164 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Application of Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) and delineation of natural risk zones in Greater Lisbon, Portugal C. Guillard-Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.910689
2. Mitigating flood consequences: analysis of private flood insurance in Slovakia Ľ. Solín et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12191
3. Justice and flood risk management: reflecting on different approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management in Europe T. Thaler & T. Hartmann https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2305-1
4. Natural disasters as stress‐tests for housing systems. Vulnerability and local resistance to the 2012 earthquake in Italy E. Giovannetti & F. Pagliacci https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12110
5. Participatory modelling of vulnerability and adaptive capacity in flood risk management D. Haase https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9704-5
6. Prioritization of flood vulnerability, coping capacity and exposure indicators through the Delphi technique: A case study in Taquari-Antas basin, Brazil M. de Brito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.027
7. Fine-scale assessment of inequities in inland flood vulnerability M. Messager et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102492
8. Überlegungen zu einer risikoangepassten Betrachtungsweise in der Raumplanung B. Steinbrunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-022-00844-x
9. Respective impacts of global warming, permafrost thaw and urban sprawl on debris-flow risk: Insights from the Dorfbach Torrent, Swiss Alps G. da Silva Correia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110086
10. Natural Hazard Management from a Coevolutionary Perspective: Exposure and Policy Response in the European Alps S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1235494
11. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
12. Measuring individual vulnerability to floods in the lower and middle Grijalva River Basin, Tabasco, Mexico F. Gurri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3533-3
13. A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport R. Totschnig et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9623-5
14. Landslide impacts in Germany: A historical and socioeconomic perspective M. Klose et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0643-9
15. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
16. Constructing vulnerability curves considering mitigation capacity to enhance the predictive ability of disaster losses F. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07204-4
17. Are local administrations really in charge of flood risk management governance? The Spanish Mediterranean coastline and its institutional vulnerability issues F. López-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1577551
18. Flood Risk Analysis by Building Use in Urban Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation I. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313006
19. Analysis of human vulnerability to the extreme rainfall event on 21–22 July 2012 in Beijing, China J. Liu & S. Wang https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2911-2013
20. Determining flood hazard patterns through a combined stochastic–deterministic approach B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9755-2
21. On the nexus between landslide susceptibility and transport infrastructure – an agent-based approach M. Schlögl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-201-2019
22. Droughts in the High Continental Climate of Central Asia I. Normatov et al. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20250901.12
23. A framework for spatio-temporal scales and concepts from different disciplines: the ‘vulnerability cube’ S. Kienberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0513-x
24. Combining Social Vulnerability and Physical Vulnerability to Analyse Landslide Risk at the Municipal Scale C. Guillard-Gonçalves & J. Zêzere https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8080294
25. Coastal climate risk and adaptation studies: The importance of understanding different classes of problem M. Gibbs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.10.018
26. Developing partnership approaches for flood risk management: implementation of inter-local co-operations in Austria T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.992720
27. Lock-ins and community resilience: Two contrasting development pathways in the Austrian Alps R. Stotten et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.001
28. Expert-based versus data-driven flood damage models: A comparative evaluation for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102148
29. A review of multivariate social vulnerability methodologies: a case study of the River Parrett catchment, UK I. Willis & J. Fitton https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1387-2016
30. Assessing and mitigating large wood‐related hazards in mountain streams: recent approaches B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12316
31. Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans C. Finch et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8
32. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
33. Vulnerability assessments as a political creation: tsunami management in Portugal M. Pronk et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12223
34. A critical analysis of vulnerability C. Gibb https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.007
35. Mapping Socioeconomic Exposure for Flood Risk Assessment in Italy M. Amadio et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13212
36. Regional vulnerability assessment for debris flows in China—a CWS approach M. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0578-1
37. Vulnerability: From the conceptual to the operational using a dynamical system perspective C. Rougé et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.07.018
38. Developing spatial agricultural drought risk index with controllable geo-spatial indicators: A case study for South Korea and Kazakhstan S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102056
39. The natural domain and its social representation in the community resilience concept R. Stotten https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2681
40. Impact Force of a Geomorphic Dam-Break Wave against an Obstacle: Effects of Sediment Inertia C. Di Cristo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020232
41. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework J. Birkmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
42. Quantitative assessment of physical fragility of buildings to the debris flow on 20 August 2019 in the Cutou gully, Wenchuan, southwestern China M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106319
43. Upgrading of an index-oriented methodology for consequence analysis of natural hazards: application to the Upper Guil catchment (southern French Alps) B. Carlier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018
44. Drivers and barriers of adaptation initiatives – How societal transformation affects natural hazard management and risk mitigation in Europe T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.306
45. Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5
46. An institutional approach to vulnerability: evidence from natural hazard management in Europe M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abe88c
47. Quantitative micro-scale flood risk assessment in a section of the Trotuș River, Romania R. Țîncu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.040
48. Quantitative risk and optimal design approaches in the snow avalanche field: Review and extensions N. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.03.003
49. Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.030
50. Bottom-up innovations in natural hazard risk management in Austria T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102689
51. A cascading flash flood guidance system: development and application in Yunnan Province, China Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2535-2
52. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
53. The SAVEMEDCOASTS-2 webGIS: The Online Platform for Relative Sea Level Rise and Storm Surge Scenarios up to 2100 for the Mediterranean Coasts A. Falciano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11112071
54. The impact of humanitarian assistance on post‐disaster social vulnerabilities: some early reflections on the Nepal earthquake in 2015 M. Hülssiep et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12437
55. Foreword: Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard risk—a dynamic perspective S. Fuchs & T. Glade https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2289-x
56. Flood Risk Assessment to Enable Improved Decision-Making for Climate Change Adaptation Strategies by Central and Local Governments I. Yu & H. Jung https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114335
57. Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka E. Perera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00615-w
58. Covid-19: implications for insurer risk management and the insurability of pandemic risk A. Richter & T. Wilson https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713-020-00054-z
59. Tipping Points in Natural Hazard Risk Management: How Societal Transformation can Provoke Policy Strategies in Mitigation S. Fuchs & T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737617500063
60. The price of safety: costs for mitigating and coping with Alpine hazards C. Pfurtscheller & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2619-2013
61. Population exposure predicts flood losses in Sweden K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00194-8
62. Debris flow simulations for hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment in the Karakorum mountain ranges, northern Pakistan I. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101389
63. Regional Hazard Analysis For Use In Vulnerability And Risk Assessment F. Maris et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2015-0026
64. Geohazard vulnerability assessment in Qiaojia seismic zones, SW China Z. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101928
65. A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2067-2020
66. Population and Landslide Risk Evolution in Long Time Series: Case Study of the Valencian Community (1920–2021) I. Cantarino Martí et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14061148
67. Using statistical functions and hydro-hydraulic models to develop human vulnerability curves for flash floods: The flash flood of the Taitou catchment (China) in 2016 T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102876
68. Neglecting property-level flood risk adaptation measures lead to overestimation in flood risk analysis – An empirical study N. Rindsfüser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105326
69. An open resilience index: Crowdsourced indicators empirically developed from natural hazard and climatic event data D. Feldmeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145734
70. Analyzing the vulnerabilities and capabilities of wealth creation activities in the Maurienne valley in the French Alps M. Bevione et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01908-0
71. Systematic Review of Multi-Dimensional Vulnerabilities in the Himalayas H. Sultan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912177
72. Drought Vulnerability Curves Based on Remote Sensing and Historical Disaster Dataset H. Jia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030858
73. Rice drought risk assessment under climate change: Based on physical vulnerability a quantitative assessment method H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141481
74. Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: a multi-criteria approach M. de Brito et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-373-2018
75. Assessing Trust in First Responder Organizations Related to Emergency Management: A Boolean Approach S. Robinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2024
76. Measuring and mapping the flood vulnerability based on land-use patterns: a case study of Beijing, China J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2375-0
77. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
78. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
79. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
80. Spatial variability in the flood vulnerability of urban areas in the headwater basins of Slovakia Ľ. Solín https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01153.x
81. Risk Assessment of Flash Flood to Buildings Using an Indicator-Based Methodology: A Case Study of Mountainous Rural Settlements in Southwest China Y. Zhen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.931029
82. The structural vulnerability in the framework of natural hazard risk analyses and the exemplary application for storm loss modelling in Tyrol (Austria) M. Huttenlau & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9768-x
83. A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
84. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
85. The introduction of catchment-wide co-operations: Scalar reconstructions and transformation in Austria in flood risk management T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.023
86. Assessment of flood vulnerability in Jamuna floodplain: a case study in Jamalpur district, Bangladesh M. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05677-1
87. Remote sensing contributing to assess earthquake risk: from a literature review towards a roadmap C. Geiß & H. Taubenböck https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0322-2
88. Regional prioritisation of flood risk in mountainous areas M. Rogelis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-833-2016
89. What do biphasic flow experiments reveal on the variability of exposure on alluvial fans and which implications for risk assessment result from this? H. Diaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05169-8
90. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.016
91. Cascading processes in a changing environment: Disturbances on fluvial ecosystems in Chile and implications for hazard and risk management B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.217
92. Multi-air pollution risk assessment in Southeast Asia region using integrated remote sensing and socio-economic data products A. Sakti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158825
93. Multi-vulnerability analysis for flash flood risk management K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2296-y
94. A simulation-based approach for assessing regional and industrial flood vulnerability using mixed-MRIO model: A case study of Hubei Province, China X. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117845
95. Enhancement of large-scale flood risk assessments using building-material-based vulnerability curves for an object-based approach in urban and rural areas J. Englhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1703-2019
96. Integrated flash flood vulnerability assessment: Insights from East Attica, Greece K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.052
97. Flood risk management in Austria: Analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017
98. Vulnerability assessment of households and its possible reflection in flood risk management: The case of the upper Myjava basin, Slovakia Ľ. Solín et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.015
99. An integrated method for assessing vulnerability of buildings caused by debris flows in mountainous areas C. Qiu & X. Geng https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-709-2025
100. Assessment of Urban air pollution by PM10 and NO2 and associated impacts and risks through computational analysis in Kigali, Rwanda E. Irankunda & A. Ozunu https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-024-00333-9
101. A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3817-2014
102. Climate change and mediterranean mountain livelihoods: insights from multi-stakeholder fuzzy cognitive mapping in portuguese highlands E. Todorova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-026-01838-4
103. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
104. Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography R. Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016
105. Who can you trust? Implications of institutional vulnerability in flood exposure along the Spanish Mediterranean coast F. López-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.004
106. Recent Slovak flood protection relative to integrated flood risk management Ľ. Solín https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2015.1022868
107. Financial recovery schemes in Austria: how planned relocation is used as an answer to future flood events T. Thaler & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1665982
108. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
109. Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0352-9
110. Evolving inter-regional co-operation in flood risk management: distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0796-z
111. Sustainable-resilient urban revitalization framework: Residential buildings renovation in a historic district R. Taherkhani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124952
112. Quantifying human vulnerability in rural areas: case study of Tutova Hills (Eastern Romania) I. Stângă & A. Grozavu https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1987-2012
113. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
114. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
115. Neue gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen im Naturgefahrenmanagement: Welche Entwicklungen kommen auf uns zu? T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-018-0468-6
116. Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2476-9
117. Methodology of natural risk assessment in Russia V. Osipov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2780-z
118. EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS OF NATURAL DISASTER RISK ASSESSMENT INDICATORS USING TOPIC MODELS M. MIURA & D. KAMISAKA https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.24-20137
119. Capturing the multifaceted phenomena of socioeconomic vulnerability L. Sorg et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3207-1
120. Climate change and geomorphological hazards in the eastern European Alps M. Keiler et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0047
121. Flash-flood potential assessment and mapping by integrating the weights-of-evidence and frequency ratio statistical methods in GIS environment – case study: Bâsca Chiojdului River catchment (Romania) R. Costache & L. Zaharia https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0828-9
122. Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design M. Holub et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1410-4
123. Fuzzy Formative Scenario Analysis for woody material transport related risks in mountain torrents B. Mazzorana & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.030
124. Assessing vulnerability of buildings to hydro-meteorological hazards using an expert based approach – An application in Nehoiu Valley, Romania A. Godfrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
125. Assessment of building behavior in slow-moving landslide-affected areas through DInSAR data and structural analysis D. Infante et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109638
126. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
127. A reliability-based approach for the impact vulnerability assessment of bridge piers subjected to debris flows S. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105567
128. A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03826-7
129. Trust and the communication of flood risks: comparing the roles of local governments, volunteers in emergency services, and neighbours S. Seebauer & P. Babcicky https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12313
130. Are Floods Becoming a More Expensive Hazard? A Damages Review of the Southeastern Spanish Coast (1996–2016) F. López-Martínez https://doi.org/10.3390/land12051035
131. Influence of building height and openings on the physical vulnerability of masonry buildings to debris flow C. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07942-5
132. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
133. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
134. Augmenting Austrian flood management practices through geospatial predictive analytics: a study in Carinthia S. Ward & G. Paulus https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1445-2013
135. Quantifying land-use change impacts on the dynamic evolution of flood vulnerability J. Liu & Z. Shi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.012
136. How do stream processes affect hazard exposure on alluvial fans? Insights from an experimental study B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5788-x
137. Dinámica distributiva de flujos bifásicos con carga de madera en un abanico aluvial experimental N. Santibañez et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2021.14703
138. Integrating Social and Physical Vulnerabilities to Assess Landslide Risk in the Aizawl Municipal Area, Mizoram, India Z. Laltanpuia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02243-7
139. Vulnerability, hazards and multiple risk assessment for Georgia O. Varazanashvili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0374-3
140. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
141. Allocation of risk and benefits—distributional justices in mountain hazard management T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1229-y
142. Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability S. Scheuer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9666-7
143. Rockfall in the Port Hills of Christchurch: Seismic and non‐seismic fatality risk on roads S. Unterrader et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nzg.12170
144. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
145. Assessing flash flood vulnerability using a multi-vulnerability approach K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708004
146. Assessing Multidimensional Vulnerability of Rural Areas to Flooding: An Index-Based Approach S. Rasool et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00547-9
147. 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes B. Gems et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1351-2016
148. Predictive Model of Community Disaster Resilience Across Serbia: A BRIC–DROP Composite Index and Spatial Patterns V. Cvetković et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety12030059
149. The resilience and vulnerability of remote mountain communities: The case of Vent, Austrian Alps G. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.022
150. Vulnerability assessment of flash floods in Wadi Dahab Basin, Egypt M. Prama et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8860-5
151. Multi-scale debris flow vulnerability assessment and direct loss estimation of buildings in the Eastern Italian Alps R. Ciurean et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2612-6
152. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
153. Development and application of a model for assessing climate-related disaster risk I. Yu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103218
154. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
155. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
156. Monitoring the temporal development of natural hazard risks as a basis indicator for climate change adaptation A. Zischg et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9927-0
157. Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
158. Understanding the effect of spatial patterns on the vulnerability of urban areas to flooding Y. Sakieh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.004
159. Fuzzy Decision-Support System for Safeguarding Tangible and Intangible Cultural Heritage A. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143953
160. A quantitative methodology for the assessment of the regional economic vulnerability to flash floods E. Aroca-Jiménez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.029
161. Assessing the vulnerability of mountain value chains to environmental and social drivers in Europe: A land-use and stakeholder-based approach P. González-Moreno et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02153-5
162. A new approach to assessing vulnerability of mountain highways subject to debris flows in China Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133318770985
163. Unravelling the impacts to the built environment caused by floods in a river heavily perturbed by volcanic eruptions S. Basso-Báez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102655
164. The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618