Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1383-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1383-2021
Review article
 | 
04 May 2021
Review article |  | 04 May 2021

Review article: Towards resilient vital infrastructure systems – challenges, opportunities, and future research agenda

Seyedabdolhossein Mehvar, Kathelijne Wijnberg, Bas Borsje, Norman Kerle, Jan Maarten Schraagen, Joanne Vinke-de Kruijf, Karst Geurs, Andreas Hartmann, Rick Hogeboom, and Suzanne Hulscher

Related authors

3D City Digital Twin Simulation to Mitigate Heat Risk of Urban Heat Islands
Aulia Imania Sukma, Mila N. Koeva, Diana Reckien, Marija Bockarjova, Andre da Silva Mano, Giulia Canili, Giovanni Vicentini, and Norman Kerle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4-W11-2024, 129–136, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W11-2024-129-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W11-2024-129-2024, 2024
Gridded 5 arcmin datasets for simultaneously farm-size-specific and crop-specific harvested areas in 56 countries
Han Su, Bárbara Willaarts, Diana Luna-Gonzalez, Maarten S. Krol, and Rick J. Hogeboom
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4397–4418, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4397-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4397-2022, 2022
Short summary
UNSUPERVISED HARMONIOUS IMAGE COMPOSITION FOR DISASTER VICTIM DETECTION
N. Zhang, F. Nex, G. Vosselman, and N. Kerle
Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLIII-B3-2022, 1189–1196, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1189-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1189-2022, 2022
MICRO AND MACRO QUADCOPTER DRONES FOR INDOOR MAPPING TO SUPPORT DISASTER MANAGEMENT
S. Karam, F. Nex, O. Karlsson, J. Rydell, E. Bilock, M. Tulldahl, M. Holmberg, and N. Kerle
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-1-2022, 203–210, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-203-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-1-2022-203-2022, 2022
Historical simulation of maize water footprints with a new global gridded crop model ACEA
Oleksandr Mialyk, Joep F. Schyns, Martijn J. Booij, and Rick J. Hogeboom
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 923–940, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-923-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-923-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric, Meteorological and Climatological Hazards
Global estimates of 100-year return values of daily precipitation from ensemble weather prediction data
Florian Ruff and Stephan Pfahl
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2939–2952, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2939-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2939-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the sensitivity of extreme event attribution of two recent extreme weather events in Sweden using long-running meteorological observations
Erik Holmgren and Erik Kjellström
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2875–2893, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2875-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2875-2024, 2024
Short summary
Probabilistic short-range forecasts of high-precipitation events: optimal decision thresholds and predictability limits
François Bouttier and Hugo Marchal
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2793–2816, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2793-2024, 2024
Short summary
Surprise floods: the role of our imagination in preparing for disasters
Joy Ommer, Jessica Neumann, Milan Kalas, Sophie Blackburn, and Hannah L. Cloke
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2633–2646, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2633-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modelling crop hail damage footprints with single-polarization radar: the roles of spatial resolution, hail intensity, and cropland density
Raphael Portmann, Timo Schmid, Leonie Villiger, David N. Bresch, and Pierluigi Calanca
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2541–2558, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2541-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2541-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adger, W. N.: Social and ecological resilience: are they related?, Prog. Human Geogr., 24, 347–364, https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465, 2000. 
Ahlborg, H., Ruiz-Mercado, I., Molander, S., and Masera, O.: Bringing Technology into Social-Ecological Systems Research-Motivations for a Socio-Technical-Ecological Systems Approach, Sustainability, 11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072009, 2019.  
Aitsi-Selmi, A., Egawa, S., Sasaki, H., Wannous, C., and Murray, V.: The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: Renewing the global commitment to people's resilience, health, and well-being, Int. J. Disast. Risk Sci., 6, 164–176, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9, 2015. 
Anderies, J. M., Rodriguez, A. A., Janssen, M. A., and Cifdaloz, O.: Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 15194–15199, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702655104, 2007. 
Anderies, J., Folke, C., Walker, B., and Ostrom, E.: Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability, Ecol. Soc., 18, 2, 2013. 
Short summary
This review synthesizes and complements existing knowledge in designing resilient vital infrastructure systems (VIS). Results from a systematic literature review indicate that (i) VIS are still being built without taking resilience explicitly into account and (ii) measures to enhance the resilience of VIS have not been widely applied in practice. The main pressing topic to address is the integration of the combined social, ecological, and technical resilience of these systems.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint