37 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Impacts of social contracts for citizens in the austrian flood risk management system K. Weber et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104266
2. Exploring key drivers affecting ginger farmers risk management strategies and adoption intensity in central and southern Ethiopia T. Dinbore et al. 10.1007/s43621-025-01613-y
3. Influence mechanism of coping behaviours for natural hazards: Empirical study in Henan, China Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104169
4. Investigating the influence of information sources on flood-coping appraisal: Insights into flood mitigation behaviour A. Fouladi Semnan et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104865
5. Modelling the role of multiple risk attitudes in implementing adaptation measures to reduce drought and flood losses M. Mazzoleni et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131305
6. The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China T. Wang et al. 10.5194/nhess-22-2185-2022
7. Understanding managers' motivation in adopting protective measures: Preventing supply chain disruptions from flood-related Natechs N. Borjigin et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104985
8. Heterogeneity in flood risk awareness: A longitudinal, latent class model approach C. Franceschinis et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126255
9. Unraveling household energy service relevant resilience behaviors for natural disasters: Perspective of extended protection motivation theory B. Kuang et al. 10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100763
10. Threat appraisal and individual adaptation as drivers for collaborative drought management in the Netherlands L. De Graaff et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109341
11. Examining the Relationship Between Disaster Scenarios and Disaster Management Behavior During Earthquakes K. Nakazawa et al. 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0182
12. Moving toward community preparedness efficacy: Uncovering barriers in communities disproportionately impacted by flooding Y. Xu et al. 10.1111/1468-5973.12524
13. The Psycho-Anthropological Perspectives of Natural Hazards: Applicability of the ‘Protection Motivation Theory’ in Explaining Behavioral Responses Towards Tropical Cyclone Idai in the Chimanimani District of Zimbabwe D. Kudejira et al. 10.1177/1354067X221103990
14. Living with water: Evolving adaptation preferences under increasing sea-level rise in Miami-Dade County, FL, USA N. Seeteram et al. 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100574
15. The Role of Information and Dissemination Activities in Enhancing People’s Willingness to Implement Natural Water Retention Measures F. Pagliacci et al. 10.3390/w14213437
16. Longitudinal survey data for diversifying temporal dynamics in flood risk modelling E. Mondino et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-2811-2021
17. Public Support for Flood Risk Management: Insights from an Italian Alpine Survey Using Systems Thinking R. Scolozzi et al. 10.3390/geographies5010003
18. The social amplification of risk and climate disaster preparedness: lessons from the Kalapara region in rural Bangladesh M. Rabbani & M. Cotton 10.1080/17477891.2025.2492320
19. The CAPS framework for governance capacity building for local climate action V. Radinger-Peer et al. 10.1080/1523908X.2025.2497934
20. “They’re the ones that sent me down a flooded road”: trust, distrust, and individuals’ flood mitigation decisions L. Briccetti et al. 10.1080/09640568.2025.2524444
21. An integrated framework for flood disaster information extraction and analysis leveraging social media data: A case study of the Shouguang flood in China H. Hou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174948
22. Identification of maladaptive behavioural patterns in response to extreme weather events L. Eusse-Villa et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-60632-3
23. Characteristics and risk management of urban surface flooding in Guangzhou, China: Insights from 2022 ground monitoring X. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101831
24. Public perceptions of multiple risks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Sweden E. Mondino et al. 10.1038/s41597-020-00778-7
25. Identifying the drivers of private flood precautionary measures in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam T. Vishwanath Harish et al. 10.5194/nhess-23-1125-2023
26. Benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs in natural water retention measures: a review of classifications and indicators P. Almasi et al. 10.1007/s11069-025-07470-2
27. Using Panel Data to Understand the Dynamics of Human Behavior in Response to Flooding P. Bubeck et al. 10.1111/risa.13548
28. Assessing factors influencing flood preparedness among Jakarta residents: A multilayer perceptron artificial neural network based on protection motivation theory B. Grahani et al. 10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101358
29. Determining factors affecting perceived effectiveness among Filipinos for fire prevention preparedness in the National Capital Region, Philippines: Integrating Protection Motivation Theory and extended Theory of Planned Behavior Y. Kurata et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103497
30. A No-Regrets Framework for Sustainable Individual and Collective Flood Preparedness Under Uncertainty J. Ommer et al. 10.3390/su17135828
31. The Role of Experience and Different Sources of Knowledge in Shaping Flood Risk Awareness E. Mondino et al. 10.3390/w12082130
32. Enhancing community resilience to ice-jam floods through individuals’ mitigation efforts M. Ghoreishi et al. 10.1038/s41598-025-98714-5
33. Expanding protection motivation theory: The role of coping experience in flood risk adaptation intentions in informal settlements J. Tasantab et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103020
34. Protection Motivation Status and Factors Influencing Risk Reduction Measures among the Flood-Prone Households in Bangladesh M. Ansari et al. 10.3390/ijerph191811372
35. Determining factors influencing flood preparedness among citizens in Jakarta: A protection motivation theory approach F. Flores et al. 10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101042
36. Mitigation of Urban Pluvial Flooding: What Drives Residents’ Willingness to Implement Green or Grey Stormwater Infrastructures on Their Property? F. Pagliacci et al. 10.3390/w12113069
37. A flood-risk-oriented, dynamic protection motivation framework to explain risk reduction behaviours P. Weyrich et al. 10.5194/nhess-20-287-2020