134 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Quantitative risk assessment of the Shilongmen reservoir landslide in the Three Gorges area of China T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03242-z
2. Human vulnerability to quick shallow landslides along road: fleeing process and modeling S. Zhang & L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0468-y
3. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
4. The Application of the Risk Concept to Debris Flow Hazards S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.200800013
5. Determination of hazard in truck manufacturing industry using hazard identification risk assessment technique R. Pawin vivid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.006
6. Prompt Quantitative Risk Assessment for Rain-Induced Landslides J. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10980
7. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
8. Physical vulnerability assessment procedures for confined and unconfined (unreinforced) clay brick masonry buildings due to mass movements, rigid foundation A. Silva-Ceron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108091
9. Quantitative risk assessment of slow-moving landslides from the viewpoint of decision-making: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir in China Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105667
10. What drives landslide risk? Disaggregating risk analyses, an example from the Franz Josef Glacier and Fox Glacier valleys, New Zealand S. de Vilder et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2289-2022
11. Exposure Elements in Disaster Databases and Availability for Local Scale Application: Case Study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia N. Muhamad et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.616246
12. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
13. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides: the case of the Three Gorges area, China L. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0518-5
14. Rockfall Hazard Analysis Based on the Concept of Functional Safety with Application to the Highway Network in South Korea J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02490-3
15. Hazard interaction analysis for multi-hazard risk assessment: a systematic classification based on hazard-forming environment B. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-629-2016
16. Slopeland disaster risk management in tourism C. Tsai & S. LinLiu https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2016.1165187
17. Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.821735
18. Landslides hazard, vulnerability and risk mapping in the data-poor region of northern Pakistan Y. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11858-x
19. Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: a case study in Tresenda, northern Italy B. Quan Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2986-7
20. Quantitative landslide risk assessment for Italy F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-025-02590-z
21. A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides M. Uzielli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.011
22. Annual landslide risk and effectiveness of risk reduction measures in Shihmen watershed, Taiwan S. Chen & C. Wu https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0588-z
23. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
24. Risk assessment of infrastructure destabilisation due to global warming in the high French Alps P. Duvillard et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.2896
25. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning R. Fell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.014
26. Influence of building height and openings on the physical vulnerability of masonry buildings to debris flow C. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07942-5
27. Analysis on the typical failure pattern of structures subjected to the impact of sliding body H. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1304270
28. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories T. Martha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
29. The Impact of Bamboo on Rainfall-Triggered Landslide Distribution at the Regional Scale: A Case Study from SE China Z. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15122223
30. Dynamic sensitivity analysis of long-running landslide models through basis set expansion and meta-modelling J. Rohmer https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0536-3
31. Semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment using GIS-based exposure analysis in Kuala Lumpur City O. Althuwaynee & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1255670
32. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
33. Debris-flow risk-to-life: Preliminary screening T. Davies et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104158
34. Terrain Pattern Recognition and Spatial Decision Making for Regional Slope Stability Studies G. Miliaresis et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-005-6951-3
35. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems J. Chacón et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-006-0064-z
36. Respective impacts of global warming, permafrost thaw and urban sprawl on debris-flow risk: Insights from the Dorfbach Torrent, Swiss Alps G. da Silva Correia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110086
37. Coastal vulnerability assessment of Puducherry coast, India, using the analytical hierarchical process R. Mani Murali et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3291-2013
38. Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR) W. Abdulwahid & B. Pradhan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0
39. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
40. Risk assessment of a layered slope considering spatial variabilities of interlayer and intralayer S. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105236
41. Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Medium Scale for Rainfall‐Induced Earthflows: Catakli Catchment Area (Cayeli, Rize, Turkey) H. Nefeslioglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/280431
42. Quantification of human vulnerability to earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105436
43. GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China S. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0509-3
44. Fragility and vulnerability curves of masonry buildings on slow-moving landslides: A comparative study on intensity parameters from MT-InSAR X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108212
45. Vulnerability of people in wood-frame buildings to rapid flow-type landslides P. LeSueur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07736-9
46. Medium-scale hazard mapping for shallow landslide initiation: the Buyukkoy catchment area (Cayeli, Rize, Turkey) H. Nefeslioglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-011-0267-7
47. Qualitative risk assessment and strategies for infrastructure on permafrost in the French Alps P. Duvillard et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103311
48. Snow-avalanche and debris-flow hazards in the fjords of north-western Iceland, mitigation and prevention A. Decaulne https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9025-x
49. Public awareness promoting new or emerging risks: Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards (NaTech) E. Salzano et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.729529
50. Hydrogeological risk assessment in the Elatsite copper mine, Central Bulgaria A. Benderev et al. https://doi.org/10.52321/GeolBalc.45.0.65
51. Spatial autocorrelation modeling to assess geohazard susceptibility assessment in the mountainous Shennongjia area of China F. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11032-2
52. A CONCEPTUAL STUDY ON METHODOLOGIES FOR LANDSLIDE HAZARD: INVENTORIES, SUSCEPTIBILITY, VULNERABILITY, AND RISK ANALYSIS A. Taye & R. Tamang https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i4.2025.6139
53. Risk Assessment and Control for Geohazards at Multiple Scales: An Insight from the West Han River of Gansu Province in China Z. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16131764
54. Site-specific vulnerability assessment for debris flows: Two case studies X. Liu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0020-1
55. The risk impacts of global natural and technological disasters G. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101653
56. Tree-ring based assessment of rockfall frequency on talus slopes at Solà d'Andorra, Eastern Pyrenees J. Moya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.007
57. A risk analysis for floods and lahars: case study in the Cordillera Central of Colombia M. Künzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0271-9
58. Evaluation du risque de déstabilisation des infrastructures de haute montagne engendré par le réchauffement climatique dans les Alpes françaises P. Duvillard et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/rga.2816
59. On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach Y. Haimes https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01310.x
60. Observational Seismic Fragility Curves for Steel Cylindrical Tanks M. D'Amico & N. Buratti https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040137
61. Automatic identification of buildings vulnerable to debris flows in Sichuan Province, China, by GIS analysis and Deep Encoding Network methods L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12830
62. Building vulnerability evaluation in landslide deformation phase L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011-2101-z
63. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
64. Identifying unrecognised risks to life from debris flows M. Bloomberg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-647-2025
65. Alipaşa Açık Ocak Albit Madeninde Meydana Gelen Heyelanın GPS Kullanılarak İzlenmesi ve Oluşum Nedenleri S. Karagöz & M. Koca https://doi.org/10.24232/jeoloji-muhendisligi-dergisi.295395
66. Local scale multiple quantitative risk assessment and uncertainty evaluation in a densely urbanised area (Brescia, Italy) S. Lari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3387-2012
67. An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility–vulnerability–risk assessment of building infrastructures in hilly regions of India A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00804-z
68. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
69. Using historical data for developing a hazard and disaster profile of the Kashmir valley for the period 1900–2020 N. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05440-6
70. Quantitative rockfall hazard and risk analysis in selected municipalities of the České Švýcarsko National Park, northwestern Czechia J. Blahůt et al. https://doi.org/10.37040/geografie2013118030205
71. A GIS-Based Procedure for Landslide Intensity Evaluation and Specific risk Analysis Supported by Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI) S. Bianchini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9111093
72. Urban flood risk mapping using an optimised additive weighting methodology based on open data D. Jato‐Espino et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12533
73. A regional scale quantitative risk assessment for landslides: case of Kumluca watershed in Bartin, Turkey A. Erener & H. Düzgün https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0317-9
74. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
75. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
76. Quantification of debris flow vulnerability of typical bridge substructure based on impact force simulation Y. Liang & F. Xiong https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1641564
77. Risk analysis of landslide disaster in Ponorogo, East Java, Indonesia S. Koesuma et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/776/1/012123
78. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
79. Integration of landslide susceptibility assessment in urban development: a case study in Predeal town, Romanian Carpathians B. Mihai et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12123
80. Integrating the mitigating effect of forests into quantitative rockfall risk analysis – Two case studies in Switzerland C. Moos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.036
81. Integration of statistical and heuristic approaches for landslide risk analysis: a case of volcanic mountains in West Java Province, Indonesia . Ngadisih et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.826030
82. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
83. Combined GIS, FR and AHP approaches to landslide susceptibility and risk zonation in the Baso Liben district, Northwestern Ethiopia B. Alamrew et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100250
84. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
85. Risk assessment of debris flow in Yushu seismic area in China: a perspective for the reconstruction H. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2957-2013
86. From landslide susceptibility to risk assessment in the conterminous United States F. Caleca et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108994
87. Satellite interferometric data for landslide intensity evaluation in mountainous regions L. Solari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.102028
88. Slope instability on pyroclastic deposits: Landslide distribution and risk mapping in Zacapoaxtla, Sierra Norte de Puebla, Mexico R. Borja-Baeza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-006-0001-4
89. Paraglacial exposure and collapse of glacial sediment: The 2013 landslide onto Svínafellsjökull, southeast Iceland D. Ben‐Yehoshua et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5398
90. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
91. Assessment of coastal vulnerability along Bangladesh coast using analytical hierarchical process (AHP) S. Kayum et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104211
92. Landslide quantitative risk analysis of buildings at the municipal scale based on a rainfall triggering scenario S. Pereira et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1250116
93. Fuzzy set theory and pixel-based landslide risk assessment: the case of Shafe and Baso catchments, Gamo highland, Ethiopia L. Shano et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00774-y
94. Multilayer-exposure maps as a basis for a regional vulnerability assessment for landslides: applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs, Austria C. Promper & T. Glade https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2311-3
95. Meteorological conditions during slush‐flow release and their geomorphological impact in northwestern iceland: a case study from the bíldudalur valley A. Decaulne & Þ. Sæmundsson https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00294.x
96. Tailings storage facilities in China: Historical failure incidents, existing status, and database-driven quantitative risk assessment C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104973
97. Assessing the vulnerability and risk of maize to drought in China based on the AquaCrop model X. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103040
98. A novel model for multi-risk ranking of buildings at city level based on open data: the test site of Rome, Italy G. Mastrantoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2275541
99. Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography R. Garcia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016
100. Surface roughness dating of long-runout landslides near Oso, Washington (USA), reveals persistent postglacial hillslope instability S. LaHusen et al. https://doi.org/10.1130/G37267.1
101. Analytic Back Calculation of Debris Flow Damage Incurred to a Masonry Building: The Case of Scaletta Zanclea 2009 Event H. Soleimankhani et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160704007
102. The impact of rockfalls on dwellings during the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes A. Grant et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0855-2
103. A GIS-Based Approach for Shallow Landslides Risk Assessment in the Giampilieri and Briga Catchments Areas (Sicily, Italy) G. Vegliante et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards5010011
104. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
105. Probabilistic model for assessing human risk from cascading landslide hazards: a case study of the Baige landslide S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2025.2507290
106. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
107. Susceptibility assessments of the Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides in Longnan using logistic regression S. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2475-z
108. A quantitative approach for the evaluation of rockfall risk on buildings V. De Biagi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2906-3
109. Resilient capacity assessment for geological failure areas: examples from communities affected by debris flow disaster S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1251-y
110. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
111. A step beyond susceptibility: an adaptation of risk framework for monetary risk estimation of gully erosion O. Nalivan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05110-z
112. Enhancing co-seismic landslide susceptibility, building exposure, and risk analysis through machine learning A. Pyakurel et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54898-w
113. Quantitative Analysis of the Debris Flow Societal Risk to People Inside Buildings at Different Times: A Case Study of Luomo Village, Sichuan, Southwest China L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.627070
114. Quantitative risk analysis for earthquake-induced landslides—Emamzadeh Ali, Iran S. Mousavi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.05.010
115. The influence of Alpine soil properties on shallow movement hazards, investigated through factor analysis S. Stanchi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1845-2012
116. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
117. Landslide risk analysis and its application in regional planning: an example from the highlands of the Outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic J. Klimeš & J. Blahůt https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0339-6
118. Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin F. Catani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0
119. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: Application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany A. Kaynia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.008
120. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
121. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
122. A quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment framework for compound flooding considering hazard inter-dependencies and interactions X. Ming et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127477
123. A simplified early-warning system for imminent landslide prediction based on failure index fragility curves developed through numerical analysis U. Ozturk et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1058863
124. Community-based disaster risk and vulnerability models of a coastal municipality in Bangladesh M. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0796-6
125. Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment to buildings in the Jiuzhaigou valley, a world natural heritage site in Western China L. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.2004244
126. Landslide Inventorization and Susceptibility Mapping in the SemiArid Kargil-Ladakh Region of Northwestern Himalaya M. Akbar et al. https://doi.org/10.17491/jgsi/2024/173894
127. Quantitative assessment of the impact of earthquake-induced geohazards on natural landscapes in Jiuzhaigou Valley X. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-018-5240-7
128. An AHP-derived method for mapping the physical vulnerability of coastal areas at regional scales G. Le Cozannet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1209-2013
129. Quantitative Risk Analysis of a Rainfall-Induced Complex Landslide in Wanzhou County, Three Gorges Reservoir, China L. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00257-y
130. Debris flow damage incurred to buildings: an in situ back analysis F. Jalayer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12238
131. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
132. Debris-flow risk-to-life: Upper-bound preliminary screening T. Davies et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341507005
133. A modified approach for semi-quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability of buildings exposed to different landslide intensity scenarios A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2018.1501076
134. Rapid assessment of landslide exposure to elements at risk for decision support in regional landslide forecasting G. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00299-z