92 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. National risk registers: Security scientism and the propagation of permanent insecurity J. Hagmann & M. Cavelty https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611430436
2. Diachronic quantitative snow avalanche risk assessment as a function of forest cover changes T. Zgheib et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2022.103
3. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
4. Avalanche protection by forests — A choice experiment in the Swiss Alps R. Olschewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.002
5. An integrated method for assessing vulnerability of buildings caused by debris flows in mountainous areas C. Qiu & X. Geng https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-709-2025
6. Integrated Approach for Landslide Risk Assessment Using Geoinformation Tools and Field Data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043102
7. Recent Slovak flood protection relative to integrated flood risk management Ľ. Solín https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2015.1022868
8. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
9. MurGame: Protect your village from debris flows! C. Berger et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341507002
10. Monitoring of torrent control structures: An integrated approach from first‐level inspections to maintenance strategies A. Cislaghi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13011
11. Integrating spatial, temporal, and size probabilities for the annual landslide hazard maps in the Shihmen watershed, Taiwan C. Wu & S. Chen https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2353-2013
12. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
13. Evaluating targeted heuristics for vulnerability assessment in flood impact model chains A. Zischg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12736
14. Cost‐Benefit Analysis for Optimization of Risk Protection Under Budget Constraints O. Špačková & D. Straub https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12310
15. The Swiss flood and landslide damage database: Normalisation and trends N. Andres & A. Badoux https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12510
16. Brief communication: On direct impact probability of landslides on vehicles P. Nicolet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-995-2016
17. The Economic Evaluation of Forest Protection Service Against Rockfall: A Review of Experiences and Approaches E. Bianchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.021
18. Identifying spatial clusters of flood exposure to support decision making in risk management V. Röthlisberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.216
19. Individual risk evaluation for landslides: key details A. Strouth & S. McDougall https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01838-8
20. Social integration matters: factors influencing natural hazard risk preparedness—a survey of Swiss households E. Maidl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04381-2
21. Multiple hazards and residential rents in Switzerland: Who pays the price of extreme natural events? F. Blok & F. Fuerst https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108485
22. Societal risk evaluation for landslides: historical synthesis and proposed tools A. Strouth & S. McDougall https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01547-8
23. Wildfire, Environmental Risk and Deliberative Planning in the Locarnese Region of Switzerland A. Bardsley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01523-5
24. Internal communication a prerequisite for risk governance: hazard zone planning in South Tyrol, Italy S. Link & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.993580
25. Understanding geomorphological hazard in Watumalang Area post Bisma volcanic era. Denudational or multihazard? A. Ashari https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/271/1/012006
26. Definitions and Concepts for Quantitative Rockfall Hazard and Risk Analysis D. Hantz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11040158
27. Education in the Forest to Support Learning about Socio-Ecological Risk D. Bardsley https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2026.10138
28. The Total Cost of Hydrological Disasters S. Balbi https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2075996
29. The trend of heatwave events in the Northern Hemisphere W. Qiu & X. Yan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102855
30. Review article: A systematic review and future prospects of flood vulnerability indices L. Moreira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1513-2021
31. Assessment of Moscow population vulnerability to natural and technogenic hazards S. Badina & R. Babkin https://doi.org/10.35595/2414-9179-2021-4-27-184-201
32. Constitution of a multicentennial multirisk database in a mountainous environment from composite sources: the example of the Vallouise-Pelvoux municipality (Ecrins, France) L. Dallons Thanneur et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4881-2025
33. Forecasting rock slope failure: how reliable and effective are warning systems? M. Sättele et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0605-2
34. Integrating the mitigating effect of forests into quantitative rockfall risk analysis – Two case studies in Switzerland C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.036
35. Infrastructure Impact Assessment through Multi-Hazard Analysis at Different Scales: The 26 November 2022 Flood Event on the Island of Ischia and Debris Management S. Cappucci et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040500
36. ASFORESEE: A Harmonized Model for Economic Evaluation of Forest Protection against Rockfall C. Accastello et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10070578
37. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
38. Avalanche protection by forests — A choice experiment in the Swiss Alps R. Olschewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.016
39. Method for Rockfall Risk Quantification and Optimal Arrangement of Protection Structures at the Regional Scale H. Kanno et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4169415
40. Deriving and assessing forest gap thresholds to prevent shallow landslides in Swiss mountain forests A. Bast et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123589
41. Using RISKPLAN for Earthquake Risk Assessment in Sichuan Province, China Y. Shi & K. Seeland https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061812
42. A method for rockfall risk quantification and optimal arrangement of protection structures along a road H. Kanno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107004
43. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
44. Economic valuation of ecosystem-based rockfall risk reduction considering disturbances and comparison to structural measures C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134077
45. Assessing road network risk performance in the United States: A standardized spatial risk analysis D. Rivera-Royero & M. Jaller https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105418
46. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.011
47. Selection of representative natural hazard scenarios for engineering systems H. Rosero‐Velásquez & D. Straub https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3743
48. Using trajectory modeling for delineation and valuation of protection forests against rockfalls and landslides E. Marras et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107932
49. A Fuzzy-AHP Methodology for Planning the Risk Management of Natural Hazards in Surface Mining Projects P. Spanidis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042369
50. Application of InSAR and Gravimetry for Land Subsidence Hazard Zoning in Aguascalientes, Mexico J. Pacheco-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215868
51. An investigation of coastal climate change risk assessment practice in Australia F. Tonmoy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.003
52. The MultiRISK platform: The technical concept and application of a regional-scale multihazard exposure analysis tool M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.01.024
53. A comparison of building value models for flood risk analysis V. Röthlisberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2431-2018
54. KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 2: Application to the Zurich case study P. Ronco et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1561-2015
55. On the correlation between the forecast avalanche danger and avalanche risk taken by backcountry skiers in Switzerland K. Winkler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103299
56. Assessing the effect of invasive tree species on rockfall risk – The case of Ailanthus altissima C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.03.001
57. Effectiveness of mitigation measures against natural hazards S. Margreth & H. Romang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.04.013
58. Physical vulnerability evaluation of buildings exposed to Balia Nala landslide using indicator-based approach and GIS: a case study of Nainital town, Uttarakhand, India H. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09742-8
59. Annual landslide risk and effectiveness of risk reduction measures in Shihmen watershed, Taiwan S. Chen & C. Wu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0588-z
60. Landslide impacts in Germany: A historical and socioeconomic perspective M. Klose et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0643-9
61. Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning M. Sättele et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.003
62. The New Zealand Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Model: development and implementation of a methodology for estimating tsunami hazard nationwide W. Power et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP456.6
63. State-of-the-art on ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: The case of gravity-driven natural hazards in the Alpine region F. Poratelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101929
64. Avalanche risk evaluation and protective dam optimal design using extreme value statistics P. FAVIER et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.64
65. Cost-benefit methodology for road slope stabilisation E. Robson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101282
66. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
67. Quantifying the influence of avalanche release volume on runout probability: A case study of a mountain road section S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2025.104734
68. A review of landslide acceptable risk and tolerable risk K. Sim et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-022-00205-6
69. An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean E. Holcombe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7
70. Spatial Diagnosis of Rain Gauges’ Distribution and Flood Impacts: Case Study in Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro—Brazil P. Campos & I. Paz https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041120
71. Upgrading of an index-oriented methodology for consequence analysis of natural hazards: application to the Upper Guil catchment (southern French Alps) B. Carlier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018
72. Assessment of rock mass erosion in unlined spillways using developed vulnerability and fragility functions A. Saeidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1660796
73. Holistic geoethical slope portfolio risk assessment F. Oboni & C. Oboni https://doi.org/10.1144/SP508-2019-157
74. A risk analysis for floods and lahars: case study in the Cordillera Central of Colombia M. Künzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0271-9
75. Regional Emigration—China’s New Approach to Geo-Disaster Mitigation H. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-024-0036-x
76. Neglecting property-level flood risk adaptation measures lead to overestimation in flood risk analysis – An empirical study N. Rindsfüser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105326
77. One and a half century of avalanche risk to settlements in the upper Maurienne valley inferred from land cover and socio-environmental changes. T. Zgheib et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102149
78. Building vulnerability to hydro-geomorphic hazards: Estimating damage probability from qualitative vulnerability assessment using logistic regression S. Ettinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.017
79. Quantitative risk and optimal design approaches in the snow avalanche field: Review and extensions N. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.03.003
80. Quantifying the effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards M. Sättele et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-149-2016
81. A Novel Multi-Risk Assessment Web-Tool for Evaluating Future Impacts of Global Change in Mountainous Areas G. Grandjean et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6040092
82. Managing protection in torrential mountain watersheds: A new conceptual integrated decision-aiding framework S. Carladous et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.040
83. Impact of climate change on snow avalanche activity in the Swiss Alps S. Mayer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5495-2024
84. Large-scale risk assessment on snow avalanche hazard in alpine regions G. Ortner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2089-2023
85. Comprehensive risk management of reservoir landslide-tsunami hazard chains: a case study of the Liangshuijing landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02283-z
86. Magnitude and frequency relations: are there geological constraints to the rockfall size? J. Corominas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0910-z
87. Flood exposure analysis of road infrastructure – Comparison of different methods at national level T. Papilloud et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101548
88. Assessing the rock failure return period on an unstable Alpine rock wall based on volume-frequency relationships: The Brenva Spur (3916 m a.s.l., Aosta Valley, Italy) L. Fei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107239
89. Sensitivity of avalanche risk to vulnerability relations P. Favier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.08.009
90. Respective impacts of global warming, permafrost thaw and urban sprawl on debris-flow risk: Insights from the Dorfbach Torrent, Swiss Alps G. da Silva Correia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110086
91. Quantitative assessment of physical fragility of buildings to the debris flow on 20 August 2019 in the Cutou gully, Wenchuan, southwestern China M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106319
92. Koliko Slovenijo stanejo naravne nesreče? B. Komac https://doi.org/10.3986/GV93102