117 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Disaster learning through a map-based mobile application: an evaluation of its readability and user satisfaction K. Sari et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/592/1/012004
2. Impacts of hazard maps on individual reaction? Results from a case study in South Tyrol, Italy L. Pedoth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105803
3. Internal communication a prerequisite for risk governance: hazard zone planning in South Tyrol, Italy S. Link & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.993580
4. Assessing flood hazard using flood marks and analytic hierarchy process approach: a case study for the 2013 flood event in Quang Nam, Vietnam C. Luu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3083-0
5. Establishing information seeking pathways in slow and flash floods B. Ryan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.005
6. Does Information Pattern Affect Risk Perception of Food Safety? A National Survey in China G. Han & Y. Liu https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091935
7. Building hazard maps with differentiated risk perception for flood impact assessment P. Bhola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2647-2020
8. Analysis of a risk prevention document using dependability techniques: a first step towards an effectiveness model L. Ferrer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1201-2018
9. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evaluating the effectiveness of maps for delivering wildfire warning information Y. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.012
10. Dots versus density: the impact of crime mapping techniques on perception of safety, police performance and neighbourhood quality K. Wuschke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1874950
11. The Influence of Hazard Maps and Trust of Flood Controls on Coastal Flood Spatial Awareness and Risk Perception D. Houston et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517748711
12. An Integrated Approach for Monitoring and Information Management of the Guanling Landslide (China) W. Hou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6030079
13. Flood Maps in the Czech Republic: Content, Perception and Information value K. Klemešová et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160710006
14. Study on effectiveness of flood control based on risk level: case study of Kampung Melayu Village and Bukit Duri Village M. Farid et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710105003
15. Evaluation of web maps for the communication of flood risks to the public in Europe M. Van Kerkvoorde et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1371411
16. Effective flood risk visualisation S. Percival et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04173-8
17. The Evaluation of a Large-Scale Flood-Fighting Exercise: Capacity Development of Flood Fighting in Mie Prefecture, Japan T. Tokioka & J. Kawaguchi https://doi.org/10.3390/w17111564
18. Operational framework for flood risk communication E. Intrieri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101510
19. An empirical analysis of learning and forgetting mechanisms in repeated evacuations: A panel recursive logit approach S. Masuda & M. Ikegai https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2024.2422366
20. Difficulties in explaining complex issues with maps: evaluating seismic hazard communication – the Swiss case M. Marti et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2677-2019
21. Solidarity in transboundary flood risk management: A view from the Dutch North Rhine–Westphalian catchment area M. Van Eerd et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1075376
22. A Review of the Philosophy of Flood Risk Communication and Education: New Insights Informed by Critical Complexity T. Lutz https://doi.org/10.3390/w16233459
23. Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps D. Henstra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
24. Communication of Statistics and Evidence in Times of Crisis C. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040722-052011
25. Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication E. Maidl & M. Buchecker https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015
26. Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan G. Roder et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2100-4
27. Co-Producing the Maryland Coastal Flood Explorer: A Collaborative Approach to User-Informed Flood Risk Visualization T. Sudol et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-026-01743-0
28. Mapping the Global Evolution and Research Directions of Information Seeking, Sharing and Communication in Disasters: A Bibliometric Study H. Tan & Y. Hao https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214878
29. How to Enhance Cartographic Visualisations of Natural Hazards Assessment Results M. Kunz & L. Hurni https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277411Y.0000000001
30. Developing and pilot-testing warning messages for risk communication in natural disasters G. Ortiz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-023-09924-z
31. Taşkın Risk Yönetiminde Sosyal Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi ve Doğu Karadeniz Havzası için Risk Algısı Yönetim Önerisi T. Anılan et al. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1360768
32. Modeling spatiotemporal patterns of building vulnerability and content evacuations before a riverine flood disaster S. Hubbard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.05.006
33. The contribution of maps to the challenges of risk communication to the public D. Dransch et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538941003774668
34. A Web Service ecosystem for high-quality, cost-effective debris-flow hazard assessment G. Rosatti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.017
35. An on-demand construction method of disaster scenes for multilevel users W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03879-z
36. Using virtual simulations of future extreme weather events to communicate climate change risk T. van Gevelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000112
37. Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and 2-D modelling for 3-D flood hazard maps in urban areas: new opportunities and perspectives P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104889
38. Three-dimensional virtual representation for the whole process of dam-break floods from a geospatial storytelling perspective W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2118877
39. Evaluating Digital Map Utilization and Interpretation Skills of Students H. Yamauchi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14020076
40. Visualization of uncertainty in natural hazards assessments using an interactive cartographic information system M. Kunz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9864-y
41. Land-use simulation as a supporting tool for flood risk assessment and coastal safety planning: The case of the Belgian coast F. Canters et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.07.018
42. Does updating natural hazard maps to reflect best practices increase viewer comprehension of risk? C. MacPherson-Krutsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101487
43. Lessons Learned From the Higher Risk Perception and the Efficient Flood Mitigation in Haji-Abad, Golestan Province, Iran, 2019 M. Heidari et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.14
44. Conveying Flood Hazard Risk Through Spatial Modeling: A Case Study for Hurricane Sandy-Affected Communities in Northern New Jersey F. Artigas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0731-1
45. Information as Intervention: How Hurricane Risk Communication Interacted with Vulnerability and Capacities in Superstorm Sandy H. Lazrus et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072702003800106
46. Criteria-based visualization design for hazard maps M. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2505-2023
47. Communication-related vulnerability at the last mile: a mechanism-based framework A. Hamidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106328
48. Flood Risk Evaluation in Urban Spaces: The Study Case of Tormes River (Salamanca, Spain) M. Criado et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010005
49. Improving intuitiveness in geoscience hazard maps: a web-based experiment supporting governmental map development A. Bang-Kittilsen & T. Midtbø https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2024.2314541
50. Urban Population Flood Impact Applied to a Warsaw Scenario J. Nowak Da Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10060062
51. Enhanced Urban Flood Monitoring: Integrating Advanced Semantic Segmentation and Human Facial Feature and Posture Analysis B. Nair et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3513239
52. Integrated vulnerability mapping for wards in Mid-Norway J. Rød et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.685879
53. Flood vulnerability assessment using data envelopment analysis – the case of Narmada river basin districts in central India S. Pathak et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.063
54. Risikokommunikation in der Hochwasserrisikomanagementrichtlinie der EU — eine Evaluation von Maßnahmen der öffentlichkeitsarbeit M. Hagemeier-Klose & K. Wagner https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03251342
55. Study on the Efficient Cognition of Disaster Prevention Signs for Library Buildings Y. Chen & L. Niu https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.811.319
56. How does your viewing perspective matter for decision-making with flood risk maps?* F. Kuster et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2268502
57. Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review C. Dieperink et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
58. Communicating complex forecasts: an analysis of the approach in Nepal's flood early warning system M. Budimir et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-49-2020
59. Research on the Hierarchical Design of Disaster Prevention Sign System for Library Buildings Y. Chen & L. Niu https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.438-439.1873
60. Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: a gap between theory and practice? C. Höppner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0356-5
61. How presentation format affects the interpretation of probabilistic flood risk information A. Strathie et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12152
62. A One-Way Coupled Hydrodynamic Advection-Diffusion Model to Simulate Congested Large Wood Transport E. Persi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8010021
63. Residential Location and Psychological Distance in Americans’ Risk Views and Behavioral Intentions Regarding Zika Virus B. Johnson https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13184
64. Milling and Public Warnings M. Wood et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517709561
65. Using maps to communicate environmental exposures and health risks: Review and best-practice recommendations D. Stieb et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.049
66. Rethinking flood risk communication E. Rollason et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3273-4
67. An opportunity missed is an opportunity lost. Flood maps and their (non-)utilization by local government bodies in the Czech Republic K. Klemešová et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0011
68. Impact of the Rainfall Duration and Temporal Rainfall Distribution Defined Using the Huff Curves on the Hydraulic Flood Modelling Results N. Bezak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020069
69. Zielgruppenspezifische Darstellung von Hochwassergefahren und -risiko M. Wenk et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-018-0470-z
70. Changing your perspective: the impact of different visualisation methods on seismic hazard maps Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2023-0123
71. Towards democratized flood risk management: An advanced AI assistant enabled by GPT-4 for enhanced interpretability and public engagement R. Martelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106821
72. “We’re Just Sitting Ducks”: Recurrent Household Flooding as An Underreported Environmental Health Threat in Detroit’s Changing Climate N. Sampson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010006
73. Mapping the geography of disease: A comparison of epidemiologists' and field-level experts' disease maps G. Enticott et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102356
74. Moving to 3-D flood hazard maps for enhancing risk communication F. Macchione et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.005
75. Flood Risk Communication Using ArcGIS StoryMaps K. Oubennaceur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8040152
76. Using community-based flood maps to explain flood hazards in Northland, New Zealand W. Auliagisni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100229
77. Mapping of transportation noise-induced health risks as an alternative tool for risk communication with local residents F. Selamat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.107987
78. Simulating and Communicating Outcomes in Disaster Management Situations M. Lichter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4041827
79. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness and Communication on Real Estate Investment Decision-Making A. Oyetunji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387868
80. River restoration: not only for the sake of nature but also for saving money while addressing flood risk. A decision‐making framework applied to the Chiese River (Po basin, Italy) A. Nardini & S. Pavan https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01132.x
81. Implications of Simulating Global Digital Elevation Models for Flood Inundation Studies L. Hawker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023279
82. FloodSafeHome: evaluating financial benefits and savings of freeboard for improved decision-making in flood risk mitigation C. Friedland et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1060901
83. Flood Risk Communications Through Maps: Challenges, Perception Theories and Approaches N. Yousaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70179
84. Creating effective flood warnings: A framework from a critical review M. Kuller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126708
85. Hurricane preparedness as anticipatory adaptation: A case study of community businesses P. Howe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.001
86. The smoke is rising but where is the fire? Exploring effective online map design for wildfire warnings Y. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2929-9
87. Influence of Terrain Factors on Urban Pluvial Flooding Characteristics: A Case Study of a Small Watershed in Guangzhou, China X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122261
88. Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research W. Kellens et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
89. Collaborative Modeling With Fine‐Resolution Data Enhances Flood Awareness, Minimizes Differences in Flood Perception, and Produces Actionable Flood Maps B. Sanders et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001391
90. RETRACTED: A 3D virtual geographic environment for flood representation towards risk communication W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103757
91. Flood Risk Management in Flanders: Past Developments and Future Challenges W. Kellens et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0366-4
92. Mapping current and future flood exposure using a 5 m flood model and climate change projections C. Darlington et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-699-2024
93. Integrated Hazards Mapping Tool E. Tate et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01284.x
94. Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effects of maps and warning messages on how publics respond to disaster information B. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.04.004
95. Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process G. Minucci et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101747
96. Towards personalised public warnings: harnessing technological advancements to promote better individual decision-making in the face of disasters Y. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1302007
97. Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
98. Flood Risk Communication from the Viewpoint of Disaster Prevention Awareness in an Urban Area of Tokyo, Kita Ward C. Mizuki https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2012.p0595
99. Application of web hazard maps to high school education for disaster risk reduction J. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102866
100. Quantitative flood hazard assessment methods: A review A. Maranzoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12855
101. Property-level adaptation to pluvial flooding: An analysis of individual behaviour and risk communication material L. Dillenardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10148-y
102. Public Attitudes Toward Policy Instruments for Flood Risk Management J. Raikes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01848-3
103. Proposal of a flash flood impact severity scale for the classification and mapping of flash flood impacts M. Diakakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125452
104. ¿Cómo de efectiva es la cartografía de peligro de inundación para la gestión de la emergencia? Evaluación a partir del mapa de las inundaciones de Valencia de octubre de 2024 A. Camarasa-Belmonte et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2025.24007
105. Mapping the Global Evolution and Research Directions of Information Seeking, Sharing and Communication in Disasters: A Bibliometric Study H. Tan & Y. Hao https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4126086
106. Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review L. Cea & P. Costabile https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9030050
107. Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps E. O’Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
108. Mobile Augmented Reality for Flood Visualisation P. Haynes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.012
109. An algorithm for converting weather radar data into GIS polygons and its application in severe weather warning systems H. Hu https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.898767
110. Achieving Successful River Restoration in Dense Urban Areas: Lessons from Taiwan R. Chou https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111159
111. Influence of Time Pressure and Flood Information Type on Flood Alert Effectiveness in Driving K. Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241287539
112. ‘A dive into floods’: exploring the Dutch implementation of the floods directive M. van Eerd et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.025
113. WebFRIS: An efficient web-based decision support tool to disseminate end-to-end risk information for flood management M. Mohanty & S. Karmakar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112456
114. Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study P. Binh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104436
115. Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production A. Luke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
116. Investigating ways to better communicate flood risk: the tight coupling of perceived flood map usability and accuracy K. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2023.2224956
117. Exploring local risk managers' use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes in Baden-Württemberg S. Kjellgren https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1857-2013