65 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
2. A simple and general methodology to calibrate seismic instruments for debris flow quantification: application to Cotopaxi and Tungurahua volcanoes (Ecuador) S. Andrade et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01784-5
3. Dynamic time warping improves sewer flow monitoring D. Dürrenmatt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.03.051
4. Evolution of Debris‐Flow Initiation Mechanisms and Sediment Sources During a Sequence of Postwildfire Rainstorms H. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004837
5. Results and experiences gathered at the Rebaixader debris-flow monitoring site, Central Pyrenees, Spain M. Hürlimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0452-y
6. Measuring internal velocity of debris flows by temporally correlated shear forces F. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-012-0258-1
7. Numerical Modeling of Infrasound Energy Radiation by Debris Flow Events M. Coco et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02759-2
8. Systems and Sensors for Debris-flow Monitoring and Warning M. Arattano & L. Marchi https://doi.org/10.3390/s8042436
9. Infrasound Array Analysis of Debris Flow Activity and Implication for Early Warning E. Marchetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JF004785
10. Deciphering seismic and normal‐force fluctuation signatures of debris flows: An experimental assessment of effects of flow composition and dynamics T. de Haas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5168
11. Mechanism of the intermittent motion of two-phase debris flows L. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-016-9483-y
12. Cross-Correlation-Based Optical Flowmeter C. Fernandes et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2025990
13. Detecting torrential processes from a distance with a seismic monitoring network V. Coviello et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1819-2
14. Infrasonic and Seismic Analysis of Debris‐Flow Events at Illgraben (Switzerland): Relating Signal Features to Flow Parameters and to the Seismo‐Acoustic Source Mechanism G. Belli et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JF006576
15. Impacts of Heterogeneous Chemistry on Vertical Profiles of Martian Ozone M. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JE007346
16. A debris-flow forecasting method with infrasound-based variational mode decomposition and ARIMA H. Dong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8901-8
17. Lateral Shear Stress Calculation Model Based on Flow Velocity Field Distribution from Experimental Debris Flows Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00584-4
18. Investigation of vertical velocity distribution in debris flows by PIV measurement H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1366955
19. Velocity and runout determination of a debris flow based on energy conservation: the Dongwopu debris flow in Tianjin, China W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2014-036
20. A new real-time debris flow and snow avalanche detection system based on optical fiber sensing M. Barla et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02399-2
21. Debris flow velocity and volume estimations based on seismic data A. Schimmel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1955-2022
22. Relations Between the Characteristics of Granular Column Collapses and Resultant High‐Frequency Seismic Signals M. Farin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005258
23. A new monitoring station for debris flows in the European Alps: first observations in the Gadria basin F. Comiti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1088-5
24. Debris flows recorded in the Moscardo catchment (Italian Alps) between 1990 and 2019 L. Marchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-87-2021
25. A shallow landslide detected by a close-range seismometer I. DOI et al. https://doi.org/10.3313/jls.61.193
26. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
27. Analysis of debris-flow recordings in an instrumented basin: confirmations and new findings M. Arattano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-679-2012
28. Characterizing the evolution of mass flow properties and dynamics through analysis of seismic signals: insights from the 18 March 2007 Mt. Ruapehu lake-breakout lahar B. Walsh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1029-2023
29. A multiobjective evolutionary optimization method based critical rainfall thresholds for debris flows initiation Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5812-1
30. Trace projection transformation: a new method for measurement of debris flow surface velocity fields Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-015-0576-6
31. A comparative assessment of two different debris flow propagation approaches – blind simulations on a real debris flow event L. Stancanelli & E. Foti https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-735-2015
32. Automatic debris flow detection using geophones S. Wei & K. Liu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01258-9
33. Developing and Testing Physically Based Triggering Thresholds for Runoff‐Generated Debris Flows H. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083623
34. Large-scale physical modelling study of a flexible barrier under the impact of granular flows D. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2625-2018
35. Shallow Landslides and Rockfalls Velocity Assessment at Regional Scale: A Methodology Based on a Morphometric Approach A. Marinelli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12040177
36. Real-time observation of an active debris flow watershed in the Wenchuan Earthquake area P. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.024
37. Geomorphic effectiveness of check dams in a debris-flow catchment using multi-temporal topographic surveys S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.11.004
38. A physical model of the high‐frequency seismic signal generated by debris flows M. Farin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4677
39. Reducing the uncertainty in indirect estimates of extreme flash flood discharges D. Lumbroso & E. Gaume https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.048
40. Flow-type landslide fragility of reinforced concrete framed buildings F. Parisi & G. Sabella https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.013
41. 3D Reconstruction of Slug Flow in Mini-Channels with a Simple and Low-Cost Optical Sensor H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204573
42. Seismic monitoring of soft-rock landslides: the Super-Sauze and Valoria case studies A. Tonnellier et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt039
43. Observations and computational multi‐phase modelling in tropical river settings show complex channel changes downstream from rainfall‐triggered landslides D. Panici et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5841
44. Characterizing and clustering debris flow and environmental noise seismic signals using unsupervised deep learning Z. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf353
45. Measurement of velocity of solid/air two phase fluid using electrostatic sensors and cross correlation technique H. Seraj et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.12.019
46. Testing seismic amplitude source location for fast debris-flow detection at Illgraben, Switzerland F. Walter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-939-2017
47. Debris-flow monitoring and warning: Review and examples M. Hürlimann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102981
48. Real‐time monitoring and estimation of the discharge of flash floods in a steep mountain catchment G. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13551
49. Modelling the temporal-varied nonlinear velocity profile of debris flow using a stratification aggregation algorithm in 3D-HBP-SPH framework Z. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8954-8
50. Measuring the internal velocity of debris flows using impact pressure detecting in the flume experiment H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011-2083-x
51. Objective definition of rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for the initiation of post-fire debris flows in southern California D. Staley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0341-9
52. Correlation and spectral analyses to assess the response of a shallow aquifer to low and high frequency rainfall fluctuations C. Duvert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.054
53. 3D dynamics of debris flows quantified at sub-second intervals from laser profiles M. Jacquemart et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2993-1
54. The method of measuring the velocity of surface acoustic waves by laser probing V. Skalsky et al. https://doi.org/10.15407/vidbir2018.46.029
55. Development of a correlator for flow measurement in pipelines using gamma radiation and cross-correlation function E. Puertas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2023.102442
56. Multi-temporal LiDAR-DTMs as a tool for modelling a complex landslide: a case study in the Rotolon catchment (eastern Italian Alps) G. Bossi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-715-2015
57. Transformation of Ground Vibration Signal for Debris-Flow Monitoring and Detection in Alarm Systems C. Abancó et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120404870
58. Debris flow detection and velocity estimation using deep convolutional neural network and image processing M. Pham & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01931-6
59. Seismic characterisation of lahars at Volcán de Colima, Mexico R. Vázquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-016-1004-9
60. Evolution of a giant debris flow in the transitional mountainous region between the Tibetan Plateau and the Qinling Mountain range, Western China: Constraints from broadband seismic records X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.08.031
61. Reconstruction of a destructive debris‐flow event via numerical modeling: the role of valley geometry on flow dynamics L. Schilirò et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3762
62. Topography-based and vectorized algorithm for extracting physical quantities in 3D-SPH form and its application in debris-flow entrainment modeling B. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107693
63. Low-Frequency Ground Vibrations Generated by Debris Flows Detected by a Lab-Fabricated Seismometer C. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239310
64. Incorporating spatially heterogeneous infiltration capacity into hydrologic models with applications for simulating post‐wildfire debris flow initiation L. McGuire et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11458
65. Investigation of the Space Distribution of the Velocity of Surface Acoustic Waves in Plastically Deformed Steel by the Laser Method V. Koshovyi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-014-9639-1