57 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessment of Enhanced Dempster-Shafer Theory for Uncertainty Modeling in a GIS-Based Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Model, Case Study—Tabriz City M. Delavar & M. Sadrykia
2. Multicriteria seismic hazard assessment in Puerto Vallarta metropolitan area, Mexico K. Flores et al.
3. Non-Invasive Identification of Vulnerability Elements in Existing Buildings and Their Visualization in the BIM Model for Better Project Management: The Case Study of Cuccagna Farmhouse E. Garavaglia et al.
4. Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings using the rough set theory and weighted linear combination Y. Asadi et al.
5. SEVUCAS: A Novel GIS-Based Machine Learning Software for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment S. Lee et al.
6. A Hybrid Analytic Network Process and Artificial Neural Network (ANP-ANN) Model for Urban Earthquake Vulnerability Assessment M. Alizadeh et al.
7. Performance of Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machines for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping: A Case Study of the 12 September 2016 ML5.8 Gyeongju Earthquake, South Korea J. Han et al.
8. Development of Vulnerability Evaluation Technology for Environmental Facilities Focused on the Water Treatment Systems in South Korea Y. Choi et al.
9. Assessment of the Socioeconomic Vulnerability to Seismic Hazards in the National Capital Region of India Using Factor Analysis N. Agrawal et al.
10. Eigenvector spatial filtering enhancing natural hazards vulnerability assessment in a susceptible urban environment: A case study of Izmir earthquake in Turkey M. Ahmadi et al.
11. Novel hybrids of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) with several metaheuristic algorithms for spatial susceptibility assessment of seismic-induced landslide H. Moayedi et al.
12. Multi-dimensional earthquake vulnerability assessment of residential neighborhoods of Mymensingh City, Bangladesh: A spatial multi-criteria analysis based approach M. Alam & S. Haque
13. GIS spatial modelling for seismic risk assessment based on exposure, resilience, and capacity indicators to seismic hazard: a case study of Pahang, Malaysia N. Sauti et al.
14. Multicriteria seismic hazard and social vulnerability assessment in the Puerto Vallarta metropolitan area, Mexico: toward a comprehensive seismic risk analysis D. Jaimes et al.
15. Integration of GIS and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making To Analysis Seismic Vulnerability of Urban Area H. Abdolazimi et al.
16. Preservation of Villages in Central Italy: Geomatic Techniques’ Integration and GIS Strategies for the Post-Earthquake Assessment F. Piccinini et al.
17. A GIS-Based Fuzzy Decision Making Model for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment in Areas with Incomplete Data M. Sadrykia et al.
18. A Comparative Study of MCDM Methods Integrated with Rapid Visual Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing RC Structures E. Harirchian et al.
19. 3D City Models as a Visual Support Tool for the Analysis of Buildings Seismic Vulnerability: The Case of Lisbon P. Redweik et al.
20. Development of an integrated model for seismic vulnerability assessment of residential buildings: Application to Mahabad City, Iran H. Bahadori et al.
21. Earthquake vulnerability assessment through spatial multi-criteria analysis: a case study of Quetta city, Pakistan . Jamal-ud-din et al.
22. Multi-Criteria Seismic Risk Assessment Based on Combined Weight-TOPSIS Model and CF-Logistic Regression Model—A Case Study of Songyuan City, China J. Zhu et al.
23. Spatial earthquake vulnerability assessment by using multi-criteria decision making and probabilistic neural network techniques in Odisha, India R. Jena et al.
24. A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT P. Villalba et al.
25. Seismic vulnerability assessment and reduction at a territorial scale on masonry and adobe housing by rapid vulnerability indicators: The case of Tlajomulco, Mexico A. Preciado et al.
26. A Basic Study on the Indicators Development of Regional Safety of Seismic Disaster Using AHP H. Park & H. Kim
27. Proposed Method and Framework for Evaluating and Calculating a Seismic Vulnerability Index of Malaysia N. Suhaiza Sauti et al.
28. An integrated approach based earthquake risk assessment of a seismically active and rapidly urbanizing area in Northern Pakistan A. Maqsoom et al.
29. Seismic vulnerability evaluation of educational buildings of Mymensingh city, Bangladesh using rapid visual screening and index based approach M. Alam & S. Haque
30. Earthquake vulnerability assessment of the built environment in the city of Srinagar, Kashmir Himalaya, using a geographic information system M. Fayaz et al.
31. Responsive and reliable injured-oriented blood supply chain for disaster relief: a real case study S. Cheraghi & S. Hosseini-Motlagh
32. Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban buildings and traffic networks using fuzzy ordered weighted average Y. Asadi et al.
33. Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Iasi City (Romania) A. Banica et al.
34. Integrated GIS-AHP based assessment of earthquake vulnerability and risk for urban residential buildings in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman A. Ansari et al.
35. Fuzzy-Based Seismic Risk Prioritization of Steel School Buildings M. Zehtab Yazdi et al.
36. Improvement of Earthquake Risk Awareness and Seismic Literacy of Korean Citizens through Earthquake Vulnerability Map from the 2017 Pohang Earthquake, South Korea J. Han et al.
37. Vulnerability assessment of cities to earthquake based on the catastrophe theory: a case study of Tabriz city, Iran M. Kheirizadeh Arouq et al.
38. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping of Gyeongju, South Korea Using Frequency Ratio, Decision Tree, and Random Forest J. Han et al.
39. Assessment of the seismic vulnerability in an urban area with the integration of machine learning methods and GIS A. Doğan et al.
40. GIS-based seismic vulnerability mapping: a comparison of artificial neural networks hybrid models P. Yariyan et al.
41. An assessment of earthquake vulnerability by multi-criteria decision-making method M. Shadmaan & S. Popy
42. Erzurum Kentsel Yayılım Alanında Deprem Tehlikesi ve Yapısal Hasar Risk Potansiyelinin CBS Tabanlı AHP Analizine Dayalı Olarak Belirlenmesi M. Demir & N. Altaş
43. Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review S. Ghaffarian et al.
44. Open Source Data-Based Solutions for Identifying Patterns of Urban Earthquake Systemic Vulnerability in High-Seismicity Areas A. Albulescu
45. A GIS-based decision making model using fuzzy sets and theory of evidence for seismic vulnerability assessment under uncertainty (case study: Tabriz) M. Sadrykia et al.
46. Using Artificial Neural Networks to Assess Earthquake Vulnerability in Urban Blocks of Tehran R. Afsari et al.
47. A GIS-BASED MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION IN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER MANAGEMENT USING GRANULAR COMPUTING F. Khamespanah et al.
48. Sensitivity analysis in seismic loss estimation of urban infrastructures M. Eskandari et al.
49. Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA Y. Ghajari et al.
50. Earthquake risk assessment using an integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process with Artificial Neural Networks based on GIS: A case study of Sanandaj in Iran P. Yariyan et al.
51. A fuzzy programming model for decentralization and drone utilization in urban humanitarian relief chains A. Amirsahami et al.
52. Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Model for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) of Urban Residential Buildings M. Alizadeh et al.
53. Assessing the earthquake systemic vulnerability of the urban centres in the South-East region of Romania. The tale of Galați and Brăila Cities, Romania A. Albulescu et al.
54. GIS-based seismic vulnerability assessment for the Istanbul Historical Peninsula S. Erdoğan & F. Terzi
55. A robust possibilistic programming approach for blood supply chain network design in disaster relief considering congestion M. Pouraliakbari-Mamaghani et al.
56. Comparative Multi-Criteria Assessment of Hydrological Vulnerability—Case Study: Drainage Basins in the Northeast Region of Romania A. Albulescu et al.
57. Integrating machine learning and geospatial approaches for multi-hazard vulnerability mapping: implications for environmental health and contaminant risk in fragile ecosystems A. Kuannaxiaer et al.