207 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Coupling HEC-RAS and AI for River Morphodynamics Assessment Under Changing Flow Regimes: Enhancing Disaster Preparedness for the Ottawa River M. Qureshi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology12020025
2. Low‐Probability Flood Risk Modeling for New York City J. Aerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12008
3. Flood Storage Allocation Rules for Parallel Reservoirs R. Hui & J. Lund https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000469
4. Physics-guided probabilistic modeling of extreme precipitation under climate change E. Kodra et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67088-1
5. Historical weather data for climate risk assessment S. Brönnimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13966
6. Ensemble-based flood vulnerability assessment for probable maximum flood in a changing environment S. Gangrade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.027
7. Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis O. Rahmati et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
8. Caractérisation micro-echelle du risque d’inondation : modélisation hydraulique détaillée et quantification des impacts socio-économiques B. Dewals et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2011015
9. Courtyard-level sewer data-enhanced two-dimensional hydraulic model for urban flood hazard assessment in Kunming, China Z. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2014.189
10. A process-based flood frequency analysis within a trivariate statistical framework. Application to a semi-arid Mediterranean case study S. Salazar-Galán et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127081
11. Mapping climate-related forest risks: An index-based approach L. Martes et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000931
12. Flood risk mapping for the area with mixed floods and human impact: a case study of Yarkant River Basin in Xinjiang, China J. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/acf0a2
13. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
14. Flood Management Strategies in Frequent and Small Scale Events: Lessons Learned from Amarante (Portugal) F. Tedim & S. Carvalho https://doi.org/10.2478/v10117-010-0024-3
15. Application of two-dimensional hydraulic modelling in flood risk mapping. A case of the urban area of Zaio, Morocco Z. Naiji et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1597389
16. Flood Hazard Zoning of Upper Awash River Basin, Ethiopia, Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) as Compared to Sensitivity Analysis T. Mekonnen et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1675634
17. Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques H. Darabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
18. Aligning Natural Resource Conservation and Flood Hazard Mitigation in California J. Calil et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132651
19. Flood Damage Assessment in HAZUS Using Various Resolution of Data and One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional HEC-RAS Depth Grids E. Ghimire & S. Sharma https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000430
20. GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: A case of Topľa basin, Slovakia S. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620
21. Whole value at risk for flood damage estimates through spatial data analysis N. Martyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad29d2
22. About the influence of elevation model quality and small-scale damage functions on flood damage estimation M. Boettle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-3327-2011
23. Geomorphic risk maps for river migration using probabilistic modeling – a framework B. Noh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-691-2024
24. A model taxonomy for flood fragility and vulnerability assessment of buildings C. Galasso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101985
25. Development and assessment of uni- and multivariable flood loss models for Emilia-Romagna (Italy) F. Carisi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2057-2018
26. Strategic Capabilities for Enhancing the Flood Resilience of Business Premises: An Expert Review and Lessons from Case Studies O. Adeniyi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169814
27. Improving Flood Inundation Mapping Accuracy Using HEC-RAS Modeling: A Case Study of the Neches River Tidal Floodplain in Texas Q. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6037
28. Flood‐resilient waterfront development in New York City: Bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning J. Aerts & W. Wouter Botzen https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06074.x
29. ¿Cómo de efectiva es la cartografía de peligro de inundación para la gestión de la emergencia? Evaluación a partir del mapa de las inundaciones de Valencia de octubre de 2024 A. Camarasa-Belmonte et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2025.24007
30. Application of Geological Weighted Regression to Establish Loss Functions Reflecting Spatial Variation T. Cheong et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.359
31. Optimal dynamic climate adaptation pathways: a case study of New York City C. Truong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05886-w
32. Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? H. Apel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
33. Development of Probabilistic Dam Breach Model Using Bayesian Inference S. Peter et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021176
34. Extreme bursting events via pulse-shaped explosion in mixed Rayleigh-Liénard nonlinear oscillator B. Kaviya et al. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02997-w
35. A data-driven framework for an efficient block-level coastal flood risk assessment F. Yarveysi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105478
36. Urban flood vulnerability assessment in a densely urbanized city using multi-factor analysis and machine learning algorithms F. Parvin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04068-7
37. Building parameters extraction from remote-sensing data and GIS analysis for the derivation of a building taxonomy of settlements – a contribution to flood building susceptibility assessment Á. Blanco-Vogt et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2014.926296
38. Flood Depth-Damage Functions for Built Environment A. Pistrika et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-014-0038-2
39. Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0420-z
40. Land Use Scenario Modeling for Flood Risk Mitigation J. Barredo & G. Engelen https://doi.org/10.3390/su2051327
41. Inter‐Model Comparison of Delft3D‐FM and 2D HEC‐RAS for Total Water Level Prediction in Coastal to Inland Transition Zones D. Muñoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12952
42. Large-scale assessment of flood risk and the effects of mitigation measures along the Elbe River J. de Kok & M. Grossmann https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9363-6
43. A probabilistic approach to estimating residential losses from different flood types D. Paprotny et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04413-x
44. Free or low-cost geoinformatics for disaster management: Uses and availability issues R. Teeuw et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.706214
45. Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas L. Gigović et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060360
46. Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Satellite Data Analysis for the 2023 Devastating Flood in Derna, Northern Libya R. Shults et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040616
47. Applications of Open-Access Remotely Sensed Data for Flood Modelling and Mapping in Developing Regions I. Ekeu-wei & G. Blackburn https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5030039
48. Natural hazard assessment and mapping using remote sensing and QGIS tools for Mumbai city, India D. Sansare & S. Mhaske https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03852-5
49. A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
50. Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
51. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany S. Vorogushyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006
52. Flood hazard assessment and the role of citizen science B. Sy et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12519
53. Flood mapping under uncertainty: a case study in the Canadian prairies R. Bharath & A. Elshorbagy https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3401-1
54. Application of entropy weighting method for urban flood hazard mapping H. Malekinezhad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-021-00586-6
55. Hybrid Spatial Modelling on Urban Flood Hazard Using Remote Sensing, GIS, and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Study of Delhi NCR, India K. Rajeev et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-024-02065-z
56. Flood Susceptibility and Risk Mapping of Kathmandu Valley Watershed, Nepal U. Chaudhary et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167101
57. A comprehensive flood event specification and inventory: 1930–2020 Turkey case study I. Haltas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102086
58. Emergence of nonchaotic bursting extreme events in a quadratic jerk oscillator P. Durairaj et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115083
59. Assessment of social vulnerability to floods based on fuzzy logic in a Mediterranean dense urban area: Palma, Mallorca, Spain A. Moragues et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105594
60. Flood hazard and risk assessment of 2014 floods in Kashmir Valley: a space-based multisensor approach R. Kumar & P. Acharya https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2428-4
61. Quantitative assessment of flood risk with evaluation of the effectiveness of dam operation for flood control: A case of the Bago River Basin of Myanmar B. Shrestha & A. Kawasaki https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101707
62. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review M. Kappes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2
63. Mapping of uplift hazard due to rising groundwater level during floods T. Julínek et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12601
64. A Zero-Order Flood Damage Model for Regional-Scale Quick Assessments A. Pogliani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091292
65. How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk? A. Metin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018
66. Satellite remote sensing and GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood hazard mapping F. Franci et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2504-9
67. A new approach to flood susceptibility assessment in data-scarce and ungauged regions based on GIS-based hybrid multi criteria decision-making method Y. Kanani-Sadat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.034
68. Study on Influencing Factors of Flood Damage to Single Houses using Field Survey Data C. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.535
69. Flood susceptibility mapping of the Western Ghat coastal belt using multi-source geospatial data and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) S. Das https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100379
70. Conveying Flood Hazard Risk Through Spatial Modeling: A Case Study for Hurricane Sandy-Affected Communities in Northern New Jersey F. Artigas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0731-1
71. Assessment of flood-risk areas using random forest techniques: Busan Metropolitan City J. Ha & J. Kang https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05142-5
72. Application of statistical techniques to proportional loss data: Evaluating the predictive accuracy of physical vulnerability to hazardous hydro-meteorological events C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.084
73. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
74. Effectiveness assessment of reservoir projects for flash flood control, water supply and irrigation in Wangmo Basin, China M. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157918
75. Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis D. Fernández & M. Lutz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
76. Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps D. Henstra et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
77. Assessment of climatic risks for real estate J. Hirsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-01-2015-0005
78. Impact analysis of river morphology and roughness variability on hydropeaking based on numerical modelling C. Hauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9519
79. Debris flow and debris flood hazard assessment in mountain catchments T. Baggio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108338
80. How reliable are projections of future flood damage? P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-3293-2011
81. Flood Control Basin Function of Wetland by Numerical Analysis of the Flood in the Middle Reach of the Amur River M. MUROOKA et al. https://doi.org/10.4157/ejgeo.6.138
82. Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01151.x
83. Flood disaster risk identification using integrated fuzzy MCDA and GIS in Song Hinh District, Phu Yen Province H. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2026.132.10165
84. Flood risk modeling for optimal rice planning for delta region of Mahanadi river basin in India D. Samantaray et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1493-9
85. FLOOD INUNDATION MAPPING FOR INTEGRATED FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT: UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM C. Theiling & J. Burant https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2583
86. Flash floods versus river floods – a comparison of psychological impacts and implications for precautionary behaviour J. Laudan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-999-2020
87. GIS-Based Roughness Derivation for Flood Simulations: A Comparison of Orthophotos, LiDAR and Crowdsourced Geodata H. Dorn et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021739
88. River flood risk and adaptation in Europe—assessment of the present status N. Lugeri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9211-8
89. Beyond the Expected—Residual Risk and Cases of Overload in the Context of Managing Alpine Natural Hazards S. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00325-3
90. District-wise multi-hazard zoning of Bangladesh U. Barua et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2276-2
91. Building Damage due to Riverine and Coastal Floods N. Nadal et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000036
92. Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12650
93. Analytic hierarchy process approach for the selection of stream-gauging sites L. Peña et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1672874
94. Flood vulnerability assessment of residential buildings by explicit damage process modelling R. Custer & K. Nishijima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1725-7
95. Morphology Dependent Assessment of Resilience for Urban Areas K. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061800
96. Urban flood modeling using deep-learning approaches in Seoul, South Korea X. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126684
97. Flood economic assessment of structural measure based on integrated flood risk management: A case study in Beijing H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111701
98. Integrated Methodology for Urban Flood Risk Mapping at the Microscale in Ungauged Regions: A Case Study of Hurghada, Egypt K. Abdrabo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213548
99. Assessment of direct economic losses of flood disasters based on spatial valuation of land use and quantification of vulnerabilities: a case study on the 2014 flood in Lishui city of China H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3161-2021
100. The use of empirical vulnerability functions to assess the response of buildings to tsunami impact: Comparative review and summary of best practice C. Tarbotton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.002
101. Model-data matching method for natural disaster emergency service scenarios: implementation based on a knowledge graph and community discovery algorithm H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06360-9
102. Surrogate Global Optimization for Identifying Cost‐Effective Green Infrastructure for Urban Flood Control With a Computationally Expensive Inundation Model W. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030928
103. Development of a novel hybrid multi-boosting neural network model for spatial prediction of urban flood H. Darabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1920629
104. Urban flood hazard assessment in the basin of Athens Metropolitan city, Greece G. Bathrellos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5157-1
105. AHP GIS-aided flood hazard mapping and surface runoff estimation in Gurugram, India S. Arya & A. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05973-4
106. Spatial Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Flood Risks in Aging-Dam Management in China: A Framework and Case Study M. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051368
107. Flood risk assessment. Case of study: Motozintla de Mendoza, Chiapas, Mexico D. Novelo-Casanova & F. Rodríguez-Vangort https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1089327
108. The KULTURisk Regional Risk Assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 1: Physical–environmental assessment P. Ronco et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5399-2014
109. Using GIS to map impacts upon agriculture from extreme floods in Vietnam V. Chau et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.014
110. GIS-based flood vulnerability mapping in a tropical river basin using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and machine learning approach P. Nair et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2025.2551261
111. Applying the Theory of Reliability to the Assessment of Hazard, Risk and Safety in a Hydrologic System: A Case Study in the Upper Sola River Catchment, Poland B. Ozga-Zielinski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060723
112. Assessing and mapping human well-being for sustainable development amid flood hazards: Poyang Lake Region of China Q. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.007
113. Tree‐based flood damage modeling of companies: Damage processes and model performance T. Sieg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020784
114. Climate change, urban development, and community perception of an extreme flood: A case study of Vernonia, Oregon, USA R. Tripathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.007
115. How useful are complex flood damage models? K. Schröter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014396
116. Construction of Urban Flooding Prevention System under “One City, One Executor, and One Network” Model: Case Study of Kunming, China F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000473
117. Evaluating the cumulative costs of small-scale flash floods in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia T. Bhuiyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128181
118. Ice-jam flood delineation: Challenges and research needs N. Kovachis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2017.1294998
119. Hydrodynamic parameters of floods and related bank erosion events indicated from tree rings and 2D hydrodynamic model for a small ungauged catchment (Sudeten Mts., Poland) I. Malik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108021
120. Evaluating urban flood hazard index (UFHI) of Dehradun city using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis N. Bansal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01348-5
121. Evaluating the cost–benefit of LID strategies for urban surface water flooding based on risk management X. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06608-y
122. Temporal development of flood risk considering settlement dynamics and local flood protection measures on catchment scale: an Austrian case study S. Achleitner et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2016.1167061
123. Assessment of Flood Risk of Residential Buildings by Using the AHP-CRITIC Method: A Case Study of the Katsushika Ward, Tokyo . Lianxiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15122016
124. Monte Carlo‐based flood modelling framework for estimating probability weighted flood risk A. Kalyanapu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01123.x
125. Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach B. Jongman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012
126. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
127. Extreme events in dynamical systems and random walkers: A review S. Nag Chowdhury et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.001
128. A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03826-7
129. Hydrological Risk Map for the Danube Delta—A Case Study of Floods Within the Fluvial Delta M. Mierla et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2347352
130. Assessment of Business Interruption of Flood-Affected Companies Using Random Forests Z. Sultana et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081049
131. Local scale multiple quantitative risk assessment and uncertainty evaluation in a densely urbanised area (Brescia, Italy) S. Lari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3387-2012
132. An assessment of multidimensional flood vulnerability at the provincial scale in China based on the DEA method D. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0323-1
133. Flooding, channel dynamics and transverse infrastructure: a challenge for Middle Ebro river management J. Horacio et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1592719
134. Assessment of flood risk zones in the Rangit Basin of the Sikkim Himalaya D. Tamang & R. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02476-y
135. Flood depth-damage and fragility functions derived with structured expert judgment G. Pita et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126982
136. Integrating high-resolution geoinformation with local knowledge enhances flood risk assessment: A case study from rural Niger M. Tiepolo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2026.09.001
137. The Role of Disaggregation of Asset Values in Flood Loss Estimation: A Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches at the Mulde River, Germany A. Wünsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9335-3
138. Assessment and mapping of debris-flow risk in a small catchment in eastern Sicily through integrated numerical simulations and GIS G. Aronica et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2012.04.002
139. Determination of flood risk: A case study in the rainiest city of Turkey O. Şen & E. Kahya https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.030
140. Understanding flood risk in the context of community resilience modeling for the built environment: research needs and trends O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
141. Urban Inundation Hazard Potential using Evidential Belief Function model (EBF) (Case study: Emam Ali town, Mashhad city) M. Rostami Khalaj et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.11.22.1
142. Evaluation of spatial analysis application for urban emergency management R. Abdalla https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3723-y
143. A joint modelling framework for daily extremes of river discharge and precipitation in urban areas K. Breinl et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12150
144. Exploring local risk managers' use of flood hazard maps for risk communication purposes in Baden-Württemberg S. Kjellgren https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1857-2013
145. An Approach Based on the Protected Object for Dam-Break Flood Risk Management Exemplified at the Zipingpu Reservoir C. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193786
146. Institutional structures underpinning flood management in Vietnam V. Chau et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.008
147. READY: a web-based geographical information system for enhanced flood resilience through raising awareness in citizens R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1645-2015
148. Available Flood Evacuation Time for High-Risk Areas in the Middle Reach of Chao Phraya River Basin S. Jamrussri & Y. Toda https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121871
149. Ice‐jam flood risk assessment and mapping K. Lindenschmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10853
150. Heavy Rainfall Probabilistic Model for Zielona Góra in Poland M. Wdowikowski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17111673
151. Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
152. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
153. Development of model for the estimation of direct flood damage including the movable property K. Zabret et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12255
154. Comparing 2D capabilities of HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP on complex topography I. Shustikova et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1671982
155. Cost-benefit analysis of local knowledge-based flood adaptation measures: A case study of Datian community in Zhejiang Province, China X. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103573
156. Flood risk assessment due to cyclone-induced dike breaching in coastal areas of Bangladesh M. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-353-2019
157. Flood Protection Cost Allocation Using Cooperative Game Theory for Adapting Infrastructure to Climate Change H. Jeong et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000920
158. A Performance Comparison of the HEC-RAS and TELEMAC-2D Models in Flood Risk Assessment - Application to the Medjerda River S. Hammami et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-ti9Lit
159. Comparison of the feasibility of three flood‐risk extent delineation techniques using Geographic Information System: case study in Tavoliere delle Puglie, Italy R. Strobl et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01143.x
160. Scenario-based risk framework selection and assessment model development for natural disasters: a case study of typhoon storm surges M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2059-1
161. Testing the use of reimbursement data to obtain damage curves in urbanised areas: the case of the Piedmont flood on October 2000 D. Bignami et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12292
162. Developing a Depth–Damage Function for the Built Environment to Support Disaster Risk Assessment in India A. Harikumar & S. Thampi https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-7116
163. Economic assessment of flood damage in South Korea: An object-based comparative study of national and local rivers J. Yang & K. Jung https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108121
164. Effects of variability in probable maximum precipitation patterns on flood losses A. Zischg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2759-2018
165. Deriving Flood-Mediated Connectivity between River Channels and Floodplains: Data-Driven Approaches T. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43239
166. 21st century scandals: towards a risk approach to financial reporting scandals K. Camfferman & J. Wielhouwer https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1614267
167. Hydrological impacts of land use–land cover change and detention basins on urban flood hazard: a case study of Poisar River basin, Mumbai, India P. Zope et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2816-4
168. Novel approach to the derivation of dam breach parameters in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of earthquake induced dam failures P. Peramuna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171505
169. Effects of spatial planning on future flood risks in urban environments A. Mustafa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.090
170. A novel approach in comparing the performance of bivariate statistical methods, boosting, and stacking models in flood susceptibility assessment L. Hanh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125670
171. River basin planning: from qualitative to quantitative flood risk assessment: the case of Abruzzo Region (central Italy) A. Scorzini & M. Leopardi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2857-8
172. Sources of uncertainty in a probabilistic flood risk model B. Winter et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3135-5
173. A New Tool to Estimate Inundation Depths by Spatial Interpolation (RAPIDE): Design, Application and Impact on Quantitative Assessment of Flood Damages A. Scorzini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121805
174. Flood risk assessment – Practices in flood prone Swedish municipalities V. Norén et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.003
175. Evaluation of web maps for the communication of flood risks to the public in Europe M. Van Kerkvoorde et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1371411
176. GIS-based Flood Risk Mapping: The Case Study of Kosi River Basin, Bihar, India N. Kumar & R. Jha https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5377
177. A cascading flash flood guidance system: development and application in Yunnan Province, China Z. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2535-2
178. Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change Z. Zahmatkesh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248
179. Flood Susceptibility in the Lower Course of the Coyuca River, Mexico: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model J. Morales-Ruano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912544
180. The effects of the July 2005 catastrophic inundations in the Siret River’s Lower Watershed, Romania G. Romanescu & I. Nistor https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9617-3
181. Iso-flood severity mapping: a new tool for distributed flood source identification B. Saghafian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9547-0
182. Assessment of the accuracy of DTM river bed model using classical surveying measurement and LiDAR: a case study in Poland P. Kotlarz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2019.1696515
183. Estimating flood exposure potentials in Turkish catchments through index-based flood mapping G. Onuşluel Gül https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0717-8
184. Geospatial Mapping and Meteorological Flood Risk Assessment: A Global Research Trend Analysis P. Sibandze et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02059-0
185. Two-Dimensional Fast-Response Flood Modeling: Desktop Parallel Computing and Domain Tracking D. Judi et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000064
186. Flood Risk Assessment of Buildings Based on Vulnerability Curve: A Case Study in Anji County S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213572
187. Assembling the Data to Support Risk-Based Asset Management: A Case Study of Dominica’s Roadway Network M. Dehghani et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2459
188. On the use of synthetic tropical cyclones and hypothetical events for storm surge assessment under climate change P. Ruiz-Salcines et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04318-9
189. Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013
190. Regional flood risk assessment via coupled fuzzy c-means clustering methods: an empirical analysis from China’s Huaihe River Basin Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3325-9
191. Flood susceptibility mapping by best–worst and logistic regression methods in Mersin, Turkey B. Özay & O. Orhan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25423-9
192. Assessing the probability of large‐scale flood loss events: a case study for the river Rhine, Germany A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12091
193. Flood-risk assessment in urban environment by geospatial approach: a case study of Ambala City, India S. Saini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-016-0174-7
194. Geo-hydrological database modeling for integrated multiple hazards and risk assessment in Lesser Himalaya: a GIS-based case study P. Rawat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0144-2
195. "Built Environment Flood Resilience Capability Maturity Model" O. Adeniyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.100
196. Estimating the Socioeconomic Impacts of Flooding on Regional Economies With a Computable General Equilibrium Model O. Parent et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033474
197. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
198. Prompt Proxy Mapping of Flood Damaged Rice Fields Using MODIS-Derived Indices Y. Kwak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs71215805
199. Flood vulnerability assessment using a fuzzy rule-based index in Melbourne, Australia S. Rashetnia & H. Jahanbani https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00489-w
200. Local level multi-hazard zonation of Nepal D. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1879941
201. The Effect of Damage Functions on Urban Flood Damage Appraisal V. Notaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.138
202. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Quantify the Human Disaster Risk Perception and Its Influence on the Population at Risk: A Case Study of Longchi Town, China S. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416393
203. A framework for the evaluation of flood inundation predictions over extensive benchmark databases D. Devi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106786
204. Effects of the Temporal Variability of Storm Surges on Coastal Flooding J. Höffken et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00098
205. Flood Hazards Mitigation Analysis Using Remote Sensing and GIS: Correspondence with Town Planning Scheme D. Patel & P. Srivastava https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0291-6
206. Mapping ecological risks with a portfolio‐based technique: incorporating uncertainty and decision‐making preferences D. Yemshanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12061
207. Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modelling and census data C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1375-2013