164 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Debris-flow modeling at Meretschibach and Bondasca catchments, Switzerland: sensitivity testing of field-data-based entrainment model F. Frank et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-801-2017
2. Characteristics of landslide movement and dynamic processes in Hongyacun landslide cluster, Qinghai Province, China G. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1551527
3. A Lagrangian finite element approach for the simulation of water-waves induced by landslides M. Cremonesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.12.005
4. Long-runout mechanism and landsliding behaviour of large catastrophic landslide triggered by heavy rainfall in Guanling, Guizhou, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0122
5. On characteristics and dynamic analysis of the Niumian valley rock avalanche triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Sichuan, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3626-6
6. Selecting optimal conditioning parameters for landslide susceptibility: an experimental research on Aqabat Al-Sulbat, Saudi Arabia S. Alqadhi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15886-z
7. Modeling the Pile Cycle of an Axially Loaded Pile in Sensitive Natural Clay J. Isaksson & J. Dijkstra https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-13179
8. Dynamic simulation of the motion of partially-coherent landslides J. Aaron & O. Hungr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.006
9. Modeling failure of jointed rock slope with two main joint sets using a novel DEM bond contact model M. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.04.013
10. Examples of multiple rock-slope collapses from Köfels (Ötz valley, Austria) and western Norway R. Hermanns et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.026
11. Multiobjective Optimization of Landslide Rheological Parameters Based on Random Forest and Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II M. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2607
12. Impact forces of granular flows on rigid structures: Comparison between discontinuous (DEM) and continuous (MPM) numerical approaches F. Ceccato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.07.014
13. Quantitative Risk Analysis of a Rainfall-Induced Complex Landslide in Wanzhou County, Three Gorges Reservoir, China L. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00257-y
14. Spatiotemporal reconstruction and post-failure stability analysis of rainfall-induced landslides via multi-modal SAR-optical data fusion L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.109399
15. Initiation, movement, and run-out of the giant Tsaoling landslide — What can we learn from a simple rigid block model and a velocity–displacement dependent friction law? C. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.008
16. The August 27, 2014, rock avalanche and related impulse water waves in Fuquan, Guizhou, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0679-5
17. Tree-Based Machine Learning and Flow Simulation for Debris Flow Susceptibility, Runout Propagation, and Dynamics in the Higher Himalayas H. Daud et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10196-3
18. Recent technological and methodological advances for the investigation of landslide dams X. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103646
19. Large deformation and failure simulations for geo-disasters using smoothed particle hydrodynamics method Y. Huang & Z. Dai https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.10.022
20. Monitoring, numerical modelling and hazard mitigation of the Moscardo landslide (Eastern Italian Alps) G. Marcato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.014
21. SLEM (Shallow Landslide Express Model): A Simplified Geo-Hydrological Model for Powerlines Geo-Hazard Assessment A. Abbate & L. Mancusi https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111507
22. Understanding the landslide trigger mechanism in gently dipping shale beds: A case study from Aizawl, Mizoram, India D. Mazumder et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-025-02647-6
23. Discrete element modeling of a rainfall-induced flowslide W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.08.006
24. Developing empirical relationships to predict loess slide travel distances: a case study on the Loess Plateau in China H. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1328-0
25. A two-layer numerical model for simulating the frontal plowing phenomenon of flow-like landslides W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105168
26. Coupled numerical simulation of a flexible barrier impacted by debris flow with boulders in front L. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01463-x
27. Numerical investigation of the air blast generated by the Wenjia valley rock avalanche in Mianzhu, Sichuan, China Y. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01253-0
28. Simulation of a long-runout rock avalanche triggered by the Lushan earthquake in the Tangjia Valley, Tianquan, Sichuan, China B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.007
29. An Energy-Based Discrete Element Modeling Method Coupled with Time-Series Analysis for Investigating Deformations and Failures of Jointed Rock Slopes X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125447
30. Failure and disaster-causing mechanism of a typhoon-induced large landslide in Yongjia, Zhejiang, China Y. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-023-02099-3
31. Investigation and dynamic analysis of a catastrophic rock avalanche on September 23, 1991, Zhaotong, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-015-0617-y
32. Flow-R, a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale P. Horton et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-869-2013
33. Effects of near-fault seismic loadings on run-out of large-scale landslide: A case study Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.08.002
34. Numerical simulation of landslide over erodible surface W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-015-0027-4
35. Back-analysis of geophysical flows using three-dimensional runout model R. Koo et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0578
36. Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment B. Luna et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.007
37. Landslide hazard assessment in the Himalayas (Nepal and Bhutan) based on Earth-Observation data C. Ambrosi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.02.020
38. Estimation of the area of sediment deposition by debris flow using a physical-based modeling approach H. An et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.049
39. Geometric approach based tool for shallow landslides propagation assessment (ShaLPA) at basin scale L. Falconi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106512
40. Integrated GBInSAR and thermo-mechanical modeling for rock slope displacement analysis across geometrical complexities L. Cifeca Recinella et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.108818
41. A methodological framework for flood hazard assessment for land transport infrastructures C. Samela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103491
42. Trends in large-deformation analysis of landslide mass movements with particular emphasis on the material point method K. Soga et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.D.004
43. The failure processes analysis of rock slope using numerical modelling techniques S. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.029
44. Advancing the predictive capability of landslide simulations using the high-resolution three-dimensional Material Point Method Z. Huo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2026.109107
45. Application of modified discontinuous deformation analysis to dynamic modelling of the Baige landslide in the Jinsha River C. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-023-8581-9
46. Post-failure stage analysis of flow-type landslides using different numerical techniques A. Troncone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107152
47. Novel GIS Based Machine Learning Algorithms for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping A. Shirzadi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113777
48. CRHyME (Climatic Rainfall Hydrogeological Modelling Experiment): a new model for geo-hydrological hazard assessment at the basin scale A. Abbate et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-501-2024
49. Run-Out Simulation of a Landslide Triggered by an Increase in the Groundwater Level Using the Material Point Method A. Troncone et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102817
50. Stick–slip motion and high speed ejecta in granular avalanches detected through a multi-sensors flume R. Bartali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.06.019
51. Characteristics and numerical runout modelling of a catastrophic rock avalanche triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake in the Wenjia valley, Mianzhu, Sichuan, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0707-5
52. Finite-element modeling of submarine landslide triggered by seismic loading in saturated cohesive soil deposits Y. Mi & J. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02005-4
53. Characteristics, mobility and dynamic of the Yahuokou flow-like landslide in Zhouqu, Gansu, China Q. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-02000-8
54. The Role of Collecting Data on Various Site Conditions Through Satellite Remote Sensing Technology and Field Surveys in Predicting the Landslide Travel Distance: A Case Study of the 2022 Petrópolis Disaster in Brazil T. dos Santos & T. Uchida https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17193337
55. Finite element analysis for rockfall and debris flow mitigation works J. Kwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0628
56. Infiltration effects on a two-dimensional molecular dynamics model of landslides G. Martelloni & F. Bagnoli https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0944-z
57. A new geological model for Spriana landslide L. Longoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0610-z
58. Analysis of rock mass behavior with Empirical and Numerical method for the construction of diversion tunnel, Laos D. Mboussa & S. Sun https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1212/1/012028
59. Runout modelling and hazard assessment of Tangni debris flow in Garhwal Himalayas, India R. Dash et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09637-z
60. EDDA 1.0: integrated simulation of debris flow erosion, deposition and property changes H. Chen & L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-829-2015
61. Mathematical Optimization Problems for Particle Finite Element Analysis Applied to 2D Landslide Modeling L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-019-09837-1
62. Exploring impact dynamics of dry granular flow against rigid barrier using numerical and depth-average analyses G. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.120624
63. Forward simulation and sensitivity analysis of run-out scenarios using MassMov2D at the Trafoi rockslide (South Tyrol, Italy) J. Iannacone et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2013.773816
64. Forensic analysis and numerical simulation of a catastrophic landslide of dissolved and fractured rock slope subject to underground mining X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01842-y
65. Forecasting hazard scenarios and implications for the evaluation of countermeasure efficiency for large debris avalanches G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.039
66. Dynamic Characterization of the 2009 Jiweishan Rockslidein Wulong, China, Based on Broadband Seismic Observations K. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-025-1303-z
67. Interaction between dry granular flow and deflectors C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0794-3
68. Small fast-moving flow-like landslides in volcanic deposits: The 2001 Las Colinas Landslide (El Salvador) G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.01.014
69. Global Patterns of coseismic landslide runout mobility differ from aseismic landslide trends A. Grant & N. Culhane https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107824
70. Assessment of rainfall-generated shallow landslide/debris-flow susceptibility and runout using a GIS-based approach: application to western Southern Alps of New Zealand T. Kritikos & T. Davies https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0533-6
71. Spatial model integration for shallow landslide susceptibility and its runout using a GIS-based approach in Yongin, Korea A. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1155658
72. Coupled 3D numerical model for a landslide-induced impulse water wave: A case study of the Fuquan landslide M. Bilal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106209
73. Stability analysis of flawed rock slope by using virtual-bond-based general particles dynamics Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102631
74. Dry granular flow interaction with dual-barrier systems C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.273
75. Combining high resolution input and stacking ensemble machine learning algorithms for developing robust groundwater potentiality models in Bisha watershed, Saudi Arabia J. Mallick et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01599-2
76. Numerical modeling of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake-triggered Niumiangou landslide considering effects of pore-water pressure D. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01433-7
77. The concept of event-size-dependent exhaustion and its application to paraglacial rockslides S. Hergarten https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-3051-2023
78. Preliminary investigation and dynamic analysis of a multiphase ice-rock avalanche on July 5, 2021, in the upper Naltar valley, Gilgit, Pakistan H. Gardezi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01840-0
79. Numerical modelling of entrainment/deposition in rock and debris-avalanches G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.004
80. Unravelling the multiphase run-out conditions of a slide-flow mass movement T. van Asch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.11.014
81. Full-waveform CNN–transformer neural network for regional coseismic landslide susceptibility modeling: A case study of the 2022 Luding earthquake, China X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108520
82. JAX-MPM: a learning-augmented differentiable meshfree framework for GPU-accelerated Lagrangian simulation and geophysical inverse modeling H. Du & Q. He https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-026-02320-6
83. Numerical analysis of dynamic characteristics of sludge-type slag landfill landslide W. Lei et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/676/1/012137
84. Natural and Anthropogenic Risk Factors of Discontinuous Ground Deformations: A Conceptual Framework for Hazard Analysis: Part I—Predisposing Conditions L. Florkowska et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020708
85. Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030368
86. Rock avalanche mobility: optimal characterization and the effects of confinement A. Strom et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01181-z
87. Identifying reactivation zones in the kotrupi landslide through UAV, satellite image and slope stability analysis N. Dhiman et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-55743-y
88. A modified finite difference model for the modeling of flowslides W. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-0980-6
89. On the Use of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data for Monitoring and Forecasting Natural Hazards M. Bernardi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-021-09948-8
90. Simulation of the sliding process of Donghekou landslide triggered by the Wenchuan earthquake using a distinct element method X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0953-8
91. Discrete Element Modeling of the Nayong Rock Avalanche, Guizhou, China Constrained by Dynamic Parameters from Seismic Signal Inversion H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02363-9
92. Post-failure stage simulation of a landslide using the material point method E. Conte et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.03.006
93. Enabling 3D landslide event statistics using satellite and UAV-enabled topographic differencing M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02374-x
94. Towards automatic delineation of landslide source and runout K. Bhuyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107866
95. Stability deterioration and failure analysis of dangerous rock masses in cold regions under the influence of freeze-thaw cycles J. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-025-9540-4
96. Geophysical investigation of the Sandalp rock avalanche deposits L. Socco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.12.005
97. Effect of changing groundwater level on shallow landslide at the basin scale: A case study in the Odo basin of south eastern Nigeria C. Ibeh https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103773
98. Effects of bedrock anisotropy on hillslope failure in the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya: an insight from physical and numerical models S. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0513-x
99. A computational toy model for shallow landslides: Molecular dynamics approach G. Martelloni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.11.026
100. Landslide Amplification by Liquefaction of Runout‐Path Material after the 2008 Wenchuan (M 8·0) Earthquake, China G. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3277
101. A deformation-dependent coupled Lagrangian/semi-Lagrangian meshfree hydromechanical formulation for landslide modeling J. Baek et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-022-00233-9
102. Parameter Analysis of Flow-R Model for Physical Vulnerability Assessment of Debris Flow Disaster in Regional Scale H. Kang & Y. Kim https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2017.17.4.233
103. Development and applications of debris mobility models in Hong Kong J. Kwan et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.21.00008
104. Numerical simulation of the propagation process of a rapid flow-like landslide considering bed entrainment: A case study P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105287
105. Simple Scaling of Catastrophic Landslide Dynamics G. Ekström & C. Stark https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232887
106. Dynamic characteristics of an active coastal spreading area using ambient noise measurements—Anchor Bay, Malta P. Galea et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu318
107. Landslide Analyst—a landslide propagation model considering block size heterogeneity Y. Wu & H. Lan https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01154-2
108. Scoring system to predict landslide runout in the Pacific Northwest, USA C. Wallace et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01839-7
109. Debris flow simulations for hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment in the Karakorum mountain ranges, northern Pakistan I. Ullah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101389
110. Prediction of the dimensions of rock avalanches’ affected areas based on the empirical relationships derived from the Central Asian database A. Strom https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-024-02264-2
111. A Numerical Model for the Analysis of Rapid Landslide Motion T. Fathani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0241-9
112. Practical Estimation of Landslide Kinematics Using PSI Data C. Crippa & F. Agliardi https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11050214
113. Predicting debris flow pathways using volume-based thresholds for effective risk assessment A. Rajaneesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00055-2
114. Evaluation of the landslide susceptibility and its spatial difference in the whole Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau region by five learning algorithms P. Sajadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-022-00218-x
115. Analysis of an excavation-induced landslide in stiff clay using the material point method A. Troncone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106479
116. A New Overflow Number for Analyzing and Designing Dual Rigid Barriers with Basal Clearance H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11873
117. Remote Sensing Assessment of Safety Risk of Iron Tailings Pond Based on Runoff Coefficient D. Che et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124373
118. Extended DDA with rotation remedies and cohesive crack model for simulation of the dynamic seismic landslide S. Gong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108395
119. Discrete element modeling of a mining-induced rock slide J. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3305-z
120. A Case Study on the Energy Capacity of a Flexible Rockfall Barrier in Resisting Landslide Debris L. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13091384
121. Numerical and experimental investigation of saturated granular column collapse in air F. Ceccato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.04.004
122. Forecasting landslide hazard by the 3D discrete element method: A case study of the unstable slope in the Lushan hot spring district, central Taiwan C. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.09.007
123. Factor analysis for the statistical modeling of earthquake-induced landslides J. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0582-y
124. Parallel numerical analysis of the failure characteristics of earthquake-induced landslides Z. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-015-0056-8
125. Cross-Trigger Transferability of Run-out-Prediction Models for Rainfall- and Earthquake-Induced Landslides S. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18121493
126. A numerical model for cascading glacier mass flow analysis (GMFA): Erosion-deposition dynamics, phase changes, and multi-hazard chain transformations R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.02.010
127. Field Monitoring‐Based and Theoretical Analysis of Baota Mountain Landslide Stability Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699917
128. Minimum-Time Path (Brachistochrone) Analysis for Extreme Flow Slide Mobility in High-End Waste Dumps: Integrating Pore Pressure and Dynamic Rheology M. Arrieta & Z. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-025-05009-2
129. Numerical modeling of 2‐D granular step collapse on erodible and nonerodible surface G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001186
130. Presenting regional shallow landslide movement on three-dimensional digital terrain H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.027
131. Numerical simulation of a flow-like landslide using the particle finite element method X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1088-z
132. Finite element analysis of failed slope by shear strength reduction technique: a case study for Surabhi Resort Landslide, Mussoorie township, Garhwal Himalaya V. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1102778
133. Application of the group method of data handling (GMDH) approach for travel distance prediction of landslides J. Wan & X. Xue https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-022-01991-8
134. Dynamic analysis and field investigation of a fluidized landslide in Guanling, Guizhou, China A. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.022
135. Fragmentation in the Val Pola rock avalanche, Italian Alps G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000455
136. Granular flows on erodible and non erodible inclines G. Crosta et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-015-0587-8
137. Probabilistic evaluation of landslide rheological parameters and run-out behavior based on lateral and longitudinal morphological characteristics of the depositional area M. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04543-1
138. Field survey of a catastrophic high-speed long-runout landslide in Jichang Town, Shuicheng County, Guizhou, China, on July 23, 2019 W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01380-z
139. Observations from the large, rapid Yigong rock slide – debris avalanche, southeast Tibet Q. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-021
140. Experimental and numerical investigations of a catastrophic long-runout landslide in Zhenxiong, Yunnan, southwestern China Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0729-z
141. Geovisualization, geometric modelling and volume estimation of the Åknes rockslide, Western Norway T. Nordvik et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0198-x
142. Deformation and Failure Process of Slope Caused by Underground Mining: A Case Study of Pusa Collapse in Nayong County, Guizhou Province, China S. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1592703
143. Application of a Three-Dimensional Deterministic Model to Assess Potential Landslides, a Case Study: Antong Hot Spring Area in Hualien, Taiwan L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020480
144. Slope reliability analysis using the geotechnical random field method S. Sasanian et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.19.00016
145. Application of Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping P. Kadavi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081252
146. Amplified Risks of the Yarlung Zangbo–Brahmaputra River to Glacier Hazard Chains due to Multi-Hazard Transformation R. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.07.002
147. The Tsaoling landslide triggered by the Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan: Insights from a discrete element simulation C. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.02.011
148. A hybrid model considering spatial heterogeneity for landslide susceptibility mapping in Zhejiang Province, China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104425
149. Validation of an Empirical Model with Risk Assessment Functionalities to Simulate and Evaluate the Tailings Dam Failure in Brumadinho T. Dedring et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116681
150. Debris flow susceptibility assessment based on an empirical approach in the central region of South Korea S. Kang & S. Lee https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.025
151. Parameterization of a numerical 2-D debris flow model with entrainment: a case study of the Faucon catchment, Southern French Alps H. Hussin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-3075-2012
152. Geomorphology of the Mount Akdag landslide, Western Taurus range (SW Turkey) T. Görüm et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1280424
153. Two‐dimensional discrete element models of debris avalanches: Parameterization and the reproducibility of experimental results J. Banton et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001161
154. Morphometry and Debris-Flow Susceptibility Map in Mountain Drainage Basins of the Vallo di Diano, Southern Italy S. Giano et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163254
155. Numerical Modelling for Dynamic Instability Process of Submarine Soft Clay Slopes Under Seismic Loading Y. Mi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-021-4701-8
156. Dynamics of landslide model with time delay and periodic parameter perturbations S. Kostić et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.02.012
157. A Novel Hybrid Model for Developing Groundwater Potentiality Model Using High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Derived Factors J. Mallick et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192632
158. A novel description of fluid flow in porous and debris materials S. Pudasaini https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.023
159. Numerical Simulation Research on Landslide Instability Mechanism Under Periodic Precipitation Conditions Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131643
160. Characteristic analysis of the Nayong rock avalanche based on the seismic signal H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/570/4/042043
161. Mechanisms of Landslide Tsunami Formation in the Coastal Zone of the Bureya Reservoir and Its Consequences A. Makhinov & A. Makhinova https://doi.org/10.1134/S1819714025700587
162. Physically-based modelling of granular flows with Open Source GIS M. Mergili et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-187-2012
163. Landslide failure forecast in near-real-time A. Manconi & D. Giordan https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2014.942388
164. The importance of entrainment and bulking on debris flow runout modeling: examples from the Swiss Alps F. Frank et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2569-2015