53 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Seismic Energy Analysis as Generated by Impact and Fragmentation of Single‐Block Experimental Rockfalls L. Saló et al. 10.1029/2017JF004374
2. The relationship between bulk‐mass momentum and short‐period seismic radiation in catastrophic landslides C. Hibert et al. 10.1002/2016JF004027
3. Dynamics of the Wulong landslide revealed by broadband seismic records Z. Li et al. 10.1186/s40623-017-0610-x
4. Evolution of a giant debris flow in the transitional mountainous region between the Tibetan Plateau and the Qinling Mountain range, Western China: Constraints from broadband seismic records X. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.08.031
5. Discussion of “Case Study: Oso, Washington, Landslide of March 22, 2014—Material Properties and Failure Mechanism” by Timothy D. Stark, Ahmed K. Baghdady, Oldrich Hungr, and Jordan Aaron R. Iverson 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001917
6. Single-block rockfall dynamics inferred from seismic signal analysis C. Hibert et al. 10.5194/esurf-5-283-2017
7. Landslide reconstruction using seismic signal characteristics and numerical simulations: Case study of the 2017 “6.24” Xinmo landslide Y. Yan et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105582
8. A Joint Seismic and Space‐Based Investigation of the 2016 Lamplugh Glacier and 2017 Wrangell Mountains (Alaska) Landslides X. Luo et al. 10.1029/2022JF006903
9. Enhanced landslide mobility by basal liquefaction: The 2014 State Route 530 (Oso), Washington, landslide B. Collins & M. Reid 10.1130/B35146.1
10. Unraveling landslide failure mechanisms with seismic signal analysis for enhanced pre-survey understanding J. Chang et al. 10.5194/nhess-25-451-2025
11. Broadband-seismic analysis of a massive landslide in southwestern China: Dynamics and fragmentation implications Z. Li et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.024
12. The 28 November 2020 Landslide, Tsunami, and Outburst Flood – A Hazard Cascade Associated With Rapid Deglaciation at Elliot Creek, British Columbia, Canada M. Geertsema et al. 10.1029/2021GL096716
13. A rockslide-generated tsunami in a Greenland fjord rang Earth for 9 days K. Svennevig et al. 10.1126/science.adm9247
14. Estimation of dynamic friction and movement history of large landslides M. Yamada et al. 10.1007/s10346-018-1002-4
15. Discussion of “Case Study: Oso, Washington, Landslide of March 22, 2014—Material Properties and Failure Mechanism” by Timothy D. Stark, Ahmed K. Baghdady, Oldrich Hungr, and Jordan Aaron J. Keaton et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001919
16. Oso, Washington, Landslide of March 22, 2014: Dynamic Analysis J. Aaron et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001748
17. AI-powered automatic detection of dynamic triggering of earthquake based on microseismic monitoring F. Jiang et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107723
18. Variation patterns of landslide basal friction revealed from long-period seismic waveform inversion D. Yu et al. 10.1007/s11069-019-03813-y
19. A framework for temporal and spatial rockfall early warning using micro-seismic monitoring L. Feng et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01534-z
20. 3D analysis of 2014 Oso landslide P. Kargar et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106100
21. Analysis of the 2017 June Maoxian landslide processes with force histories from seismological inversion and terrain features J. Zhao et al. 10.1093/gji/ggaa269
22. Identifying landslides from continuous seismic surface waves: a case study of multiple small-scale landslides triggered by Typhoon Talas, 2011 R. Okuwaki et al. 10.1093/gji/ggab129
23. Machine learning prediction of the mass and the velocity of controlled single-block rockfalls from the seismic waves they generate C. Hibert et al. 10.5194/esurf-12-641-2024
24. Seismic Advances in Process Geomorphology K. Cook & M. Dietze 10.1146/annurev-earth-032320-085133
25. Earthquake hazard and risk analysis for natural and induced seismicity: towards objective assessments in the face of uncertainty J. Bommer 10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4
26. A large frozen debris avalanche entraining warming permafrost ground—the June 2021 Assapaat landslide, West Greenland K. Svennevig et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01922-7
27. The 22 December 2018 tsunami from flank collapse of Anak Krakatau volcano during eruption L. Ye et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1377
28. 2014 Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Landslide runout analysis — current practice and challenges S. McDougall 10.1139/cgj-2016-0104
29. Laboratory Landquakes: Insights From Experiments Into the High‐Frequency Seismic Signal Generated by Geophysical Granular Flows M. Arran et al. 10.1029/2021JF006172
30. RETRACTED: Reconstructing the Dynamic Processes of the Taimali Landslide in Taiwan Using the Waveform Inversion Method G. Lin & C. Hung 10.3390/app10175872
31. Formation mechanism and dynamic process of open-pit coal mine landslides: a case study of the Xinjing landslide in Inner Mongolia, China Q. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10346-023-02193-6
32. Near-real-time seismic monitoring improves deep-seated landslides early warning, Jiuxianping, China L. Feng et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108231
33. Closure to “Case Study: Oso, Washington, Landslide of March 22, 2014—Material Properties and Failure Mechanism” by Timothy D. Stark, Ahmed K. Baghdady, Oldrich Hungr, and Jordan Aaron T. Stark et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001920
34. Reconstruction of the 2018 tsunamigenic flank collapse and eruptive activity at Anak Krakatau based on eyewitness reports, seismo-acoustic and satellite observations A. Perttu et al. 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116268
35. The 22 March 2014 Oso landslide, Washington, USA J. Wartman et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.10.022
36. Direct observations of a three million cubic meter rock-slope collapse with almost immediate initiation of ensuing debris flows F. Walter et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106933
37. Broad-band seismic analysis and modeling of the 2015 Taan Fjord, Alaska landslide using Instaseis L. Gualtieri & G. Ekström 10.1093/gji/ggy086
38. Using surface waves recorded by a large mesh of three-element arrays to detect and locate disparate seismic sources W. Fan et al. 10.1093/gji/ggy316
39. Shear surface undulations modulate clayey gouge strength and contribute to divergent landslide acceleration W. Schulz et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108353
40. Insights on Multistage Rock Avalanche Behavior From Runout Modeling Constrained by Seismic Inversions A. Mitchell et al. 10.1029/2021JB023444
41. Effects of mass entrainment on the estimation of landslide parameters from long-period seismic inversion X. Wang et al. 10.1007/s10950-023-10165-5
42. Seismic monitoring system for landslide hazard assessment and risk management at the drainage plant of the Peschiera Springs (Central Italy) R. Iannucci et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105787
43. Seismic signature of the deadly snow avalanche of January 18, 2017, at Rigopiano (Italy) T. Braun et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-75368-z
44. Dynamics of the Askja caldera July 2014 landslide, Iceland, from seismic signal analysis: precursor, motion and aftermath A. Schöpa et al. 10.5194/esurf-6-467-2018
45. Impact‐Induced Liquefaction Mechanism of Sandy Silt at Different Saturations H. Li et al. 10.1155/2021/6686339
46. When hazard avoidance is not an option: lessons learned from monitoring the postdisaster Oso landslide, USA M. Reid et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01686-6
47. Combining seismic signal dynamic inversion and numerical modeling improves landslide process reconstruction Y. Yan et al. 10.5194/esurf-10-1233-2022
48. Characteristics of the Seismic Signal Generated by Fragmental Rockfalls: Insight From Laboratory Experiments Q. Lin et al. 10.1029/2022JB025096
49. Case Study: Oso, Washington, Landslide of March 22, 2014—Material Properties and Failure Mechanism T. Stark et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001615
50. Runout evaluation of Oso landslide with the material point method A. Yerro et al. 10.1139/cgj-2017-0630
51. The 2016 Lamplugh rock avalanche, Alaska: deposit structures and emplacement dynamics A. Dufresne et al. 10.1007/s10346-019-01225-4
52. Seismogenic landslides volume and runout estimation with machine learning C. Hibert et al. 10.1007/s10346-025-02496-w
53. Exploration of continuous seismic recordings with a machine learning approach to document 20 yr of landslide activity in Alaska C. Hibert et al. 10.1093/gji/ggz354