122 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Quantitative risk assessment of the Shilongmen reservoir landslide in the Three Gorges area of China T. Zeng et al. 10.1007/s10064-023-03242-z
2. Human vulnerability to quick shallow landslides along road: fleeing process and modeling S. Zhang & L. Zhang 10.1007/s10346-014-0468-y
3. Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management S. Fuchs et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0508-7
4. The Application of the Risk Concept to Debris Flow Hazards S. Fuchs et al. 10.1002/geot.200800013
5. Determination of hazard in truck manufacturing industry using hazard identification risk assessment technique R. Pawin vivid et al. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.006
6. Prompt Quantitative Risk Assessment for Rain-Induced Landslides J. He et al. 10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-10980
7. Physical vulnerability assessment of damaged buildings to the Shenzhen catastrophic CSW landslide S. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s10346-023-02200-w
8. Quantitative risk assessment of slow-moving landslides from the viewpoint of decision-making: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir in China Z. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105667
9. What drives landslide risk? Disaggregating risk analyses, an example from the Franz Josef Glacier and Fox Glacier valleys, New Zealand S. de Vilder et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-2289-2022
10. Exposure Elements in Disaster Databases and Availability for Local Scale Application: Case Study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia N. Muhamad et al. 10.3389/feart.2021.616246
11. Hazard and population vulnerability analysis: a step towards landslide risk assessment F. Murillo-García et al. 10.1007/s11629-016-4179-9
12. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides: the case of the Three Gorges area, China L. Peng et al. 10.1007/s10346-014-0518-5
13. Rockfall Hazard Analysis Based on the Concept of Functional Safety with Application to the Highway Network in South Korea J. Lee et al. 10.1007/s00603-021-02490-3
14. Hazard interaction analysis for multi-hazard risk assessment: a systematic classification based on hazard-forming environment B. Liu et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-629-2016
15. Slopeland disaster risk management in tourism C. Tsai & S. LinLiu 10.1080/13683500.2016.1165187
16. Assessing Debris Flow Risk at a Catchment Scale for an Economic Decision Based on the LiDAR DEM and Numerical Simulation Y. Tang et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.821735
17. Landslides hazard, vulnerability and risk mapping in the data-poor region of northern Pakistan Y. Ullah et al. 10.1007/s12665-024-11858-x
18. Physically based dynamic run-out modelling for quantitative debris flow risk assessment: a case study in Tresenda, northern Italy B. Quan Luna et al. 10.1007/s12665-013-2986-7
19. A conceptual framework for quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability to landslides M. Uzielli et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.011
20. Annual landslide risk and effectiveness of risk reduction measures in Shihmen watershed, Taiwan S. Chen & C. Wu 10.1007/s10346-015-0588-z
21. Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties R. Totschnig & S. Fuchs 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.12.019
22. Risk assessment of infrastructure destabilisation due to global warming in the high French Alps P. Duvillard et al. 10.4000/rga.2896
23. Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning R. Fell et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.014
24. Analysis on the typical failure pattern of structures subjected to the impact of sliding body H. Yang et al. 10.1080/19648189.2017.1304270
25. Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories T. Martha et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.001
26. The Impact of Bamboo on Rainfall-Triggered Landslide Distribution at the Regional Scale: A Case Study from SE China Z. Guo et al. 10.3390/f15122223
27. Dynamic sensitivity analysis of long-running landslide models through basis set expansion and meta-modelling J. Rohmer 10.1007/s11069-012-0536-3
28. Semi-quantitative landslide risk assessment using GIS-based exposure analysis in Kuala Lumpur City O. Althuwaynee & B. Pradhan 10.1080/19475705.2016.1255670
29. A mathematical approach for assessing landslide vulnerability H. Martinez-Carvajal et al. 10.15446/esrj.v22n4.68553
30. Debris-flow risk-to-life: Preliminary screening T. Davies et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104158
31. Terrain Pattern Recognition and Spatial Decision Making for Regional Slope Stability Studies G. Miliaresis et al. 10.1007/s11053-005-6951-3
32. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems J. Chacón et al. 10.1007/s10064-006-0064-z
33. Coastal vulnerability assessment of Puducherry coast, India, using the analytical hierarchical process R. Mani Murali et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-3291-2013
34. Landslide vulnerability and risk assessment for multi-hazard scenarios using airborne laser scanning data (LiDAR) W. Abdulwahid & B. Pradhan 10.1007/s10346-016-0744-0
35. Physical vulnerability models for assessing building damage by debris flows S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.017
36. Risk assessment of a layered slope considering spatial variabilities of interlayer and intralayer S. Yi et al. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105236
37. Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Medium Scale for Rainfall‐Induced Earthflows: Catakli Catchment Area (Cayeli, Rize, Turkey) H. Nefeslioglu et al. 10.1155/2011/280431
38. Quantification of human vulnerability to earthquake-induced landslides using Bayesian network S. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105436
39. GIS-based rare events logistic regression for landslide-susceptibility mapping of Lianyungang, China S. Bai et al. 10.1007/s12665-010-0509-3
40. Medium-scale hazard mapping for shallow landslide initiation: the Buyukkoy catchment area (Cayeli, Rize, Turkey) H. Nefeslioglu et al. 10.1007/s10346-011-0267-7
41. Qualitative risk assessment and strategies for infrastructure on permafrost in the French Alps P. Duvillard et al. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103311
42. Snow-avalanche and debris-flow hazards in the fjords of north-western Iceland, mitigation and prevention A. Decaulne 10.1007/s11069-006-9025-x
43. Public awareness promoting new or emerging risks: Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards (NaTech) E. Salzano et al. 10.1080/13669877.2012.729529
44. Hydrogeological risk assessment in the Elatsite copper mine, Central Bulgaria A. Benderev et al. 10.52321/GeolBalc.45.0.65
45. Spatial autocorrelation modeling to assess geohazard susceptibility assessment in the mountainous Shennongjia area of China F. Zou et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-11032-2
46. Risk Assessment and Control for Geohazards at Multiple Scales: An Insight from the West Han River of Gansu Province in China Z. Ye et al. 10.3390/w16131764
47. Site-specific vulnerability assessment for debris flows: Two case studies X. Liu 10.1007/s11629-006-0020-1
48. The risk impacts of global natural and technological disasters G. Shen et al. 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101653
49. Tree-ring based assessment of rockfall frequency on talus slopes at Solà d'Andorra, Eastern Pyrenees J. Moya et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.02.007
50. A risk analysis for floods and lahars: case study in the Cordillera Central of Colombia M. Künzler et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0271-9
51. Evaluation du risque de déstabilisation des infrastructures de haute montagne engendré par le réchauffement climatique dans les Alpes françaises P. Duvillard et al. 10.4000/rga.2816
52. On the Complex Definition of Risk: A Systems‐Based Approach Y. Haimes 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01310.x
53. Observational Seismic Fragility Curves for Steel Cylindrical Tanks M. D'Amico & N. Buratti 10.1115/1.4040137
54. Automatic identification of buildings vulnerable to debris flows in Sichuan Province, China, by GIS analysis and Deep Encoding Network methods L. Wei et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12830
55. Building vulnerability evaluation in landslide deformation phase L. Chen et al. 10.1007/s11629-011-2101-z
56. Proportional loss functions for debris flow events C. Rheinberger et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2147-2013
57. Alipaşa Açık Ocak Albit Madeninde Meydana Gelen Heyelanın GPS Kullanılarak İzlenmesi ve Oluşum Nedenleri S. Karagöz & M. Koca 10.24232/jeoloji-muhendisligi-dergisi.295395
58. Local scale multiple quantitative risk assessment and uncertainty evaluation in a densely urbanised area (Brescia, Italy) S. Lari et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-3387-2012
59. An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility–vulnerability–risk assessment of building infrastructures in hilly regions of India A. Singh et al. 10.1007/s10668-020-00804-z
60. The quantitative estimation of the vulnerability of brick and concrete wall impacted by an experimental boulder J. Zhang et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-299-2016
61. Using historical data for developing a hazard and disaster profile of the Kashmir valley for the period 1900–2020 N. Ali et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05440-6
62. Quantitative rockfall hazard and risk analysis in selected municipalities of the České Švýcarsko National Park, northwestern Czechia J. Blahůt et al. 10.37040/geografie2013118030205
63. A GIS-Based Procedure for Landslide Intensity Evaluation and Specific risk Analysis Supported by Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI) S. Bianchini et al. 10.3390/rs9111093
64. Urban flood risk mapping using an optimised additive weighting methodology based on open data D. Jato‐Espino et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12533
65. A regional scale quantitative risk assessment for landslides: case of Kumluca watershed in Bartin, Turkey A. Erener & H. Düzgün 10.1007/s10346-012-0317-9
66. Assessment of physical vulnerability and potential losses of buildings due to shallow slides M. Silva & S. Pereira 10.1007/s11069-014-1052-4
67. Development of Physical Vulnerability Curve based on Debris Flow Events C. Song et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.4.185
68. Quantification of debris flow vulnerability of typical bridge substructure based on impact force simulation Y. Liang & F. Xiong 10.1080/19475705.2019.1641564
69. Risk analysis of landslide disaster in Ponorogo, East Java, Indonesia S. Koesuma et al. 10.1088/1742-6596/776/1/012123
70. Vulnerability of buildings to landslides: The state of the art and future needs H. Luo et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104329
71. Integration of landslide susceptibility assessment in urban development: a case study in Predeal town, Romanian Carpathians B. Mihai et al. 10.1111/area.12123
72. Integrating the mitigating effect of forests into quantitative rockfall risk analysis – Two case studies in Switzerland C. Moos et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.036
73. Integration of statistical and heuristic approaches for landslide risk analysis: a case of volcanic mountains in West Java Province, Indonesia . Ngadisih et al. 10.1080/17499518.2013.826030
74. A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment V. Gallina et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
75. Combined GIS, FR and AHP approaches to landslide susceptibility and risk zonation in the Baso Liben district, Northwestern Ethiopia B. Alamrew et al. 10.1016/j.qsa.2024.100250
76. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
77. Risk assessment of debris flow in Yushu seismic area in China: a perspective for the reconstruction H. Lan et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-2957-2013
78. Satellite interferometric data for landslide intensity evaluation in mountainous regions L. Solari et al. 10.1016/j.jag.2019.102028
79. Slope instability on pyroclastic deposits: Landslide distribution and risk mapping in Zacapoaxtla, Sierra Norte de Puebla, Mexico R. Borja-Baeza et al. 10.1007/s11629-006-0001-4
80. Paraglacial exposure and collapse of glacial sediment: The 2013 landslide onto Svínafellsjökull, southeast Iceland D. Ben‐Yehoshua et al. 10.1002/esp.5398
81. Quantitative physical model of vulnerability of buildings to urban flow slides in construction solid waste landfills: a case study of the 2015 Shenzhen flow slide H. Cheng et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05239-5
82. Landslide quantitative risk analysis of buildings at the municipal scale based on a rainfall triggering scenario S. Pereira et al. 10.1080/19475705.2016.1250116
83. Fuzzy set theory and pixel-based landslide risk assessment: the case of Shafe and Baso catchments, Gamo highland, Ethiopia L. Shano et al. 10.1007/s12145-022-00774-y
84. Multilayer-exposure maps as a basis for a regional vulnerability assessment for landslides: applied in Waidhofen/Ybbs, Austria C. Promper & T. Glade 10.1007/s11069-016-2311-3
85. Meteorological conditions during slush‐flow release and their geomorphological impact in northwestern iceland: a case study from the bíldudalur valley A. Decaulne & Þ. Sæmundsson 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00294.x
86. Tailings storage facilities in China: Historical failure incidents, existing status, and database-driven quantitative risk assessment C. Su et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104973
87. Assessing the vulnerability and risk of maize to drought in China based on the AquaCrop model X. Zhu et al. 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103040
88. A novel model for multi-risk ranking of buildings at city level based on open data: the test site of Rome, Italy G. Mastrantoni et al. 10.1080/19475705.2023.2275541
89. Assessing population exposure for landslide risk analysis using dasymetric cartography R. Garcia et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2769-2016
90. Surface roughness dating of long-runout landslides near Oso, Washington (USA), reveals persistent postglacial hillslope instability S. LaHusen et al. 10.1130/G37267.1
91. Analytic Back Calculation of Debris Flow Damage Incurred to a Masonry Building: The Case of Scaletta Zanclea 2009 Event H. Soleimankhani et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/20160704007
92. The impact of rockfalls on dwellings during the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes A. Grant et al. 10.1007/s10346-017-0855-2
93. A GIS-Based Approach for Shallow Landslides Risk Assessment in the Giampilieri and Briga Catchments Areas (Sicily, Italy) G. Vegliante et al. 10.3390/geohazards5010011
94. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: state of the art and future needs M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. 10.1007/s11069-010-9632-4
95. Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study W. Lo et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0124-6
96. Susceptibility assessments of the Wenchuan earthquake-triggered landslides in Longnan using logistic regression S. Bai et al. 10.1007/s12665-013-2475-z
97. A quantitative approach for the evaluation of rockfall risk on buildings V. De Biagi et al. 10.1007/s11069-017-2906-3
98. Resilient capacity assessment for geological failure areas: examples from communities affected by debris flow disaster S. Chen et al. 10.1007/s00254-008-1251-y
99. Vulnerability assessment for reinforced concrete buildings exposed to landslides O. Mavrouli et al. 10.1007/s10064-014-0573-0
100. A step beyond susceptibility: an adaptation of risk framework for monetary risk estimation of gully erosion O. Nalivan et al. 10.1007/s11069-021-05110-z
101. Enhancing co-seismic landslide susceptibility, building exposure, and risk analysis through machine learning A. Pyakurel et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-54898-w
102. Quantitative Analysis of the Debris Flow Societal Risk to People Inside Buildings at Different Times: A Case Study of Luomo Village, Sichuan, Southwest China L. Wei et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.627070
103. Quantitative risk analysis for earthquake-induced landslides—Emamzadeh Ali, Iran S. Mousavi et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.05.010
104. The influence of Alpine soil properties on shallow movement hazards, investigated through factor analysis S. Stanchi et al. 10.5194/nhess-12-1845-2012
105. Debris flows risk analysis and direct loss estimation: the case study of Valtellina di Tirano, Italy J. Blahut et al. 10.1007/s11629-013-2806-2
106. Landslide risk analysis and its application in regional planning: an example from the highlands of the Outer Western Carpathians, Czech Republic J. Klimeš & J. Blahůt 10.1007/s11069-012-0339-6
107. Landslide hazard and risk mapping at catchment scale in the Arno River basin F. Catani et al. 10.1007/s10346-005-0021-0
108. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: Application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany A. Kaynia et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.008
109. Quantitative landslide risk analysis in the Hashtchin area (NW-Iran) R. Talaei & S. Samadov 10.1080/19648189.2016.1229224
110. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
111. A quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment framework for compound flooding considering hazard inter-dependencies and interactions X. Ming et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127477
112. A simplified early-warning system for imminent landslide prediction based on failure index fragility curves developed through numerical analysis U. Ozturk et al. 10.1080/19475705.2015.1058863
113. Community-based disaster risk and vulnerability models of a coastal municipality in Bangladesh M. Islam et al. 10.1007/s11069-013-0796-6
114. Quantitative multi-hazard risk assessment to buildings in the Jiuzhaigou valley, a world natural heritage site in Western China L. Wei et al. 10.1080/19475705.2021.2004244
115. Landslide Inventorization and Susceptibility Mapping in the SemiArid Kargil-Ladakh Region of Northwestern Himalaya M. Akbar et al. 10.17491/jgsi/2024/173894
116. Quantitative assessment of the impact of earthquake-induced geohazards on natural landscapes in Jiuzhaigou Valley X. Hu et al. 10.1007/s11629-018-5240-7
117. An AHP-derived method for mapping the physical vulnerability of coastal areas at regional scales G. Le Cozannet et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-1209-2013
118. Quantitative Risk Analysis of a Rainfall-Induced Complex Landslide in Wanzhou County, Three Gorges Reservoir, China L. Xiao et al. 10.1007/s13753-020-00257-y
119. Debris flow damage incurred to buildings: an in situ back analysis F. Jalayer et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12238
120. Multi-hazard risk assessment for roads: probabilistic versus deterministic approaches S. Oberndorfer et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-3135-2020
121. Debris-flow risk-to-life: Upper-bound preliminary screening T. Davies et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341507005
122. A modified approach for semi-quantitative estimation of physical vulnerability of buildings exposed to different landslide intensity scenarios A. Singh et al. 10.1080/17499518.2018.1501076