64 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Capturing flood community perceptions for social vulnerability reduction and risk management planning G. Cruz-Bello & M. Alfie-Cohen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.029
2. Perceptions and Awareness on the Perceived Effectiveness of Nature-Based Solutions in Selected Coastal Communities of Rivers State, Nigeria C. Onwubiko & D. Aheto https://doi.org/10.3390/coasts6010007
3. Strategies of relief organizations for improvement of disaster risk communication process in Iran A. Fathollahzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102896
4. Understanding Flood Risk Perception: A Case Study from Canada K. Oubennaceur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053087
5. KULTURisk regional risk assessment methodology for water-related natural hazards – Part 2: Application to the Zurich case study P. Ronco et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1561-2015
6. Decision support for sustainable building modifications to mitigate climate risk J. Maleyeff et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2025-0560
7. Human-centered flood mapping and intelligent routing through augmenting flood gauge data with crowdsourced street photos B. Alizadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101730
8. Public perceptions of multiple risks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Sweden E. Mondino et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00778-7
9. Flood Risk and River Conservation: Mapping Citizen Perception to Support Sustainable River Management A. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.675131
10. Governing river rehabilitation projects for transformative capacity development P. Martel et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2021.071
11. Assessing the Capacity to Govern Flood Risk in Cities and the Role of Contextual Factors S. Koop et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082869
12. Social Dimensions of Urban Flood Experience, Exposure, and Concern R. Hale et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12676
13. Residents' perception of flood risk and urban stream restoration using multi‐criteria decision analysis C. Hong & H. Chang https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3728
14. Model Pengelolaan Banjir: Systematic Review dan Arahan untuk Masa Depan V. Djoharam et al. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.20.3.524-546
15. Public perception of the urban pluvial floods risk-case study of Porec (Croatia) S. Siljeg et al. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2202147S
16. An impact assessment of disaster education on children’s flood risk perceptions in China: Policy implications for adaptation to climate extremes S. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143761
17. A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature A. Morrison et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12315
18. Multiple hazards and risk perceptions over time: the availability heuristic in Italy and Sweden under COVID-19 G. Di Baldassarre et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-3439-2021
19. From Perception to Adoption: The Established Psychological Social Distance Measure as a Criterion for Citizens’ Willingness to Accept Sustainable Engineering Solutions S. Svetozarević et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091781
20. The Role of Experience and Different Sources of Knowledge in Shaping Flood Risk Awareness E. Mondino et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082130
21. Impact of social preparedness on flood early warning systems M. Girons Lopez et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019387
22. A Multidisciplinary Review into the Evolution of Risk Concepts and Their Assessment Methods Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12112449
23. How well do the wider public accept integrated flood risk management? An empirical study in two Swiss Alpine valleys M. Buchecker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.021
24. Flood risk perceptions, insurance, and policy: a review of the Pennsylvania flood task force initiative H. Singh & C. Sala https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae162f
25. Development of a Combined Index to Evaluate Sustainability of Water Resources Systems M. Abdi-Dehkordi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02880-w
26. Model Pengelolaan Banjir: Systematic Review dan Arahan untuk Masa Depan V. Djoharam et al. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.20.3.524-545
27. Towardsustainablepolicy instruments: assessing instrument selection among policy actors A. Glaus et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1944847
28. Increasing flood risk awareness and warning readiness by participation – But who understands what under ‘participation’? A. Fekete et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102157
29. Challenges of disaster risk communication from the perspectives of experts and affected people: A conventional content analysis A. Fathollahzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104553
30. Cumulative hazard: The case of nuisance flooding H. Moftakhari et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000494
31. A conceptual model of people's vulnerability to floods L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016172
32. Multihazard Scenarios for Analysis of Compound Extreme Events M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077317
33. Roles, responsibilities, and strategies for enhancing disaster risk perception: A quantitative study E. Samamdipour et al. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_185_18
34. Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication E. Maidl & M. Buchecker https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015
35. A spatial Bayesian network model to assess the benefits of early warning for urban flood risk to people S. Balbi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1323-2016
36. Social integration matters: factors influencing natural hazard risk preparedness—a survey of Swiss households E. Maidl et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04381-2
37. The Role of Information and Dissemination Activities in Enhancing People’s Willingness to Implement Natural Water Retention Measures F. Pagliacci et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213437
38. Improving adaptive capacity of social-ecological system of Tashk-Bakhtegan Lake basin to climate change effects – A methodology based on Post-Modern Portfolio Theory S. Mahabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.11.002
39. The effects of tailor-made flood risk advice for homeowners in Flanders, Belgium P. Davids et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1614251
40. When experts feel threatened: Strategies of depoliticisation in participatory river restoration projects N. Buletti Mitchell & O. Ejderyan https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12686
41. ‘Contractual’ and ‘cooperative’ civic engagement: The emergence and roles of ‘flood action groups’ in England and Wales L. Geaves & E. Penning-Rowsell https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x
42. An unsafe behaviour formation mechanism based on risk perception L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20762
43. Riverine flood risk assessment with a combined model chain in southeastern China L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110686
44. Stakeholder Perceptions of Nature-Based Solutions and Their Collaborative Co-Design and Implementation Processes in Rural Mountain Areas—A Case Study From PHUSICOS G. Lupp et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.678446
45. A systematic review of social Media-Enabled flood disaster Informatics: Method, technology and application S. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104935
46. Understanding the shift toward a risk-based approach in flood risk management, a comparative case study of three Italian rivers C. Vitale https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.015
47. Human dimensions in flood risk management: Exploring risk perception and climate change considerations among engineers in the US M. Pourmatin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100453
48. International investments and businesses as enablers of globalization of local risks: A case for risk communication and climate fragility reduction P. Sivapuram V.R.K. & R. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100125
49. Modeling Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Participatory Multi-risk Assessment on a Deltaic Environment Under Climate Change Conditions M. Katirtzidou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-023-09890-5
50. Factors influencing communities’ flood risk perceptions: outcome of a community survey in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment, Australia S. Masud et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2019.1682077
51. Flood risk perception of rural households in western mountainous regions of Henan Province, China D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.051
52. How Do Individual-Level Characteristics Influence Cross-Domain Risk Perceptions Among Chinese Urban Residents? Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211003570
53. Crash tests for forward-looking flood control in the city of Zürich (Switzerland) M. Zappa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-370-235-2015
54. Climate change, riverine flood risk and adaptation for the conterminous United States C. Wobus et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac1bd7
55. Unwinding the spiral of silence in rural America: looking backward with stories to plan forward M. Keller et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1398452
56. Fuzzy based multi-criteria M&E of the integrated flood risk management performance using priority ranking methodology: A case study in Metro Manila, Philippines J. Mercado et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102498
57. Hydrological risk: modeling flood memory and human proximity to rivers E. Ridolfi et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2020.195
58. Drought Characterization and Potential of Nature-Based Solutions for Drought Risk Mitigation in Eastern Ethiopia D. Sintayehu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511613
59. Investigating the public perception of green, hybrid and grey flood risk management measures in Europe N. Bezak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100360
60. Users’ Perspectives About the Potential Usefulness of Online Storylines to Communicate River Research to a Multi-disciplinary Audience V. Cortes Arevalo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1504098
61. Constructing futures, enhancing solutions: Stakeholder-driven scenario development and system modeling for climate-change challenges P. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1055547
62. Why do we decide to live with risk at the coast? S. Costas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.015
63. Translating Uncertain Sea Level Projections Into Infrastructure Impacts Using a Bayesian Framework H. Moftakhari et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076116
64. Eliciting actors’ perspectives in integrated watershed management: exploring a practical tool based on a mental model approach R. Gaus et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1823343