the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Analysis of landslide and mudflow scenarios in loess and clay soils that caused tragic incidents in Uzbekistan
Rustam Niyazov
Ibragim Uralov
Fazliddin Anorboyev
Abstract. The article describes real landslides occurred in Uzbekistan, divided into two groups. The first group is about landslides that caused accidents, where the separation zone, the form of movement, blockages and the nature of the destruction of residential buildings are considered. These are landslides of a one-time separation, rectilinearly directed and covering residential buildings; liquefaction landslides that demolish or overwhelm buildings located in the lower part of the slope; mud streams moving along the channel of the brook, transferring to the opposite side and flooding the buildings located in the floodplain of the brook. The second group is about landslides that block the riverbeds and form blockages of transverse and longitudinal shape. Scenarios for the formation and erosion of blockages, the height of blockages in loess and clayey rocks, the parameters of dammed lakes, and the places of debris erosion are considered.
- Preprint
(1945 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Rustam Niyazov et al.
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on nhess-2023-110', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Aug 2023
reply
Dear colleagues,
as such the manuscript cannot be accepted for publication, as
1) first, a general English review is necessary;
2) second, maps locating the landslide events should be included;
3) a more general introduction would be needed to link those events to types of scenarios described in literature
(and for sure, a much vaster and more general referencing is needed - as such, the manuscript looks like a local report).
4) right now, the manuscript is far too descriptive, more analysis of involved processes, applied methods is needed.
5) finally, a basic paper structure should be followed: introduction, Methods, Data-Results, Discussion-Conclusions.
So, my main recommendation is to get some external colleague involved (eg project partners of this Special Issue),
to improve the paper (50% has to be rewritten!).
Sincerely yours
Reviewer H
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-110-RC1
Rustam Niyazov et al.
Rustam Niyazov et al.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 32 | 10 | 204 | 6 | 7 |
- HTML: 162
- PDF: 32
- XML: 10
- Total: 204
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1