34 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Current status of seismo-electromagnetics for short-term earthquake prediction M. Hayakawa & Y. Hobara https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2010.486933
2. Geomagnetic Disturbances and Pulse Amplitude Anomalies Preceding M > 6 Earthquakes from 2021 to 2022 in Sichuan-Yunnan, China X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134280
3. Remarkable variations in geomagnetic disturbances preceding the 2017 M 7.1 Jiuzhaigou earthquake Y. Guan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2025.107438
4. Seismogenic ULF/ELF Wave Phenomena: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives M. Hayakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2023.123003
5. Detection of Geomagnetic Signals as Precursors to Some Earthquakes in China X. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031680
6. Integrated Analysis of Multi-Parameter Precursors to the Fukushima Offshore Earthquake (Mj = 7.3) on 13 February 2021 and Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling Channels M. Hayakawa & Y. Hobara https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15081015
7. ULF/ELF magnetic field variations from atmosphere induced by seismicity A. Schekotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RS003441
8. ULF Magnetic Field Depression as a Possible Precursor to the 2011/3.11 Japan Earthquake A. Schekotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1541/jae.33.41
9. Possible seismogenic origin of changes in the ULF EM resonant structure observed at the Teoloyucan geomagnetic station, Mexico, 1999–2001 A. Kotsarenko et al. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2005.05.030
10. Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling Effects Based on Multiparameter Precursor Observations for February–March 2021 Earthquakes (M~7) in the Offshore of Tohoku Area of Japan M. Hayakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11110481
11. Multi-Parameter Observations of Seismogenic Phenomena Related to the Tokyo Earthquake (M = 5.9) on 7 October 2021 M. Hayakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12070265
12. Observation of Ultra-Low-Frequency Wave Effects in Possible Association with the Fukushima Earthquake on 21 November 2016, and Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling M. Hayakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081255
13. A new method for extracting geomagnetic perturbation anomalies preceding the M7.4 Maduo earthquake L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107305
14. Ground Water Chemistry Changes before Major Earthquakes and Possible Effects on Animals R. Grant et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8061936
15. A physical model for the precursory magnetic anomalies of the M5.4 Alum Rock and M6.0 Parkfield earthquakes E. Dologlou https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-014-1004-y
16. Precursory signature of several major earthquakes studied using 40 kHz low frequency signal A. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.04.024
17. Detection and characterization of geomagnetic anomaly waveforms Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105837
18. On the seismogenic increase of the ratio of the ULF geomagnetic field components F. Masci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.05.001
19. Direct and indirect evidence of pre-seismic electromagnetic emissions associated with two large earthquakes in Japan S. Chowdhury et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05271-5
20. Seismo-ionospheric depression of the ULF geomagnetic fluctuations at Kamchatka and Japan A. Schekotov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.043
21. Flow instabilities in two-phase or supercritical crust fluids and its possible relevance to seismo-electromagnetic disturbances N. Yagova et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3203-5
22. The lower ionospheric perturbation as a precursor to the 11 March 2011 Japan earthquake M. Hayakawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2012.751938
23. Ionospheric TEC disturbance study over seismically region in China X. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.12.004
24. West Pacific Earthquake Forecasting Using NOAA Electron Bursts With Independent L-Shells and Ground-Based Magnetic Correlations C. Fidani https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.673105
25. On effective ULF frequency ranges for geomagnetic earthquake precursor K. Yusof et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1152/1/012033
26. Identifying Ultra-Low-Frequency Geomagnetic Precursors of Baikal Rift Earthquakes via Polarization Analysis M. Prikop & I. Seminsky https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351326700291
27. Ultra-Low Frequency Geomagnetic Variations before Dholavira Earthquake M = 5.1 on the 20th of June 2012 in Kachchh Region, Gujarat, India S. Joshi & K. Madhusudhanarao https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852121040142
28. Fractal dimension variability in ULF magnetic field with reference to local earthquakes at MPGO, Ghuttu G. Rawat et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1137242
29. Refinement of Different Frequency Bands of Geomagnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization Anomalies before M > 5.5 Earthquakes H. Faheem et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103240
30. Assessment of Rn-222 continuous time series for the identification of anomalous changes during moderate earthquakes of the Garhwal Himalaya V. Shukla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109327
31. Multistationary Geomagnetic Vertical Intensity Polarization Anomalies for Predicting M ≥ 6 Earthquakes in Qinghai, China L. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178888
32. Ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic field emissions associated with some major earthquakes occurred in Indian Subcontinent . Swati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105469
33. SeisGuard: A Software Platform to Establish Automatically an Earthquake Forecasting Model X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2023.124007
34. On the statistical correlation of over-horizon VHF signals with meteorological radio ducting and seismicity N. Yonaiguchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2007.01.007