110 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Internal communication a prerequisite for risk governance: hazard zone planning in South Tyrol, Italy S. Link & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.993580
2. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
3. Exploring discrepancies between quantitative validation results and the geomorphic plausibility of statistical landslide susceptibility maps S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.015
4. Identifying spatial clusters of flood exposure to support decision making in risk management V. Röthlisberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.216
5. Mapping fires and American Red Cross aid using demographic indicators of vulnerability E. Lue & J. Wilson https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12198
6. Tipping Points in Natural Hazard Risk Management: How Societal Transformation can Provoke Policy Strategies in Mitigation S. Fuchs & T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737617500063
7. Deconstructing the legal framework for flood protection in Austria: individual and state responsibilities from a planning perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1627641
8. Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
9. Trends in torrential flooding in the Austrian Alps: A combination of climate change, exposure dynamics, and mitigation measures M. Schlögl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100294
10. Vulnerability to Flash Floods: A Simplified Structural Model for Masonry Buildings L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022577
11. Prescriptive conflict prevention analysis: An application to the 2021 update of the Austrian flood risk management plan Y. Hernández-González et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.007
12. Unpacking the barriers to natural and climate risk insurance adoption: A literature review S. Ceolotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106374
13. Using statistical functions and hydro-hydraulic models to develop human vulnerability curves for flash floods: The flash flood of the Taitou catchment (China) in 2016 T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102876
14. Effects of government flood expenditures: the problem of crowding‐out L. Slavikova https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12265
15. Türkiye'nin Üç Pilot İlinde Çığ Tehlike ve Risk Analizleri: Bitlis, Van ve Antalya Örnekleri E. Yıldız & Z. Selek https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufenbed.1490337
16. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
17. A quantitative methodology for the assessment of the regional economic vulnerability to flash floods E. Aroca-Jiménez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.029
18. Partnership approaches in flood risk management: lessons from the Eastern Alps T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720002
19. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
20. Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China F. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626
21. Mitigating flood consequences: analysis of private flood insurance in Slovakia Ľ. Solín et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12191
22. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
23. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
24. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
25. Slushflows: science and planning considerations for an expanding hazard G. Relf et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1716-8
26. Beyond the Expected—Residual Risk and Cases of Overload in the Context of Managing Alpine Natural Hazards S. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00325-3
27. Semi-quantitative risk assessment: From rainfall-induced landslides to the risk of persons in buildings H. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04420-x
28. Natural Hazard Management from a Coevolutionary Perspective: Exposure and Policy Response in the European Alps S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1235494
29. Future Public Sector Flood Risk and Risk Sharing Arrangements: An Assessment for Austria C. Unterberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.019
30. Multitemporal Accuracy and Precision Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Photogrammetry for Slope-Scale Snow Depth Maps in Alpine Terrain M. Adams et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1748-y
31. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.016
32. Determination of a Hazard Compensations Based on Land Administration Data N. Vučić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020071
33. The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations: Scalar reconstructions and transformation in Austria in flood risk management T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.023
34. Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps D. Henstra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
35. Flood risk management in Austria: Analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017
36. Financial recovery schemes in Austria: how planned relocation is used as an answer to future flood events T. Thaler & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1665982
37. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
38. What does nature have to do with it? Reconsidering distinctions in international disaster response frameworks in the Danube basin S. McClain et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-2151-2017
39. Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0352-9
40. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
41. Neue gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen im Naturgefahrenmanagement: Welche Entwicklungen kommen auf uns zu? T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-018-0468-6
42. A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3817-2014
43. A paradigm quantitative approach for a regional risk assessment and management in a few landslide prone hamlets along the windward slope of Western Ghats, India K. Sajinkumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.10.004
44. Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design M. Holub et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1410-4
45. Risk perception of local stakeholders on natural hazards: implications for theory and practice M. Mărgărint et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3251-2021
46. The connection between long-term and short-term risk management strategies for flood and landslide hazards: examples from land-use planning and emergency management in four European case studies K. Prenger-Berninghoff et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3261-2014
47. Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps M. Keiler et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0047
48. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
49. Fuzzy Formative Scenario Analysis for woody material transport related risks in mountain torrents B. Mazzorana & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.030
50. Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review C. Dieperink et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
51. Regional economic impacts of natural hazards – the case of the 2005 Alpine flood event in Tyrol (Austria) C. Pfurtscheller https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-359-2014
52. Moving away from local-based flood risk policy in Austria T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1195282
53. Localism and flood risk management in England: the creation of new inequalities? C. Begg et al. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12216
54. An institutional approach to vulnerability: evidence from natural hazard management in Europe M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe88c
55. Spatio-temporal dynamics in the flood exposure due to land use changes in the Alpine Lech Valley in Tyrol (Austria) H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0280-8
56. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
57. Understanding local-level institutional barriers in landslide disaster management: a qualitative study on southeast Bangladesh N. Sultana https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02562-3
58. Paying a Price of Climate Change: Who Pays for Managed Retreats? I. Noy https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-020-00155-x
59. Bottom-up innovations in natural hazard risk management in Austria T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102689
60. Risk reduction partnerships in railway transport infrastructure in an alpine environment A. Otto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.025
61. Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.030
62. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
63. Assessing adaptive capacity through governance networks: The elaboration of the flood risk management plan in Austria M. Ceddia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.014
64. Investigations of disaster information representation from a geospatial perspective: Progress, challenges and recommendations W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12922
65. Experimental study on large wood filtration performance by herringbone water-sediment separation structure X. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3922-6
66. Allocation of risk and benefits—distributional justices in mountain hazard management T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1229-y
67. Risk analysis for local management from hydro-geomorphologic disaster databases P. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.12.007
68. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
69. The price of safety: costs for mitigating and coping with Alpine hazards C. Pfurtscheller & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2619-2013
70. Sensitivity analysis of a built environment exposed to the synthetic monophasic viscous debris flow impacts with 3-D numerical simulations X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-871-2023
71. Adjustment or transformation? Disaster risk intervention examples from Austria, Indonesia, Kiribati and South Africa A. Fekete et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106230
72. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
73. Joint analysis of environmental and risk policies: Methodology and application to the French case E. Vigier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.017
74. Evaluating data quality collected by volunteers for first-level inspection of hydraulic structures in mountain catchments V. Cortes Arevalo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2681-2014
75. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
76. Climate crisis and gender: Women strategies in a male-dominated profession S. Caroly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2026.103901
77. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness and Communication on Real Estate Investment Decision-Making A. Oyetunji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387868
78. Justice and flood risk management: reflecting on different approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management in Europe T. Thaler & T. Hartmann https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2305-1
79. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
80. Überlegungen zu einer risikoangepassten Betrachtungsweise in der Raumplanung B. Steinbrunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-022-00844-x
81. Snow Avalanche Hazard and Risk Management at a Regional Scale in Türkiye: Detailed Analyses and Modeling Approaches in the Provinces of Bitlis, Van, and Antalya E. Yıldız & Z. Selek https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1720942
82. A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
83. Risk Communication on Floodings: Insights Into the Risk Awareness of Migrants in Rural Communities in Austria K. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00060.1
84. The changing trajectory of snow mapping J. Linde & S. Grab https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311399493
85. Obligation or Innovation: Can the EU Floods Directive Be Seen as a Tipping Point Towards More Resilient Flood Risk Management? A Case Study from Vorarlberg, Austria M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195505
86. Spatio-temporal aspects and dimensions in integrated disaster risk management C. Aubrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0619-9
87. Methodology of disaster risk assessment for debris flows in a river basin I. Chiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0932-1
88. Formation phases and structural failure of a landslide compartment at Brienz/Brinzauls, Switzerland R. Kenner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108343
89. Landslide risk management—A brief overview and example from Sweden of current situation and climate change Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.002
90. Estimating changes in flood risks and benefits of non-structural adaptation strategies - a case study from Tyrol, Austria A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9602-3
91. A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport R. Totschnig et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9623-5
92. Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
93. The district of North Vancouver’s landslide management strategy: role of public involvement for determining tolerable risk and increasing community resilience K. Tappenden https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1016-0
94. Quantifying damage contributions from convective and stratiform weather types: How well do precipitation and discharge data indicate the risk? K. Schroeer & M. Tye https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12491
95. A structured approach to enhance flood hazard assessment in mountain streams B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9811-y
96. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
97. Recent Slovak flood protection relative to integrated flood risk management Ľ. Solín https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2015.1022868
98. Determination of rockfall design blocks in Upper Triassic limestones and dolomites (Dachstein Formation, Northern Calcareous Alps) H. Laimer https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01640-w
99. Who can you trust? Implications of institutional vulnerability in flood exposure along the Spanish Mediterranean coast F. López-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.004
100. Developing partnership approaches for flood risk management: implementation of inter-local co-operations in Austria T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.992720
101. The shifting position of homeowners in flood resilience: From recipients to key‐stakeholders K. Snel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1451
102. Editorial T. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1671464
103. Threshold or Limit? Precipitation Dependency of Austrian Landslides, an Ongoing Challenge for Hazard Mapping under Climate Change I. Offenthaler et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156182
104. State-of-the-art on ecosystem-based solutions for disaster risk reduction: The case of gravity-driven natural hazards in the Alpine region F. Poratelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101929
105. Landslide mitigation strategies in southeast Bangladesh: Lessons learned from the institutional responses N. Sultana & S. Tan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102402
106. Decision support method to systematically evaluate first-level inspections of the functional status of check dams V. Cortes Arevalo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1144619
107. Key networks to create disaster resilient Smart Cities Mission: A case for remodeling India's Smart Cities Mission to include disaster resilience Y. Meduri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.09.001
108. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
109. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
110. Evolving inter-regional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0796-z