104 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. GIS-based techniques for assessing the vulnerability of buildings to tsunami: current approaches and future steps C. Tarbotton et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP361.10
2. The Oil Spill Hazard Index (OSHI) elaboration. An oil spill hazard assessment concerning Italian hydrocarbons maritime traffic D. Astiaso Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.03.016
3. Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
4. Application of InSAR and Gravimetry for Land Subsidence Hazard Zoning in Aguascalientes, Mexico J. Pacheco-Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215868
5. Risk modelling as a tool to support natural hazard risk management in New Zealand local government M. Crawford et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.011
6. Probabilistic Fire Risk Framework for Optimizing Construction Site Layout R. El Meouche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104065
7. Framework for developing volcanic fragility and vulnerability functions for critical infrastructure G. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-017-0065-6
8. A simplified early-warning system for imminent landslide prediction based on failure index fragility curves developed through numerical analysis U. Ozturk et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1058863
9. Developing empirical fragility functions for lava flow building damage E. Meredith et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105844
10. The challenges of dynamic vulnerability and how to assess it M. de Ruiter & A. van Loon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104720
11. Assessment of the physical vulnerability of buildings affected by slow-moving landslides Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2547-2020
12. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
13. Vulnerability, hazards and multiple risk assessment for Georgia O. Varazanashvili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0374-3
14. Space weather influence on power systems: prediction, risk analysis, and modeling V. Yatsenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-009-0003-8
15. A method for multi-hazard mapping in poorly known volcanic areas: an example from Kanlaon (Philippines) M. Neri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1929-2013
16. Key factors affecting the flood vulnerability and adaptation of the shrimp farming sector in Thailand C. Seekao & C. Pharino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.012
17. RV-DSS: Towards a resilience and vulnerability- informed decision support system framework for interdependent infrastructure systems D. Hajializadeh & M. Imani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107276
18. Urban flood disaster risk management using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A scoping review G. Piaseckienė & J. Antuchevičienė https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2025.25478
19. Reliability-based vulnerability assessment of steel truss bridge components S. López et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102623
20. Assessing the risk posed by flash floods to the transportation network in southwestern China Y. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2076919
21. Ensemble learning framework for landslide susceptibility mapping: Different basic classifier and ensemble strategy T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101645
22. The drought risk of maize in the farming–pastoral ecotone in Northern China based on physical vulnerability assessment Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2697-2016
23. Network resilience X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.002
24. Categorizing and Harmonizing Natural, Technological, and Socio-Economic Perils Following the Catastrophe Modeling Paradigm A. Mignan https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912780
25. Impact Forecasting to Support Emergency Management of Natural Hazards B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000704
26. Space-Based Earth Observations for Disaster Risk Management G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09586-5
27. A Comprehensive Risk Analysis of Transportation Networks Affected by Rainfall‐Induced Multihazards K. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12968
28. Integrating expert opinion with modelling for quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment in the Eastern Italian Alps L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.041
29. Assessment of rock mass erosion in unlined spillways using developed vulnerability and fragility functions A. Saeidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1660796
30. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
31. Integrating population dynamics into mapping human exposure to seismic hazard S. Freire & C. Aubrecht https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3533-2012
32. Constructing Damage Indices Based on Publicly Available Spatial Data: Exemplified by Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions in Indonesia E. Skoufias et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00348-4
33. Dynamic coastal vulnerability index: A machine learning approach to predict future impacts of climate change and human activity on coastal environments M. Vadivel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105692
34. Evaluating the impacts of volcanic eruptions using RiskScape N. Deligne et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-017-0069-2
35. A risk analysis for floods and lahars: case study in the Cordillera Central of Colombia M. Künzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0271-9
36. An Open Distributed Architecture for Sensor Networks for Risk Management J. Douglas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8031755
37. Impact on loss/risk assessments of inter-model variability in vulnerability analysis J. Selva et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0616-z
38. Building vulnerability to hydro-geomorphic hazards: Estimating damage probability from qualitative vulnerability assessment using logistic regression S. Ettinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.017
39. Interpretable damage state-dependent fragility models for multi-hazard interactions based on Bayesian modeling and causal inference K. Trevlopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2026.102713
40. Indicator-based approach for the assessment of intrinsic physical vulnerability of the built environment to hydro-meteorological hazards: Review of indicators and example of parameters selection for a sample area R. Agliata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102199
41. Integrated environmental vulnerability to oil spills in sensitive areas C. Monteiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115238
42. A novel framework for soil salinity risk management based on climate change and socioeconomic scenarios H. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2025.2579104
43. GIS-based assessment of risk due to salt mining activities at Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina) F. Mancini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.018
44. Integrated seismic risk assessment in Nepal S. Bhochhibhoya & R. Maharjan https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3211-2022
45. A ‘coastal-hazard GIS’ for Sri Lanka J. Desprats et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-009-0084-5
46. An oil risk management system based on high-resolution hazard and vulnerability calculations A. Azevedo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.11.014
47. Assessing the earthquake systemic vulnerability of the urban centres in the South-East region of Romania. The tale of Galați and Brăila Cities, Romania A. Albulescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2065219
48. A simplified method for assessing landslide damage indices O. Petrucci & G. Gullà https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9398-8
49. Hazard vulnerability assessment: How well does nature follow our rules? J. LEIN & L. ABEL https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2010.0027
50. Volcanic hazard impacts to critical infrastructure: A review G. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.030
51. A multi-scale risk assessment for tephra fallout and airborne concentration from multiple Icelandic volcanoes – Part 2: Vulnerability and impact C. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2289-2014
52. Spatial analysis of the level of exposure to seismic hazards of health facilities in Mexico City, Mexico S. Morán-Rodríguez & D. Novelo-Casanova https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2011.633105
53. Bottom-up building exposure modeling with multimodal earth vision P. Aravena Pelizari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.10.036
54. A novel clay shrink-swell buildings damage model: From unstructured insurance data to the creation of buildings database, and the proposition of damage severity scale N. Mzungu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105636
55. Exploring the role of model classification, complexity, and selection in volcanic hazard forecasting E. Scott et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2025.106070
56. Improving the assessment of volcanic risk from in-situ vulnerability studies: A methodological approach through the case study of the Ollagüe volcano, northern Chile A. Esquivel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100428
57. Cyclone risk assessment of the Cox’s Bazar district and Rohingya refugee camps in southeast Bangladesh A. Alam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135360
58. Variable-resolution building exposure modelling for earthquake and tsunami scenario-based risk assessment: an application case in Lima, Peru J. Gomez-Zapata et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3599-2021
59. Assessment of physical vulnerability of buildings and analysis of landslide risk at the municipal scale: application to the Loures municipality, Portugal C. Guillard-Gonçalves et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-311-2016
60. Coastal vulnerability: Evolving concepts in understanding vulnerable people and places A. Bevacqua et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.006
61. Spatiotemporal analysis of residential flood exposure in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area A. Ferguson & W. Ashley https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2806-6
62. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
63. Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment of interaction among risks J. Selva https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0599-9
64. The Asynergies of Structural Disaster Risk Reduction Measures: Comparing Floods and Earthquakes M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001531
65. Social Vulnerability and How It Matters: A Bibliometric Analysis T. Toharudin et al. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.71
66. Identifying urban and rural settlement archetypes: clustering for enhanced risk-oriented exposure and vulnerability analysis G. Tocchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3665-2025
67. From static to dynamic: Conceptual and operational developments of vulnerability I. Armaș & A. Albulescu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112070
68. Probabilistic evaluation of the physical impact of future tephra fallout events for the Island of Vulcano, Italy S. Biass et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1028-1
69. Distributed Hydrological Model for Assessing Flood Hazards in Laos S. Phrakonkham et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.118056
70. Smart monitoring system with multi-criteria decision using a feature based computer vision technique C. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.6.1583
71. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
72. Indicator-based approach for assigning physical vulnerability of the houses to landslide hazard in the Himalayan region of India S. Bera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101891
73. Using rapid damage observations for Bayesian updating of hurricane vulnerability functions: A case study of Hurricane Dorian using social media J. de Bruijn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102839
74. Improvement of vulnerability curves using data from extreme events: debris flow event in South Tyrol M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0105-9
75. A multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment methodological approach to support Civil Protection planning in wide areas M. Boni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105343
76. Developing building-damage scales for lahars: application to Merapi volcano, Indonesia S. Jenkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0961-8
77. The use of empirical vulnerability functions to assess the response of buildings to tsunami impact: Comparative review and summary of best practice C. Tarbotton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.002
78. Flood risk assessment of Srinagar city in Jammu and Kashmir, India A. Alam et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2017-0012
79. Damage assessment for the 2018 lower East Rift Zone lava flows of Kīlauea volcano, Hawaiʻi E. Meredith et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-022-01568-2
80. Integrating information and communications technology (ICT) assets in assessing tropical cyclone risk in the Philippines R. Espada https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101141
81. Review article: Physical vulnerability database for critical infrastructure hazard risk assessments – a systematic review and data collection S. Nirandjan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4341-2024
82. A multi-criteria evaluation model of earthquake vulnerability in Victoria, British Columbia B. Walker et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1240-2
83. Exposure of main critical facilities to natural and man-made hazards in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands D. Novelo-Casanova & G. Suárez https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9982-6
84. Navigating climate change complexity and deep uncertainty: approach for building socio-ecological resilience using qualitative dynamic simulation T. Merino-Benítez et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2024.1331945
85. A risk map methodology to assess the spatial and temporal distribution of leakage into groundwater from Geologic Carbon Storage E. Siirila-Woodburn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.02.003
86. Deep spatio-temporal learning for multi-hazard events: A ConvGRU multi-label classification approach S. Zahra et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-026-00568-0
87. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2
88. Potential and limitations of risk scenario tools in volcanic areas through an example at Mount Cameroon P. Gehl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2409-2013
89. Bias in the Estimation of Seismic Risk for Municipal Building Stocks Due to Limited Data A. Babič et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092245
90. An AHP-derived method for mapping the physical vulnerability of coastal areas at regional scales G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1209-2013
91. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
92. Assessing Multidimensional Vulnerability of Rural Areas to Flooding: An Index-Based Approach S. Rasool et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00547-9
93. Using experimental data to reduce the single-building sigma of fragility curves: case study of the BRD tower in Bucharest, Romania M. Perrault et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0203-z
94. Temporal evolution of roof collapse from tephra fallout during the 2021-Tajogaite eruption (La Palma, Spain) M. Reyes-Hardy et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1303330
95. Empirical building fragilities from observed damage in the 2009 South Pacific tsunami S. Reese et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.01.009
96. Indicators in risk management: Are they a user-friendly interface between natural hazards and societal responses? Challenges and opportunities after UN Sendai conference in 2015 A. Ivčević et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101301
97. Risk analysis for consumer-level utility gas and liquefied petroleum gas incidents using probabilistic network modeling: A case study of gas incidents in Japan C. LAM & A. CRUZ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.008
98. Multidimensional Approach for Tsunami Vulnerability Assessment: Framing the Territorial Impacts in Two Municipalities in Portugal A. Tavares et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12678
99. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses in seismic risk assessments on the example of Cologne, Germany S. Tyagunov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1625-2014
100. Physical vulnerability assessment of buildings exposed to landslides in India A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03568-y
101. The structural vulnerability in the framework of natural hazard risk analyses and the exemplary application for storm loss modelling in Tyrol (Austria) M. Huttenlau & J. Stötter https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9768-x
102. From engagement to empowerment: how heritage professionals can incorporate participatory methods in disaster recovery to better serve socially vulnerable groups J. Gibson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1530291
103. Estimation of seismic building structural types using multi-sensor remote sensing and machine learning techniques C. Geiß et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.07.016
104. Social vulnerability in the context of bushfire risk at the urban-bush interface in Sydney: a case study of the Blue Mountains and Ku-ring-gai local council areas D. Solangaarachchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0334-y