Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2249-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2249-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
11 Oct 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 11 Oct 2019

Geologic and geomorphic controls on rockfall hazard: how well do past rockfalls predict future distributions?

Josh Borella, Mark Quigley, Zoe Krauss, Krystina Lincoln, Januka Attanayake, Laura Stamp, Henry Lanman, Stephanie Levine, Sam Hampton, and Darren Gravley

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (19 Aug 2019) by Thomas Glade
AR by Josh Borella on behalf of the Authors (25 Aug 2019)  Author's response 
ED: Publish as is (01 Sep 2019) by Thomas Glade
AR by Josh Borella on behalf of the Authors (06 Sep 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Here we evaluate geologic, geomorphic, and anthropogenic controls on rockfall hazard and highlight the complexity of interpreting future rockfall hazard based on former boulder distributions. To evaluate how past rockfall deposits relate to contemporary rockfall hazard, we mapped then compared the locations, physical characteristics, and lithologies of rockfall boulders deposited during the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (n = 185) with their prehistoric counterparts (n = 1093).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint