505 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Landslide susceptibility near highways is increased by 1 order of magnitude in the Andes of southern Ecuador, Loja province A. Brenning et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-45-2015
2. Landslide susceptibility mapping using Bayesian approach in the Sultan Mountains (Akşehir, Turkey) A. Ozdemir https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9853-1
3. A refinement analysis of the shallow landslides susceptibility at regional scale supported by GIS-aided geo-database G. Gullà et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1967204
4. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling J. Goetz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.007
5. Validation and evaluation of two multivariate statistical models for predictive shallow landslide susceptibility mapping of the Eastern Pyrenees (Spain) C. Baeza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0361-5
6. Modeling the potential distribution of shallow-seated landslides using the weights of evidence method and a logistic regression model: a case study of the Sabae Area, Japan R. SONG et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6279(08)60010-4
7. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Peloritani Mts. (Sicily, Italy) and clues for tectonic control of relief processes G. De Guidi & S. Scudero https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-949-2013
8. Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model D. Camilo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.08.003
9. Rockfall susceptibility mapping using XGBoost model by hybrid optimized factor screening and hyperparameter H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2120547
10. Cross-Trigger Transferability of Run-out-Prediction Models for Rainfall- and Earthquake-Induced Landslides S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121493
11. A spatial–temporal analysis of impacts from human development on the Shih-men Reservoir watershed, Taiwan Y. Chen & K. Chang https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.562253
12. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of Heraklion Prefecture in Crete, Greece S. Adam et al. https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.28703
13. Scientometric Analysis for Spatial Autocorrelation-Related Research from 1991 to 2021 Q. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050309
14. Rainfall-Induced Landslides and Erosion Processes in the Road Network of the Jaén Province (Southern Spain) R. Carpena et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8030100
15. Frequency ratio model based landslide susceptibility mapping in lower Mae Chaem watershed, Northern Thailand N. Intarawichian & S. Dasananda https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1055-3
16. Spatial Interpolation of Gravimetric Soil Moisture Using EM38-mk Induction and Ensemble Machine Learning (Case Study from Dry Steppe Zone in Volgograd Region) A. Zeyliger et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22166153
17. Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy C. Ballabio & S. Sterlacchini https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-011-9379-9
18. Exploring the impact of spatial autocorrelation on optimistic bias in cross-validation and assessing the effectiveness of spatial cross-validation M. Yoo & H. Koo https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2024.2422593
19. On the use of hierarchical fuzzy inference systems (HFIS) in expert-based landslide susceptibility mapping: the central part of the Rif Mountains (Morocco) B. Ozer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01548-5
20. The influence of land use and land cover change on landslide susceptibility: a case study in Zhushan Town, Xuan'en County (Hubei, China) L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2207-2019
21. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on global and local logistic regression models in Three Gorges Reservoir area, China M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5764-5
22. Spatial analysis of groundwater flowing artesian condition using machine learning techniques A. Al-Abadi & J. Alsamaani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100418
23. Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India) I. Das et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.023
24. An Ensemble Model for Co-Seismic Landslide Susceptibility Using GIS and Random Forest Method S. Shrestha et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110365
25. Estimating the prediction performance of spatial models via spatial k-fold cross validation J. Pohjankukka et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1346255
26. From scenario-based seismic hazard to scenario-based landslide hazard: fast-forwarding to the future via statistical simulations L. Lombardo & H. Tanyas https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02020-1
27. Integrating machine learning and numerical methods for enhanced landslide susceptibility and hazard mapping in the Bhotekoshi watershed, central Nepal B. Gurung et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-9951-2
28. Entropy Ensemble Filter: A Modified Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging) Procedure to Improve Efficiency in Ensemble Model Simulation H. Foroozand & S. Weijs https://doi.org/10.3390/e19100520
29. GIS-based analysis of landslides susceptibility mapping: a case study of Lushoto district, north-eastern Tanzania M. Makonyo & Z. Zahor https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06038-2
30. Evaluating performance of simplified physically based models for shallow landslide susceptibility G. Formetta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4585-2016
31. Utilization of Open Source Spatial Data for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping at Chittagong District of Bangladesh—An Appraisal for Disaster Risk Reduction and Mitigation Approach M. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.84031
32. Ensemble classification of paired data W. Adler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.11.017
33. Tier 4 maps of soil pH at 25 m resolution for the Netherlands A. Helfenstein et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115659
34. A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping P. Tarolli & D. Tarboton https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-663-2006
35. Retrogressive thaw slump susceptibility in the northern hemisphere permafrost region E. Makopoulou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5890
36. Fourth paradigm GIScience? Prospects for automated discovery and explanation from data M. Gahegan https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1652304
37. Different Approaches to Use Morphometric Attributes in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Meso-Scale Spatial Units: A Case Study in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) V. Canavesi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12111826
38. A Comparative Assessment of Machine Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Rugged Terrain of Northern Pakistan N. Shahzad et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052280
39. A review of landslides related to the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake: implication and future challenges M. Basharat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04688-8
40. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on GIS and support vector machine models for the Qianyang County, China W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5093-0
41. Spatial cross-validation is not the right way to evaluate map accuracy A. Wadoux et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109692
42. Landslide hazard prediction under an extreme rainfall scenario by considering multiple timescale rainfalls and effective recharge Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2025.2570863
43. Exploring discrepancies between quantitative validation results and the geomorphic plausibility of statistical landslide susceptibility maps S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.015
44. An evaluation of SVM using polygon-based random sampling in landslide susceptibility mapping: The Candir catchment area (western Antalya, Turkey) B. San https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.09.010
45. Shallow landslide prediction and analysis with risk assessment using a spatial model in a coastal region in the state of São Paulo, Brazil P. Camarinha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2449-2014
46. Landslide susceptibility mapping using physics-guided machine learning: a case study of a debris flow event in Colorado Front Range T. Pei & T. Qiu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-024-02384-y
47. Effects of rainfall spatial variability and intermittency on shallow landslide triggering patterns at a catchment scale J. von Ruette et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015122
48. Supervised classification of landforms in Arctic mountains H. Mithan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2015
49. Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran H. Hamedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02263-6
50. Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and fuzzy logic methods at the central Zab basin, Iran H. Shahabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4028-0
51. ALICE (Assessment of Landslides Induced by Climatic Events): A single tool to integrate shallow and deep landslides for susceptibility and hazard assessment R. Vandromme et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107307
52. Optimizing landslide susceptibility zonation: Effects of DEM spatial resolution and slope unit delineation on logistic regression models R. Schlögel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.10.018
53. Space-time landslide predictive modelling L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103318
54. Landslide Analysis Approaches in Tropical Environment Region for Disaster Risk Reduction M. Kahar et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1102/1/012025
55. Satellite-Based NO2 and Model Validation in a National Prediction Model Based on Universal Kriging and Land-Use Regression M. Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05099
56. Geographically Weighted Random Forest Based on Spatial Factor Optimization for the Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility F. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091608
57. Simulation of Forest Distribution in the Qilian Mountains of China with a Terrain-based Logistic Regression Model S. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/forsci/fxac040
58. Predicting gully occurrence at watershed scale: Comparing topographic indices and multivariate statistical models C. Conoscenti & E. Rotigliano https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107123
59. Effects of raster resolution on real probability of landslides X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100364
60. Comparing probabilistic and statistical methods in landslide susceptibility modeling in Rwanda/Centre-Eastern Africa J. Nsengiyumva et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.248
61. A dissimilarity-adaptive cross-validation method for evaluating geospatial machine learning predictions with clustered samples Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103287
62. Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling–Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya K. Devkota et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0347-6
63. A topography‐based model of forest cover at the alpine tree line in the tropical Andes M. Bader & J. Ruijten https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01818.x
64. Distribution Characteristics and Hazard Assessment of Ground Collapse in the Mining Activity Areas of the Turpan–Hami Basin T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073354
65. Landslide susceptibility mapping with GIS in high mountain area of Nepal: a comparison of four methods P. Gautam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09650-2
66. Conventional data-driven landslide susceptibility models may only tell us half of the story: Potential underestimation of landslide impact areas depending on the modeling design P. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108638
67. Catchment natural driving factors and prediction of baseflow index for Continental United States based on Random Forest technique S. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02057-2
68. Integrating physical and statistical models for regional rainfall‐induced landslide hazard assessment K. Ono et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.70357
69. Mapping of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Wencheng, China, using support vector machine C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1562-0
70. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and combined fuzzy and support vector machine methods: a case study from Wolong Giant Panda Natural Reserve, China Q. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0786-x
71. Landslide susceptibility assessment in scarce-data regions using remote sensing data E. Aristizábal-Giraldo & D. Ruiz-Vásquez https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20231030
72. A random forests-based hedonic price model accounting for spatial autocorrelation E. Tepe https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-024-00449-w
73. Landslide susceptibility methodology for railway planning: a comparative analysis of statistical and machine learning methods in a case study of Marche region, Italy R. Rani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101731
74. Application of alternating decision tree with AdaBoost and bagging ensembles for landslide susceptibility mapping Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104396
75. Geological Hazard Susceptibility Assessment Based on the Combined Weighting Method: A Case Study of Xi’an City, China P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15080290
76. Impact of Spatial Resolution of Digital Elevation Model on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Kullu Valley, Himalayas S. Meena & T. Gudiyangada Nachappa https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9080360
77. Improvement of landslide hazard assessments for regulatory zoning in France: STATE–OF–THE-ART perspectives and considerations Y. Thiery et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101562
78. Distinct Susceptibility Patterns of Active and Relict Landslides Reveal Distinct Triggers: A Case in Northwestern Turkey M. Loche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14061321
79. Is higher resolution always better? A comparison of open-access DEMs for optimized slope unit delineation and regional landslide prediction M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2519-2025
80. Spatial flood susceptibility prediction in Middle Ganga Plain: comparison of frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models A. Arora et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1687594
81. Spatial analysis of ecological risk in a coastal dune landscape using high resolution aerial photography N. ListyaNiNgrum et al. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0001
82. Random Forest with semantic tie points for classifying landforms and creating rigorous shaded relief representations F. Veronesi & L. Hurni https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.020
83. Comprehensive performance assessment of landslide susceptibility mapping with MLP and random forest: a case study after Elazig earthquake (24 Jan 2020, Mw 6.8), Turkey G. Karakas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10225-y
84. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia A. Youssef et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0614-1
85. Combining release and runout in statistical landslide susceptibility modeling M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01222-7
86. Spatial and temporal variability of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in gradients of disturbance B. Zimmermann & H. Elsenbeer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.027
87. Hierarchical machine learning for the automatic classification of surface deformation from SAR observations J. Rivera-Rivera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2025.100171
88. Source areas, connectivity, and delivery rate of sediments in mountainous-forested hillslopes: A probabilistic approach A. Cislaghi & G. Bischetti https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.318
89. Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory J. Samia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0739-x
90. Regional-scale landslide risk assessment in Central Asia F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-13-2024
91. Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows T. Heckmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-259-2014
92. Integration of GIS-MCDA and machine learning for landslide susceptibility mapping to support sustainable land use planning: a case study of Korbous, Tunisia N. Rebai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2026.106137
93. Data-driven mapping of the potential mountain permafrost distribution N. Deluigi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.041
94. Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods H. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3536-0
95. Transformer, more than meets the eye: A deep learning approach to integrate rainfall time-series in multi-type landslide probability modelling R. Rani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2026.102295
96. How can statistical models help to determine driving factors of landslides? P. Vorpahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.007
97. Flow-Py v1.0: a customizable, open-source simulation tool to estimate runout and intensity of gravitational mass flows C. D'Amboise et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2423-2022
98. Spatial landslide hazard assessment along the Jelapang Corridor of the North-South Expressway in Malaysia using high resolution airborne LiDAR data N. Yusof et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1937-x
99. Spatial Non-Stationarity-Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using PCAMGWR Model Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060881
100. Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study Á. Felicísimo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0320-1
101. A novel hybrid evidential belief function-based fuzzy logic model in spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the Lang Son city area (Vietnam) D. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2013.843206
102. Validation and prediction challenges in data-driven landslide susceptibility mapping: insights from random sampling of training and test data in machine learning models C. Barella et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-026-04911-5
103. Effects of sample size on the accuracy of geomorphological models J. Hjort & M. Marmion https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.006
104. Input Modality Ablation for Sustainable Landslide Hazard Management Using U-Net: Fused DEM–Optical vs. Spectral vs. Terrain Representations in a Small-Sample Pilot Study W. Chen & F. Tsai https://doi.org/10.3390/su18136649
105. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and hazard zonation techniques – a review L. Shano et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-020-00152-0
106. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for soil salinity predictions in three dryland oases located in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XJUAR) of China F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2019.1596756
107. Soil erodibility assessment of laterite dominant sub-basin watersheds in the humid tropical region of India A. Gayen & S. Mafizul Haque https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106161
108. Effect of Earthquake on Subsequent Typhoon-Induced Landslides Using Remote Sensing Imagery in the 99 Peaks Region, Central Taiwan S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.500.773
109. Multi-Temporal Landslide Inventory-Based Statistical Susceptibility Modeling Associated With the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake, Sichuan, China L. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.858635
110. A Tool for Classification and Regression Using Random Forest Methodology: Applications to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping and Soil Thickness Modeling D. Lagomarsino et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-016-9538-y
111. A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for National Glacier Mapping: Evaluating Performance through Spatial Cross-Validation in Perú M. Bueno et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15244214
112. Applying GIS to monitor school exposure to landslide hazards in disaster-prone areas of Mount Elgon in Uganda F. Akello et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2025.2480390
113. Predicting Soil Erodibility Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography M. Karim & S. Tucker-Kulesza https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001857
114. A hybrid random forests and artificial neural networks bagging ensemble for landslide susceptibility modelling L. Lucchese et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2109761
115. Predicting species abundance using machine learning approach: a comparative assessment of random forest spatial variants and performance metrics C. Mushagalusa et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02055-7
116. Estimation of erosion in tectonically active orogenies. Example from the Bhotekoshi catchment, Himalaya (Nepal) C. Andermann & R. Gloaguen https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802558733
117. Evaluation of Machine Learning Performance in Wildfire Susceptibility Mapping Under Limited Training Data Condition M. SHAFAPOURTEHRANY https://doi.org/10.46387/bjesr.1174006
118. Optimizing a prediction model for engineering disturbance hazard susceptibility along the China-Nepal highway in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04669-2
119. Assessing the Available Landslide Susceptibility Map and Inventory for the Municipality of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Potentials and Challenges for Data-Driven Applications P. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14090330
120. A new simple topo-climatic model to predict surface displacement in paraglacial and periglacial mountains of the European Alps: The importance of ground heating index and floristic components as ecological indicators S. Ponti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106889
121. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping O. Althuwaynee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003
122. Shallow landslides susceptibility assessment in different environments M. Persichillo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1265011
123. A functional entity approach to predict soil erosion processes in a small Plio-Pleistocene Mediterranean catchment in Northern Chianti, Italy M. Märker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.022
124. Landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence model in Qingshui River watershed of 2008 Wenchuan earthquake struck region C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-012-0236-7
125. Multifactor empirical mapping of the protective function of forests against landslide occurrence: statistical approaches and a case study D. Cimini et al. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1740-008
126. Effect of landslide spatial representation and raster resolution on the landslide susceptibility assessment S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11442-3
127. Comparison of machine-learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping using two-level random sampling (2LRS) in Alakir catchment area, Antalya, Turkey M. Ada & B. San https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3043-8
128. A novel voting ensemble model for spatial prediction of landslides using GIS S. Sachdeva et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2019.1654141
129. Combination of statistical and conceptual approaches for debris-flow susceptibility modelling at a regional scale, British Columbia, Canada T. Bornaetxea et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.109044
130. Forest cover change trajectories and their impact on landslide occurrence in the tropical Andes M. Guns & V. Vanacker https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2352-9
131. A free web-based approach for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility modeling: Case study of Clearwater National Forest, Idaho, USA P. Gorsevski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105632
132. Chinese High Resolution Satellite Data and GIS-Based Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility along Highway G30 in Guozigou Valley Using Logistic Regression and MaxEnt Model Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153620
133. Planet Image-Based Inventorying and Machine Learning-Based Susceptibility Mapping for the Landslides Triggered by the 2018 Mw6.6 Tomakomai, Japan Earthquake X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080978
134. A step beyond landslide susceptibility maps: a simple method to investigate and explain the different outcomes obtained by different approaches T. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01299-0
135. New insights into machine learning prediction techniques for real-time sanitary risk assessment in karst drinking water sources affected by faecal contamination J. Fernández-Ortega et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.125060
136. Comparing classical statistic and machine learning models in landslide susceptibility mapping in Ardanuc (Artvin), Turkey H. Akinci & M. Zeybek https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04743-4
137. The propagation of inventory-based positional errors into statistical landslide susceptibility models S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2729-2016
138. Evaluation of predictive models for post-fire debris flow occurrence in the western United States E. Nikolopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2331-2018
139. Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: A comparison of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023
140. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001
141. Kernel-Based Mapping of Orographic Rainfall Enhancement in the Swiss Alps as Detected by Weather Radar L. Foresti et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2179550
142. Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications – Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction H. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108815
143. iSoLIM : a similarity-based spatial prediction software for the big data era F. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2024.2324381
144. Forward logistic regression for earth-flow landslide susceptibility assessment in the Platani river basin (southern Sicily, Italy) D. Costanzo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0415-3
145. Multi-Resolution Landslide Susceptibility Analysis Using a DEM and Random Forest U. Paudel et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2016.75056
146. Random Forest-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Coastal Regions of Artvin, Turkey H. Akinci et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9090553
147. Uncertainties of prediction accuracy in shallow landslide modeling: Sample size and raster resolution A. Shirzadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.017
148. Big Data Analytics for Emergency Communication Networks: A Survey J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2540004
149. Sedimentological characteristics and application of machine learning techniques for landslide susceptibility modelling along the highway corridor Nahan to Rajgarh (Himachal Pradesh), India V. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104150
150. Combination of Rainfall Thresholds and Susceptibility Maps for Dynamic Landslide Hazard Assessment at Regional Scale S. Segoni et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00085
151. Development and validation of sinkhole susceptibility models in mantled karst settings. A case study from the Ebro valley evaporite karst (NE Spain) J. Galve et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.11.011
152. Assessment of susceptibility to earth-flow landslide using logistic regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines: A case of the Belice River basin (western Sicily, Italy) C. Conoscenti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.09.020
153. A grid portal for solving geoscience problems using distributed knowledge discovery services G. Folino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2009.08.002
154. Introducing a novel multi-layer perceptron network based on stochastic gradient descent optimized by a meta-heuristic algorithm for landslide susceptibility mapping H. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140549
155. Landslide susceptibility: a statistically-based assessment on a depositional pyroclastic ramp F. Murillo-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5225-6
156. Machine Learning: New Potential for Local and Regional Deep-Seated Landslide Nowcasting A. van Natijne et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051425
157. Flood Spatial Modeling in Northern Iran Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Comparison between Evidential Belief Functions and Its Ensemble with a Multivariate Logistic Regression Model D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131589
158. Regional-scale controls on the spatial activity of rockfalls (Turtmann Valley, Swiss Alps) — A multivariate modeling approach K. Messenzehl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.01.008
159. Integration of rainfall thresholds and susceptibility maps in the Emilia Romagna (Italy) regional-scale landslide warning system S. Segoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0502-0
160. Broad-scale species distribution models applied to data-poor areas C. Guillaumot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.04.007
161. A Physically Constrained Variational Autoencoder for Geochemical Pattern Recognition Y. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09979-1
162. Lethality level analysis of secondary landslides based on field survey data: a case study of Luding earthquake L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02172-x
163. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Nepal’s Chure Region: A Geospatial Analysis P. Thapa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12122186
164. Landslide susceptibility mapping at sin Ho, Lai Chau province, Vietnam using ensemble models based on fuzzy unordered rules induction algorithm T. Bien et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2136253
165. PSLSA v2.0: An automatic Python package integrating machine learning models for regional landslide susceptibility assessment Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106367
166. Application of gis and frequency ratio model in mapping the potential surface failure sites in the poonjar sub-watershed of meenachil river in western ghats of kerala H. Vijith & G. Madhu https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013495
167. Insights Gained from the Review of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Studies in Italy S. Segoni et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234491
168. Transferability of regional permafrost disturbance susceptibility modelling using generalized linear and generalized additive models A. Rudy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.04.011
169. Scale Effects in Landslide Susceptibility Assessment: Integrating Slope Unit Division and SHAP-Based Interpretability in a Typical River Basin W. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131877
170. A review on spatial, temporal and magnitude prediction of landslide hazard A. Tyagi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaesx.2022.100099
171. Spatial prediction of spring locations in data poor region of Central Himalayas R. Niraula et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.223
172. Optimizing and validating the Gravitational Process Path model for regional debris-flow runout modelling J. Goetz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2543-2021
173. Assessment of advanced random forest and decision tree algorithms for modeling rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in the Izu-Oshima Volcanic Island, Japan J. Dou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221
174. Comparing methods of landslide data acquisition and susceptibility modelling: Examples from New Zealand H. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107660
175. Evaluating the use of a coordinate-based tensor-product for addressing spatial autocorrelation in shallow landslide susceptibility modelling L. Pompili et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-026-03283-2
176. A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping A. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.04.003
177. Spatial statistical modeling of shallow landslides—Validating predictions for different landslide inventories and rainfall events J. von Ruette et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.010
178. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Danish Case Study A. Ageenko et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11060324
179. Shallow-landslide stability evaluation in loess areas according to the Revised Infinite Slope Model: a case study of the 7.25 Tianshui sliding-flow landslide events of 2013 in the southwest of the Loess Plateau, China J. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2615-2024
180. Assessment of rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility in Artvin, Turkey using machine learning techniques H. Akinci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104535
181. The Effect of Observation Data Sampling Methods on Infiltration Areas by Maximum Entropy Model M. Jafarzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.11.22.96
182. Literature review and bibliometric analysis on data-driven assessment of landslide susceptibility P. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7254-9
183. Field Measurements of Passive Earth Forces in Steep, Shallow, Landslide‐Prone Areas A. Cislaghi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JF004557
184. Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines Y. Huang & L. Zhao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.03.003
185. Comprehensive landslide susceptibility map of Central Asia A. Rosi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2229-2023
186. Uncertainties of landslide susceptibility prediction considering different landslide types F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.03.001
187. Application of a Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithm in Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Mountainous Area B. Ghasemian et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.897254
188. Building a landslide hazard indicator with machine learning and land surface models T. Stanley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104692
189. Active-Learning Approaches for Landslide Mapping Using Support Vector Machines Z. Wang & A. Brenning https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132588
190. Landslide susceptibility analysis in central Vietnam based on an incomplete landslide inventory: Comparison of a new method to calculate weighting factors by means of bivariate statistics M. Meinhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.042
191. Catchment-scale impacts of shallow landslides on stream water chemistry N. Yoshihara et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153970
192. Landslide susceptibility mapping on a global scale using the method of logistic regression L. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1411-2017
193. Quantifying effectiveness of trees for landslide erosion control R. Spiekermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107993
194. Statistical modelling of rainfall-induced shallow landsliding using static predictors and numerical weather predictions: preliminary results V. Capecchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-75-2015
195. Multi-scale support vector algorithms for hot spot detection and modelling A. Pozdnoukhov & M. Kanevski https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-007-0162-x
196. Exploring Influence of Sampling Strategies on Event-Based Landslide Susceptibility Modeling J. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8090397
197. Assessing Landslide Drivers in Social–Ecological–Technological Systems: The Case of Metropolitan Region of São Paulo, Brazil M. Hirye et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123048
198. Transferability of geomorphological distribution models: Evaluation using solifluction features in subarctic and Arctic regions J. Hjort et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.002
199. How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment? — A catchment-scale case study from China Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.07.026
200. A Semi-Automated Object-Based Gully Networks Detection Using Different Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Bowen Catchment, Queensland, Australia H. Shahabi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19224893
201. Exploring performance and robustness of shallow landslide susceptibility modeling at regional scale using different training and testing sets M. Conforti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10844-z
202. Developing a more complete understanding of tropical montane forest disturbance ecology through landslide research C. Freund & M. Silman https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1091387
203. Landslide susceptibility assessment in complex geological settings: sensitivity to geological information and insights on its parameterization S. Segoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01340-2
204. Integration of the Statistical Index Method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process technique for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in Huizhou, China G. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.03.028
205. Assessment of co-seismic landslide hazard using the Newmark model and statistical analyses: a case study of the 2013 Lushan, China, Mw6.6 earthquake S. Ma & C. Xu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3548-9
206. Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Suşehri (Sivas) Heyelan Duyarlılık Analizi G. DEMİR https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.299987
207. On the use of adversarial validation for quantifying dissimilarity in geospatial machine learning prediction Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2025.2460513
208. Spatially distributed antecedent rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence: a multitask machine learning modelling approach L. Lucchese et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2561163
209. Hybrid meta-heuristic machine learning methods applied to landslide susceptibility mapping in the Sahel-Algiers M. Benbouras https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.04.003
210. Engineered slope failure susceptibility modelling using high spatial resolution geospatial data S. Obrike et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02413-0
211. An additive framework for developing a hybrid VS30 model: Incorporating geological information into the existing SCK Model for an updated VS30 map of Chinese mainland J. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108926
212. When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models G. Titti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11110469
213. Using InfoVal method and GIS techniques for the spatial modelling of landslide susceptibility in the upper catchment of river Meenachil in Kerala H. Vijith et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-009-0028-4
214. Application of an incomplete landslide inventory, logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping related to the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake of China C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0661-7
215. Joint modelling of landslide counts and sizes using spatial marked point processes with sub-asymptotic mark distributions R. Yadav et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlad077
216. The performance of landslide susceptibility models critically depends on the quality of digital elevation models J. Brock et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1776403
217. Exploring the effect of absence selection on landslide susceptibility models: A case study in Sicily, Italy C. Conoscenti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.006
218. Foundation for unbiased cross-validation of spatio-temporal models for Species Distribution Modeling D. Koldasbayeva & A. Zaytsev https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103521
219. Spatial+: A new cross-validation method to evaluate geospatial machine learning models Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103364
220. A review of regularised estimation methods and cross-validation in spatiotemporal statistics P. Otto et al. https://doi.org/10.1214/24-SS150
221. Fiber bundle model for multiscale modeling of hydromechanical triggering of shallow landslides D. Cohen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007889
222. Advancing rainfall-induced landslide hazard mapping: comparative study of semi-quantitative, statistical, hybrid, and deterministic models T. Nontapot & K. Chao https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2594735
223. Integrating Eco-DRR into landslide susceptibility assessment: The critical role of eco-environmental factors M. Broquet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127043
224. Evaluation of Different Landslide Susceptibility Models for a Local Scale in the Chitral District, Northern Pakistan B. Aslam et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093107
225. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Y. Achour & H. Pourghasemi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001
226. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Ya’an Based on Coupling of GWR and TabNet J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152678
227. Disaggregating County-Level Census Data for Population Mapping Using Residential Geo-Objects With Multisource Geo-Spatial Data T. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2974896
228. Landslide susceptibility mapping in Lesalso (Laelay Maichew), Northern Ethiopia: a GIS approach using frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy process methods A. Gebrehiwot et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-025-02578-7
229. A framework for estimating actual evapotranspiration at weather stations without flux observations by combining data from MODIS and flux towers through a machine learning approach C. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127047
230. A spatially aware Bayesian deep learning framework for UAV-based soil salinity prediction D. Dayal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101359
231. Landslide failure and runout susceptibility in the upper T. Ceno valley (Northern Apennines, Italy) A. Clerici et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9349-4
232. Water erosion susceptibility mapping by applying Stochastic Gradient Treeboost to the Imera Meridionale River Basin (Sicily, Italy) S. Angileri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.018
233. Evaluation and Validation of Landslide Spatial Susceptibility in the Western Ghats of Kerala, through GIS-based Weights of Evidence Model and Area under Curve Technique V. Prasannakumar & H. Vijith https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-012-0171-3
234. Swarm optimization based heterogeneous machine learning techniques for enhanced landslide susceptibility assessment with comprehensive uncertainty quantification S. Dey & S. Das https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01617-8
235. Landslide susceptibility mapping & prediction using Support Vector Machine for Mandakini River Basin, Garhwal Himalaya, India D. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.013
236. A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023
237. Analysis and evaluation of landslide susceptibility: a review on articles published during 2005–2016 (periods of 2005–2012 and 2013–2016) H. Pourghasemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3531-5
238. A Modeling Comparison of Groundwater Potential Mapping in a Mountain Bedrock Aquifer: QUEST, GARP, and RF Models D. Davoudi Moghaddam et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030679
239. Evaluating the uncertainty in landslide susceptibility prediction: effect of spatial data variability and evaluation unit choices S. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04180-8
240. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision? H. Pourghasemi & O. Rahmati https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022
241. GIS-based logistic regression for rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility mapping under different grid sizes in Yueqing, Southeastern China Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105147
242. GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.040
243. Landslide Susceptibility Zoning Using C5.0 Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and Comparison of Their Performance in a Coal Mine Area Q. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.781472
244. Bridging Pedology and Data Science: Machine Learning Applications for Soil Organic Matter and Carbon Analysis A. Dolatabadian & K. Kariman https://doi.org/10.3390/app16115412
245. Landslide occurrence and its relation with terrain factors in the Siwalik Hills, Nepal: case study of susceptibility assessment in three basins M. Ghimire https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9569-7
246. Exploring the impact of introducing the TRIGRS physical model into machine learning model on the rainfall-induced shallow landslide-susceptibility assessment L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04229-8
247. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm M. Marjanović et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.006
248. Modeling the spatial distribution of subarctic forest in northern Manitoba using GIS-based terrain and climate data S. Mamet et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2014.994253
249. A methodological approach of QRA for slow-moving landslides at a regional scale F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01875-x
250. An Ensemble Approach of Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models for Regional Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Arid Mountainous Terrain of Southern Peru C. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051376
251. Analytical techniques for mapping multi-hazard with geo-environmental modeling approaches and UAV images N. Kariminejad et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18757-w
252. Predicting Earthquake-Induced Landslides by Using a Stochastic Modeling Approach: A Case Study of the 2001 El Salvador Coseismic Landslides C. Mercurio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12040178
253. Rapid Factor Screening for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping of Linear Engineering Slopes Using a Reduced-Factor Information Value Model: A Case Study of the Jing-Zhang Railway, China Z. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics6020041
254. Spatial prediction of groundwater spring potential mapping based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4771-2018
255. Optimizing Landslide Susceptibility Mapping with Non-Landslide Sampling Strategy and Spatio-Temporal Fusion Models J. Deng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17121778
256. Métodos estadísticos para la evaluación de la susceptibilidad por movimientos en masa E. Aristizábal-Giraldo et al. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.1247
257. Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy) A. Trigila et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.001
258. Which data for quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at operational scale? Case study of the Pays d'Auge plateau hillslopes (Normandy, France) M. Fressard et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-569-2014
259. A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility mapping using data-driven methods A. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104188
260. Classification Efficacy Using K-Fold Cross-Validation and Bootstrapping Resampling Techniques on the Example of Mapping Complex Gully Systems K. Phinzi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152980
261. Integrating geomorphology, statistic and numerical simulations for landslide invasion hazard scenarios mapping: An example in the Sorrento Peninsula (Italy) F. Lucà et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.01.006
262. Susceptibility mapping of shallow landslides using kernel-based Gaussian process, support vector machines and logistic regression I. Colkesen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2016.02.019
263. A bibliometric and content analysis of research trends on GIS-based landslide susceptibility from 2001 to 2020 J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23732-z
264. To what extent do natural disturbances contribute to Andean plant diversity? A theoretical outline from the wettest and driest parts of the tropical Andes M. Richter https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-22-95-2009
265. An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm A. Akgun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.012
266. On the use of explainable AI for susceptibility modeling: Examining the spatial pattern of SHAP values N. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2024.101800
267. Evaluation of Landslide Risk Using the WoE and IV Methods: A Case Study in the Zipaquirá–Pacho Road Corridor S. Velazco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards6020027
268. Estimating the Quality of the Most Popular Machine Learning Algorithms for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu Earthquake S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194733
269. GIS-based bivariate statistical modelling for earthquake-triggered landslides susceptibility mapping related to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2012-006
270. An introduction to learning algorithms and potential applications in geomorphometry and Earth surface dynamics A. Valentine & L. Kalnins https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-445-2016
271. Improving sinkhole hazard models incorporating magnitude–frequency relationships and nearest neighbor analysis J. Galve et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.020
272. Identifying the controls on coastal cliff landslides using machine-learning approaches M. Dickson & G. Perry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.029
273. Dynamic rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility: A step towards a unified forecasting system M. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103593
274. Independent Multi-Sensor Validation of Machine-Learning Landslide Susceptibility: Footprint Construction Decides the Verdict—May 2023 Emilia-Romagna Event L. Necula et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142318
275. Integrating predictive modeling techniques with geospatial data for landslide susceptibility assessment in northern Pakistan A. Asghar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8029-2
276. Evaluating map quality and model performance through iterative statistics-based landslide susceptibility in eastern KY M. Crawford et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07255-7
277. Landslide susceptibility assessment using the certainty factor and deep neural network W. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.1091560
278. Spatial machine-learning model diagnostics: a model-agnostic distance-based approach A. Brenning https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2022.2131789
279. Spatial prediction strategy for landslides triggered by large earthquakes oriented to emergency response, mid-term resettlement and later reconstruction S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101362
280. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines, and logistic regression T. Kavzoglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0391-7
281. Improved environmental mapping and validation using bagging models with spatially clustered data B. Misiuk & C. Brown https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102181
282. Electrical resistivity as a binary classifier for bridge scour evaluation M. Karim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.03.002
283. Evolution of soil wetting patterns preceding a hydrologically induced landslide inferred from electrical resistivity survey and point measurements of volumetric water content and pore water pressure P. Lehmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014560
284. Spatial statistics and soil mapping: A blossoming partnership under pressure G. Heuvelink & R. Webster https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2022.100639
285. Indirect modeling of hourly meteorological time series for winter road maintenance A. Brenning et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.1072
286. Assessment and validation of GIS-based landslide susceptibility maps: a case study from Feltrino stream basin (Central Italy) M. Sciarra et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0954-7
287. The 2010 Yushu earthquake triggered landslide hazard mapping using GIS and weight of evidence modeling C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1624-0
288. Seismically induced landslide hazard and exposure modelling in Southern California based on the 1994 Northridge, California earthquake event M. Budimir et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0531-8
289. Effect of bin width on variogram model accuracy: a case study of teak tree volume specific to Solomon clone in Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia J. Jamalul Kiram et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2025.2485190
290. Using machine learning paradigm to predict CBR value of treated expansive soil U. Ahmad et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.24.00066
291. Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides in El Salvador using logistic regression M. García-Rodríguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.001
292. Spatial leave‐one‐out cross‐validation for variable selection in the presence of spatial autocorrelation K. Le Rest et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12161
293. A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China Z. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6640-7
294. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6
295. Comparisons of filter, wrapper, and embedded feature selection for rockfall susceptibility prediction and mapping C. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06878-6
296. Benchmarking data handling strategies for landslide susceptibility modeling using random forest workflows G. Samodra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiig.2024.100093
297. Mapping flood susceptibility in an arid region of southern Iraq using ensemble machine learning classifiers: a comparative study A. Al-Abadi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3584-5
298. Integration of multi-criteria decision analysis and statistical models for landslide susceptibility mapping in the western Algiers Province (Algeria) using GIS techniques and remote sensing data S. Mokadem et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-024-00548-9
299. A comparison of information value and logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping by using GIS T. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5317-y
300. Macroscopic Lane Change Model—A Flexible Event-Tree-Based Approach for the Prediction of Lane Change on Freeway Traffic C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4020044
301. Comparison of a logistic regression and Naïve Bayes classifier in landslide susceptibility assessments: The influence of models complexity and training dataset size P. Tsangaratos & I. Ilia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.004
302. The use of digital technologies for landslide disaster risk research and disaster risk management: progress and prospects H. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10575-7
303. Three oversampling methods applied in a comparative landslide spatial research in Penang Island, Malaysia H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03307-8
304. Field-based landslide susceptibility assessment in a data-scarce environment: the populated areas of the Rwenzori Mountains L. Jacobs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-105-2018
305. Development of a morphometric connectivity model to mitigate sediment derived from storm-driven shallow landslides R. Spiekermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106676
306. A Novel Hybrid Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping-Based GeoDetector and Machine Learning Cluster: A Case of Xiaojin County, China W. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020093
307. Spatial Regression Models for Field Trials: A Comparative Study and New Ideas S. Hawinkel et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.858711
308. Performance assessment of the landslide susceptibility modelling using the support vector machine, radial basis function network, and weight of evidence models in the N'fis river basin, Morocco H. Naceur et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-022-00249-4
309. Comparative analysis of certainty factor and analytic hierarchy process for landslide susceptibility zonation in parts of Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India A. Magray et al. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0020
310. Context-sensitive analysis of disaster resilience and equity through geospatial explainable machine learning Y. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2026.107203
311. Incorporation of neighborhood information improves performance of SDB models A. Knudby & G. Richardson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101033
312. Landslide susceptibility mapping by using a geographic information system (GIS) along the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (Karakoram Highway), Pakistan S. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-999-2019
313. Regional-scale spatiotemporal landslide probability assessment through machine learning and potential applications for operational warning systems: a case study in Kvam (Norway) N. Nocentini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02287-9
314. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine I. Yilmaz https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0394-9
315. A software framework for classification models of geographical data Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.02.006
316. Point process-based modeling of multiple debris flow landslides using INLA: an application to the 2009 Messina disaster L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1518-0
317. Development of a binary logistic lane change model and its validation using empirical freeway data C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2020.1715309
318. Landslide susceptibility mapping using AHP and fuzzy methods in the Gilan province, Iran Y. Bahrami et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10162-y
319. Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran H. Pourghasemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2
320. Reducing subjectivity in landslide susceptibility mapping method: an integrated methodology S. Gebru & T. Shewangzaw https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-026-00365-9
321. Soft computing in assessment of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5576-7
322. A hybrid machine learning model for landslide-oriented risk assessment of long-distance pipelines H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118177
323. Pre-processing algorithms and landslide modelling on remotely sensed DEMs M. Santini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.023
324. Data-driven topo-climatic mapping with machine learning methods A. Pozdnoukhov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9339-y
325. Comparison of new individual and hybrid machine learning algorithms for modeling and mapping fire hazard: a supplementary analysis of fire hazard in different counties of Golestan Province in Iran S. Eskandari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04169-4
326. The influence of systematically incomplete shallow landslide inventories on statistical susceptibility models and suggestions for improvements S. Steger et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0820-0
327. The RUSLE erosion index as a proxy indicator for debris flow susceptibility A. Zini et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0515-8
328. Towards landslide space-time forecasting through machine learning: the influence of rainfall parameters and model setting N. Nocentini et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1152130
329. Mapping Fractional Land Use and Land Cover in a Monsoon Region: The Effects of Data Processing Options B. Seo et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2544802
330. A quick method of early landslide identification based on dynamic susceptibility analysis using M-SVM method: a case study Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03440-9
331. Comparison and combination of different models for optimal landslide susceptibility zonation G. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2013-071
332. Susceptibility mapping of instability related to shallow mining cavities in a built-up environment R. Pellicani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.12.011
333. Spatial modelling of gully erosion using evidential belief function, logistic regression, and a new ensemble of evidential belief function–logistic regression algorithm A. Arabameri et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3151
334. Assessment of calanchi and rill-interrill erosion susceptibility in northern Liguria, Italy: A case study using a probabilistic modelling framework M. Maerker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114367
335. Binary logistic regression versus stochastic gradient boosted decision trees in assessing landslide susceptibility for multiple-occurring landslide events: application to the 2009 storm event in Messina (Sicily, southern Italy) L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1915-3
336. A Comparative Study of the Frequency Ratio, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Taşkent (Konya), Turkey A. Ozdemir https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01284-8
337. A comparative study of different classification techniques for marine oil spill identification using RADARSAT-1 imagery L. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.012
338. Evaluation of geological risk and hydrocarbon favorability using logistic regression model with case study Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.02.012
339. Exploring the impact of introducing a physical model into statistical methods on the evaluation of regional scale debris flow susceptibility J. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04498-4
340. Comparison of Statistical Approaches for Modelling Land-Use Change B. Sun & D. Robinson https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040144
341. Geomorphic process rates of landslides along a humidity gradient in the tropical Andes J. Muenchow et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.029
342. Comparative Assessment of Three Nonlinear Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Coal Mine Area Q. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6070228
343. Uncertainty due to DEM error in landslide susceptibility mapping C. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.770515
344. Mamdani fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping L. Lucchese et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04547-6
345. Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression D. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9844-2
346. Terrain Controls and Landscape-Scale Susceptibility Modelling of Active-Layer Detachments, Sabine Peninsula, Melville Island, Nunavut A. Rudy et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1900
347. Benchmarking classifiers to optimally integrate terrain analysis and multispectral remote sensing in automatic rock glacier detection A. Brenning https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.005
348. Comparison of different models for susceptibility mapping of earthquake triggered landslides related with the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.002
349. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Vietnam Using Support Vector Machines, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes Models D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/974638
350. Distinctive controls on the distribution of river-damming and non-damming landslides induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake R. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1381-8
351. A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression M. Budimir et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0550-5
352. Landslide susceptibility assesssment in the Uttarakhand area (India) using GIS: a comparison study of prediction capability of naïve bayes, multilayer perceptron neural networks, and functional trees methods B. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1702-9
353. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modelling: a comparative assessment of kernel logistic regression, Naïve-Bayes tree, and alternating decision tree models W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1289250
354. Assessing the utility of regionalized rock-mass geomechanical properties in rockfall susceptibility modelling in an alpine environment G. Bajni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108401
355. Integrating physical and empirical landslide susceptibility models using generalized additive models J. Goetz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.001
356. Landslide susceptibility of the Prato–Pistoia–Lucca provinces, Tuscany, Italy S. Segoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1233463
357. Degree of geocomplexity for diagnosing spatial pattern loss beyond prediction accuracy H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2026.2657087
358. Prediction of debris-avalanches and -flows triggered by a tropical storm by using a stochastic approach: An application to the events occurred in Mocoa (Colombia) on 1 April 2017 G. Vargas-Cuervo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.023
359. Autologistic modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy P. Atkinson & R. Massari https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.02.001
360. Counteracting flawed landslide data in statistically based landslide susceptibility modelling for very large areas: a national-scale assessment for Austria P. Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01693-7
361. A comparative study of different machine learning models for landslide susceptibility prediction: a case study of Kullu-to-Rohtang pass transport corridor, India . Nirbhav et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10846-x
362. Landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping in Loess Plateau based on different machine learning algorithms by hybrid factors screening: Case study of Xunyi County, Shaanxi Province, China X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.074
363. Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek, South Korea A. Pradhan & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1065-z
364. An expert knowledge-based approach to landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and fuzzy logic A. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.003
365. A side-sampling based Linformer model for landslide susceptibility assessment: a case study of the railways in China N. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2024.2354507
366. Hyperparameter tuning and performance assessment of statistical and machine-learning algorithms using spatial data P. Schratz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.002
367. An assessment on the use of Terra ASTER L3A data in landslide susceptibility mapping H. Nefeslioglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.08.005
368. Improving the reliability of landslide susceptibility mapping through spatial uncertainty analysis: a case study of Al Hoceima, Northern Morocco H. Rahali https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1357767
369. Dynamic association of slope movements in the Uttarakhand Himalaya: a critical review on the landslide susceptibility assessment H. Khali et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2273214
370. Soybean yield prediction using machine learning algorithms under a cover crop management system L. Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100442
371. Effect of Various Feature Engineering Techniques and Hyper-Parameters Tuning of Machine Learning Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Map Generation V. Saxena et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-025-02190-3
372. Reasons for an outstanding plant diversity in the tropical Andes of Southern Ecuador M. Richter et al. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.200912
373. Manifestation of LiDAR-Derived Parameters in the Spatial Prediction of Landslides Using Novel Ensemble Evidential Belief Functions and Support Vector Machine Models in GIS M. Jebur et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2341276
374. Improving transferability strategies for debris flow susceptibility assessment: Application to the Saponara and Itala catchments (Messina, Italy) M. Cama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.025
375. A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses B. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.12.004
376. Scaling land-surface variables for landslide detection F. Sîrbu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0290-1
377. Climate Change Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment - for Aiding Climate Resilient Planning for Road Infrastructure: A Case Study in Rangamati District, Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh I. Wijaya et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1091/1/012010
378. Modelling terrain erosion susceptibility of logged and regenerated forested region in northern Borneo through the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and GIS techniques H. Vijith & D. Dodge-Wan https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-019-0124-x
379. Quantitative analysis of landslide impact on vegetation: Insights from field surveys and UAV imagery S. Yousefi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107581
380. Method for prediction of landslide movements based on random forests M. Krkač et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0761-z
381. A remote sensing-based tool for assessing rainfall-driven hazards D. Wright et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.12.006
382. Landslide susceptibility mapping using precipitation data, Mazandaran Province, north of Iran M. Arab Amiri & C. Conoscenti https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2962-8
383. Comparative Assessment of Quantitative Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Feature Selection Techniques B. Joshi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15010020
384. Spatio-Statistical Analysis of Flood Susceptibility Assessment Using Bivariate Model in the Floodplain of River Swat, District Charsadda, Pakistan M. Moazzam et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2020.85010
385. How can landslide risk maps be validated? Potential solutions with open-source databases F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.998885
386. Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Youfang catchment using logistic regression S. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3171-5
387. Machine learning and multi-sensor based modelling of woody vegetation in the Molopo Area, South Africa M. Ludwig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.019
388. Spatial modeling of multi-hazard threat to cultural heritage sites L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105776
389. Evaluation of the influence of source and spatial resolution of DEMs on derivative products used in landslide mapping R. Mahalingam & M. Olsen https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1115431
390. Markov–Switching Spatio–Temporal Generalized Additive Model for Landslide Susceptibility A. Sridharan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105892
391. Qualitative Model for Hurricane-Induced Debris Flow Prediction: A Case Study of the Impact of Hurricane Maria (2017) in Puerto Rico Y. Gorokhovich et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics6010015
392. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models P. Reichenbach et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
393. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Different Machine Learning Methods in Longnan City, China J. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416716
394. Understanding the topic evolution of scientific literatures like an evolving city: Using Google Word2Vec model and spatial autocorrelation analysis K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.02.014
395. Effects of forest cover, topography, and sampling extent on the measured density of shallow, translational landslides D. Miller & K. Burnett https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004807
396. Cost-based analysis of mitigation measures for shallow-landslide risk reduction strategies J. Galve et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.002
397. Evaluation of ground conditions and vehicle-induced vibration using Spatio-geophysical approach for the Nilgiris landslide transportation interaction corridor, Western Ghats, India S. Chellamuthu & G. Ganapathy https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2532046
398. Rapid susceptibility mapping of co-seismic landslides triggered by the 2013 Lushan Earthquake using the regression model developed for the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2786-2
399. Spatial Prediction Models for Seismic Landslides Based on Support Vector Machine and Varied Kernel Functions: A Case Study of the 14 April 2010 Yushu Earthquake in China https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1761
400. Application of expert rules in indirect approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment Y. Thiery et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0390-8
401. Modeling shallow landslides and root reinforcement: A review I. Murgia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106671
402. Early identification of an impending rockslide location via a spatially-aided Gaussian mixture model S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1214/20-AOAS1326
403. Estimating global landslide susceptibility and its uncertainty through ensemble modeling A. Felsberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3063-2022
404. Setting up evaluate indicators for slope control engineering based on spatial clustering analysis W. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3332-x
405. Spatiotemporal distribution of labeled data can bias the validation and selection of supervised learning algorithms: A marine remote sensing example A. Stock https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.02.023
406. Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach J. Deppner & M. Cajias https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-022-09915-y
407. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas, Pakistan M. Basharat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2308-y
408. Hazard prediction of backfill and dumping zones of open-pit mining areas using InSAR and multi-factor ensemble modeling J. Lou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108911
409. Focusing on the spatial non-stationarity of landslide predisposing factors in northern Iceland T. Feuillet et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314528944
410. An inventory-driven rock glacier status model (intact vs. relict) for South Tyrol, Eastern Italian Alps C. Kofler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106887
411. Landslide susceptibility mapping along national highway-1 in Jammu and Kashmir State (India) G. Hussain et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0245-9
412. Landslide intelligent prediction using object-oriented method X. Wang & R. Niu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.017
413. Functional soil-landscape modelling to estimate slope stability in a steep Andean mountain forest region M. Ließ et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.05.015
414. Comparison of general kernel, multiple kernel, infinite ensemble and semi-supervised support vector machines for landslide susceptibility prediction Z. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02208-z
415. Comparison of spatial and aspatial logistic regression models for landmine risk mapping C. Schultz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.005
416. A hybrid-optimized Random Forest interpretable model for debris flow susceptibility by prior model-based negative sampling H. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.04.055
417. Eigenvector Spatial Filtering-Based Logistic Regression for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080332
418. Landslides in Tijuana, Mexico: hazard assessment in an urban neighborhood A. Oliva González et al. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.17882
419. Review on remote sensing methods for landslide detection using machine and deep learning A. Mohan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3998
420. Landslide Hazard and Exposure Modelling in Data‐Poor Regions: The Example of the Rohingya Refugee Camps in Bangladesh R. Emberson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001666
421. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for Land Use Planning and Risk Assessment A. Roccati et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020162
422. Potential Controlling Factors and Landslide Susceptibility Features of the 2022 Ms 6.8 Luding Earthquake S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16152861
423. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using a CNN–BiLSTM-AM Model X. Ju et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219476
424. What controls the distribution of post-Little Ice Age landslides around the South Patagonian Icefield? G. Seier et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02681-x
425. Replication of a terrain stability mapping using an Artificial Neural Network M. Pavel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.08.012
426. Spatial clustering and modelling for landslide susceptibility mapping in the north of the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal B. Pokharel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01558-5
427. Integration of Analytical Hierarchy Process and Landslide Susceptibility Index Based Landslide Susceptibility Assessment of the Pearl River Delta Area, China H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2938554
428. Machine Learning Feature Selection Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping N. Micheletti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9511-0
429. A global slope unit-based method for the near real-time prediction of earthquake-induced landslides H. Tanyas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.10.022
430. Predicting storm-triggered debris flow events: application to the 2009 Ionian Peloritan disaster (Sicily, Italy) M. Cama et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1785-2015
431. Application of different earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment models on the 2022 Ms 6.8 luding earthquake Y. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1429421
432. Logistic regression applied to natural hazards: rare event logistic regression with replications M. Guns & V. Vanacker https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1937-2012
433. A Novel Relevance Vector Machine Classifier with Cuckoo Search Optimization for Spatial Prediction of Landslides N. Hoang & D. Tien Bui https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000557
434. A comparative study on machine learning modeling for mass movement susceptibility mapping (a case study of Iran) S. Emami et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01915-7
435. A comparison of predictive methods in modelling the distribution of periglacial landforms in Finnish Lapland M. Marmion et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1695
436. Integrated Geospatial Assessment of a Human-Induced Winter Landslide in Almaty: The February 2024 Tau-Samal Event E. Orynbassarova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115691
437. Assessing the quality of landslide susceptibility maps – case study Lower Austria H. Petschko et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-95-2014
438. On the dangers of model complexity without ecological justification in species distribution modeling D. Bell & D. Schlaepfer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.012
439. Community perceptions of landslide risk and susceptibility: a multi-country study M. Bukhari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02027-5
440. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues F. Catani et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013
441. Integration of Remotely Sensed Soil Sealing Data in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping T. Luti et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12091486
442. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031
443. Combination of statistical and physically based methods to assess shallow slide susceptibility at the basin scale S. Oliveira et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1091-2017
444. GIS-based landslide susceptibility modeling: A comparison between fuzzy multi-criteria and machine learning algorithms S. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.004
445. A test of transferability for landslides susceptibility models under extreme climatic events: application to the Messina 2009 disaster L. Lombardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1285-2
446. Reliability of groundwater vulnerability maps obtained through statistical methods A. Sorichetta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.12.009
447. Deep spatio-temporal learning for multi-hazard events: A ConvGRU multi-label classification approach S. Zahra et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-026-00568-0
448. Applications of geographical information systems and remote sensing in natural disaster hazard assessment and mitigation in Taiwan H. Merrett & W. Chen https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2012.686064
449. Accounting for covariate distributions in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models. A case study in the alpine environment G. Amato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105237
450. Shaping shallow landslide susceptibility as a function of rainfall events M. Fumagalli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4405-2025
451. Geospatial-based risk analysis of solar plants located in the mountainous region of Gangwon Province, South Korea M. Adhikari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123408
452. Open-source optical–radar data fusion for mapping invasive tree species: A scalable framework for regional LULC applications M. García-Ontiyuelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2026.06.024
453. Rock mass geomechanical properties to improve rockfall susceptibility assessment: a case study in Valchiavenna (SO) G. Bajni et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012180
454. Modelling landslide hazards under global changes: the case of a Pyrenean valley S. Bernardie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-147-2021
455. Different landslide sampling strategies in a grid-based bi-variate statistical susceptibility model H. Hussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.030
456. Spatial Heterogeneity Modeling Using Machine Learning Based on a Hybrid of Random Forest and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) A. Barry et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdaip.2024.123018
457. Hazard assessment modeling and software development of earthquake-triggered landslides in the Sichuan–Yunnan area, China X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5113-2023
458. Determining Pleiades satellite data capability for tree diversity modeling H. Akbari & S. Kalbi https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1884-009
459. A new method of pseudo absence data generation in landslide susceptibility mapping with a case study of Shenzhen C. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-3219-x
460. Shifting from traditional landslide occurrence modeling to scenario estimation with a “glass-box” machine learning F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175277
461. A Survey of Internet of Things (IoT) for Geohazard Prevention: Applications, Technologies, and Challenges G. Mei et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2952593
462. Development of a landslide susceptibility assessment for a rail network K. Martinović et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.10.011
463. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in Zunyi City Incorporating MT-InSAR-Based Physical Constraints and Explainable Analysis Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18030515
464. Fine Identification of Landslide Acceleration Phase Using Time Logarithm Prediction Method Based on Arc Synthetic Aperture Radar Monitoring Data C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042147
465. Machine Learning for Gully Feature Extraction Based on a Pan-Sharpened Multispectral Image: Multiclass vs. Binary Approach K. Phinzi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040252
466. Mapping Post-Earthquake Landslide Susceptibility: A U-Net Like Approach Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172767
467. Assessing the performance of GIS- based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion Y. Garosi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.093
468. Advancing Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in the Medea Region Using a Hybrid Metaheuristic ANFIS Approach F. Debiche et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060889
469. Landslide Detection Using Densely Connected Convolutional Networks and Environmental Conditions H. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3079196
470. Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping B. Feizizadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-2918-z
471. Comparison of the presence-only method and presence-absence method in landslide susceptibility mapping A. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.012
472. Applicability of spatial prediction models for landslide susceptibility in land-use zoning instruments: a guideline in a coastal settlement in South-Central Chile P. López et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1939440
473. Landslide Susceptibility Estimation Using GIS. Evritania Prefecture: A Case Study in Greece G. Ntelis et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2019.78015
474. GIS-based spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using logistic regression model S. Mousavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2010.532975
475. Prediction model for cyanide soil pollution in artisanal gold mining area by using logistic regression L. Razanamahandry et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.018
476. How does forest structure affect root reinforcement and susceptibility to shallow landslides? C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3887
477. Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101211
478. Application of two fuzzy models using knowledge-based and linear aggregation approaches to identifying flooding-prone areas in Tehran M. Rezaei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03816-9
479. High-resolution earthquake-induced landslide hazard assessment in Southwest China through frequency ratio analysis and LightGBM Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103947
480. High Resolution Precipitation and Soil Moisture Data Integration for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Y. Peiro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14120330
481. Neural network-based model for landslide susceptibility and soil longitudinal profile analyses: Two case studies F. Farrokhzad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2011.09.004
482. Effects of sampling intensity and non-slide/slide sample ratio on the occurrence probability of coseismic landslides X. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107222
483. Multivariate geostatistical modeling of the spatial sediment distribution in a large scale drainage basin, Upper Rhone, Switzerland A. Schoch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.11.026
484. Improving the Generalization Performance of Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modeling by a Stacking Ensemble Learning-Based Negative Sample Strategy J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17162460
485. A support vector machine model of landslide susceptibility mapping based on hyperparameter optimization using the Bayesian algorithm: a case study of the highways in the southern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau K. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06665-3
486. Mass movement susceptibility assessment of alpine infrastructure in the Salzkammergut area, Austria L. Abad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103009
487. An analysis of landslide susceptibility zonation using a subjective geomorphic mapping and existing landslides M. Pavel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.006
488. Coseismic landslides triggered by the 2022 Luding Ms6.8 earthquake, China L. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02061-3
489. Population Based Binary Reclassification of Indian Standard Landslide Hazard Model K. Thrideep et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-017-0581-3
490. Landslide susceptibility analysis with logistic regression model based on FCM sampling strategy L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.006
491. Combining spatial data in landslide reactivation susceptibility mapping: A likelihood ratio-based approach in W Belgium O. Dewitte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.06.010
492. Landslide susceptibility modeling in a landslide prone area in Mazandarn Province, north of Iran: a comparison between GLM, GAM, MARS, and M-AHP methods H. Pourghasemi & M. Rossi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1919-2
493. Multihazard Risk Model for Reliability Analysis of Expansive Soil Landslide Based on T–S Fuzzy Logic J. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001225
494. Investigations of a Weathered and Closely Jointed Rock Slope Failure Using Back Analyses K. Shao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313452
495. A Novel Hybrid Machine Learning-Based Model for Rockfall Source Identification in Presence of Other Landslide Types Using LiDAR and GIS A. Fanos & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-019-00114-z
496. Damage Assessment of Earthen Sites of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province Y. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/3376120
497. Characteristics of landslides and assessment of deep-seated landslide susceptibility in Northern Turkey T. Duman & T. Çan https://doi.org/10.1007/s42990-023-00105-3
498. Forest harvesting is associated with increased landslide activity during an extreme rainstorm on Vancouver Island, Canada J. Goetz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1311-2015
499. Multivariate statistical algorithms for landslide susceptibility assessment in Kailash Sacred landscape, Western Himalaya A. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2227324
500. GIS-based earthquake-triggered-landslide susceptibility mapping with an integrated weighted index model in Jiuzhaigou region of Sichuan Province, China Y. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1973-2019
501. Prediction of Landslide Displacement by the Novel Coupling Method of HP Filtering Method and Extreme Gradient Boosting L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-022-00470-8
502. Comparative Study of Rapid Assessment Methods for Earthquake-Triggered Landslides Based on the Newmark Model—A Case Study of the 2022 Luding Ms6.8 Earthquake H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177500
503. Comprehensive eco-geo-environmental assessment of the Sichuan–Yunnan ecological barrier zone using a random forest model X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45455-8
504. Random forest and spatial cross-validation performance in predicting species abundance distributions C. Mushagalusa et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-024-00352-9
505. Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using Conditional Analysis and Rare Events Logistics Regression: A Case-Study in the Antrodoco Area (Rieti, Italy) V. Chiessi et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.412001