Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-1-73-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhessd-1-73-2013
29 Jan 2013
 | 29 Jan 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal NHESS but the revision was not accepted.

Comparing multi-criteria methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Chania Prefecture, Crete Island, Greece

M. Kouli, C. Loupasakis, P. Soupios, D. Rozos, and F. Vallianatos

Abstract. In this work, two multi-criteria methods, an expert-based, semi-quantitative, relative weighting – rating approach, the weighted linear combination (WLC) and a quantitative, statistical method, the weights of evidence (WoE) approach were applied for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in the Chania Prefecture of Crete Island, Greece. Several thematic maps representing various landslide casual factors, such as geological formations, faults proximity, elevation, slope gradient, aspect and curvature, rivers proximity, precipitation, roads proximity and land use types; have been generated in a GIS environment. Two landslide susceptibility maps were created; one for each method. The maps were compared and validated using the success rate curve (SRC) analysis. The resulting landslide susceptibility maps have uncertainties introduced due to the subjective knowledge of experts in the case of WLC method and to the quality of the recorded landslides sample in the case of the WoE method. Both approaches produced almost equally accurate maps with the WoE method to produce slightly superior predictions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Kouli, C. Loupasakis, P. Soupios, D. Rozos, and F. Vallianatos
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Kouli, C. Loupasakis, P. Soupios, D. Rozos, and F. Vallianatos
M. Kouli, C. Loupasakis, P. Soupios, D. Rozos, and F. Vallianatos

Viewed

Total article views: 2,363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,128 930 305 2,363 134 113
  • HTML: 1,128
  • PDF: 930
  • XML: 305
  • Total: 2,363
  • BibTeX: 134
  • EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics