210 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Risk assessment of simultaneous debris flows in mountain townships P. Cui et al. 10.1177/0309133313491445
2. Automatic identification of buildings vulnerable to debris flows in Sichuan Province, China, by GIS analysis and Deep Encoding Network methods L. Wei et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12830
3. New insights on rainfall triggering flow-like landslides and flash floods in Campania (Southern Italy) N. Santangelo et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01667-9
4. Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR) W. Abdulwahid & B. Pradhan 10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0
5. Applicability of Diffusive model for mud-flows: An unsteady analysis C. Di Cristo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126512
6. Debris flow and debris flood hazard assessment in mountain catchments T. Baggio et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2024.108338
7. Applicability of Kinematic model for mud-flows: An unsteady analysis C. Di Cristo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123967
8. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
9. Landslide quantitative risk analysis of buildings at the municipal scale based on a rainfall triggering scenario S. Pereira et al. 10.1080/19475705.2016.1250116
10. Flood Risk Analysis by Building Use in Urban Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation I. Yu et al. 10.3390/su132313006
11. Physical vulnerability assessment of buildings exposed to landslides in India A. Singh et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-03568-y
12. Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011 C. Dowling & P. Santi 10.1007/s11069-013-0907-4
13. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
14. Vulnerability assessment for buildings exposed to torrential hazards at Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor Y. Lei et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106803
15. Regional vulnerability assessment for debris flows in China—a CWS approach M. Ding et al. 10.1007/s10346-015-0578-1
16. Landslide size matters: A new data-driven, spatial prototype L. Lombardo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106288
17. A systematic review for assessing the impact of climate change on landslides: research gaps and directions for future research A. Sharma et al. 10.1007/s41324-023-00551-z
18. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
19. Laboratory investigations of the role of biofilms on stream‐bed surfaces in debris‐flow runout Y. Tang et al. 10.1002/esp.4794
20. Debris flow damage incurred to buildings: an in situ back analysis F. Jalayer et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12238
21. Debris flow disaster risk analysis and modeling via numerical simulation and land use assessment J. Wang et al. 10.1007/s12517-020-05958-8
22. Quantification of debris flow vulnerability of typical bridge substructure based on impact force simulation Y. Liang & F. Xiong 10.1080/19475705.2019.1641564
23. Stochastic landslide vulnerability modeling in space and time in a part of the northern Himalayas, India I. Das et al. 10.1007/s10661-010-1668-0
24. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
25. Lahar risk assessment from source identification to potential impact analysis: the case of Vulcano Island, Italy A. Gattuso et al. 10.1186/s13617-021-00107-6
26. The March 2015 catastrophic flood event and its impacts in the city of Copiapó (southern Atacama Desert). An integrated analysis to mitigate future mudflow derived damages T. Izquierdo et al. 10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102975
27. Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5
28. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. 10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
29. A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings B. Mazzorana et al. 10.5194/hess-18-3817-2014
30. Upgrading of an index-oriented methodology for consequence analysis of natural hazards: application to the Upper Guil catchment (southern French Alps) B. Carlier et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018
31. Catchment-scale flood hazard mapping and flood vulnerability analysis of residential buildings: The case of Khando River in eastern Nepal S. Thapa et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100704
32. Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning H. Sritart et al. 10.3390/su12187355
33. Coupling effect analysis of dam break flood spread and building collapse based on numerical simulation T. Song et al. 10.1007/s11431-023-2771-y
34. Damage analysis of masonry structures subjected to rockfalls O. Mavrouli et al. 10.1007/s10346-016-0765-8
35. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
36. Vulnerability Degree Assessment of Red Tide Disaster Based on High-Resolution RS Images and GIS S. Wen et al. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.500.481
37. Flood Risk Assessment to Enable Improved Decision-Making for Climate Change Adaptation Strategies by Central and Local Governments I. Yu & H. Jung 10.3390/su142114335
38. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
39. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira 10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
40. Assessing landslide exposure in areas with limited landslide information R. Pellicani et al. 10.1007/s10346-013-0386-4
41. Development of structural type-based physical vulnerability curves to debris flow using numerical analysis and regression model J. Lee et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104431
42. An interactive web-GIS tool for risk analysis: a case study in the Fella River basin, Italy Z. Aye et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-85-2016
43. Space-Based Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management G. Le Cozannet et al. 10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
44. Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change M. Khan et al. 10.3390/land11122240
45. Study on Physical Vulnerability Curves of Buildings by Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.155
46. Physics of building vulnerability to debris flows, floods and earth flows H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105611
47. Fuzzy Formative Scenario Analysis for woody material transport related risks in mountain torrents B. Mazzorana & S. Fuchs 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.030
48. Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain H. Zheng et al. 10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7
49. Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0352-9
50. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. 10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
51. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
52. 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes B. Gems et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-1351-2016
53. Farmers' perceptions on the impact of climate change: Case study of the agricultural sector of Cambodia S. Thav et al. 10.30852/sb.2023.2224
54. A novel approach to flood risk assessment: the Exposure-Vulnerability matrices S. Naso et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160708007
55. A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data S. Fuchs et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
56. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. 10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
57. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
58. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
59. Determination of the potential economic flood damages in Medzev, Slovakia M. Zeleňáková et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12298
60. Assessing vulnerability of buildings to hydro-meteorological hazards using an expert based approach – An application in Nehoiu Valley, Romania A. Godfrey et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
61. Multi-vulnerability analysis for flash flood risk management K. Karagiorgos et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2296-y
62. Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment U. Eidsvig et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.006
63. Assessment of pluvial flood exposure and vulnerability of residential areas T. Grahn & L. Nyberg 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.016
64. Debris flow runout behaviors considering the influences of densely populated buildings S. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s11629-023-8390-1
65. Landslide risk assessment in a densely populated hilly area L. Vranken et al. 10.1007/s10346-014-0506-9
66. Quantifying Sediment Deposition Volume in Vegetated Areas with UAV Data S. Emtehani et al. 10.3390/rs13122391
67. Generation of a flood susceptibility map of evenly weighted conditioning factors for Hungary N. Sarkadi et al. 10.5937/gp26-38969
68. Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact C. Zeng et al. 10.1007/s10346-014-0490-0
69. An integrated approach to the study of catastrophic debris-flows: geological hazard and human influence C. Del Ventisette et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-2907-2012
70. Quantitative assessment of expected direct economic losses of buildings for debris flows in multiple rainfall intensity scenarios in Yangling Gully, Southwest China M. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-06315-0
71. Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams B. Mazzorana et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.030
72. Development of structural debris flow fragility curves (debris flow buildings resistance) using momentum flux rate as a hazard parameter J. Prieto et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.014
73. Reliability-based formulation of building vulnerability to debris flow impacts H. Luo et al. 10.1139/cgj-2020-0120
74. Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology A. Puissant et al. 10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x
75. Vulnerability curves for masonry buildings affected by hyperconcentrated flows as natural disaster risk management tools for the quantification of material damage A. Jara et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/958/1/012021
76. Public perception and stakeholder involvement in the crisis management of sediment‐related disasters and their mitigation: The case of the Stože debris flow in NW Slovenia M. Mikoš 10.1002/ieam.140
77. Risk evolution: how can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards? B. Schwendtner et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013
78. A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters R. Sun et al. 10.1007/s11069-019-03826-7
79. Quantifying human vulnerability in rural areas: case study of Tutova Hills (Eastern Romania) I. Stângă & A. Grozavu 10.5194/nhess-12-1987-2012
80. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
81. Vulnerability, hazards and multiple risk assessment for Georgia O. Varazanashvili et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0374-3
82. Using web-based observations to identify thresholds of a person's stability in a flow L. Milanesi et al. 10.1002/2016WR019182
83. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
84. Disaster risk, social vulnerability, and economic development P. Ward & G. Shively 10.1111/disa.12199
85. Spatiotemporal patterns of landslide exposure – a step within future landslide risk analysis on a regional scale applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs Austria C. Promper et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.003
86. Runout model evaluation based on back-calculation of building damage K. Barnhart et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341507001
87. Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout R. El Meouche et al. 10.3390/su12104065
88. Observations of the atmospheric electric field preceding intense rainfall events in the Dolomite Alps near Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy M. Bernard et al. 10.1007/s00703-019-00677-6
89. Physical vulnerability evaluation of buildings exposed to Balia Nala landslide using indicator-based approach and GIS: a case study of Nainital town, Uttarakhand, India H. Tiwari et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-09742-8
90. A new approach to assessing vulnerability of mountain highways subject to debris flows in China Q. Zou et al. 10.1177/0309133318770985
91. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
92. Development and Application of Urban Landslide Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Reflecting Social and Economic Variables Y. Park et al. 10.1155/2016/4572498
93. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
94. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories T. Martha et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
95. Identifying potential debris flow hazards after the 2022 Mw 6.8 Luding earthquake in southwestern China M. Chen et al. 10.1007/s10064-024-03749-z
96. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
97. Vulnerability to Flash Floods: A Simplified Structural Model for Masonry Buildings L. Milanesi et al. 10.1029/2018WR022577
98. Experimental study on debris-flow velocity control mechanism with baffles in a drainage channel F. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10064-020-02086-1
99. Development of a Meteorological Risk Map for Disaster Mitigation and Management in the Chishan Basin, Taiwan T. Lee et al. 10.3390/su7010962
100. A Conceptual Framework for Vulnerability Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Critical Oil and Gas Infrastructure in the Niger Delta J. Udie et al. 10.3390/cli6010011
101. Multi-scale debris flow vulnerability assessment and direct loss estimation of buildings in the Eastern Italian Alps R. Ciurean et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2612-6
102. Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation Y. Tang et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.821735
103. Detection of debris-flow events from seismic signals using Benford’s law Q. Zhou et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341503033
104. Assessing strategies to mitigate debris-flow risk in Abancay province, south-central Peruvian Andes C. Rodríguez-Morata et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.06.012
105. Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact M. Jakob et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-0007-2
106. Territorial Accessibility and Decision-Making Structure Related to Debris Flow Impacts on Roads in the French Alps M. Utasse et al. 10.1007/s13753-016-0088-3
107. Vulnerability and adaptive capacities to slope failure threat: a study of the Klang Valley Region P. Thanapackiam et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0108-6
108. Terrace Abandonment Hazards in a Mediterranean Cultural Landscape L. Boccia et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000473
109. Semi-quantitative method to identify the vulnerable areas in terms of building aggregation for probable landslide runout at the regional scale: a case study from Soacha Province, Colombia A. Pradhan et al. 10.1007/s10064-019-01533-y
110. A three-level framework for multi-risk assessment Z. Liu et al. 10.1080/17499518.2015.1041989
111. The impact of rockfalls on dwellings during the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes A. Grant et al. 10.1007/s10346-017-0855-2
112. Spatiotemporal Variations and Risk Analysis of Chinese Typhoon Disasters F. Chen et al. 10.3390/su13042278
113. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
114. Analysis of Landslide Vulnerabilities in Small and Medium-Sized Cities of ColombiaⅠ: With Focus on Physical Vulnerability J. Lee et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.87
115. Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact H. Luo et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
116. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12712
117. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
118. Multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data using supervised learning approaches D. Wagenaar et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-1683-2017
119. Vulnerability Assessment in Technology-Based Systems: A Case Study in Tehran Gas Supply Network E. Shoja et al. 10.52547/johe.8.1.19
120. Integrating expert opinion with modelling for quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment in the Eastern Italian Alps L. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.041
121. Quantitative analysis of consequences to masonry buildings interacting with slow-moving landslide mechanisms: a case study D. Peduto et al. 10.1007/s10346-018-1014-0
122. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
123. Multi-hazard vulnerability of buildings to debris flows H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105859
124. Building vulnerability to hydro-geomorphic hazards: Estimating damage probability from qualitative vulnerability assessment using logistic regression S. Ettinger et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.017
125. GIS-based cell model for simulating debris flow runout on a fan C. Gregoretti et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.054
126. A physically-based multi-hazard risk assessment platform for regional rainfall-induced slope failures and debris flows H. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.009
127. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
128. The Application of the Risk Concept to Debris Flow Hazards S. Fuchs et al. 10.1002/geot.200800013
129. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
130. Social vulnerability assessment using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SEVI model) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI model) – a case study for Bucharest, Romania I. Armaș & A. Gavriș 10.5194/nhess-13-1481-2013
131. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
132. Experimental and numerical study on the design of a deposition basin outlet structure at a mountain debris cone B. Gems et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-175-2014
133. Analysis of pluvial flood damage costs in residential buildings – A case study in Malmö S. Mobini et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102407
134. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
135. Generation of a national landslide hazard and risk map for the country of Georgia G. Gaprindashvili & C. Van Westen 10.1007/s11069-015-1958-5
136. Empirical flash flood vulnerability functions for residential buildings C. Arrighi et al. 10.1007/s42452-020-2696-1
137. Debris flow hazard evaluation based on the GTW-ECM in Shijiaying Township, China Q. Ni et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-10426-6
138. Simulating the effect of check dam collapse in a debris-flow channel T. Baggio & V. D'Agostino 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151660
139. A Method for Assessing Flood Vulnerability Based on Vulnerability Curves and Online Data of Residential Buildings—A Case Study of Shanghai Z. Li et al. 10.3390/w14182840
140. Assessing Flood Risk of Heritage Sites in an Urban Area: Impact of Locational Characteristics and Historical Context J. Kim & H. Sung 10.3390/su162310473
141. Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls O. Mavrouli & J. Corominas 10.1007/s10346-010-0200-5
142. Revisiting landslide risk terms: IAEG commission C-37 working group on landslide risk nomenclature J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-023-03474-z
143. Assessing coastal landscape vulnerability using geospatial techniques along Vizianagaram–Srikakulam coast of Andhra Pradesh, India M. Rani et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3414-9
144. Urban flood depth-economic loss curves and their amendment based on resilience: evidence from Lizhong Town in Lixia River and Houbai Town in Jurong River of China X. Wu et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2281-5
145. Results and experiences gathered at the Rebaixader debris-flow monitoring site, Central Pyrenees, Spain M. Hürlimann et al. 10.1007/s10346-013-0452-y
146. Quantitative micro-scale flood risk assessment in a section of the Trotuș River, Romania R. Țîncu et al. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.040
147. Annual landslide risk and effectiveness of risk reduction measures in Shihmen watershed, Taiwan S. Chen & C. Wu 10.1007/s10346-015-0588-z
148. Methodology of disaster risk assessment for debris flows in a river basin I. Chiou et al. 10.1007/s00477-014-0932-1
149. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport M. Sturm et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.016
150. Regional prioritisation of flood risk in mountainous areas M. Rogelis et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-833-2016
151. A probabilistic approach for landslide hazard analysis S. Lari et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.015
152. Model-based approach for design and performance evaluation of works controlling stony debris flows with an application to a case study at Rovina di Cancia (Venetian Dolomites, Northeast Italy) M. Bernard et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.468
153. Risk Assessment of Flash Flood to Buildings Using an Indicator-Based Methodology: A Case Study of Mountainous Rural Settlements in Southwest China Y. Zhen et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.931029
154. The structural vulnerability in the framework of natural hazard risk analyses and the exemplary application for storm loss modelling in Tyrol (Austria) M. Huttenlau & J. Stötter 10.1007/s11069-011-9768-x
155. Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China K. Hu et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-2209-2012
156. Enriching Great Britain's National Landslide Database by searching newspaper archives F. Taylor et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.019
157. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi 10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
158. Integrated flash flood vulnerability assessment: Insights from East Attica, Greece K. Karagiorgos et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.052
159. Analytic Back Calculation of Debris Flow Damage Incurred to a Masonry Building: The Case of Scaletta Zanclea 2009 Event H. Soleimankhani et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160704007
160. A GIS-Based Approach for Shallow Landslides Risk Assessment in the Giampilieri and Briga Catchments Areas (Sicily, Italy) G. Vegliante et al. 10.3390/geohazards5010011
161. A probabilistic approach for performance-based assessment of highway bridges under post-earthquake induced landslides Y. Pang et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107207
162. Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design M. Holub et al. 10.1007/s12665-011-1410-4
163. Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods K. Karagiorgos et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2476-9
164. An analysis of physical vulnerability to flash floods in the small mountainous watershed of Aceh Besar Regency, Aceh province, Indonesia A. Azmeri & A. Isa 10.4102/jamba.v10i1.550
165. Debris-flow risk analysis in a managed torrent based on a stochastic life-cycle performance J. Ballesteros Cánovas et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.036
166. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov 10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
167. Allocation of risk and benefits—distributional justices in mountain hazard management T. Thaler et al. 10.1007/s10113-017-1229-y
168. Short communication: A model to predict flood loss in mountain areas S. Fuchs et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.026
169. Terraced landscapes: risk and liability G. Delogu et al. 10.4081/jae.2024.1618
170. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
171. Model tests of the failure behaviors of buildings under the impact of granular flow L. Xing et al. 10.1007/s10346-024-02372-z
172. Damage assessment of lake floods: Insured damage to private property during two lake floods in Sweden 2000/2001 T. Grahn & R. Nyberg 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.003
173. Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods J. Du et al. 10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6
174. Empirical relationships for the estimation of debris flow runout distances on depositional fans in the Wenchuan earthquake zone W. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123932
175. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
176. Flow-type landslide fragility of reinforced concrete framed buildings F. Parisi & G. Sabella 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.013
177. The impact of the aggregation formula on indicator-based method for the assessment of building susceptibility to hydro-meteorological hazards R. Agliata et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102850
178. Non-Monotonic Relationships between Return Periods of Precipitation Surface Hazard Intensity B. van den Bout et al. 10.3390/w14091348
179. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle 10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
180. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
181. Methodological Approaches to the Vulnerability Assessment for the Effect Quantification of Debris Flow Disaster Mitigation Facilities J. Lee et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.3.359
182. The accessibility of urban neighborhoods when buildings collapse due to an earthquake A. Golla et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102439
183. A spatiotemporal optimization model for the evacuation of the population exposed to flood hazard H. Alaeddine et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-687-2015
184. Understanding flood risk in the context of community resilience modeling for the built environment: research needs and trends O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt 10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
185. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
186. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
187. Debris flow modelling and hazard assessment for a glacier area: a case study in Barsem, Tajikistan K. Yılmaz et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05654-8
188. Physical vulnerability curve construction and quantitative risk assessment of a typhoon-triggered debris flow via numerical simulation: A case study of Zhejiang Province, SE China T. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10346-024-02218-8
189. Assessing flash flood vulnerability using a multi-vulnerability approach K. Karagiorgos et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160708004
190. Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China Y. Zhou et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1198-0
191. Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania I. Armaş & E. Avram 10.1007/s11069-008-9337-0
192. The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.1007/s11069-015-2032-z
193. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
194. Methodological approach for mapping the flood physical vulnerability index with geographical open-source data: an example in a small-middle city (Ponferrada, Spain) L. Tascón-González et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-06370-7
195. Assessment of Building Vulnerability with Varying Distances from Outlet Considering Impact Force of Debris Flow and Building Resistance M. Kim & J. Kwak 10.3390/w12072021
196. Development of Debris flow Vulnerability Curve for Data-driven Method C. Song et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341505025
197. A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport R. Totschnig et al. 10.1007/s11069-010-9623-5
198. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
199. The importance of indicator weights for vulnerability indices and implications for decision making in disaster management M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
200. Hydrogeomorphic Impacts of Floods in a First-Order Catchment: Integrated Approach Based on Dendrogeomorphic Palaeostage Indicators, 2D Hydraulic Modelling and Sedimentological Parameters R. Tichavský et al. 10.3390/w12010212
201. Monitoring the temporal development of natural hazard risks as a basis indicator for climate change adaptation A. Zischg et al. 10.1007/s11069-011-9927-0
202. A reliability-based approach for the impact vulnerability assessment of bridge piers subjected to debris flows S. Yan et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105567
203. Development and application of a model for assessing climate-related disaster risk I. Yu 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103218
204. Time capsule for landslide risk assessment Y. Lei et al. 10.1080/17499518.2023.2164899
205. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
206. Evaluation of debris-flow building damage forecasts K. Barnhart et al. 10.5194/nhess-24-1459-2024
207. Coupling Flood Propagation Modeling and Building Collapse in Flash Flood Studies L. Milanesi & M. Pilotti 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001941
208. Physical Vulnerability Function of Buildings Impacted by Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim 10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.133
209. Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? M. Gall et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.010
210. A Virtual Geographic Environment for Debris Flow Risk Analysis in Residential Areas L. Yin et al. 10.3390/ijgi6110377