304 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessment of flood loss in administrative units based on improved vulnerability curves R. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2024.12.008
2. Sequential Disaster Forensics: A Case Study on Direct and Socio-Economic Impacts M. Mendoza & R. Schwarze https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215898
3. Social Vulnerability (Re-)Assessment in Context to Natural Hazards: Review of the Usefulness of the Spatial Indicator Approach and Investigations of Validation Demands A. Fekete https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-0213-1
4. The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses D. Chinh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12171
5. Minimizing Urban Floodplain Management Regrets under Deeply Uncertain Climate Change J. Hecht & P. Kirshen https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001012
6. Longitudinal survey data for diversifying temporal dynamics in flood risk modelling E. Mondino et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2811-2021
7. An Economic Analysis of Climate Adaptations to Hurricane Risk in St. Lucia C. Ou-Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2013.18
8. Socioeconomic determinants of household climate adaptation in Pabna municipality, Bangladesh A. Mamun https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00634-2
9. Civil engineering works versus self-protection measures for the mitigation of floods economic risk. A case study from a new classification criterion for cost-benefit analysis J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101157
10. Quantifying Flood Vulnerability Reduction via Private Precaution N. Sairam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000994
11. Assessing Flood Adaptation Measures in Post-Cyclone Recovery and Reconstruction: The 2023 Cyclone Freddy Case in Kachulu, Malawi A. Taghimolla et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101593
12. Future Public Sector Flood Risk and Risk Sharing Arrangements: An Assessment for Austria C. Unterberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.09.019
13. Economic evaluation of structural and non-structural flood risk management measures: examples from the Mulde River V. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9997-z
14. Social perceptions of coastal hazards in the Anlo Beach Community in the Western Region of Ghana O. Dada et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-022-00909-9
15. Assessing 40 Years of Flood Risk Evolution at the Micro-Scale Using an Innovative Modeling Approach: The Effects of Urbanization and Land Planning T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13040112
16. Taşkın Risk Yönetiminde Sosyal Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi ve Doğu Karadeniz Havzası için Risk Algısı Yönetim Önerisi T. Anılan et al. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1360768
17. Characterization of damages in buildings after floods in Vega Baja County (Spain) in 2019. The case study of Almoradí municipality R. Moya Barbera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03004
18. Predictors of risk reduction behavior: Evidence in last-mile communities R. Yanquiling https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104875
19. Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
20. Influence of flood risk characteristics on flood insurance demand: a comparison between Germany and the Netherlands I. Seifert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1691-2013
21. Factors Influencing (Mal)adaptive Responses to Natural Disasters: The Case of Hurricane Matthew G. Wong-Parodi & I. Feygina https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0138.1
22. Testing empirical and synthetic flood damage models: the case of Italy M. Amadio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-661-2019
23. Toward an adequate level of detail in flood risk assessments T. Sieg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12889
24. Homeowner Decisions to Retrofit to Reduce Hurricane-Induced Wind and Flood Damage Z. Y. Jasour et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000452
25. Flood precaution of companies and their ability to cope with the flood in August 2002 in Saxony, Germany H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004691
26. Household measures for river flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic B. Duží et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12132
27. Analysis of flood impacts on masonry structures and mitigation measures S. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12743
28. Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-production A. Luke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
29. Advancing disaster policies by integrating dynamic adaptive behaviour in risk assessments using an agent-based modelling approach T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770
30. Learning from Floods: Linking flood experience and flood resilience D. Kuang & K. Liao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111025
31. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
32. Determining the effects of the FEMA Community Rating System program on flood losses in the United States W. Highfield & S. Brody https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.013
33. Factors influencing farmers' willingness to provide private land for a coordinated flood mitigation scheme in the Drin basin J. Brabec et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13027
34. Have flood mortality qualitative characteristics changed during the last decades? The case study of Greece M. Diakakis https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2016.1147412
35. An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2019.1608148
36. Affecting factors on perceived usefulness of area-business continuity management: A perspective from employees in industrial areas in Thailand K. Meechang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012016
37. Flood mitigation data analytics and decision support framework: Iowa Middle Cedar Watershed case study Y. Alabbad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152768
38. How to achieve better flood-risk governance in the United States D. Tullos https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722412115
39. A fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process approach for measuring flood resilience at the individual property level O. Adebimpe et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-10-2019-0094
40. The near-miss effect in flood risk estimation: A survey-based approach to model private mitigation intentions into agent-based models A. Bogani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103629
41. Always on my mind: indications of post-traumatic stress disorder among those affected by the 2021 flood event in the Ahr valley, Germany M. Zenker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2837-2024
42. Calibration and validation of FLFArs -- a new flood loss function for Australian residential structures R. Hasanzadeh Nafari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-15-2016
43. Comprehensive approach to the reduction of river flood risk: Case study of the Upper Vistula Basin B. Wyżga et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.015
44. Impact of Flood on a Simple Masonry Building S. Xiao & H. Li https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000357
45. Economic assessment of precautionary measures against floods: insights from a non-contextual approach C. Richert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2525-2019
46. Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007
47. Determinants of Farmers’ Decisions on Risk Coping Strategies in Rural West Java D. Mutaqin https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7010007
48. Perception of earthquake risk: a study of the earthquake insurance pilot area in China L. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1257-6
49. Property level flood risk adaptation: technical and socioeconomic dimensions to resilience A. Amadi https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2023-0014
50. Coping with floods: impacts, preparedness and resilience capacity of Greek micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises in flood-affected areas A. Skouloudis et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-09-2022-0122
51. Living with Floods: Protective Behaviours and Risk Perception of Vietnamese Households A. Reynaud et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2013.16
52. A comparative analysis of the relationship between flood experience and private flood mitigation behaviour in the regions of England M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12700
53. The Value of Empirical Data for Estimating the Parameters of a Sociohydrological Flood Risk Model M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024128
54. Urban micro-scale flood risk estimation with parsimonious hydraulic modelling and census data C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1375-2013
55. Improvements on Flood Alleviation in Germany: Lessons Learned from the Elbe Flood in August 2002 T. Petrow et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-6291-4
56. How Do Disaster Characteristics Influence Risk Perception? M. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
57. An analysis of the costs of resilient reinstatement of flood affected properties R. Joseph et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111162350
58. Flood insurance arrangements in the European Union for future flood risk under climate and socioeconomic change P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101966
59. Flood forecasting in Niger-Benue basin using satellite and quantitative precipitation forecast data A. Haile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.06.021
60. Poorly adapted but nothing to lose? A study on the flood risk – income relationship with a focus on low-income households D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100268
61. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures R. Dittrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1752-8
62. A flood-risk-oriented, dynamic protection motivation framework to explain risk reduction behaviours P. Weyrich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-287-2020
63. People, not just places: Expanding physical and social vulnerability indices by psychological indicators P. Babcicky & S. Seebauer https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12752
64. The Determinants of Private Flood Mitigation Measures in Germany Evidence from a Nationwide Survey D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2457791
65. Do perceptions of climate change influence precautionary measures? H. Kreibich https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691111129011
66. Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk J. Lawrence et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1288-z
67. Probabilistic, Multivariable Flood Loss Modeling on the Mesoscale with BT‐FLEMO H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12650
68. Socio-economic determinants of landslide risk perception in Murree hills of Pakistan S. Qasim et al. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2018.5.305
69. A systematic review on approaches and methods used for flood vulnerability assessment: framework for future research S. Rehman et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-03567-z
70. Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004177
71. Potential of semi-structural and non-structural adaptation strategies to reduce future flood risk: case study for the Meuse J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3455-2012
72. Living Behind Dikes: Mimicking Flooding Experiences R. Zaalberg & C. Midden https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01868.x
73. The object-specific flood damage database HOWAS 21 P. Kellermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2503-2020
74. Simulating the dynamics of individual adaptation to floods K. Erdlenbruch & B. Bonté https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.005
75. Assessing the immediate and short-term impact of flooding on residential property participant behaviour C. Eves & S. Wilkinson https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0961-y
76. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
77. Adaptation to Flooding in Urban Areas E. Heikkila & M. Huang https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X13506559
78. Interactions between citizen responsibilization, flood experience and household resilience: insights from the 2013 flood in Germany C. Begg et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1200961
79. Decision-tree analysis of factors influencing rainfall-related building structure and content damage M. Spekkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2531-2014
80. Micro household waste management and pandemic social impact relaxation; case study in DKI Jakarta A. Husen https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/986/1/012003
81. The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy and coping capacity P. Babcicky & S. Seebauer https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1147489
82. Factors affecting the application of protective measures before flood occurrence among local communities in Iran E. Askari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100730
83. Risk perception of the people in the flood prone Khyber Pukhthunkhwa province of Pakistan S. Qasim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.001
84. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
85. Investigating the Risk Reduction Potential of Disaster Insurance Across Europe S. Surminski & P. Hudson https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-016-0039-7
86. Flood Forecasting and Warning System: A Survey of Models and Their Applications in West Africa M. Fofana et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2023.121001
87. Implementation of property‐level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures: Choices and decisions M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1404
88. Exposure to Flood Hazards in Miami and Houston: Are Hispanic Immigrants at Greater Risk than Other Social Groups? A. Maldonado et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080775
89. How does flood resistance affect learning from flood experiences? A study of two communities in Central China D. Kuang & K. Liao https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03401-3
90. Insurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00741.x
91. Role of hazard information in the adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: Information treatment experiment in Beijing H. Lim & D. Fang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103182
92. A framework to include the (inter)dependencies of Disaster Risk Reduction measures in coastal risk assessment L. Cumiskey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.009
93. Towards more effective strategies to reduce property level flood risk: standardising the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles M. Casado & P. Leinster https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2020.093
94. Factors affecting flood insurance purchase in residential properties in Johor, Malaysia U. Aliagha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3297-2014
95. Strengthening resilience in reconstruction after extreme events – Insights from flood affected communities in Germany J. Birkmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103965
96. Managing natural disaster risks in a changing climate W. BOTZEN & J. VAN DEN BERGH https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2009.0023
97. After the extreme flood in 2002: changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011 S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-505-2015
98. Risk Perceptions and Terror Management Theory: Assessing Public Responses to Urban Flooding in Toronto, Canada C. Mann & S. Wolfe https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1308-8
99. Economic Assessment of Mitigating Damage of Flood Events: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Proofing Commercial Buildings in Umbria, Italy W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-017-0065-0
100. The potential of global coastal flood risk reduction using various DRR measures E. Mortensen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1381-2024
101. Delineating Urban Flooding When Incorporating Community Stormwater Knowledge M. Scolio et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4758102
102. Risk Type Analysis of Building on Urban Flood Damage K. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182505
103. Property-level adaptation to pluvial flooding: An analysis of individual behaviour and risk communication material L. Dillenardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10148-y
104. Flooding in The Netherlands: How people's interpretation of personal, social and institutional resources influence flooding preparedness J. Kerstholt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.013
105. Behavior of crossing flood on foot, associated risk factors and estimating a predictive model H. Shabanikiya et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1124-5
106. Public perception of flood risk in flash flood prone areas of Eastern Mediterranean: The case of Attica Region in Greece M. Diakakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.018
107. Individual willingness to prepare for disasters in a geological hazard risk area: an empirical study based on the protection motivation theory S. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05026-8
108. Was Alexandria (Egypt) Destroyed in A.D. 365? A Famous Historical Tsunami Revisited S. Stiros https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200045
109. Modelling the potential damage-reducing benefits of flood warnings using European cases S. Priest et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.579335
110. Adaptation to climate change by organizations F. Berkhout https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.154
111. Flood Damage Assessment: A Review of Microscale Methodologies for Residential Buildings O. Aribisala et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113817
112. Flooding: Contributing factors to residential flood damage in Canada B. Deschamps et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105348
113. Plans and Prospects for Coastal Flooding in Four Communities Affected by Sandy G. Wong-Parodi et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0042.1
114. A Subjective Bayesian Framework for Synthesizing Deep Uncertainties in Climate Risk Management J. Doss‐Gollin & K. Keller https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003044
115. Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands S. Jonkman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.022
116. The influence of socioeconomic factors on individual and household adaptation strategies to climate change risks in Port Harcourt, Nigeria O. Okunola et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2022.2143821
117. Flood Vulnerability Models and Household Flood Damage Mitigation Measures: An Econometric Analysis of Survey Data T. Endendijk et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR034192
118. What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements E. Lechowska https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z
119. A machine learning-based prediction and analysis of flood affected households: A case study of floods in Bangladesh K. Ganguly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.002
120. Perceived attributes of hurricane-related retrofits and their effect on household adoption Y. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04165-8
121. Agent-Based Analysis of Financial Crisis Management Strategies to Enhance the Energy Transition in Germany T. Schell & A. Nebel https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051083
122. Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3507-2012
123. Development and evaluation of FLFAcs – A new Flood Loss Function for Australian commercial structures R. Hasanzadeh Nafari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.007
124. Flood concerns and impacts on rural landowners: An empirical study of the Deerfield watershed, MA (USA) A. Short Gianotti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.007
125. Trends and Drivers of Flood Occurrence in Germany: A Time Series Analysis of Temperature, Precipitation, and River Discharge M. Alobid et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182589
126. Natural hazard mitigation strategies review: Actor–network theory and the eco-based approach understanding in Zimbabwe A. Katanha & D. Simatele https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v11i1.629
127. Sustainable survival under climatic extremes: linking flood risk mitigation and coping with flood damages in rural Pakistan A. Abbas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3203-8
128. Challenges for achieving sustainable flood risk management M. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12211
129. Scenario-based risk framework selection and assessment model development for natural disasters: a case study of typhoon storm surges M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2059-1
130. Climate change and accessibility of landed properties in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria T. Adenike & F. Igho https://doi.org/10.5897/JLMA2025.0041
131. Factors influencing the occurrence of flooding, risk and management strategies in Lagos, Nigeria I. Akoteyon https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00651-y
132. Neglecting uncertainties biases house-elevation decisions to manage riverine flood risks M. Zarekarizi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19188-9
133. Protection Motivation Theory: A Proposed Theoretical Extension and Moving beyond Rationality—The Case of Flooding M. Oakley et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071848
134. An Integrated Flood Risk Assessment and Mitigation Framework: A Case Study for Middle Cedar River Basin, Iowa, US E. Yildirim & I. Demir https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102113
135. Modelling the benefits of flood emergency management measures in reducing damages: a case study on Sondrio, Italy D. Molinari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1913-2013
136. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
137. A comparative survey of the impacts of extreme rainfall in two international case studies M. Spekkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1337-2017
138. Adaptation to the Impacts of Climate Extremes in Central Europe: A Case Study in a Rural Area in the Czech Republic R. Stojanov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912758
139. Taşkın Farkındalık ve Erken Uyarı Sistemleri Değerlendirmesi: Trabzon Beşikdüzü Örneği T. ANILAN et al. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.722798
140. Motivation, Satisfaction, and Risks of Operational Forces and Helpers Regarding the 2021 and 2013 Flood Operations in Germany A. Fekete https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212587
141. The progression of flood risk in southern Alberta since the 2013 flood S. Bryant et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12811
142. The determinants of private flood mitigation measures in Germany — Evidence from a nationwide survey D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.010
143. The future orientation of Austria’s flood policies: from flood control to anticipatory flood risk management R. Nordbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1515731
144. The safe development paradox: An agent-based model for flood risk under climate change in the European Union T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102009
145. Experimental study on forces exerted on buildings with openings due to extreme hydrodynamic events D. Wüthrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.06.002
146. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1731-2014
147. The challenges of longitudinal surveys in the flood risk domain P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1617339
148. The Affordability of Flood Risk Property‐Level Adaptation Measures P. Hudson https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13465
149. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas H. Cammerer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
150. Lessons Learned From the Higher Risk Perception and the Efficient Flood Mitigation in Haji-Abad, Golestan Province, Iran, 2019 M. Heidari et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.14
151. Impact hydrodynamique des vagues contre les bâtiments D. Wüthrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2020007
152. Measuring flood resilience: a fuzzy logic approach V. Oladokun et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-12-2016-0029
153. Hydrogeological and Climatological Risks Perception in a Multi-Hazard Environment: The Case of Greece K. Papagiannaki et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091770
154. A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions G. Wong-Parodi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2917
155. Flood-Resilient Communities: How We Can Encourage Adaptive Behaviour Through Smart Tools in Public–Private Interaction P. Davids & T. Thaler https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4246
156. Natural Hazards and Motivation for Mitigation Behavior: People Cannot Predict the Affect Evoked by a Severe Flood M. Siegrist & H. Gutscher https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x
157. Assessment of social vulnerability to flood, earthquake and fire hazards case study: districts of Sari city M. Ramzanpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101289
158. Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5
159. Coping with Pluvial Floods by Private Households V. Rözer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8070304
160. Flood risk quantification and mapping: An integrated vulnerability-based approach at the local scale in New Brunswick, Canada F. Duhamel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103403
161. Integrating Household Risk Mitigation Behavior in Flood Risk Analysis: An Agent‐Based Model Approach T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12740
162. Recent Changes in the Occurrences and Damages of Floods and Droughts in the United States Q. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091109
163. Enhancing community resilience to ice-jam floods through individuals’ mitigation efforts M. Ghoreishi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98714-5
164. BN-FLEMOΔ: a Bayesian-network-based flood loss estimation model for adaptation planning in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam K. Shahi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2845-2025
165. Flood risk assessment for Mulde River catchment transferring data from an observed meteorological flood event B. Aslantas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103029
166. Assessing the perceived spatial extent of a flood using cognitive mapping: a case study of rural communities along Indus and Chenab Rivers, Pakistan S. Rasool et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01442-2
167. CFD-Based Evaluation of Elevated Coastal Residential Buildings under Hurricane Wind Loads M. Amini & A. Memari https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000472
168. A Review of Flood Loss Models as Basis for Harmonization and Benchmarking T. Gerl et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159791
169. Evolution of natural risk: analysing changing landslide hazard in Wellington, Aotearoa/New Zealand G. Hufschmidt & M. Crozier https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9158-6
170. A Decision‐Centered Method to Evaluate Natural Hazards Decision Aids by Interdisciplinary Research Teams G. Wong‐Parodi & M. Small https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13261
171. Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: a case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0420-z
172. Make it personal: Introducing intangible outcomes and psychological sources to flood vulnerability and policy P. Babcicky et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102169
173. Combined Flood and Wind Mitigation for Hurricane Damage Prevention: Case for Amphibious Construction E. English et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001750
174. Approaches in research on flood risk perception and their importance in flood risk management: a review E. Lechowska https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05140-7
175. Willingness of households to reduce flood risk in southern France V. Champonnois & K. Erdlenbruch https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12696
176. Flood risk and climate change in the Rotterdam area, The Netherlands: enhancing citizen's climate risk perceptions and prevention responses despite skepticism J. de Boer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0900-4
177. Cascading social risks: A cross-spatial vulnerability analysis of atypical power system failures in China M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2025.102011
178. Evaluating the Public Perceptions of Landslide Risks in the Himalayan Mandi Town P. Chaturvedi & V. Dutt https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591323
179. Flash floods versus river floods – a comparison of psychological impacts and implications for precautionary behaviour J. Laudan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-999-2020
180. Assessment and influencing factors of urban residents' flood emergency preparedness capacity: An example from Jiaozuo City, China D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104294
181. Progress and landscape of disaster science: Insights from computational analyses M. Yazdani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104536
182. Flood risk perception in flood-affected communities in Lagos, Nigeria I. Adelekan & A. Asiyanbi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1977-2
183. An Empirical, Functional approach to Depth Damages W. Lehman et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160705002
184. A nature-based approach to mitigate flood risk and improve ecosystem services in Shiga, Japan W. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101309
185. An integrated approach of flood risk assessment in the eastern part of Dhaka City A. Gain et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1911-7
186. Identification of motivating factors to help decision-making to minimise flood risk by applying private mitigation measures A. Fouladi Semnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104038
187. Damage and protection cost curves for coastal floods within the 600 largest European cities B. Prahl et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.34
188. Delineating urban flooding when incorporating community stormwater knowledge M. Scolio et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/adad11
189. Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People's Perceptions and Expert's Assessments in Switzerland M. Siegrist & H. Gutscher https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x
190. Adaptation to climate change in the insurance sector: examples from the UK, Germany and the Netherlands E. Keskitalo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0912-7
191. Implications of disclosure and non-disclosure of flood hazard maps – a synthesis for the Canadian context T. Lyle et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2023.2287462
192. Statistical learning to identify salient factors influencing FEMA public assistance outlays H. Ghaedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06620-2
193. Determining social-psychological drivers of Texas Gulf Coast homeowners’ intention to implement private green infrastructure practices T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102090
194. Rethinking the share of responsibilities in disaster preparedness to encourage individual preparedness for flash floods in urban areas C. Monteil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102663
195. An empirical analysis of unwillingness to participate in flash flood hazard adjustments in mountain communities of North India P. Maghelal & S. Arlikatti https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-01-2025-0002
196. High-resolution approach to quantify the impact of building-level flood risk mitigation and adaptation measures on flood losses at the community-level O. Nofal & J. van de Lindt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101903
197. Urban pluvial flooding: a qualitative case study of cause, effect and nonstructural mitigation I. Douglas et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01061.x
198. Is there differential engagement in urban flooding prevention in Detroit? T. Tran et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2026.2642133
199. An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast W. Kellens et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x
200. Sensitivity of flood damage estimation to spatial resolution A. Komolafe et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12224
201. Accounting for uncertainty in real-time flood inundation mapping using HAND model: Iowa case study Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05215-z
202. Impacts of Climate Change and Remote Natural Catastrophes on EU Flood Insurance Markets: An Analysis of Soft and Hard Reinsurance Markets for Flood Coverage M. Tesselaar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020146
203. Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-53-2013
204. Psychological determinants of financial buffer saving: the influence of financial risk tolerance and regulatory focus J. Magendans et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1147491
205. Establishment of detailed loss functions for the urban flood risk assessment in Chao Phraya River basin, Thailand A. Komolafe et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2018.1539038
206. The mixed blessing of shifting responsibilities: Challenges for introducing compulsory elemental insurance in Germany J. Plass & J. Zinn https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105670
207. The Impact of Risk Perception on Flood Insurance Adoption Intention in the Coastal Areas of South Korea J. Yeom et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.5.55
208. Using Panel Data to Understand the Dynamics of Human Behavior in Response to Flooding P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13548
209. Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13318
210. Testing innovative technologies to manage flood risk A. Connelly et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.14.00063
211. An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Tree-Based Models for Multi-Variate Flood Damage Assessment in Australia R. Hasanzadeh Nafari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8070282
212. Investigation about rainfall-induced shallow landslides in CYL and TWR watersheds, Taiwan C. Jan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5215-8
213. How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk? A. Metin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018
214. Investigating homeowners' interest in property‐level flood protection A. Kazmierczak & E. Bichard https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901011056622
215. Caractérisation micro-echelle du risque d’inondation : modélisation hydraulique détaillée et quantification des impacts socio-économiques B. Dewals et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2011015
216. Residential flood loss estimated from Bayesian multilevel models G. Mohor et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1599-2021
217. Integrating agent-based approaches with flood risk models: A review and perspective J. Aerts https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100076
218. Modeling household decision-making for structural retrofit processes M. Porada et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105643
219. Resilience to flooding: lessons from international comparison J. Lamond & D. Proverbs https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
220. Household‐Level Coastal Adaptation and Its Drivers: A Systematic Case Study Review J. Koerth et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12663
221. Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019
222. Three-step neural network approach for predicting monsoon flood preparedness and adaptation: Application in urban communities of Lahore, Pakistan I. Rana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101266
223. Pricing Storm Surge Risks in Florida: Implications for Determining Flood Insurance Premiums and Evaluating Mitigation Measures M. Montgomery & H. Kunreuther https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13127
224. The Determinants of Farmers’ Perceived Flood Risk and Their Flood Adaptation Assessments: A Study in a Char-Land Area of Bangladesh M. Faruk & K. Maharjan https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813727
225. Less is More? Evaluating Technical Aspects and User Experiences of Smart Flood Risk Assessment Tools P. Witte et al. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4257
226. Flood loss models for residential buildings, based on the 2013 Colorado floods D. Deniz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2615-3
227. Flood risk perception and its determinants among rural households in two communities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan F. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04166-7
228. Flood Risk Quantification and Mapping: An Integrated Vulnerability-Based Approach at the Local Scale in New Brunswick, Canada F. Duhamel et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4116274
229. Measuring Urban Disaster Resilience and Analyzing Influencing Factors: The Case of South Korea J. YEOM & J. JUNG https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4172864
230. Investigating moral hazard and property-level flood resilience measures through panel data from Germany P. Hudson & L. Berghäuser https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103480
231. Use of fluid structure interaction technique for flash flood impact assessment of structural components S. Kankanamge et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12581
232. River flood risk in Jakarta under scenarios of future change Y. Budiyono et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-757-2016
233. Climate Risk Management K. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-080320-055847
234. The session series on “Natural Hazards’ impact on urban areas and infrastructure” M. Bostenaru Dan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-011-9231-1
235. Assessing social capacity and vulnerability of private households to natural hazards – integrating psychological and governance factors J. Werg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1613-2013
236. Hurricane Harvey and Greater Houston households: comparing pre‐event preparedness with post‐event health effects, event exposures, and recovery S. Grineski et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12368
237. Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01151.x
238. Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries I. Seifert-Dähnn https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018
239. Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework H. Mees et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1299623
240. Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study P. Binh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104436
241. Individual flood risk adaptation in Germany: exploring the role of different types of flooding L. Dillenardt & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3257-2025
242. New Ways in Municipal Flood Mitigation: a Mixed-Integer Programming Approach and its Practical Application J. Boeckmann & C. Thielen https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-023-00246-z
243. How do lessons learned from past flood experiences influence household-level flood resilience: A case study of Jiangnan village in Southern China D. Kuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104998
244. Comparative Evaluation of Depth-Damage Estimation Approaches Using High-Resolution Building Inventory Data and Hydraulic Model Outputs . Itohaosa Isibor et al. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCE26104
245. Multivariate pluvial flood damage models L. Van Ootegem et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.05.005
246. Applying Machine Learning Techniques to Identify Key Factors Motivating Flood-Prone Residents to Implement Private Flood Mitigation Measures A. Fouladi Semnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1928
247. Perception of Flood Risk and Mitigation: Survey Results from the Eastern Black Sea Basin, Turkey T. Anilan & O. Yuksek https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000232
248. Needed: A systems approach to improve flood risk mitigation through private precautionary measures M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100080
249. Local perception of infrequent, extreme upland flash flooding: prisoners of experience? J. Hopkins & J. Warburton https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12120
250. Probabilistic life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of portfolios of buildings under flood hazard Y. Dong & D. Frangopol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.063
251. Modeling the Influence of Flood Mitigation Measures on the Vulnerability of Coastal Residential Construction A. Paleo-Torres et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000507
252. US tropical cyclone flood risk: Storm surge versus freshwater G. Tonn & J. Czajkowski https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13890
253. Environmental injustice and Hurricane Harvey: A household-level study of socially disparate flood exposures in Greater Houston, Texas, USA T. Collins et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772
254. Multiple Flood Experiences and Social Resilience: Findings from Three Surveys on Households and Companies Exposed to the 2013 Flood in Germany C. Kuhlicke et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0069.1
255. Spatial Integration of Urban Runoff Modeling, Heat, and Social Vulnerability for Blue-Green Infrastructure Planning and Management N. Marks et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001593
256. Protection Motivation Status and Factors Influencing Risk Reduction Measures among the Flood-Prone Households in Bangladesh M. Ansari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811372
257. Assessing the drivers of flood risk reduction actions of businesses V. Ooms et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-024-00338-9
258. Using practical and social information to influence flood adaptation behavior M. Allaire https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018258
259. Understanding householder responses to natural hazards: flooding and sea‐level rise comparisons J. Harvatt et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.503935
260. Flood vulnerability assessment of residential buildings by explicit damage process modelling R. Custer & K. Nishijima https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1725-7
261. The determinants of households' flood mitigation decisions in France - on the possibility of feedback effects from past investments C. Richert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.014
262. The effect of flood experience on household mitigation—Evidence from longitudinal and insurance data D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.003
263. La protection du bâti individuel et des commerces contre l’inondation. Opportunités et obstacles F. Vinet et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/norois.5723
264. Flood forecasting using quantitative precipitation forecasts and hydrological modeling in the Sebeya catchment, Rwanda M. Assoumpta & D. Aja https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2021.094
265. Methodology to Assess Potential Flood Damages in Urban Areas under the Influence of Climate Change A. Komolafe et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000278
266. More Than Fear Induction: Toward an Understanding of People's Motivation to Be Well‐Prepared for Emergencies in Flood‐Prone Areas J. de Boer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12289
267. Mitigation of the Adverse Consequences of Floods for Human Life, Infrastructure, and the Environment M. Zeleňáková et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000255
268. FLEMOflash – Flood Loss Estimation MOdels for companies and households affected by flash floods A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-103-2026
269. Chronic and Acute Coastal Flood Risks to Assets and Communities in Southeast Florida M. Ghanbari et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001245
270. Development of generalized loss functions for rapid estimation of flood damages: a case study in Kelani River basin, Sri Lanka A. Komolafe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-017-0200-4
271. Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002 A. THIEKEN et al. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.5.1016
272. Drivers of future fluvial flood risk change for residential buildings in Europe M. Steinhausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102559
273. A review of multiple natural hazards and risks in Germany H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1265-6
274. Effect of Risk and Protective Decision Aids on Flood Preparation in Vulnerable Communities G. Wong-Parodi et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0069.1
275. Flood‐resilient waterfront development in New York City: Bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning J. Aerts & W. Wouter Botzen https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06074.x
276. Evaluation of flood risk reduction strategies through combinations of interventions E. van Berchum et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12506
277. Socio‐Economic Risk of Rising Compound Precipitation‐Wind Extremes in San Francisco Bay Area N. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70120
278. Public Choice barriers to efficient climate adaptation – theoretical insights and lessons learned from German flood disasters E. GAWEL et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137416000163
279. Towards integrated multi-risk reduction strategies: A catalog of flood and earthquake risk mitigation measures at the building and neighborhood scales A. FathiAzar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104884
280. How useful are complex flood damage models? K. Schröter et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014396
281. Assessment and management of flood risks in Austria H. Nachtnebel & R. Faber https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470701189530
282. Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC R. Lasage et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1441-2014
283. Climate change or variable weather: rethinking Danish homeowners’ perceptions of floods and climate N. Baron & L. Petersen https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0701-1
284. The flood of June 2013 in Germany: how much do we know about its impacts? A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1519-2016
285. Agent-Based Modeling for Household Decision-Making in Adoption of Private Flood Mitigation Measures: The Upper Kan Catchment Case Study S. Nabinejad & H. Schüttrumpf https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142027
286. Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory: evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior P. Babcicky & S. Seebauer https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175
287. A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
288. Incentivising flood risk adaptation through risk based insurance premiums: Trade-offs between affordability and risk reduction P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.015
289. Population Preparedness for Disasters and Extreme Weather Events as a Predictor of Building a Resilient Society: The Slovak Republic M. Titko et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052311
290. Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be? H. Apel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
291. Multi-variate residential flood loss estimation model for Jakarta: an approach based on a combination of statistical techniques R. Wahab & R. Tiong https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2716-z
292. Household flood risk reduction in the Czech Republic B. Duží et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9504-9
293. A spatial and integrated flood risk diagnosis O. Bennani et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-12-2018-0379
294. Economic Value of Flood Forecasts and Early Warning Systems: A Review G. Van Houtven https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2094
295. Perceived risk and preferences of response and recovery actions of individuals living in a floodplain community L. Gomez-Cunya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102645
296. Experimental and numerical analysis of a masonry wall under hydrostatic and debris impact loads P. Korswagen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1644699
297. Adaptation strategies of flood-damaged businesses in Germany B. Wutzler et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.932061
298. The Importance of Being Early? Anticipatory Cash Transfers for Flood-Affected Households A. Pople et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhag016
299. Experience and the perceived efficacy of cyclone preparedness behaviour M. Scovell et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2020-0031
300. Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators M. de Ruiter et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017
301. Impact Assessment of Coupling Mode of Hydrological Model and Machine Learning Model on Runoff Simulation: A Case of Washington J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121461
302. Last-mile household preparedness for future disasters: a study of flooding in Kogi State, Nigeria T. Ogunwumi & C. Ihinegbu https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2025.2476498
303. From little things big things flow: the drivers of flood risk adaptation P. Kamstra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134931
304. Portfolios of adaptation investments in water management J. Aerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9540-0