Articles | Volume 19, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2541-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2541-2019
Brief communication
 | 
19 Nov 2019
Brief communication |  | 19 Nov 2019

Machine learning analysis of lifeguard flag decisions and recorded rescues

Chris Houser, Jacob Lehner, Nathan Cherry, and Phil Wernette

Viewed

Total article views: 2,318 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,616 607 95 2,318 91 81
  • HTML: 1,616
  • PDF: 607
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 2,318
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,318 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,074 with geography defined and 244 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
On many beaches, lifeguards set out flags to warn beach users of the surf and rip hazard based on the regional surf forecast and careful observation. There is a potential that the chosen flag does not accurately reflect the potential risk. Results of a machine learning analysis suggest that the greatest number of rescues occurred on days when the lifeguard flew a more cautious flag than the model predicted. It is argued that that beach users may be discounting lifeguard warnings.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint