Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2541–2549, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2541-2019
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2541–2549, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2541-2019

Brief communication 19 Nov 2019

Brief communication | 19 Nov 2019

Machine learning analysis of lifeguard flag decisions and recorded rescues

Chris Houser et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,133 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
791 303 39 1,133 35 36
  • HTML: 791
  • PDF: 303
  • XML: 39
  • Total: 1,133
  • BibTeX: 35
  • EndNote: 36
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 962 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
On many beaches, lifeguards set out flags to warn beach users of the surf and rip hazard based on the regional surf forecast and careful observation. There is a potential that the chosen flag does not accurately reflect the potential risk. Results of a machine learning analysis suggest that the greatest number of rescues occurred on days when the lifeguard flew a more cautious flag than the model predicted. It is argued that that beach users may be discounting lifeguard warnings.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint