36 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Design and evaluation of railway corridors based on spatial ecological and geological criteria M. Karlson et al. 10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.012
2. Comparison of methods for predicting regolith thickness in previously glaciated terrain, Stockholm, Sweden C. Karlsson et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.003
3. Combination of statistical and physically based methods to assess shallow slide susceptibility at the basin scale S. Oliveira et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-1091-2017
4. Effect of Digital Elevation Model Resolution on Shallow Landslide Modeling Using TRIGRS T. Viet et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000233
5. Susceptibility assessment of debris flow from Baoxing River basin in Lushan earthquake zone, China L. Liu et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/861/5/052010
6. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow at Regional Scale considering Catchment Area in Chuncheon, Korea G. Choi et al. 10.1007/s12205-021-0136-4
7. Regional back analysis of landslide events using TRIGRS model and rainfall threshold: an approach to estimate landslide hazard for Kodagu, India H. Rana & G. Babu 10.1007/s10064-022-02660-9
8. Data Mining and Statistical Approaches in Debris-Flow Susceptibility Modelling Using Airborne LiDAR Data U. Lay et al. 10.3390/s19163451
9. Influence of digital elevation models on the simulation of rainfall-induced landslides in the hillslopes of Guwahati, India C. Sarma et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105523
10. Influences of spatial distribution of soil thickness on shallow landslide prediction J. Ho et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.09.013
11. Susceptibility assessment of soil-water hazard chain on a small catchment in gully region of Loess Plateau: Implications for artificially-induced mountaintop removal filling valley and geoheritage H. Shu & F. Zhang 10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108949
12. The RUSLE erosion index as a proxy indicator for debris flow susceptibility A. Zini et al. 10.1007/s10346-014-0515-8
13. Establishing a GIS-based evaluation method considering spatial heterogeneity for debris flow susceptibility mapping at the regional scale S. Qin et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05487-5
14. Morphometry and Debris-Flow Susceptibility Map in Mountain Drainage Basins of the Vallo di Diano, Southern Italy S. Giano et al. 10.3390/rs13163254
15. Assessment and mapping of debris-flow risk in a small catchment in eastern Sicily through integrated numerical simulations and GIS G. Aronica et al. 10.1016/j.pce.2012.04.002
16. Combining spatial modelling and regionalization of rainfall thresholds for debris flows hazard mapping in the Emilia-Romagna Apennines (Italy) C. G. et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01739-w
17. Hazard ranking of the UNESCO world heritage sites (WHSs) in Europe by multicriteria analysis A. Valagussa et al. 10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2019-0023
18. Combining stratigraphic forward modeling and susceptibility mapping to investigate the origin and evolution of submarine canyons L. Wan et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.108047
19. Geotechnical map of Thi Qar governorate using geographical information systems (GIS) H. Mohammed Ali & R. Shakir 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.138
20. Debris flow susceptibility assessment based on an empirical approach in the central region of South Korea S. Kang & S. Lee 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.025
21. Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods R. Melo & J. Zêzere 10.1007/s11069-017-2921-4
22. Using multinomial logistic regression for prediction of soil depth in an area of complex topography in Taiwan H. Chan et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.030
23. Using 3D Numerical Analysis for the Assessment of Tunnel–Landslide Relationship: Bahce–Nurdag Tunnel (South of Turkey) M. Komu et al. 10.1007/s10706-019-01084-9
24. Flow-R, a model for susceptibility mapping of debris flows and other gravitational hazards at a regional scale P. Horton et al. 10.5194/nhess-13-869-2013
25. Prediction of landslide occurrence based on slope-instability analysis and hydrological model simulation K. Lee & J. Ho 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.053
26. Coupled model for simulation of landslides and debris flows at local scale D. Park et al. 10.1007/s11069-016-2150-2
27. Performance evaluation of a physically based model for shallow landslide prediction J. Ho & K. Lee 10.1007/s10346-016-0762-y
28. Characterization of field-scale soil variation using a stepwise multi-sensor fusion approach and a cost-benefit analysis S. Chatterjee et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105190
29. Analysis of Differences in Geomorphological Characteristics on Initiation of Landslides and Debris Flows S. Kang et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.2.249
30. Hazard assessment and formation mechanism of debris flow outbursts in a small watershed of the Linxia Basin W. Yang et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.994593
31. A geotechnical investigation of the retrogressive Yaka Landslide and the debris flow threatening the town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey) A. Özdemir & M. Delikanli 10.1007/s11069-008-9282-y
32. Multi-risk analysis on European cultural and natural UNESCO heritage sites A. Valagussa et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04417-7
33. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using the Rock Engineering System (RES) method: a case study D. Vianello et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01985-6
34. Development of an initiation criterion for debris flows based on local topographic properties and applicability assessment at a regional scale S. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.017
35. A multi-scale approach for deterministic analysis of landslide triggering and mass flow mechanism at Kaliasaur (Rudraprayag) A. Sajwan et al. 10.1007/s10346-023-02151-2
36. Predicting the Initiation Area of a Debris Flow Using Geomorphological Characteristics and a Physically-Based Model C. Song et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2021.21.2.137