140 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Reconstruction of the 1374 Rhine river flood event around Cologne region using 1D-2D coupled hydraulic modelling approach H. Ngo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129039
2. Review of literature on decision support systems for natural hazard risk reduction: Current status and future research directions J. Newman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.042
3. The influence of climate change on flood risks in France – first estimates and uncertainty analysis P. Dumas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-809-2013
4. Multi-scale spatial sensitivity analysis of a model for economic appraisal of flood risk management policies N. Saint-Geours et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.012
5. How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk? A. Metin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018
6. Tales of future weather W. Hazeleger et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2450
7. Development of an Asset Value Map for Disaster Risk Assessment in China by Spatial Disaggregation Using Ancillary Remote Sensing Data J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12806
8. Dominant flood generating mechanisms across the United States W. Berghuijs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068070
9. From climate research to climate compatible development: experiences and progress in the Netherlands J. Veraart et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0567-7
10. Dynamic maps of human exposure to floods based on mobile phone data M. Balistrocchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3485-2020
11. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1731-2014
12. Rainstorm Flood Risk Assessment of Urban Metro System in Different Operating Periods: A Case Study of the Central Urban Area of Tianjin, China X. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2102
13. A Cost Efficiency Analysis of Flood Proofing Measures for Hydraulic Risk Mitigation in an Urbanized Riverine Area U. Ventimiglia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092395
14. Efficient pan-European river flood hazard modelling through a combination of statistical and physical models D. Paprotny et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1267-2017
15. Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5
16. Contribution of land use changes to future flood damage along the river Meuse in the Walloon region A. Beckers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2301-2013
17. Benchmark wealth capital stock estimations across China's 344 prefectures: 1978 to 2012 J. WU et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.10.008
18. A flood risk assessment to municipal infrastructure due to changing climate part I: methodology E. Bowering et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2012.758293
19. Climatically Induced Levee Break and Flood Risk Management of the Gorakhpur Region, Rapti River Basin, Ganga Plain, India D. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-015-0195-6
20. Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study of Fuzhou City, China J. Lian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-679-2013
21. Multiscale flood risk assessment under climate change: the case of the Miño River in the city of Ourense, Spain D. Fernández-Nóvoa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3957-2022
22. Spatio-temporal analysis of present and future precipitation responses over South Germany S. Paparrizos et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2017.009
23. Disaster Management Dynamics – An Analysis of Chaos from the Flash Flood (2013) in the Fragile Himalayan System R. Sen & S. Chakrabarti https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-019-1180-2
24. Perspective-taking with affected others to promote climate change mitigation A. Koessler et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1225165
25. First look at changes in flood hazard in the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project ensemble R. Dankers et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302078110
26. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
27. Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007
28. Development of a Preliminary-Risk-Based Flood Management Approach to Address the Spatiotemporal Distribution of Risk under the Kaldor–Hicks Compensation Principle M. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249045
29. Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC R. Lasage et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1441-2014
30. Destructive Flooding Induced by Broken Embankments along Linbian Creek, Taiwan, during Typhoon Morakot T. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001069
31. Mapping ecosystem services: The supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe J. Stürck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.010
32. Influence of flood risk characteristics on flood insurance demand: a comparison between Germany and the Netherlands I. Seifert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1691-2013
33. Analysis of flood damage and influencing factors in urban catchments: case studies in Manila, Philippines, and Jakarta, Indonesia M. Kefi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04281-5
34. China’s Wealth Capital Stock Mapping via Machine Learning Methods L. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030689
35. The role of spatial dependence for large-scale flood risk estimation A. Metin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-967-2020
36. LOSS OF LIFE ESTIMATION IN FUTURE FLOOD CONSIDERING CLIMATE CHANGE, DEPOPULATION AND AGING POPULATION D. MATSUI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.23-16070
37. Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data S. Muis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
38. A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
39. River flooding risk prevention: A cooperative game theory approach X. Álvarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109284
40. A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1265-6
41. RegioFEM — Applying a floodplain evaluation method to support a future‐oriented flood risk management (Part II) M. Eder et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12758
42. Assessing potential future urban heat island patterns following climate scenarios, socio-economic developments and spatial planning strategies E. Koomen & V. Diogo https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9646-z
43. Economic evaluation of agricultural land to assess land use changes E. Ustaoglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.020
44. Investigation of the role of land use method on increased flood vulnerability in rural areas: a case study on Güneysu River, Turkey C. Melisa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05627-w
45. A Brief Introduction to the Concept of Return Period for Univariate Variables R. Vezzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195426
46. Rhine flood stories: Spatio‐temporal analysis of historic and projected flood genesis in the Rhine River basin E. Rottler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14918
47. Projections of Future Extreme Weather Losses Under Changes in Climate and Exposure L. Bouwer https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01880.x
48. A combined hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach for the flood hazard mapping of the Po river basin R. Nogherotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12755
49. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
50. A partition of the combined impacts of socioeconomic development and climate variation on economic risks of riverine floods Y. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12508
51. Hydrodynamics-based assessment of flood losses in an urban district under changing environments X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06792-x
52. An indicator set for capturing long-term open space fragmentation and urban development dynamics A. Wagtendonk & E. Koomen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.04.007
53. Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
54. Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12151
55. Mapping social vulnerability to floods. A comprehensive framework using a vulnerability index approach and PCA analysis I. Ajtai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110838
56. Estimating changes in flood risks and benefits of non-structural adaptation strategies - a case study from Tyrol, Austria A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9602-3
57. RegioFEM– Informing future‐oriented flood risk management at the regional scale (Part I) L. Löschner et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12754
58. Modelling and quantifying tomorrow's risks from natural hazards G. Cremen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152552
59. An integrated and transferable climate change vulnerability assessment for regional application A. Holsten & J. Kropp https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0147-z
60. Biases in national and continental flood risk assessments by ignoring spatial dependence V. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76523-2
61. Historical development and future outlook of the flood damage potential of residential areas in the Alpine Lech Valley (Austria) between 1971 and 2030 H. Cammerer & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0407-9
62. ESTIMATION OF POTENTIAL DAMAGE COST ON FLOOD AND STORM SURGE DISASTERS UNDER SAME RETURN PERIOD M. AKIMA et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.72.I_1267
63. A Review of Driving Factors, Scenarios, and Topics in Urban Land Change Models Y. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080246
64. Adaptation turning points on inland waterway transport in the Rhine River M. Riquelme-Solar et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.091
65. Global warming to increase flood risk on European railways P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02434-5
66. Promoting flood risk reduction: The role of insurance in Germany and England S. Surminski & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000587
67. Application of re/insurance models to estimate increases in flood risk due to climate change J. Thistlethwaite et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-018-0101-9
68. Increasing flood exposure in the Netherlands: implications for risk financing B. Jongman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1245-2014
69. A high-resolution global flood hazard model C. Sampson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016954
70. Analyse diachronique de la vulnérabilité par l’évaluation des dommages potentiels : quels enjeux dans le temps ? C. Heitz  et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.23419
71. Up-scaling of impact dependent loss distributions: a hybrid convolution approach for flood risk in Europe S. Hochrainer-Stigler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0885-6
72. Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios L. Alfieri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004
73. GIS and remote sensing techniques for the assessment of land use change impact on flood hydrology: the case study of Yialias basin in Cyprus D. Alexakis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-413-2014
74. Evaluating the effectiveness of the city master plan in regulating future urban spatial growth of Varanasi city, India A. Rai et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1649418
75. Evaluation of Climate Driven Simulations of Po River Flow from 1971 to 2000 Through Flow-Duration Curve Indices: Preliminary Results R. Vezzoli et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2491404
76. Influence of climate change and socio-economic development on catastrophe insurance: a case study of flood risk scenarios in the Netherlands Y. Paudel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0736-3
77. Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach B. Jongman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012
78. Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation R. Rojas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006
79. Modeling multivariate landscape affordances and functional ecosystem connectivity in landscape archeology M. Kempf https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01127-w
80. Quantitative micro-scale flood risk assessment in a section of the Trotuș River, Romania R. Țîncu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.040
81. Process‐Based Flood Risk Assessment for Germany N. Sairam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002259
82. Ranking sources of uncertainty in flood damage modelling: a case study on the cost‐benefit analysis of a flood mitigation project in the Orb Delta, France N. Saint‐Geours et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12068
83. Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe L. Alfieri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1401-2016
84. Flood risk assessment for delta mega-cities: a case study of Jakarta Y. Budiyono et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1327-9
85. Impacts of rainfall variability and expected rainfall changes on cost-effective adaptation of water systems to climate change T. van der Pol et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.016
86. Designing a flood-risk education program in the Netherlands A. Bosschaart et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1130013
87. Analysis and assessment of urban flash floods on areas with limited available altimetry data (Arouca, NW Portugal): a methodological approach I. Marafuz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3943-9
88. FLOPROS: an evolving global database of flood protection standards P. Scussolini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1049-2016
89. Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston Y. Kim & G. Newman https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041048
90. Climate change adaptation and Integrated Water Resource Management in the water sector F. Ludwig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.010
91. Progress and landscape of disaster science: Insights from computational analyses M. Yazdani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104536
92. On the role of floodplain storage and hydrodynamic interactions in flood risk estimation M. Farrag et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2030058
93. Satellite nighttime lights reveal increasing human exposure to floods worldwide S. Ceola et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061859
94. Large-scale flood risk assessment under different development strategies: the Luanhe River Basin in China J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01034-6
95. Low‐Probability Flood Risk Modeling for New York City J. Aerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12008
96. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
97. Risk management of extreme events under climate change X. Yuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.209
98. Floodplains along the Danube River evaluated with the Floodplain Evaluation Matrix (FEM) determining their importance for flood protection, ecology, and socio-economics M. Eder et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06788-7
99. Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives Z. Kundzewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
100. Structural and functional response of methane‐consuming microbial communities to different flooding regimes in riparian soils P. Bodelier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.34
101. When nature frowns: A comprehensive impact assessment of the 2012 Babessi floods on people’s livelihoods in rural Cameroon R. Balgah et al. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v7i1.197
102. Flood Risk Assessment, Future Trend Modeling, and Risk Communication: A Review of Ongoing Research A. Salman & Y. Li https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000294
103. A Critical Review of Flood Risk Management and the Selection of Suitable Measures M. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238752
104. Advancing scenario planning through integrating urban growth prediction with future flood risk models Y. Kim & G. Newman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101498
105. Drivers of flood risk change in residential areas F. Elmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1641-2012
106. Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3455-2012
107. Scientific knowledge use and addressing uncertainties about climate change and ecosystem functioning in the Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt estuaries J. Veraart et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.009
108. Simulation of post-volcanic eruption time variant land use and economic impacts in the Auckland region of New Zealand R. Cardwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-01400-9
109. Assessing the probability of large‐scale flood loss events: a case study for the river Rhine, Germany A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12091
110. How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impacts H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1558367
111. How reliable are projections of future flood damage? P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-3293-2011
112. Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
113. Perspectives on Open Access High Resolution Digital Elevation Models to Produce Global Flood Hazard Layers C. Sampson et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00085
114. Modelling flood damages under climate change conditions – a case study for Germany F. Hattermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3151-2014
115. Improving hydrological climate impact assessments using multirealizations from a global climate model F. Sperna Weiland et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12787
116. How Probable Is Widespread Flooding in the United States? M. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028096
117. Uncertainty and sensitivity of flood risk calculations for a dike ring in the south of the Netherlands H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.015
118. Degrading flood regulation function of river systems in the urbanization process X. Deng & Y. Xu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.088
119. Living Behind Dikes: Mimicking Flooding Experiences R. Zaalberg & C. Midden https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01868.x
120. Floods in a Changing Climate T. Andersen & J. Marshall Shepherd https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12025
121. Predicting future urban growth scenarios and potential urban flood exposure using Artificial Neural Network-Markov Chain model in Miami Metropolitan Area S. Rifat & W. Liu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105994
122. Profiling urban vulnerabilities to climate change: An indicator-based vulnerability assessment for European cities C. Tapia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040
123. Water Resources of Belarus under Changing Climate Conditions: Current Status and Prognosis А. Volchak & I. Bulskaya https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0231-1
124. Vulnerability and impact assessment of extreme climatic event: A case study of southern Punjab, Pakistan A. Aslam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.155
125. Climate change impact on river flow extremes in the Upper Blue Nile River basin H. Meresa & M. Gatachew https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.154
126. An integrated global model of local urban development and population change E. Koomen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101935
127. Late Holocene flood magnitudes in the Lower Rhine river valley and upper delta resolved by a two‐dimensional hydraulic modelling approach B. van der Meulen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5071
128. Spatio-temporal dynamics in the flood exposure due to land use changes in the Alpine Lech Valley in Tyrol (Austria) H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0280-8
129. A Flood Risk Assessment of Quang Nam, Vietnam Using Spatial Multicriteria Decision Analysis C. Luu & J. Von Meding https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040461
130. Estimation of river flood damages in Jakarta, Indonesia P. Wijayanti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2730-1
131. A joint probability approach using a 1-D hydrodynamic model for estimating high water level frequencies in the Lower Rhine Delta H. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1841-2013
132. Assessment of urban vulnerability towards floods using an indicator-based approach – a case study for Santiago de Chile A. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
133. Effect of spatial adaptation measures on flood risk: study of coastal floods in Belgium E. Koks et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0514-7
134. Flood risk mapping for direct damage to residential buildings in Quebec, Canada K. Oubennaceur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.09.007
135. How are flood risk estimates affected by the choice of return-periods? P. Ward et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-3181-2011
136. Estimating the economic loss caused by earthquake in Mainland China Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103708
137. Assessment of the flash flood potential of Bâsca River Catchment (Romania) based on physiographic factors G. Minea https://doi.org/10.2478/s13533-012-0137-4
138. Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01151.x
139. Geospatial technology for flood hazard analysis in Comal Watershed, Central Java, Indonesia Y. Wibowo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1039/1/012027
140. Integrated Hydro-Hazard Index (HHI) for Drought-Flood Risk Assessment: A Multi-Temporal Machine Learning Approach N. Buasri et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18147448