99 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. An assessment and identification of avalanche hazard sites in Uri sector and its surroundings on Himalayan mountain A. A. S. Mohammed et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3274-z
2. Assessing physical vulnerability in large cities exposed to flash floods and debris flows: the case of Arequipa (Peru) J. Thouret et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1172-x
3. Probabilistic prediction of wildfire economic losses to housing in Cyprus using Bayesian network analysis P. Papakosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15113
4. Flood susceptibility assessment based on a novel random Naïve Bayes method: A comparison between different factor discretization methods X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104536
5. Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems—State of research and implications for management P. Bebi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.050
6. Prioritisation Recommendation Mapping (PrioReMap): A method for supporting relief coordination in flood disaster response M. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105949
7. Probabilistic prediction of daily fire occurrence in the Mediterranean with readily available spatio-temporal data P. Papakosta & D. Straub https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1686-009
8. Application of Bayesian networks for fire risk mapping using GIS and remote sensing data W. Dlamini https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9362-x
9. Investigating forest fire causes through an integrated Bayesian network and geographic information system approach Z. Konurhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07304-1
10. Quantifying uncertainties in earth observation-based ecosystem service assessments A. Stritih et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.005
11. Addressing disturbance risk to mountain forest ecosystem services A. Stritih et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113188
12. An elicitation process to quantify Bayesian networks for dam failure analysis A. Verzobio et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0089
13. Bayesian Network Based Probabilistic Modelling of Earthquake Induced Landslides T. Das & D. Choudhury https://doi.org/10.3208/jgssp.v10.OS-2-04
14. A software system for assessing the spatially distributed ecological risk posed by oil shipping A. Jolma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.023
15. A Bayesian probabilistic framework for avalanche modelling based on observations D. Straub & A. Grêt-Regamey https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2006.08.024
16. A Bayesian network model to disentangle the effects of stand and climate factors on tree mortality of Chinese fir plantations Y. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1298968
17. A spatial Bayesian network model to assess the benefits of early warning for urban flood risk to people S. Balbi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1323-2016
18. Bayesian optimal design of an avalanche dam using a multivariate numerical avalanche model N. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0287-6
19. Bayesian stochastic modelling for avalanche predetermination: from a general system framework to return period computations N. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0107-4
20. Dynamic process-based risk assessment of debris flow on a local scale Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1169477
21. Integrating Entropy‐Based Naïve Bayes and GIS for Spatial Evaluation of Flood Hazard R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12698
22. Dynamic Bayesian Network for Probabilistic Modeling of Tunnel Excavation Processes O. Špačková & D. Straub https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00759.x
23. Linking GIS-based models to value ecosystem services in an Alpine region A. Grêt-Regamey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.05.019
24. An online platform for spatial and iterative modelling with Bayesian Networks A. Stritih et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104658
25. Spaceborne LiDAR for characterizing forest structure across scales in the European Alps L. Mandl et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.330
26. On the use of Bayesian networks as a meta-modelling approach to analyse uncertainties in slope stability analysis I. Chivatá Cárdenas https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2018.1498524
27. Risk assessment of simultaneous debris flows in mountain townships P. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313491445
28. Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian networks J. Luque & D. Straub https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.002
29. Evaluating the benefit of avalanche protection forest with GIS-based risk analyses—A case study in Switzerland M. Teich & P. Bebi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.046
30. Bayesian network learning for natural hazard analyses K. Vogel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2605-2014
31. Income vulnerability of rural households in Bangladesh: a comparison between Bayesian and classical methods M. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2012.656310
32. Using Bayesian networks in analyzing powerful earthquake disaster chains J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0631-0
33. A real-world application of Monte Carlo procedure for debris flow risk assessment B. Calvo & F. Savi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.04.002
34. Snow Avalanche Risk Assessment using GIS-Based AHP for Bitlis Province M. AYDIN et al. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1195607
35. Probabilistic Graphical Models for Flood State Detection of Roads Combining Imagery and DEM D. Frey et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2012.2188881
36. Valuing Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Landscape Planning in Alpine Regions A. Grêt-Regamey et al. https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.0951
37. Encoding Dependence in Bayesian Causal Networks J. Sulik et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00084
38. 3-D numerical approach to simulate the overtopping volume caused by an impulse wave comparable to avalanche impact in a reservoir R. Gabl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2617-2015
39. Bayesian networks in environmental modelling P. Aguilera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.06.004
40. A Bayesian Network for Flood Detection Combining SAR Imagery and Ancillary Data A. D'Addabbo et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2520487
41. Quantitative risk and optimal design approaches in the snow avalanche field: Review and extensions N. Eckert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.03.003
42. Practical Approach for Reliability-Based Inspection Planning of Jacket Platforms Using Bayesian Networks H. Gholami et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001071
43. Hazard Assessment of Earthquake Disaster Chains Based on a Bayesian Network Model and ArcGIS L. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8050210
44. Risk assessment of drinking water intake contamination from agricultural activities using a Bayesian network R. Kammoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000073
45. A comparison of two sensitivity analysis techniques based on four bayesian models representing ecosystem services provision in the Argentine Pampas F. Rositano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.07.005
46. Reviewing Bayesian Networks potentials for climate change impacts assessment and management: A multi-risk perspective A. Sperotto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.044
47. Envisioning uncertainty in geospatial information K. Laskey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2009.05.011
48. Validation of extreme snow avalanches and related return periods derived from a statistical-dynamical model using tree-ring techniques R. Schläppy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.12.001
49. A dynamic evaluation method for slope safety with monitoring information based on a hybrid intelligence algorithm C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105772
50. A Framework for Assessing and Managing Risks Posed by Emerging Diseases T. Walshe & M. Burgman https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01305.x
51. A HAZARD MAP BASED ON 3D SNOW AVALANCHE SIMULATION K. KITOU et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejam.74.I_203
52. Analysis of human risks due to dam-break floods—part 1: a new model based on Bayesian networks M. Peng & L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0275-5
53. A spatially explicit decision support framework for parcel- and community-level resilience assessment using Bayesian networks D. Sanderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2021.1966164
54. Integration of Bayesian Networks with GIS for Dynamic Avalanche Hazard Assessment: NSDI Perspective İ. Yılmaz & D. Öztürk https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.365255
55. A Review of Bayesian Networks for Spatial Data C. Krapu et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516523
56. Risk management in civil engineering S. Mašović et al. https://doi.org/10.5937/GRMK2300003M
57. Spatial bayesian approach for socio-economic assessment of pumped hydro storage S. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114007
58. Modeling land use decisions with Bayesian networks: Spatially explicit analysis of driving forces on land use change E. Celio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.014
59. Multi-risk assessment in mountain regions: A review of modelling approaches for climate change adaptation S. Terzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.100
60. Avalanche protection by forests — A choice experiment in the Swiss Alps R. Olschewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.016
61. Urban Infrastructure Vulnerability to Climate-Induced Risks: A Probabilistic Modeling Approach Using Remote Sensing as a Tool in Urban Planning I. Rodríguez-Antuñano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9070107
62. Spatial Analysis of Climate Risk in the West Bank, Palestine S. Alawna & X. Garcia https://doi.org/10.3390/world6030121
63. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling S. Chen & C. Pollino https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.012
64. An Optimized Weighted Naïve Bayes Method for Flood Risk Assessment X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13743
65. Bayesian Network Enhanced with Structural Reliability Methods: Methodology D. Straub & A. Der Kiureghian https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000173
66. Slope safety evaluation by integrating multi-source monitoring information M. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.08.007
67. Using spatial analysis and Bayesian network to model the vulnerability and make insurance pricing of catastrophic risk L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.510473
68. Assessing spatial likelihood of flooding hazard using naïve Bayes and GIS: a case study in Bowen Basin, Australia R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1198-y
69. Automatic Detection of Regional Snow Avalanches with Scattering and Interference of C-band SAR Data J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172781
70. Assessment of Catastrophic Risk Using Bayesian Network Constructed from Domain Knowledge and Spatial Data L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01429.x
71. Methodischer Rahmen für den Einsatz von Backcasting zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel A. Grêt-Regamey & S. Brunner https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557123
72. Bayesian-network-based system identification of spatial distribution of structural parameters S. Lee & J. Song https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.08.029
73. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.011
74. Improved Bayesian Network-Based Risk Model and Its Application in Disaster Risk Assessment M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0171-z
75. Avalanche protection by forests — A choice experiment in the Swiss Alps R. Olschewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.10.002
76. Towards a holistic paradigm for long-term snow avalanche risk assessment and mitigation N. Eckert & F. Giacona https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01804-1
77. Integrating Bayesian networks and geographic information systems: Good practice examples S. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.262
78. Improving ecosystem services modelling: Insights from a Bayesian network tools review E. Pérez-Miñana https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.007
79. A Bayesian network model for prediction and analysis of possible forest fire causes V. Sevinc et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117723
80. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management A. Grêt-Regamey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.028
81. Bayesian network for characterizing model uncertainty of liquefaction potential evaluation models H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1367-1
82. Dynamic Process Analysis and Hazard Prediction of Debris Flow in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Area—A Case Study at Ridi Gully Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0017-019
83. A Framework for the Integration of Nature-Based Solutions into Environmental Risk Management Strategies C. Accastello et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020489
84. Stochastic Modeling of Deterioration Processes through Dynamic Bayesian Networks D. Straub https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000024
85. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
86. Quantifying the influence of avalanche release volume on runout probability: A case study of a mountain road section S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2025.104734
87. Estimating Leaf Area Index by Bayesian Linear Regression Using Terrestrial LiDAR, LAI-2200 Plant Canopy Analyzer, and Landsat TM Spectral Indices N. Ilangakoon et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2015.1102629
88. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
89. The Economy-Wide Value-at-Risk from the Exposure of Natural Capital to Climate Change and Extreme Natural Events: The Case of Wind Damage and Forest Recreational Services in New Zealand J. Monge & G. McDonald https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106747
90. Bayesian network based probabilistic approach for uncertainty analysis of earthquake induced landslides T. Das & D. Choudhury https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101620
91. A spatial assessment of urban waterlogging risk based on a Weighted Naïve Bayes classifier X. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.172
92. Snow Avalanches in Forested Terrain: Influence of Forest Parameters, Topography, and Avalanche Characteristics on Runout Distance M. Teich et al. https://doi.org/10.1657/1938-4246-44.4.509
93. Reliability and effectiveness of early warning systems for natural hazards: Concept and application to debris flow warning M. Sättele et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.003
94. Comparative study of deterministic and probabilistic assessments of microbial risk associated with combined sewer overflows upstream of drinking water intakes R. Kammoun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100735
95. A new approach to assess landslide susceptibility based on slope failure mechanisms Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105388
96. A review of graphical methods to map the natural hazard-to-wellbeing risk chain in a socio-ecological system J. Monge et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149947
97. A GIS plug-in for Bayesian belief networks: Towards a transparent software framework to assess and visualise uncertainties in ecosystem service mapping D. Landuyt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.002
98. A model to predict ordinal suitability using sparse and uncertain data R. Whitsed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.016
99. Landslide hazards mapping using uncertain Naïve Bayesian classification method Y. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2891-1