48 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Debris flows analysis through quantitative evaluation of soil depth distribution under limited data S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108379
2. Dynamic numerical simulation and risk predictive assessment of the slope debris flow for the rear mountain at the management office of the Erlang Mountain Tunnel H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1025636
3. Slip monitoring of a dip-slope and runout simulation by the discrete element method: a case study at the Huafan University campus in northern Taiwan C. Tseng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3016-y
4. From back-analysis to run-out prediction: a case study in the Western Italian Alps M. Pirulli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0248-2
5. Comparison of two depth-averaged numerical models for debris flow runout estimation F. Vagnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0455
6. Granular and particle-laden flows: from laboratory experiments to field observations R. Delannay et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/50/5/053001
7. Coupling Depth-Averaged and 3D numerical models to study debris flow: Saint-Vincent event A. Pasqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341502015
8. Collapse of granular–cohesive soil mixtures on a horizontal plane L. Brezzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0725-7
9. Modelling of flowslides and debris avalanches in natural and engineered slopes: a review S. Cuomo https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-019-0133-9
10. A novel approach to evaluate and compare computational snow avalanche simulation J. Fischer https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1655-2013
11. Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps H. Hussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
12. Description and numerical modelling of the October 2000 Nora debris flow, Northwestern Italian Alps M. Pirulli & F. Marco https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-082
13. Extension of Iber for Simulating Non–Newtonian Shallow Flows: Mine-Tailings Spill Propagation Modelling M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142039
14. Predicting Debris Flow Runout with SFLOW Model: Case Study of Datong and Taicun Gullies, Lijiang, China Q. Mehmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-03020-y
15. Development of an advanced numerical simulation program considering debris flow and driftwood behavior T. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106366
16. Development and Application of an Automated Check-Dam Scenario Analysis Program for Debris-Flow Hazards S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2026.26.3.33
17. Debris-Flow Hazard Assessment and Methods Applied in Engineering Practice D. RICKENMANN https://doi.org/10.13101/ijece.9.80
18. Variable density bore interaction with block obstacles L. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2011.575372
19. A multivariate statistical method for susceptibility analysis of debris flow in southwestern China F. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1321-2020
20. Estimation of the area of sediment deposition by debris flow using a physical-based modeling approach H. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.049
21. An overview of debris-flow mathematical modelling M. Trujillo-Vela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104135
22. An analysis of rheological models for lahar modelling with Iber M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.22201/igc.20072902e.2025.3.1882
23. Uniaxial compressive strength and crack propagation of debris-ice mixtures: Insights from experiments and particle-based modeling G. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108253
24. Insights into rock‐ice avalanche dynamics by combined analysis of seismic recordings and a numerical avalanche model D. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JF001734
25. A quantitative approach for debris flow inception and propagation analysis in the lead up to risk management M. Ciurleo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01630-8
26. Comparison of depth-averaged and 3D models for dense granular flows A. Pasqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012101
27. Combining Spatial Models for Shallow Landslides and Debris-Flows Prediction R. Gomes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5052219
28. SPH run-out modelling of channelised landslides of the flow type L. Cascini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.031
29. A robust debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in Santa Teresa, Peru H. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z
30. Modeling the formation of bright slope deposits associated with gullies in Hale Crater, Mars: Implications for recent liquid water K. Kolb et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.09.009
31. Geotechnical and rheological characteristics of waste rock deposits influencing potential debris flow occurrence at the abandoned Imgi Mine, Korea S. Jeong https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3991-1
32. Evaluation of different erosion–entrainment models in debris-flow simulation S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01901-y
33. A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model L. Brezzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y
34. A multiscale framework for simulating landslide runout and impact with barriers A. Pasqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0034
35. Characterization of wood‐laden flows in rivers V. Ruiz‐Villanueva et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4603
36. Advance survey and modelling technologies for the study of the slope stability in an Alpine basin A. Ferrero et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1490-z
37. Modeling the runout behavior of the July 23rd, 2015 Cancia debris-flow event using two numerical models Z. Qiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341505019
38. El rol de los términos de fricción y cohesión en la modelización bidimensional de fluidos no Newtonianos: avalanchas de nieve densa M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2023.20080
39. Debris flow simulation 2D (DFS 2D): Numerical modelling of debris flows and calibration of friction parameters M. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.004
40. Deciphering controls for debris‐flow erosion derived from a LiDAR‐recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Roßbichelbach, Germany) A. Dietrich & M. Krautblatter https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4578
41. Rainfall-induced runoff and debris flows: modelling the Cervinara 1999 cascade flow-like mass movements S. Cuomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04283-2
42. A two‐phase mechanical model for rock‐ice avalanches S. Pudasaini & M. Krautblatter https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003183
43. Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation C. Chen & Q. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y
44. Numerical modelling of dense snow avalanches with a well-balanced scheme based on the 2D shallow water equations M. Sanz-Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.48
45. Runout modeling and calibration of friction parameters of Kurichermala debris flow, India M. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01540-1
46. Solid-liquid interaction caused by minor wetting in gravel-ice mixtures: A key factor for the mobility of rock-ice avalanches Y. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106072
47. A new method for evaluating stony debris flow rainfall thresholds: the Backward Dynamical Approach G. Rosatti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01994
48. Evaluation of probabilistic snow avalanche simulation ensembles with Doppler radar observations J. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.09.011