63 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Data Mining and Statistical Approaches in Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modelling Using Airborne LiDAR Data U. Lay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163451
2. Back‐calculation of bedload transport in steep channels with a numerical model M. Chiari & D. Rickenmann https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2108
3. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060218
4. Empirical prediction of debris‐flow mobility and deposition on fans C. Scheidl & D. Rickenmann https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1897
5. Research on the numerical model for the routing of viscous debris flow considering the interface Z. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1531789
6. Development of an advanced numerical simulation program considering debris flow and driftwood behavior T. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106366
7. Multi-temporal LiDAR-DTMs as a tool for modelling a complex landslide: a case study in the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps) G. Bossi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-715-2015
8. Rapid hazard prediction and assessment of post-fire debris flows using UAV lidar: Eaton Fire, California Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02694-0
9. From consumer to enterprise grade: How the choice of four UAS impacts point cloud quality M. Stark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5142
10. Volume estimation of small scale debris flows based on observations of topographic changes using airborne LiDAR DEMs H. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2829-8
11. What can be learnt from the catastrophic failure of a check dam system? A forensic analysis of a cascading natural-anthropogenic hazard E. Dallan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07301-4
12. Modelling the dynamics of a large rock landslide in the Dolomites (eastern Italian Alps) using multi-temporal DEMs R. Gatter et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5903
13. Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation C. Chen & Q. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y
14. Multi-temporal analysis to support the management of torrent control structures S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107599
15. The structure of a magnitude-frequency relation for debris flows conditioned by earthquake shock M. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.946301
16. Sediment loads due to fluvial transport and debris flows during the 2005 flood events in Switzerland D. Rickenmann & A. Koschni https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7536
17. Estimating the Future Function of the Nipsa Reservoir due to Climate Change and Debris Sediment Factors F. Maris et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7060076
18. Multi-temporal analysis of morphologic changes applying geomatic techniques. 70 years of torrential activity in the Rebaixader catchment (Central pyrenees) M. Núñez-Andrés et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1523235
19. Framework for prioritizing geospatial data processing tasks during extreme weather events X. Hu & J. Gong https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2018.12.006
20. Evaluation concepts to compare observed and simulated deposition areas of mass movements M. Heiser et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-016-9609-9
21. Monitoring sediment source areas in a debris-flow catchment using terrestrial laser scanning G. Blasone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.07.001
22. Evaluating the Differences of Gridding Techniques for Digital Elevation Models Generation and Their Influence on the Modeling of Stony Debris Flows Routing: A Case Study From Rovina di Cancia Basin (North-Eastern Italian Alps) M. Boreggio et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00089
23. Combining airborne and terrestrial laser scanning for quantifying erosion and deposition by a debris flow event M. Bremer & O. Sass https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.08.024
24. How does co-registration affect geomorphic change estimates in multi-temporal surveys? S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2020.1763048
25. Topographical Changes in Torrential Stream After Dredging in Erosion Control Dam - Using Terrestrial LiDAR Data - J. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.3.392
26. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for engineering geology applications D. Giordan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01766-2
27. Unsupervised domain adaptation with self-attention for post-disaster building damage detection Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.005
28. Reading the bed morphology of a mountain stream: a geomorphometric study on high-resolution topographic data S. Trevisani et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-393-2010
29. Application of statistical techniques to proportional loss data: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of physical vulnerability to hazardous hydro-meteorological events C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.084
30. Estimate of the debris-flow entrainment using field and topographical data C. Abancó & M. Hürlimann https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0930-5
31. Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review M. Jaboyedoff et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2
32. From geotechnical analysis to quantification and modelling using LiDAR data: a study on rockfall in the Reintal catchment, Bavarian Alps, Germany T. Heckmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2250
33. Does the topographic data source truly influence the routing modelling of debris flows in a torrent catchment? M. Boreggio et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5366
34. The concept of transport capacity in geomorphology J. Wainwright et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000474
35. Sediment transport modelling in a distributed physically based hydrological catchment model M. Konz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2821-2011
36. Geomorphic impact and assessment of flexible barriers using multi-temporal LiDAR data: The Portainé mountain catchment (Pyrenees) A. Victoriano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.016
37. Long-Term Changes of Morphodynamics on Little Ice Age Lateral Moraines and the Resulting Sediment Transfer into Mountain Streams in the Upper Kauner Valley, Austria M. Altmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123375
38. Estimation of debris flood magnitudes based on dendrogeomorphic data and semi-empirical relationships K. Schraml et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.06.009
39. Estimation of the area of sediment deposition by debris flow using a physical-based modeling approach H. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.049
40. Landslide recognition and mapping in a mixed forest environment from airborne LiDAR data T. Görüm https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105155
41. Runout analysis of a large rockfall in the Dolomites/Italian Alps using LIDAR derived particle sizes and shapes F. Haas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3295
42. Exploring debris‐flow history and process dynamics using an integrative approach on a dolomitic cone in western Austria E. Procter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3207
43. A control volume finite-element model for predicting the morphology of cohesive-frictional debris flow deposits T. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-325-2023
44. Computing spatially distributed sediment delivery ratios: inferring functional sediment connectivity from repeat high‐resolution digital elevation models T. Heckmann & D. Vericat https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4334
45. Debris-Flow Channel Headwater Dynamics: Examining Channel Recharge Cycles With Terrestrial Laser Scanning D. Bonneau et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.883259
46. Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion K. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01017.1
47. Fusion Analysis of Optical Satellite Images and Digital Elevation Model for Quantifying Volume in Debris Flow Disaster H. Miura https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11091096
48. A new approach to estimating hazard posed by debris flows in the Westfjords of Iceland S. Conway et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.08.015
49. Debris‐flow release processes investigated through the analysis of multi‐temporal LiDAR datasets in north‐western Iceland C. Morino et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4488
50. Long-term monitoring of torrential rainfall effects on talus cones stability in the alpine terrain (the High Tatras) S. Jacko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02614-8
51. Methods for detecting channel bed surface changes in a mountain torrent – experiences from the Dorfbach torrent C. Willi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-70-265-2015
52. Assessment of erosion and deposition in steep mountain basins by differencing sequential digital terrain models M. Cavalli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.04.009
53. Effect of the construction of ski runs on changes in relief in a mountain catchment (Inner Carpathians, Southern Poland) J. Fidelus-Orzechowska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.305
54. Deciphering controls for debris‐flow erosion derived from a LiDAR‐recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Roßbichelbach, Germany) A. Dietrich & M. Krautblatter https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4578
55. Sediment sources and delivery of Norwegian mountain rivers in a changing climate J. Bogen https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14701
56. Characterizing streams and riparian areas with airborne laser scanning data P. Tompalski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.01.038
57. Multi-temporal analysis of the role of check dams in a debris-flow channel: Linking structural and functional connectivity S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106844
58. Comparative analysis of the differences between using LiDAR and contour-based DEMs for hydrological modeling of runoff generating debris flows in the Dolomites M. Degetto et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00021
59. Mapping and quantifying sediment transfer between the front of rapidly moving rock glaciers and torrential gullies M. Kummert & R. Delaloye https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.02.021
60. Assessing levee stability with geometric parameters derived from airborne LiDAR A. Casas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.003
61. Remote Sensing for Landslide Investigations: An Overview of Recent Achievements and Perspectives M. Scaioni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109600
62. Channel position-dependent erosivity of steep debris flows combining gravitational and erosive processes: Towards predictive modeling V. Stammberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108919
63. Magnitude–frequency relationships of debris flows — A case study based on field surveys and tree-ring records M. Stoffel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.009