60 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Enhancing debris flow run-out hazard assessment through probabilistic post-event back analysis P. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02746-5
2. Hazard assessment of debris flow by using FLO-2D and hazard matrix: a case study of Qingshui Gully in the southern Gansu Province, China P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2023.30108
3. Evaluation of approaches to calculate debris-flow parameters for hazard assessment M. Hürlimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.012
4. Risk assessment of debris flow disaster in mountainous area of northern Yunnan province based on FLO-2D under the influence of extreme rainfall X. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1252206
5. Performance Assessment of Bench‐Terraces Through 2‐D Modelling C. Perlotto & V. D'Agostino https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2653
6. Source characteristics and tectonic impacts on cluster debris flow hazards assessment: Evidence from the Tieba River Basin, NE Qinghai-Tibet Plateau L. Xiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355619
7. End-to-End Modelling as a Non-Invasive Tool for Sustainable Risk Management After the Rupture of the Landslide Dam Along River Courses M. Mangifesta et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su172411195
8. A study of methods to estimate debris flow velocity A. Prochaska et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-008-0137-0
9. Experimental study on impact and deposition behaviours of multiple surges of channelized debris flow on a flexible barrier D. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01378-7
10. Debris-flow simulations on Cheekye River, British Columbia M. Jakob et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0365-1
11. Rheological behavior of dredged slurries at high water contents G. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1173747
12. Study on Physical Vulnerability Curves of Buildings by Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.155
13. A calculation method for predicting the runout volume of dam-break and non-dam-break debris flows in the Wenchuan earthquake area Q. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.023
14. A new data assimilation procedure to develop a debris flow run-out model L. Brezzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0625-y
15. Evaluation of Unsaturated Soil Properties for a Debris-Flow Simulation F. Castelli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020064
16. Unravelling the multiphase run-out conditions of a slide-flow mass movement T. van Asch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.11.014
17. Manning’s equation and two-dimensional flow analogs T. Hromadka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.044
18. An integrated procedure to evaluate rheological parameters to model debris flows A. Pellegrino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.07.002
19. The impact of slit and detention dams on debris flow control using GSTARS 3.0 L. Hassan-Esfahani & M. Banihabib https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5183-z
20. Flood hazard mapping using synthesis hydraulic and geomorphic properties at watershed scale A. Motevalli & M. Vafakhah https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1305-8
21. A regional scale quantitative risk assessment for landslides: case of Kumluca watershed in Bartin, Turkey A. Erener & H. Düzgün https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0317-9
22. Predictive modeling and analysis of runout distance of physical mudflows based on a discrete element method J. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2021.1978327
23. Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation C. Chen & Q. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y
24. Numerical runout simulation of debris avalanches in the Faroe Islands, North Atlantic Ocean M. Dahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0355-3
25. Simulating debris flow deposition using a two-dimensional finite model and Soil Conservation Service-curve number approach for Hanlin gully of southern Gansu (China) P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3865-6
26. Numerical modeling techniques for flood analysis M. Anees et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.10.001
27. Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.821735
28. Combining Spatial Models for Shallow Landslides and Debris-Flows Prediction R. Gomes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5052219
29. Modelling of a Debris Flow Event in the Enna Area for Hazard Assessment F. Castelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.026
30. Experimental study on rheologic behaviour of debris flow material R. Kaitna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-007-0026-z
31. Coupled Effects of Pore-Water Pressure Evolution, Slope Curvature, and Mass Variation on the Kinematics of Rapidly Sliding Fine-Grained Materials F. Federico & C. Cesali https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000976
32. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006245
33. A debris-flow simulation model for the evaluation of protection structures Y. Tsai https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-007-0193-2
34. Assessment of dynamic impact force of debris flow in mountain torrent based on characteristics of debris flow M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7707-9
35. Dynamic numerical simulation and risk predictive assessment of the slope debris flow for the rear mountain at the management office of the Erlang Mountain Tunnel H. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1025636
36. Preliminary analysis of the deadly debris flow on August 11th, 2023, at Xi’an of China: characteristics, mechanism, and hazard assessment Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-026-02709-w
37. A high resolution finite volume model for 1D debris flow J. Paik https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.03.001
38. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Rheological Properties of Muddy Flow and Their Measurement Method J. Ryou et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.6.217
39. Dynamic Analysis and Hazard Assessment of Debris Flows in Donghaolitaogao Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.53469/jrse.2024.06(10).06
40. Debris flow susceptibility mapping in mountainous area based on multi-source data fusion and CNN model – taking Nujiang Prefecture, China as an example F. Xu & B. Wang https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2022.2142304
41. Deterministic Landslide Risk Assessment at a Past Landslide Site M. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-008-9232-1
42. Run-out Modeling of Debris Flows in Mt. Umyeon using FLO-2D S. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.965
43. Landslide mobility analysis for design of multiple debris-resisting barriers J. Kwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0152
44. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060218
45. Collapse of granular–cohesive soil mixtures on a horizontal plane L. Brezzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0725-7
46. A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event L. Stancanelli & E. Foti https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
47. A new real-time debris flow and snow avalanche detection system based on optical fiber sensing M. Barla et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02399-2
48. DebrisInterMixing-2.3: a finite volume solver for three-dimensional debris-flow simulations with two calibration parameters – Part 2: Model validation with experiments A. von Boetticher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017
49. A general analytical model for superelevation in landslide S. Pudasaini & M. Jaboyedoff https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01333-1
50. A method for identifying gully-type debris flows based on adaptive multi-scale feature extraction Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2502593
51. Hazard assessment and formation mechanism of debris flow outbursts in a small watershed of the Linxia Basin W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.994593
52. Field characterisation and numerical modelling of debris avalanche runout on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada M. Brideau et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01141-7
53. Hazard Assessments of Riverbank Flooding and Backward Flows in Dike-Through Drainage Ditches during Moderate Frequent Flooding Events in the Ningxia Reach of the Upper Yellow River (NRYR) F. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071477
54. Comparison between FLO-2D and Debris-2D on the application of assessment of granular debris flow hazards with case study Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2511-1
55. Variable density bore interaction with block obstacles L. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618562.2011.575372
56. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
57. Slope dynamics of Lake Albano (Rome, Italy): insights from high resolution bathymetry F. Bozzano et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1832
58. Comparative numerical modelling of a debris-flow fan in the Eastern Italian Alps A. Deganutti et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP440.13
59. Numerical Treatment of the Resistance Term in Upwind Schemes in Debris Flow Runout Modeling G. Sánchez Burillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000865
60. Debris-flow velocities and superelevation in a curved laboratory channel C. Scheidl et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0081