44 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. GIS-based assessment of risk due to salt mining activities at Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina) F. Mancini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.018
2. Proposed vulnerability assessment model for masonry buildings on slow-moving landslides based on physical models and field observations Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03385-z
3. Facing and managing natural disasters in the Sporades islands, Greece P. Karanikola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-995-2014
4. Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls O. Mavrouli & J. Corominas https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0200-5
5. Soil erosion susceptibility mapping for current and 2100 climate conditions using evidential belief function and frequency ratio M. Tehrany et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1384406
6. Observing slope stability changes on the basis of tilt and hydrologic measurements G. Mentes https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2016-0020
7. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the evidential belief function model in GIS B. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1128-1
8. Surface roughness dating of long-runout landslides near Oso, Washington (USA), reveals persistent postglacial hillslope instability S. LaHusen et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/G37267.1
9. Physical vulnerability assessment procedures for confined and unconfined (unreinforced) clay brick masonry buildings due to mass movements, rigid foundation A. Silva-Ceron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108091
10. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
11. Integration of PSI, MAI, and Intensity-Based Sub-Pixel Offset Tracking Results for Landslide Monitoring with X-Band Corner Reflectors—Italian Alps (Corvara) M. Darvishi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10030409
12. A methodology for estimating risks associated with landslides of contaminated soil into rivers G. Göransson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.013
13. Coğrafi bilgi sistemleri kullanılarak Kürtün Irmağı Havzası’nda (Samsun) heyelan duyarlılık analizi İ. Demirağ Turan & A. Kayaalp https://doi.org/10.33409/tbbbd.1719504
14. Risk evolution: how can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards? B. Schwendtner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013
15. Contribution to Czech Terminology in Landslide Risk Studies J. Blahůt & J. Klimeš https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2011116010079
16. Brief communication: Weak correlation between building damage and loss of life from landslides M. Van Wyk de Vries et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1937-2025
17. Development of methodology for quantitative landslide risk assessment—Example Göta river valley Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2014.63018
18. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
19. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
20. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
21. Assessment of risks of loose landslide deposits formed by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1381-2012
22. Integrating Social and Physical Vulnerabilities to Assess Landslide Risk in the Aizawl Municipal Area, Mizoram, India Z. Laltanpuia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02243-7
23. Preparing first-time slope failures hazard maps: from pixel-based to slope unit-based G. Domènech et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01279-4
24. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
25. Landslide cost modeling for transportation infrastructures: a methodological approach M. Klose et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0481-1
26. Detailed and large-scale cost/benefit analyses of landslide prevention vs. post-event actions G. Salbego et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2461-2015
27. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
28. Geospatial assessment of urban sprawl and landslide susceptibility around the Nainital lake, Uttarakhand, India J. Dey et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00731-z
29. Valuing landslide risk reduction programs in the Italian Alps: The effect of visual information on preference stability S. Mattea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.032
30. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
31. Assessment of physical vulnerability of buildings and analysis of landslide risk at the municipal scale: application to the Loures municipality, Portugal C. Guillard-Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-311-2016
32. Qualitative hazard and risk assessment of landslides: a practical framework for a case study in China H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0008-1
33. Integration of statistical and heuristic approaches for landslide risk analysis: a case of volcanic mountains in West Java Province, Indonesia . Ngadisih et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.826030
34. Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: a case study in Tresenda, northern Italy B. Quan Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2986-7
35. Risk assessment of debris flow in Yushu seismic area in China: a perspective for the reconstruction H. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2957-2013
36. Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey) A. Akgun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2352-8
37. Landslide risk management—A brief overview and example from Sweden of current situation and climate change Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.002
38. Assessment of the physical vulnerability of buildings affected by slow-moving landslides Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2547-2020
39. Examining professional emergency managers in Korea K. Ha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.09.004
40. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation Model in Rwanda J. Nsengiyumva et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020243
41. Introduce a framework for landslide risk assessment using geospatial analysis: a case study from Kegalle District, Sri Lanka E. Perera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00811-z
42. Integrated approach to evaluate unstable rocky slopes: case study of Aqabat Al-Sulbat road in Aseer Province, Saudi Arabia K. Khedher et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20130-3
43. Two-tier framework for landslide risk assessment of construction solid waste landfills H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2026.115828
44. Multilayer-exposure maps as a basis for a regional vulnerability assessment for landslides: applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs, Austria C. Promper & T. Glade https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2311-3