238 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. What can be learnt from the catastrophic failure of a check dam system? A forensic analysis of a cascading natural-anthropogenic hazard E. Dallan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07301-4
2. Risk assessment of simultaneous debris flows in mountain townships P. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313491445
3. Automatic identification of buildings vulnerable to debris flows in Sichuan Province, China, by GIS analysis and Deep Encoding Network methods L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12830
4. New insights on rainfall triggering flow-like landslides and flash floods in Campania (Southern Italy) N. Santangelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01667-9
5. Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR) W. Abdulwahid & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0
6. Applicability of Diffusive model for mud-flows: An unsteady analysis C. Di Cristo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126512
7. Debris flow and debris flood hazard assessment in mountain catchments T. Baggio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108338
8. Applicability of Kinematic model for mud-flows: An unsteady analysis C. Di Cristo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123967
9. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
10. Landslide quantitative risk analysis of buildings at the municipal scale based on a rainfall triggering scenario S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1250116
11. Flood Risk Analysis by Building Use in Urban Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation I. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313006
12. Structural fragility curves for brick-concrete buildings subjected to debris flow loading in northern China using momentum flux approach X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112344
13. Physical vulnerability assessment of buildings exposed to landslides in India A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03568-y
14. Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011 C. Dowling & P. Santi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0907-4
15. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
16. Vulnerability assessment for buildings exposed to torrential hazards at Sichuan-Tibet transportation corridor Y. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106803
17. Regional vulnerability assessment for debris flows in China—a CWS approach M. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0578-1
18. Landslide size matters: A new data-driven, spatial prototype L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106288
19. A systematic review for assessing the impact of climate change on landslides: research gaps and directions for future research A. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-023-00551-z
20. Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
21. Laboratory investigations of the role of biofilms on stream‐bed surfaces in debris‐flow runout Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4794
22. Debris flow damage incurred to buildings: an in situ back analysis F. Jalayer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12238
23. Debris flow disaster risk analysis and modeling via numerical simulation and land use assessment J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05958-8
24. Quantification of debris flow vulnerability of typical bridge substructure based on impact force simulation Y. Liang & F. Xiong https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1641564
25. Stochastic landslide vulnerability modeling in space and time in a part of the northern Himalayas, India I. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1668-0
26. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
27. Lahar risk assessment from source identification to potential impact analysis: the case of Vulcano Island, Italy A. Gattuso et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-021-00107-6
28. The March 2015 catastrophic flood event and its impacts in the city of Copiapó (southern Atacama Desert). An integrated analysis to mitigate future mudflow derived damages T. Izquierdo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102975
29. Editorial for the special issue: vulnerability to natural hazards—the challenge of integration S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9825-5
30. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
31. Versagen von Schutzbauwerken: Analyse eines Überlastfalls einer Staffelstrecke am Beispiel des Rio Rotian (IT) G. Nagl & J. Hübl https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.70076
32. Effectiveness of Direct Protection Forests in Rockfall Mitigation: A Risk- and Cost-Based Assessment in Baunei (Sardinia, Italy) F. Giadrossich & M. Serra https://doi.org/10.3390/f16111687
33. A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3817-2014
34. Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping S. FUCHS et al. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2009.0007
35. Upgrading of an index-oriented methodology for consequence analysis of natural hazards: application to the Upper Guil catchment (southern French Alps) B. Carlier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2221-2018
36. Catchment-scale flood hazard mapping and flood vulnerability analysis of residential buildings: The case of Khando River in eastern Nepal S. Thapa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100704
37. Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning H. Sritart et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187355
38. Coupling effect analysis of dam break flood spread and building collapse based on numerical simulation T. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-023-2771-y
39. Damage analysis of masonry structures subjected to rockfalls O. Mavrouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0765-8
40. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
41. Vulnerability Degree Assessment of Red Tide Disaster Based on High-Resolution RS Images and GIS S. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.500.481
42. Flood Risk Assessment to Enable Improved Decision-Making for Climate Change Adaptation Strategies by Central and Local Governments I. Yu & H. Jung https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114335
43. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
44. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
45. Assessing landslide exposure in areas with limited landslide information R. Pellicani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0386-4
46. Development of structural type-based physical vulnerability curves to debris flow using numerical analysis and regression model J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104431
47. An interactive web-GIS tool for risk analysis: a case study in the Fella River basin, Italy Z. Aye et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-85-2016
48. Space-Based Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
49. Assessment of Physical Vulnerability and Uncertainties for Debris Flow Hazard: A Review concerning Climate Change M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11122240
50. Study on Physical Vulnerability Curves of Buildings by Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.155
51. Physics of building vulnerability to debris flows, floods and earth flows H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105611
52. Fuzzy Formative Scenario Analysis for woody material transport related risks in mountain torrents B. Mazzorana & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.030
53. Assessment of Building Physical Vulnerability in Earthquake-Debris Flow Disaster Chain H. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00509-7
54. Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0352-9
55. Multi hazard risk assessment through geospatial analysis and machine learning P. Pidurkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00540-1
56. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
57. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
58. 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes B. Gems et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1351-2016
59. Farmers' perceptions on the impact of climate change: Case study of the agricultural sector of Cambodia S. Thav et al. https://doi.org/10.30852/sb.2023.2224
60. A novel approach to flood risk assessment: the Exposure-Vulnerability matrices S. Naso et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708007
61. A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2127-2015
62. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
63. Towards dynamics in flood risk assessment B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3571-2012
64. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
65. Optimizing check dams construction and afforestation for debris flows mitigation in slag and landslides- prone gullies L. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2026.109852
66. Determination of the potential economic flood damages in Medzev, Slovakia M. Zeleňáková et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12298
67. Assessing vulnerability of buildings to hydro-meteorological hazards using an expert based approach – An application in Nehoiu Valley, Romania A. Godfrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
68. Multi-vulnerability analysis for flash flood risk management K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2296-y
69. Quantification of model uncertainty in debris flow vulnerability assessment U. Eidsvig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.006
70. Assessment of pluvial flood exposure and vulnerability of residential areas T. Grahn & L. Nyberg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.016
71. A Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Approach for Risk Assessment of Slope Instability Driven by Glacier Melting in the Alpine Area G. Castellazzi & M. Previtali https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411524
72. Progressive damage processes and quantitative vulnerability assessment of buildings under debris flow and mudflow impacts B. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121113
73. From snowmelt to disaster: modeling debris flow dynamics in the Shatoobar Nala watershed, Hunza, Pakistan H. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08068-y
74. Fragility and vulnerability curves of masonry buildings on slow-moving landslides: A comparative study on intensity parameters from MT-InSAR X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108212
75. Debris flow runout behaviors considering the influences of densely populated buildings S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8390-1
76. Landslide risk assessment in a densely populated hilly area L. Vranken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0506-9
77. Quantifying Sediment Deposition Volume in Vegetated Areas with UAV Data S. Emtehani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122391
78. Generation of a flood susceptibility map of evenly weighted conditioning factors for Hungary N. Sarkadi et al. https://doi.org/10.5937/gp26-38969
79. Failure modes of reinforced concrete columns of buildings under debris flow impact C. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0490-0
80. An integrated approach to the study of catastrophic debris-flows: geological hazard and human influence C. Del Ventisette et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2907-2012
81. Morphometric analysis of debris flow hazard and risk assessment in the mountain terrains of northern Pakistan using remote sensing and field data N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01807-y
82. Quantitative assessment of expected direct economic losses of buildings for debris flows in multiple rainfall intensity scenarios in Yangling Gully, Southwest China M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06315-0
83. Developing consistent scenarios to assess flood hazards in mountain streams B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.030
84. Development of structural debris flow fragility curves (debris flow buildings resistance) using momentum flux rate as a hazard parameter J. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.014
85. Reliability-based formulation of building vulnerability to debris flow impacts H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0120
86. Landslide consequence analysis: a region-scale indicator-based methodology A. Puissant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0429-x
87. Vulnerability curves for masonry buildings affected by hyperconcentrated flows as natural disaster risk management tools for the quantification of material damage A. Jara et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/958/1/012021
88. Public perception and stakeholder involvement in the crisis management of sediment-related disasters and their mitigation: The case of the Stože debris flow in NW Slovenia M. Mikoš https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.140
89. Risk evolution: how can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards? B. Schwendtner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2195-2013
90. A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03826-7
91. Is every flood rough on built environment? Flood fragility and vulnerability modeling for residential buildings S. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136215
92. Quantifying human vulnerability in rural areas: case study of Tutova Hills (Eastern Romania) I. Stângă & A. Grozavu https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1987-2012
93. Assessing Flood Risk Dynamics in Southern Laos: A Comparative Analysis of HEC-RAS, Empirical and Physically Based Froude Number Models along the Xekaman River K. PHOMMAVONG et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748125500137
94. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
95. Physical vulnerability assessment procedures for confined and unconfined (unreinforced) clay brick masonry buildings due to mass movements, rigid foundation A. Silva-Ceron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108091
96. Vulnerability, hazards and multiple risk assessment for Georgia O. Varazanashvili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0374-3
97. Using web-based observations to identify thresholds of a person's stability in a flow L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019182
98. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
99. Disaster risk, social vulnerability, and economic development P. Ward & G. Shively https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12199
100. Spatiotemporal patterns of landslide exposure – a step within future landslide risk analysis on a regional scale applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs Austria C. Promper et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.11.003
101. Runout model evaluation based on back-calculation of building damage K. Barnhart et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341507001
102. Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout R. El Meouche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104065
103. Observations of the atmospheric electric field preceding intense rainfall events in the Dolomite Alps near Cortina d’Ampezzo, Italy M. Bernard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-019-00677-6
104. Physical vulnerability evaluation of buildings exposed to Balia Nala landslide using indicator-based approach and GIS: a case study of Nainital town, Uttarakhand, India H. Tiwari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09742-8
105. Quantitative Risk Assessment of Buildings and Infrastructures: A Natural Hazard Perspective Under Extreme Rainfall Scenarios G. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052522
106. A new approach to assessing vulnerability of mountain highways subject to debris flows in China Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133318770985
107. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
108. Development and Application of Urban Landslide Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Reflecting Social and Economic Variables Y. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4572498
109. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
110. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories T. Martha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
111. Identifying potential debris flow hazards after the 2022 Mw 6.8 Luding earthquake in southwestern China M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03749-z
112. Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – An integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.003
113. Vulnerability to Flash Floods: A Simplified Structural Model for Masonry Buildings L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022577
114. Experimental study on debris-flow velocity control mechanism with baffles in a drainage channel F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02086-1
115. Development of a Meteorological Risk Map for Disaster Mitigation and Management in the Chishan Basin, Taiwan T. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010962
116. A Conceptual Framework for Vulnerability Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Critical Oil and Gas Infrastructure in the Niger Delta J. Udie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6010011
117. Multi-scale debris flow vulnerability assessment and direct loss estimation of buildings in the Eastern Italian Alps R. Ciurean et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2612-6
118. Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.821735
119. Detection of debris-flow events from seismic signals using Benford’s law Q. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341503033
120. Assessing strategies to mitigate debris-flow risk in Abancay province, south-central Peruvian Andes C. Rodríguez-Morata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.06.012
121. Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact M. Jakob et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0007-2
122. Respective impacts of global warming, permafrost thaw and urban sprawl on debris-flow risk: Insights from the Dorfbach Torrent, Swiss Alps G. da Silva Correia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110086
123. Territorial Accessibility and Decision-Making Structure Related to Debris Flow Impacts on Roads in the French Alps M. Utasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0088-3
124. Vulnerability and adaptive capacities to slope failure threat: a study of the Klang Valley Region P. Thanapackiam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0108-6
125. Terrace Abandonment Hazards in a Mediterranean Cultural Landscape L. Boccia et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000473
126. Semi-quantitative method to identify the vulnerable areas in terms of building aggregation for probable landslide runout at the regional scale: a case study from Soacha Province, Colombia A. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01533-y
127. A three-level framework for multi-risk assessment Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2015.1041989
128. The impact of rockfalls on dwellings during the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes A. Grant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0855-2
129. Spatiotemporal Variations and Risk Analysis of Chinese Typhoon Disasters F. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042278
130. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
131. Analysis of Landslide Vulnerabilities in Small and Medium-Sized Cities of ColombiaⅠ: With Focus on Physical Vulnerability J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.87
132. Progressive failure of buildings under landslide impact H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01164-0
133. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
134. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
135. Multi-variable flood damage modelling with limited data using supervised learning approaches D. Wagenaar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1683-2017
136. Vulnerability Assessment in Technology-Based Systems: A Case Study in Tehran Gas Supply Network E. Shoja et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/johe.8.1.19
137. Integrating expert opinion with modelling for quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment in the Eastern Italian Alps L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.041
138. 河谷滑坡灾害链风险评估及防控研究进展 M. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2025.142
139. Quantitative analysis of consequences to masonry buildings interacting with slow-moving landslide mechanisms: a case study D. Peduto et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1014-0
140. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
141. Multi-hazard vulnerability of buildings to debris flows H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105859
142. Building vulnerability to hydro-geomorphic hazards: Estimating damage probability from qualitative vulnerability assessment using logistic regression S. Ettinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.017
143. GIS-based cell model for simulating debris flow runout on a fan C. Gregoretti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.054
144. A physically-based multi-hazard risk assessment platform for regional rainfall-induced slope failures and debris flows H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.009
145. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
146. The Application of the Risk Concept to Debris Flow Hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200800013
147. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
148. Social vulnerability assessment using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SEVI model) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI model) – a case study for Bucharest, Romania I. Armaș & A. Gavriș https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1481-2013
149. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
150. Experimental and numerical study on the design of a deposition basin outlet structure at a mountain debris cone B. Gems et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-175-2014
151. Analysis of pluvial flood damage costs in residential buildings – A case study in Malmö S. Mobini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102407
152. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
153. Generation of a national landslide hazard and risk map for the country of Georgia G. Gaprindashvili & C. Van Westen https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1958-5
154. Empirical flash flood vulnerability functions for residential buildings C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2696-1
155. Debris flow hazard evaluation based on the GTW-ECM in Shijiaying Township, China Q. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10426-6
156. Simulating the effect of check dam collapse in a debris-flow channel T. Baggio & V. D'Agostino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151660
157. The integration of slow-moving landslide features, MT-InSAR data, damage survey results and deep learning algorithms for building vulnerability zoning and forecast T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108449
158. Probabilistic deep learning regression framework for post-hazard hurricane wind damage assessment of buildings A. Ewis & O. Nofal https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112900
159. A Method for Assessing Flood Vulnerability Based on Vulnerability Curves and Online Data of Residential Buildings—A Case Study of Shanghai Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182840
160. Assessing Flood Risk of Heritage Sites in an Urban Area: Impact of Locational Characteristics and Historical Context J. Kim & H. Sung https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310473
161. Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls O. Mavrouli & J. Corominas https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0200-5
162. Revisiting landslide risk terms: IAEG commission C-37 working group on landslide risk nomenclature J. Corominas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03474-z
163. Assessing coastal landscape vulnerability using geospatial techniques along Vizianagaram–Srikakulam coast of Andhra Pradesh, India M. Rani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3414-9
164. Urban flood depth-economic loss curves and their amendment based on resilience: evidence from Lizhong Town in Lixia River and Houbai Town in Jurong River of China X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2281-5
165. Results and experiences gathered at the Rebaixader debris-flow monitoring site, Central Pyrenees, Spain M. Hürlimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0452-y
166. Quantitative micro-scale flood risk assessment in a section of the Trotuș River, Romania R. Țîncu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.040
167. Annual landslide risk and effectiveness of risk reduction measures in Shihmen watershed, Taiwan S. Chen & C. Wu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0588-z
168. Methodology of disaster risk assessment for debris flows in a river basin I. Chiou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0932-1
169. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.016
170. Assessment of the vulnerability of buildings destroyed during postfire debris flow events in Kule village, Yajiang County, China J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2717-2026
171. Regional prioritisation of flood risk in mountainous areas M. Rogelis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-833-2016
172. A probabilistic approach for landslide hazard analysis S. Lari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.015
173. Model-based approach for design and performance evaluation of works controlling stony debris flows with an application to a case study at Rovina di Cancia (Venetian Dolomites, Northeast Italy) M. Bernard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.468
174. Risk Assessment of Flash Flood to Buildings Using an Indicator-Based Methodology: A Case Study of Mountainous Rural Settlements in Southwest China Y. Zhen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.931029
175. The structural vulnerability in the framework of natural hazard risk analyses and the exemplary application for storm loss modelling in Tyrol (Austria) M. Huttenlau & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9768-x
176. Characteristics of damage to buildings by debris flows on 7 August 2010 in Zhouqu, Western China K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2209-2012
177. Enriching Great Britain's National Landslide Database by searching newspaper archives F. Taylor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.019
178. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
179. Integrated flash flood vulnerability assessment: Insights from East Attica, Greece K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.052
180. Analytic Back Calculation of Debris Flow Damage Incurred to a Masonry Building: The Case of Scaletta Zanclea 2009 Event H. Soleimankhani et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160704007
181. A GIS-Based Approach for Shallow Landslides Risk Assessment in the Giampilieri and Briga Catchments Areas (Sicily, Italy) G. Vegliante et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5010011
182. A probabilistic approach for performance-based assessment of highway bridges under post-earthquake induced landslides Y. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107207
183. Mountain hazards: reducing vulnerability by adapted building design M. Holub et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1410-4
184. Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2476-9
185. An analysis of physical vulnerability to flash floods in the small mountainous watershed of Aceh Besar Regency, Aceh province, Indonesia A. Azmeri & A. Isa https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.550
186. Debris-flow risk analysis in a managed torrent based on a stochastic life-cycle performance J. Ballesteros Cánovas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.036
187. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
188. Allocation of risk and benefits—distributional justices in mountain hazard management T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1229-y
189. Short communication: A model to predict flood loss in mountain areas S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.026
190. Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides P. LeSueur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07736-9
191. Terraced landscapes: risk and liability G. Delogu et al. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2024.1618
192. Flash flood impacts and vulnerability mapping at catchment scale: Insights from southern Apennines G. Forte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107988
193. Spatial scan statistics in vulnerability assessment: an application to mountain hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0081-5
194. Assembling the Data to Support Risk-Based Asset Management: A Case Study of Dominica’s Roadway Network M. Dehghani et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2459
195. Model tests of the failure behaviors of buildings under the impact of granular flow L. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02372-z
196. Damage assessment of lake floods: Insured damage to private property during two lake floods in Sweden 2000/2001 T. Grahn & R. Nyberg https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.003
197. Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods J. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6
198. Empirical relationships for the estimation of debris flow runout distances on depositional fans in the Wenchuan earthquake zone W. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123932
199. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
200. Flow-type landslide fragility of reinforced concrete framed buildings F. Parisi & G. Sabella https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.013
201. The impact of the aggregation formula on indicator-based method for the assessment of building susceptibility to hydro-meteorological hazards R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102850
202. Non-Monotonic Relationships between Return Periods of Precipitation Surface Hazard Intensity B. van den Bout et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091348
203. Using trajectory modeling for delineation and valuation of protection forests against rockfalls and landslides E. Marras et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2026.107932
204. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
205. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
206. Methodological Approaches to the Vulnerability Assessment for the Effect Quantification of Debris Flow Disaster Mitigation Facilities J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.3.359
207. The accessibility of urban neighborhoods when buildings collapse due to an earthquake A. Golla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102439
208. A spatiotemporal optimization model for the evacuation of the population exposed to flood hazard H. Alaeddine et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-687-2015
209. Understanding flood risk in the context of community resilience modeling for the built environment: research needs and trends O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
210. Risk assessment and loss estimation of urban built environments exposed to UVCE from off-site gasoline transport incidents S. Chakraborty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105780
211. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
212. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
213. Debris flow modelling and hazard assessment for a glacier area: a case study in Barsem, Tajikistan K. Yılmaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05654-8
214. Physical vulnerability curve construction and quantitative risk assessment of a typhoon-triggered debris flow via numerical simulation: A case study of Zhejiang Province, SE China T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02218-8
215. Assessing flash flood vulnerability using a multi-vulnerability approach K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708004
216. Socioeconomic development and the impact of natural disasters: some empirical evidences from China Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1198-0
217. Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania I. Armaş & E. Avram https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9337-0
218. The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2032-z
219. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
220. Methodological approach for mapping the flood physical vulnerability index with geographical open-source data: an example in a small-middle city (Ponferrada, Spain) L. Tascón-González et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06370-7
221. Assessment of Building Vulnerability with Varying Distances from Outlet Considering Impact Force of Debris Flow and Building Resistance M. Kim & J. Kwak https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072021
222. Development of Debris flow Vulnerability Curve for Data-driven Method C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341505025
223. A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport R. Totschnig et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9623-5
224. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
225. The importance of indicator weights for vulnerability indices and implications for decision making in disaster management M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
226. Hydrogeomorphic Impacts of Floods in a First-Order Catchment: Integrated Approach Based on Dendrogeomorphic Palaeostage Indicators, 2D Hydraulic Modelling and Sedimentological Parameters R. Tichavský et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010212
227. Influence of building height and openings on the physical vulnerability of masonry buildings to debris flow C. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07942-5
228. Monitoring the temporal development of natural hazard risks as a basis indicator for climate change adaptation A. Zischg et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9927-0
229. A reliability-based approach for the impact vulnerability assessment of bridge piers subjected to debris flows S. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105567
230. Development and application of a model for assessing climate-related disaster risk I. Yu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103218
231. Time capsule for landslide risk assessment Y. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2023.2164899
232. Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
233. Evaluation of debris-flow building damage forecasts K. Barnhart et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1459-2024
234. MM3: Multimodal framework for regional-scale quantitative landslide risk analysis W. Pollock & J. Wartman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103218
235. Coupling Flood Propagation Modeling and Building Collapse in Flash Flood Studies L. Milanesi & M. Pilotti https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001941
236. Physical Vulnerability Function of Buildings Impacted by Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.133
237. Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? M. Gall et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.010
238. A Virtual Geographic Environment for Debris Flow Risk Analysis in Residential Areas L. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110377