72 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The Changing Relationship Between Rainfall and Surface Runoff on the Loess Plateau, China C. Miao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032053
2. Numerical evaluation of design factors for effective debris flow mitigation of closed-type check dams S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1598919
3. Geomorphic effectiveness of check dams in a debris-flow catchment using multi-temporal topographic surveys S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.004
4. Study on debris flow discharge characteristics of check dam spillway W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218452
5. Assessment of barrier location effect on debris flow based on smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation on 3D terrains S. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01477-5
6. A multi-source data fusion modeling method for debris flow prevention engineering Q. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-020-6332-8
7. Comparative analysis of debris flow mitigation by geotechnical and biological measures: a case study of Shaer Gully, Sichuan, China J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2026.2707695
8. Additional insights to EC7 from the application of reliability-based design methods: the case of debris flow protection structures F. Vagnon et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012190
9. Simulating the effect of check dam collapse in a debris-flow channel T. Baggio & V. D'Agostino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151660
10. Performance evaluation of check dam location using small-scale flume channel and numerical simulation M. Pham & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11195-5
11. Novel Mangrove‐Guard Baffles for Rock Avalanche Protection: Numerical Analysis X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/9530970
12. Model analysis of check dam impacts on long-term sediment and water budgets in Southeast Arizona, USA L. Norman & R. Niraula https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.12.001
13. An assessment framework for the mitigation effects of check dams on debris flow M. Banihabib & A. Forghani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.01.018
14. Hydrodynamic conditions governing the initiation of buried particles in dilute debris flows R. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121575
15. Why do we build check dams in Alpine streams? An historical perspective from the French experience G. Piton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3967
16. A Case Study on the Closed-Type Barrier Effect on Debris Flows at Mt. Woomyeon, Korea in 2011 via a Numerical Approach S. Choi & T. Kwon https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237890
17. Performance of ethylene-vinyl acetate foam as cushioning material for rigid debris-resisting barriers C. Lam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0987-z
18. Effects of Barrier Stiffness on Debris Flow Dynamic Impact—I: Laboratory Flume Test Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020177
19. Effects of Baffle Transverse Blockage on Landslide Debris Impedance C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2014.06.012
20. Micro-mechanism and efficiency of baffle structure in deceleration of granular flows B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01290-x
21. Modelling the long-term geomorphic response to check dam failures in an alpine channel with CAESAR-Lisflood J. Ramirez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.04.005
22. Modelling the temporal-varied nonlinear velocity profile of debris flow using a stratification aggregation algorithm in 3D-HBP-SPH framework Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8954-8
23. Assessing the hydrological effect of the check dams in the Loess Plateau, China, by model simulations Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2185-2013
24. Design of Sediment Traps with Open Check Dams. I: Hydraulic and Deposition Processes G. Piton & A. Recking https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001048
25. Gully Erosion Control Practices in Northeast China: A Review X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185065
26. Numerical Analysis of Debris-Flow Erosion in Nonuniform Erodible Beds with Concave and Convex Slopes: A Comparison of Four Dynamic Models P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-13541
27. Debris Flow Mobility: A Comparison of Weathered Soils and Clay-rich Soils S. Jeong https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2013.29.1.23
28. Fonctions des barrages de correction torrentielle G. Piton et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.32190
29. Structural health monitoring of sabo check dams with cosmic-ray muography L. Oláh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.108019
30. Study on the impact characteristics of debris flow under the check dam W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0294646
31. Geomorphology and kinematics of debris flows with high entrainment rates: A case study in the South French Alps A. Remaître et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2011.09.007
32. Effects of Barrier Stiffness on Debris Flow Dynamic Impact—II: Numerical Simulation Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020182
33. Sediment Yield in Dam-Controlled Watersheds in the Pisha Sandstone Region on the Northern Loess Plateau, China F. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111264
34. Bedrock ledges, colluvial wedges, and ridgetop wetlands: characterizing geomorphic and atmospheric controls on the 2023 Wrangell landslide to inform landslide assessment in Southeast Alaska, USA J. Roering et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-587-2026
35. Effectiveness of Torrential Erosion Control Structures (Check Dams) Under Post-Fire Conditions—The Importance of Immediate Construction A. Theofanidis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030629
36. Unravelling the multiphase run-out conditions of a slide-flow mass movement T. van Asch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.11.014
37. Tracking long-term cascade check dam siltation: implications for debris flow control and landslide stability Z. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01755-w
38. Debris aggregates in debris flows and implications for debris-flow dynamics Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2025.106946
39. Check dam storage capacity calculation based on high-resolution topogrammetry: Case study of the Cutou Gully, Wenchuan County, China T. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148083
40. Dissipative effects of baffles on the dynamics of debris flow and its impact on downstream structure T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107246
41. Resolved Simulation of a Granular-Fluid Flow with a Coupled SPH-DCDEM Model R. Canelas et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001331
42. Evaluating effectiveness of mitigation measures for large debris flows in Wenchuan, China J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01809-z
43. Rapid episodic erosion of a cohesionless landslide dam: Insights from loss to scour of Yangjia Gully check dams and from flume experiments Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105971
44. Effects of Y-type spillway lateral contraction ratios on debris-flowpatterns and scour features downriver of a check dam H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2433-2016
45. TET: An automated tool for evaluating suitable check-dam sites based on sediment trapping efficiency O. Rahmati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122051
46. Deposition areas: An effective solution for the reduction of the sediment volume transported by stony debris flows on the high‐sloping reach of channels incising fans and debris cones M. Bernard et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5727
47. Longitudinal spreading of granular flow in trapezoidal channels C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.016
48. Unsteady overflow behavior of polydisperse granular flows against closed type barrier B. Zhang & Y. Huang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105959
49. Calculation of debris flow overflow distance and impact force analysis of double rigid check dams B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07749-4
50. Experimental Research on the Dam‐Break Mechanisms of the Jiadanwan Landslide Dam Triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake in China F. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/272363
51. Debris-flow risk analysis in a managed torrent based on a stochastic life-cycle performance J. Ballesteros Cánovas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.036
52. Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps H. Hussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
53. Investigation of erosion characteristics of debris flow based on historical cases C. Kang & D. Chan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106767
54. Simulation study on the impact of check dams on water and sand in Xiliugou Basin and inner Mongolia section of the Yellow River W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32381-4
55. Numerical simulation of 2D granular flow entrainment using DEM C. Kang & D. Chan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-017-0782-x
56. Check dams worldwide: Objectives, functions, effectiveness and undesired effects M. Lucas-Borja et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105390
57. Why structural solutions for flood control should be adapted to climate change? M. Hosseinipoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06969-4
58. Effects of check dams on runoff characteristics along gully reaches, the case of Northern Ethiopia E. Guyassa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.019
59. Challenges and perspectives in designing engineering structures against debris-flow disaster Y. Huang & B. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2020.1854126
60. Usage des ouvrages de correction torrentielle et plages de dépôt : origine, état des lieux, perspectives G. Piton et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2019008
61. Numerical assessments of the influences of soil–boulder mixed flow impact on downstream facilities S. Ren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105055
62. Physics-based modeling of debris flows and assessing the performance of effective mitigation measures N. Mubarak et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-024-00291-8
63. An alternative approach for the sediment control of in-channel stony debris flows with an application to the case study of Ru Secco Creek (Venetian Dolomites, Northeast Italy) M. Barbini et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1340561
64. Research on the blocking effect of baffle-net structure on rock avalanches: consider the influence of particle splashing Y. Bi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03289-y
65. ASCHFLOW - A dynamic landslide run-out model for medium scale hazard analysis B. Quan Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-016-0064-7
66. Landslide mobility analysis for design of multiple debris-resisting barriers J. Kwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0152
67. Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment B. Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.007
68. Simulation of interactions between debris flow and check dams on three-dimensional terrain H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.02.001
69. Machine learning-assisted check dam planning on the Chinese Loess Plateau R. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133015
70. Hazard Assessment Based on the Combination of DAN3D and Machine Learning Method for Planning Closed-Type Barriers against Debris-Flow E. Cheon et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010170
71. Driftwood deposition from debris flows at slit-check dams and fans B. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9939-9
72. Quantitative analysis of artificial dam failure effects on debris flows – A case study of the Zhouqu ‘8.8’ debris flow in northwestern China Y. Chong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148439