51 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Computer Analysis of Total Electron Content in the Earth’s Ionosphere in Problems of Searching for and Detection of Earthquake Precursors: Current Problems and Challenges O. Zolotov et al. 10.1134/S1990793119040146
2. Ionospheric anomalies possibly associated with M⩾6.0 earthquakes in the Japan area during 1998–2010: Case studies and statistical study S. Kon et al. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.10.005
3. Identification of ionospheric earthquake precursors in Kamchatka region based on correlation analysis . Богданов & . Павлов 10.26117/2079-6641-2021-37-4-150-158
4. Unique atmospheric wave: precursor to the 26 January 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake B. Gera et al. 10.1080/01431161.2010.542208
5. Seismoionospheric effects in the F2 layer over Kamchatka T. Gaivoronskaya 10.1134/S106935131201003X
6. Changes observed in land surface and air temperature after the Yushu (China) (6.9 Mw) and Kaikoura (New Zealand) (7.8 Mw) earthquakes using Landsat thermal and geophysical datasets B. Nath et al. 10.1007/s12040-024-02441-w
7. Classification of the Ionospheric Disturbances Caused by Geomagnetic and Seismic Activity with K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithm C. Budak et al. 10.1007/s11277-024-10965-z
8. Contrastive research of ionospheric precursor anomalies between Calbuco volcanic eruption on April 23 and Nepal earthquake on April 25, 2015 W. Li et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.014
9. Anomalous phenomena in Schumann resonance band observed in China before the 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake in Japan H. Zhou et al. 10.1002/2013JD020269
10. SHARED RESEARCH FACILITIES "SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS AND CONTROL OF NEAR-EARTH SPACE" ("THE ANGARA") AS APPLIED FOR GEODYNAMICS AND TECTONOPHYSICS Y. Yasyukevich & A. Vesnin 10.5800/GT-2022-13-2-0593
11. Investigating radon and TEC anomalies relative to earthquakes via AI models A. Muhammad et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2023.106037
12. A Machine Learning‐Based Detection of Earthquake Precursors Using Ionospheric Data A. Akyol et al. 10.1029/2019RS006931
13. A qualitative study of seismic-ionospheric precursor phenomena monitored by a very close to the epicenter VLF and LF receiver C. Skeberis et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2015.01.009
14. Elazığ-Sivrice Depremi’nin (24 Ocak 2020) Öncül Belirtileri S. GÜRBÜZ & Y. KUTLU 10.46464/tdad.1180719
15. Monitoring Earth using SDR Earth Imager R. Sharif et al. 10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105907
16. Ionospheric perturbations over Delhi caused by the 26 December 2004 Sumatra earthquake H. Dutta et al. 10.1080/01431160601099590
17. Atmosphere-ionosphere response to the M9 Tohoku earthquake revealed by multi-instrument space-borne and ground observations: Preliminary results D. Ouzounov et al. 10.1007/s11589-011-0817-z
18. Unbiased total electron content (UTEC), their fluctuations, and correlation with seismic activity over Japan P. Cornely & J. Hughes 10.1007/s11600-017-0105-y
19. Principles of organizing earthquake forecasting based on multiparameter sensor-WEB monitoring data S. Pulinets et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202019603004
20. Vertical TEC over seismically active region during low solar activity E. Astafyeva & K. Heki 10.1016/j.jastp.2011.02.020
21. Method for Cognitive Identification of Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes S. Pulinets et al. 10.1134/S0016793221010126
22. The Study on Anomalies of the Geomagnetic Topology Network Associated with the 2022 Ms6.8 Luding Earthquake Z. Yu et al. 10.3390/rs16091613
23. On the detection of anomalous seismo-ionospheric behavior in the presence of space weather stimuli for large earthquakes B. Lim & E. Leong 10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.020
24. Investigating short-term earthquake precursors detection through monitoring of total electron content variation in ionosphere N. Zulhamidi et al. 10.3389/fspas.2023.1166394
25. Investigation of ionospheric electron content variations before earthquakes in southern California, 2003–2004 T. Dautermann et al. 10.1029/2006JB004447
26. TEC anomalies—Local TEC changes prior to earthquakes or TEC response to solar and geomagnetic activity changes? E. Afraimovich & E. Astafyeva 10.1186/BF03352851
27. Time–frequency analysis of VLF for seismic-ionospheric precursor detection: Evaluation of Zhao-Atlas-Marks and Hilbert-Huang Transforms C. Skeberis et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2015.02.006
28. Monitoring of the ionosphere TEC variations during the 17th August 1999 Izmit earthquake using GPS data U. Dogan et al. 10.5047/eps.2011.07.020
29. Ionosphere Sounding for Pre-seismic Anomalies Identification (INSPIRE): Results of the Project and Perspectives for the Short-Term Earthquake Forecast S. Pulinets et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.610193
30. Study of Ionospheric Perturbations during Strong Seismic Activity by Correlation Analysis Method A. Gwal et al. 10.3923/ajes.2011.214.222
31. Ionospheric activity and possible connection with seismicity: Contribution from the analysis of long time series of GNSS signals F. Mancini et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2014.10.005
32. From Hector Mine M7.1 to Ridgecrest M7.1 Earthquake. A Look from a 20-Year Perspective S. Pulinets et al. 10.3390/atmos12020262
33. Advances of Satellite Remote Sensing Technology in Earthquake Prediction X. Zhao et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000419
34. GNSS TEC-Based Earthquake Ionospheric Perturbation Detection Using a Novel Deep Learning Framework P. Xiong et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3175961
35. Electric and magnetic field perturbations recorded by DEMETER satellite before seismic events of the 17th July 2006 M 7.7 earthquake in Indonesia S. Bhattacharya et al. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.08.010
36. The cross correlation method response prior to earthquakes using foF2 data from various ionospheric stations K. Benghanem et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2019.01.016
37. Investigation of the relationship between ionospheric foF2 and earthquakes T. Karaboga et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2018.01.015
38. Spatio-temporal evaluation of ionospheric disturbances before, during and after earthquakes using differential rate of TEC (DROT) from GPS measurements S. Karatay et al. 10.1007/s12665-025-12216-1
39. Taiwan’ Chi-Chi earthquake precursor detection using nonlinear principal component analysis to multi-channel total electron content records J. Lin 10.1007/s12583-013-0325-2
40. Multiparameter monitoring of short-term earthquake precursors and its physical basis. Implementation in the Kamchatka region S. Pulinets et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20161100019
41. Earthquake forecasting: a possible solution considering the GPS ionospheric delay M. De Agostino & M. Piras 10.5194/nhess-11-3263-2011
42. Seismo-ionospheric disturbance using principal component analysis — A study of Japan’s Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake on 13 June 2008 J. Lin 10.1556/AGeod.46.2011.1.1
43. Two-dimensional ionospheric total electron content map (TEC) seismo-ionospheric anomalies through image processing using principal component analysis J. Lin 10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.029
44. Is it possible to trace an impending earthquake's occurrence from seismo-ionospheric disturbance using principal component analysis? A study of Japan's Iwate–Miyagi Nairiku earthquake on 13 June 2008 J. Lin 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.004
45. Precursory Phenomena Possibly Related to the 2011M9.0 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake T. Nagao et al. 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0303
46. Ionospheric total electron content anomaly possibly associated with the April 4, 2010 Mw7.2 Baja California earthquake J. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2021.12.007
47. Ultra-low-frequency (ULF) and total electron content (TEC) anomalies observed at Agra and their association with regional earthquakes V. Chauhan et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2009.06.002
48. Special case of ionospheric day-to-day variability associated with earthquake preparation S. Pulinets et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2006.04.032
49. Preliminary investigation of real‐time mapping of foF2 in northern China based on oblique ionosonde data C. Zhou et al. 10.1002/jgra.50262
50. A Comparative Study on Multi-Parameter Ionospheric Disturbances Associated with the 2015 Mw 7.5 and 2023 Mw 6.3 Earthquakes in Afghanistan R. Rasheed et al. 10.3390/rs16111839
51. Investigation of total electron content variability due to seismic and geomagnetic disturbances in the ionosphere S. Karatay et al. 10.1029/2009RS004313