95 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Introduce a framework for landslide risk assessment using geospatial analysis: a case study from Kegalle District, Sri Lanka E. Perera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00811-z
2. Vulnerability and adaptive capacities to slope failure threat: a study of the Klang Valley Region P. Thanapackiam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0108-6
3. A simple method for landslide risk assessment in the Rivière Aux Vases basin, Quebec, Canada A. Regmi & N. Agrawal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100247
4. A novel model for multi-risk ranking of buildings at city level based on open data: the test site of Rome, Italy G. Mastrantoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2275541
5. Estimating elements susceptible to urban flooding using multisource data and machine learning W. Asfaw et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105169
6. Use of GIS in assessing building vulnerability for landslide hazard in The Nilgiris, Western Ghats, India E. Thennavan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2232-1
7. Enhancing Landslide Vulnerability Mapping Through Automated Fuzzy Logic Algorithm-Based Methodology A. Bruzón et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02714-z
8. Socio-economic determinants of landslide risk perception in Murree hills of Pakistan S. Qasim et al. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2018.5.305
9. Physical flood vulnerability assessment of buildings in Kota Bharu, Malaysia: an indicator-based approach I. Usman Kaoje et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2020-0046
10. Rainfall-induced landslide risk: the state of the art and future needs T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12541-5
11. Physical vulnerability assessment of buildings exposed to landslides in India A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03568-y
12. Quantitative assessment of the impact of earthquake-induced geohazards on natural landscapes in Jiuzhaigou Valley X. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5240-7
13. Economic valuation of landslide damage in hilly regions: A case study from Flanders, Belgium L. Vranken et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.025
14. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
15. Spatiotemporal patterns of landslide exposure – a step within future landslide risk analysis on a regional scale applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs Austria C. Promper et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.003
16. Assessing community vulnerability to landslide and flood in northwestern Rwanda C. Idukunda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105329
17. Assessment of recharge capacity potential of groundwater using comparative multi-criteria decision analysis approaches I. Minea et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1970-0
18. Integration of Vulnerability and Hazard Factors for Landslide Risk Assessment P. Arrogante-Funes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211987
19. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
20. Analysing physical vulnerability and risk of historical religious buildings to earthquake-triggered landslides F. Del Carlo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2025.2507286
21. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
22. Modelling Burglary Susceptibility – An Expert Judgement Approach S. Azmy et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012042
23. An indicator based approach for assessing household’s perceptions of landslide risk in Murree hills of Pakistan S. Qasim & M. Qasim https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04076-8
24. An integrated approach for evaluating the effectiveness of landslide risk reduction in unplanned communities in the Caribbean E. Holcombe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9920-7
25. Building Blocks: A Quantitative Approach for Evaluating Coastal Vulnerability K. Kantamaneni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120905
26. Vulnerability Analysis of House Construction on Cut Slopes Based on Coupled Data-Driven and Physics-Based Simulations S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16157758
27. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
28. Quantitative risk analysis for earthquake-induced landslides—Emamzadeh Ali, Iran S. Mousavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.05.010
29. Comparing the suitability of global gridded population datasets for local landslide risk assessments A. Opdyke & K. Fatima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06283-5
30. Acquiring vulnerability indicators to geo-hydrological hazards: An example of mobile phone-based data collection P. Salvati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102087
31. Damage analysis of masonry structures subjected to rockfalls O. Mavrouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0765-8
32. Landslide Risk Assessment in Eastern Kentucky, USA: Developing a Regional Scale, Limited Resource Approach M. Crawford et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246246
33. Assessing landslide susceptibility in Chefchaouen, Morocco: An application of the landslide numerical risk factor method for sustainable urban development and disaster risk management L. Dahmani et al. https://doi.org/10.15421/012442
34. Mapping and characterising buildings for flood exposure analysis using open-source data and artificial intelligence K. Bhuyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05612-4
35. Multitemporal landslide exposure and vulnerability assessment in Medellín, Colombia M. Kühnl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05679-z
36. Vulnerability Assessment in the Context of Earthquake Resilience: Case Study of Bayraklı, İzmir, Turkey H. Aydın & D. Gerçek https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.1664234
37. Integrated Approach for Landslide Risk Assessment Using Geoinformation Tools and Field Data in Hindukush Mountain Ranges, Northern Pakistan N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043102
38. Fuzzy set theory and pixel-based landslide risk assessment: the case of Shafe and Baso catchments, Gamo highland, Ethiopia L. Shano et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00774-y
39. An integrated approach to social vulnerability assessment of groundwater resources in the Moldavian Plain under temperate climatic conditions I. Minea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102308
40. Multilayer-exposure maps as a basis for a regional vulnerability assessment for landslides: applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs, Austria C. Promper & T. Glade https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2311-3
41. A methodological framework of landslide quantitative risk assessment in areas with incomplete historical landslide information X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-7950-8
42. Assessing the physical vulnerability of the houses to cyclonic hazard and its relation with economic and environmental factors: a study from the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve of India T. Nasrin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06808-6
43. Landslide quantitative risk analysis of buildings at the municipal scale based on a rainfall triggering scenario S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1250116
44. Harmonized methodology for cross-border hazard and risk assessment of earthquake-induced landslides at regional scale J. Bojadjieva et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02505-y
45. A Multiscale FE Framework for Flood–Structure Interaction: Integrated Hydraulic Actions and Structural Damage Prediction U. De Maio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081503
46. Characterization of elements at risk in the multirisk coastal context and at different spatial scales: Multi-database integration (normandy, France). K. Graff et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102076
47. Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka E. Perera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00615-w
48. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
49. Examining the physical and human dichotomy in geography: existing divisions and possible mergers in pedagogic outlooks R. Dasgupta & P. Patel https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12220
50. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
51. Finite Element and Vulnerability Analyses of a Building Failure due to Landslide in Kaithakunda, Kerala, India R. Andrewwinner et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5297864
52. A new approach for assessing landslide vulnerability at the urban scale: the case of the city of Constantine, Algeria M. BOUAOUD & S. MEZHOUD https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.10432
53. A simplified method for assessing landslide damage indices O. Petrucci & G. Gullà https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9398-8
54. Integration of a limit-equilibrium model into a landslide early warning system B. Thiebes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0416-2
55. Rockfall Vulnerability of a Rural Road Network—A Methodological Approach in the Harz Mountains, Germany A. Wohlers & B. Damm https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12040170
56. A modified approach for semi-quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability of buildings exposed to different landslide intensity scenarios A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2018.1501076
57. Landslide risk assessment in a densely populated hilly area L. Vranken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0506-9
58. Retreat from flood zones: Simulating land use changes in response to compound flood risk in coastal communities Y. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104953
59. Assessment of household vulnerability to embankment breaching in the coastal area of the Indian Sundarban I. Barui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104632
60. Vulnerability indicators for natural hazards: an innovative selection and weighting approach M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50257-2
61. Machine learning for sinkhole risk mapping in Guidonia-Bagni di Tivoli plain (Rome), Italy S. Bianchini et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2113455
62. A WebGIS decision-support system for slope stability based on limit-equilibrium modelling B. Thiebes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.004
63. Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography R. Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016
64. Analysis and quantification of potential consequences in multirisk coastal context at different spatial scales (Normandy, France) K. Graff et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03763-5
65. Disaster risk assessment of educational infrastructure in mountain geographies using PROMETHEE-II S. Mir et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104489
66. Building Vulnerability to Landslides: Broad-Scale Assessment in Xinxing County, China F. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134366
67. A GIS-Based Approach for Shallow Landslides Risk Assessment in the Giampilieri and Briga Catchments Areas (Sicily, Italy) G. Vegliante et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5010011
68. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides: the case of the Three Gorges area, China L. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0518-5
69. Stochastic landslide vulnerability modeling in space and time in a part of the northern Himalayas, India I. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1668-0
70. Probabilistic framework for quantifying human flight failure rate to landslides S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107723
71. Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology A. Puissant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x
72. The value of multi-source data for improved flood damage modelling with explicit input data uncertainty treatment: INSYDE 2.0 M. Di Bacco et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1681-2024
73. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
74. Physical vulnerability evaluation of buildings exposed to Balia Nala landslide using indicator-based approach and GIS: a case study of Nainital town, Uttarakhand, India H. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09742-8
75. Fast detection of ground motions on vulnerable elements using Sentinel-1 InSAR data L. Solari et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1413013
76. Quantifying human vulnerability in rural areas: case study of Tutova Hills (Eastern Romania) I. Stângă & A. Grozavu https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1987-2012
77. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
78. Assessing environmental fragility in a mining areafor specific spatial planning purposes R. Cocheci et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2019-0013
79. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
80. A semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment of central Kahramanmaraş City in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey Ç. Biçer & M. Ercanoglu https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05697-w
81. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories T. Martha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
82. Assessment of socioeconomic vulnerability to landslides using an indicator-based approach: methodology and case studies U. Eidsvig et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0571-2
83. Improving the assessment of volcanic risk from in-situ vulnerability studies: A methodological approach through the case study of the Ollagüe volcano, northern Chile A. Esquivel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100428
84. Time evolution of landslide damages to buildings: the case study of Lungro (Calabria, southern Italy) L. Antronico et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0591-y
85. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
86. Application of geospatial technologies for multi-hazard mapping and characterization of associated risk at local scale H. Kaur et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2018.1424739
87. 基于滑坡致灾强度预测的建筑物易损性定量评价 T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2022.429
88. The impact of the aggregation formula on indicator-based method for the assessment of building susceptibility to hydro-meteorological hazards R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102850
89. Indicator-based approach for assigning physical vulnerability of the houses to landslide hazard in the Himalayan region of India S. Bera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101891
90. Investigating the effective consequences on the assets of an urban system in facing scenario-based hazards S. Givehchi et al. https://doi.org/10.25100/eg.v0i28.14399
91. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
92. Climate vulnerability mapping: A systematic review and future prospects A. de Sherbinin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.600
93. Flood vulnerability assessment in the mountain–plateau transition zone: a case study of Marginea village (Romania) G. Romanescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12249
94. Vulnerability assessment of mountainous households to landslides: A multidimensional study in the rural Himalayas H. Mirdda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102809
95. Integrating Social and Physical Vulnerabilities to Assess Landslide Risk in the Aizawl Municipal Area, Mizoram, India Z. Laltanpuia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02243-7