Articles | Volume 25, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2929-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-2929-2025
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
29 Aug 2025
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 29 Aug 2025

Turning regret into future disaster preparedness with no regrets

Joy Ommer, Milan Kalas, Jessica Neumann, Sophie Blackburn, and Hannah L. Cloke

Viewed

Total article views: 612 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
434 144 34 612 70 42 69
  • HTML: 434
  • PDF: 144
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 612
  • Supplement: 70
  • BibTeX: 42
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Apr 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 612 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 600 with geography defined and 12 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Aug 2025
Download
Executive editor
This paper reports on the role of regret from previous action or non-action, based on a survey with citizens who had been affected by a major flooding event in Germany. It is shown that regret can be primarily associated with inaction (instead of actions) which is contrasting psychological studies from other fields than disaster science.
Short summary
What do we regret about our disaster preparedness? This paper explores the regrets of 438 citizens who were affected by flooding in Germany in 2021. It shows that regret can primarily be associated with inaction (instead of actions), which contrasts with psychological studies from fields other than disaster science. The findings of this study suggest that the no-regret approach could be a suitable framework for moving towards longer-term disaster preparedness to reduce future regrets.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint