-induced impulse wave N. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122583
26. Numerical estimation of landslide runout flow–structure interactions: A case study of Zhengjiamo landslide Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03713-x
27. Study on Physical Vulnerability Curves of Buildings by Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.155
28. Quantifying the strength of debris flow and analyzing the vulnerability of a novel grille dam for debris flow B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06822-8
29. Development of structural type-based physical vulnerability curves to debris flow using numerical analysis and regression model J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104431
30. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
31. Assessing residential buildings vulnerability on a regional scale to rainfall–earthquake-induced landslides on Mt. Umyeon, Korea B. Nguyen & T. Nguyen https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07824-w
32. Multi-spatial scale analysis of cutting-slope houses to landslide hazard in granite regions: A case study in central China S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-48055-8
33. Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact C. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0490-0
34. Sensitivity analysis of a built environment exposed to the synthetic monophasic viscous debris flow impacts with 3-D numerical simulations X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-871-2023
35. Determination of the suspension competence of debris flows based on particle size analysis H. YANG et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60023-8
36. Impact Model for Baffle Design Resisting Granular-Flow Disasters B. Zhang & Y. Huang https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002555
37. Challenges and perspectives in designing engineering structures against debris-flow disaster Y. Huang & B. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1854126
38. Analysis of house damage and prevention strategies for cut slope house-building landslides in tectonically weak and humid hilly areas: a case study of Jiangxi Province Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02245-5
39. Demographic changes associated with rainfall-induced landslides and floods in a rural area with a declining population: A case study in Asakura City, Northern Kyushu, Japan T. Sato & Y. Shuin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100560
40. Post-eruptive lahars at Kali Putih following the 2010 eruption of Merapi volcano, Indonesia: occurrences and impacts D. Hadmoko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3396-7
41. Vulnerability to Flash Floods: A Simplified Structural Model for Masonry Buildings L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022577
42. A Semiautomatic Pixel-Object Method for Detecting Landslides Using Multitemporal ALOS-2 Intensity Images B. Adriano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030561
43. Experimental study on a debris flow water-sediment separation structure of a funnel-type grating and its sorting characteristics S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03160-0
44. The mechanisms behind shallow failures in slopes comprised of landslide deposits P. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.04.009
45. Dynamic response of buildings under debris flow impact H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8572-x
46. Developing building-damage scales for lahars: application to Merapi volcano, Indonesia S. Jenkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0961-8
47. Hazard Assessment Based on the Combination of DAN3D and Machine Learning Method for Planning Closed-Type Barriers against Debris-Flow E. Cheon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010170
48. Landslide damage incurred to buildings: A case study of Shenzhen landslide W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.025
49. Physical vulnerability assessment procedures for confined and unconfined (unreinforced) clay brick masonry buildings due to mass movements, rigid foundation A. Silva-Ceron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108091
50. Experimental study on the characteristics of a debris-flow drainage channel with an energy dissipation structure J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0860-z
51. Spatiotemporal Change Analysis and Prediction of the Great Yellow River Region (GYRR) Land Cover and the Relationship Analysis with Mountain Hazards C. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020340
52. Assessment of dynamic impact force of debris flow in mountain torrent based on characteristics of debris flow M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7707-9
53. Safeguarding cultural heritage from climate change related hydrometeorological hazards in Central Europe A. Bonazza et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102455
54. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
55. Pore pressure evolution and entrainment mechanism of convex unsaturated colluvial beds with divergent compositions under debris flow overriding P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.03.040
56. Experimental study of entrainment behavior of debris flow over channel inflexion points K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3749-6
57. Debris flow runout behaviors considering the influences of densely populated buildings S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8390-1
58. How does a cluster of buildings affect landslide mobility: a case study of the Shenzhen landslide H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01239-y
59. AI surrogate model for debris flow impact on a transmission tower using SPH–FEM simulations D. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2026.108260
60. Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
61. Reliability-based formulation of building vulnerability to debris flow impacts H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0120
62. Efficient intensity measures for vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings under flow-type and slow to moderately moving landslides M. Kulariya & S. Saha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107267
63. Two-dimensional simulation of debris flow impact pressures on buildings L. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.012
64. Debris flow volume prediction model based on back propagation neural network optimized by improved whale optimization algorithm B. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297380
65. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
66. Micro-mechanism and efficiency of baffle structure in deceleration of granular flows B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01290-x
67. An experimental study of dilute debris flow characteristics in a drainage channel with an energy dissipation structure J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.004
68. Process of building collapse caused by the Po Shan Road landslide in Hong Kong on 18 June 1972 H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01745-y
69. Progressive destruction processes and physical vulnerability of damaged buildings to the Huzhu loess flowslide in Qinghai Province, China H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02524-9
70. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
71. Physical vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings under debris avalanche impact based on GF-discrepancy and DEM-FEM J. Pu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06294-2
72. Centrifuge and DEM investigation of dry granular impacts: Effect of granular volume under high-speed impact conditions B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02219-7
73. Failure mechanism and landslide fragility of reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertain flow properties M. Kulariya & S. Saha https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2024.2337377
74. Nonlinear Simulation and Vulnerability Analysis of Masonry Structures Impacted by Flash Floods Q. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682234
75. Rapid visual screening methodology for multi-hazard vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in hilly region M. Kulariya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-02056-y
76. Sequential failure-based fragility assessment of a transmission tower under debris flows D. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121097
77. Flow–Structure Interaction Mechanism under Coriolis Conditions B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001914
78. Experimental Study on Performance of Frame Structure Strengthened with Foamed Aluminum under Debris Flow Impact Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001403
79. Debris flow vulnerability assessment in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau using integrated UAV-SLAM 3D reconstruction: Shuihaizigou Gully case study H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02715-y
80. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
81. Assessment of Building Vulnerability with Varying Distances from Outlet Considering Impact Force of Debris Flow and Building Resistance M. Kim & J. Kwak https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072021
82. Finite Element Method Simulations to Study Factors Affecting Buried Pipeline Subjected to Debris Flow W. Ying et al. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042055
83. Experimental study on the performance of CFRP-strengthened masonry structures under debris flow impacts P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.014
84. Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122240
85. Physical Vulnerability Function of Buildings Impacted by Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.133
86. Multi-Hazard Assessment of Masonry Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123711
87. Debris flow hazards for mountain regions of Russia: regional features and key events V. Perov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2841-3
88. Development of Debris flow Vulnerability Curve for Data-driven Method C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341505025
89. The Application of Numerical Simulation in Debris Flow Disaster Early Warning: A Case Study of Shiyang Gully, China H. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010181
90. Transformations in exposure to debris flows in post-earthquake Sichuan, China I. Utley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2699-2025
91. Effects of changing spatial scale on debris-flow hazard assessment: A case study in the Dadu River basin, China L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176482
92. DEM investigation of the interaction between dry granular flow and pier with coupled particle size and Froude characteristics Z. Wang & H. Zhou https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-025-01564-1
93. Progressive failure and disaster resistance performance of a prefabricated building subject to landslide impact X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.114407
94. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
95. The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2032-z
96. Numerical modeling of interactions between a flow slide and buildings considering the destruction process S. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01220-9
97. Review on key issues in centrifuge modeling of flow-structure interaction Y. Huang & B. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1762751
98. Experimental and numerical study on the performance of novel RC frame structure encased with shaped steel under debris flow impact P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110472
99. Contrast experiments on breaching characteristics of landslide dams and debris-flow dams H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0534
100. Structural fragility curves for brick-concrete buildings subjected to debris flow loading in northern China using momentum flux approach X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112344
101. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
102. The vulnerability of buildings to a large-scale debris flow and outburst flood hazard cascade that occurred on 30 August 2020 in Ganluo, southwest China L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4179-2024
103. Peak discharge amplication of debris flows in colluvial channels with varying cross-sections L. Ning et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12232-1
104. Risk Assessment of 2011 Debris Flow Hazard Area in Yongin City G. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.165
105. Fine-Grained Building Classification in Rural Areas Based on GF-7 Data M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020392
106. Investigation of boulder impact force and energy transfer for steel baffle with footing C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0271
107. A convex hull-constrained SPH-DEM model for simulating soil-rock mixture landslide dynamics W. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106426
108. Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides P. LeSueur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07736-9
109. Hazard assessment comparison of Tazhiping landslide before and after treatment using the finite-volume method D. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1611-2017
110. Multi-hazard vulnerability of buildings to debris flows H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105859
111. Automatic identification of buildings vulnerable to debris flows in Sichuan Province, China, by GIS analysis and Deep Encoding Network methods L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12830
112. Damage assessment of buildings in the Western Himalayan region under soil subsidence, debris flood, and soil erosion events occurred during 2023 monsoon season M. Kulariya & S. Saha https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02345-8
113. Critical review of existing built environment resilience frameworks: Directions for future research G. Cerѐ et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.018
114. Hazard characteristics and causes of the “7.22” 2021 debris flow in Shenshuicao gully, Qilian Mountains, NW China Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01992-7
115. Damage Model and the Influence Factors of Mitigation Engineering against Glacial Debris Flow in the Parlung River Basin, SE Tibetan Plateau M. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061098
116. Model tests of the failure behaviors of buildings under the impact of granular flow L. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02372-z
117. Numerical study of retention efficiency of a flexible barrier in mitigating granular flow comparing with large-scale physical modeling test data D. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-01036-1