119 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study P. Binh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104436
2. Stakeholders’ perceptions of Helium and Carbon Dioxide risks in a subsurface engineering project in France K. Nadarajah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.123
3. What helps people recover from floods? Insights from a survey among flood-affected residents in Germany P. Bubeck & A. Thieken https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1200-y
4. Willingness of households to reduce flood risk in southern France V. Champonnois & K. Erdlenbruch https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12696
5. Assessing factors influencing flood preparedness among Jakarta residents: A multilayer perceptron artificial neural network based on protection motivation theory B. Grahani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101358
6. Sustainable survival under climatic extremes: linking flood risk mitigation and coping with flood damages in rural Pakistan A. Abbas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3203-8
7. Patterns in reported adaptation constraints: insights from peer-reviewed literature on floods and sea-level rise S. Gil-Clavel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101502
8. A machine learning-based prediction and analysis of flood affected households: A case study of floods in Bangladesh K. Ganguly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.002
9. Determining social-psychological drivers of Texas Gulf Coast homeowners’ intention to implement private green infrastructure practices T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102090
10. Flood forecasting in Niger-Benue basin using satellite and quantitative precipitation forecast data A. Haile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.06.021
11. A review of damage-reducing measures to manage fluvial flood risks in a changing climate H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9629-5
12. The role of local stakeholder participation in flood defence decisions in the United Kingdom and Germany C. Begg et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12305
13. Living with Floods: Protective Behaviours and Risk Perception of Vietnamese Households A. Reynaud et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2013.16
14. The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures R. Dittrich et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1752-8
15. Effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures: Empirical evidence from French flood disasters J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007
16. Insights into Flood‐Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory: Empirical Evidence from Germany and France P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12938
17. A comparative survey of the impacts of extreme rainfall in two international case studies M. Spekkers et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1337-2017
18. Risk communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A Q-methodology study on opinions of affected homeowners M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233551
19. Interactions between citizen responsibilization, flood experience and household resilience: insights from the 2013 flood in Germany C. Begg et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1200961
20. Heat, cold, and floods: exploring farmers’ motivations to adapt to extreme weather events in the Terai region of Nepal N. Budhathoki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04127-0
21. Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment J. Aerts et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
22. Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory: evidence for a separate protective and non-protective route in private flood mitigation behavior P. Babcicky & S. Seebauer https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1485175
23. ‘Living with the floods’: the influence of relational and cognitive capital on disaster risk management capacities in Ratnapura, Sri Lanka N. Ahangama et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2018.1485622
24. The problems of the late implementation of the legal prevention measures for flood risk V. Sanseverino-Godfrin et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713010
25. Response to “The Necessity for Longitudinal Studies in Risk Perception Research” P. Bubeck & W. Botzen https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12028
26. Flood risk management in Austria: Analysing the shift in responsibility-sharing between public and private actors from a public stakeholder's perspective M. Rauter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017
27. Invited perspectives: safeguarding the usability and credibility of flood hazard and risk assessments B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-4015-2024
28. A No-Regrets Framework for Sustainable Individual and Collective Flood Preparedness Under Uncertainty J. Ommer et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135828
29. The effect of flood experience on household mitigation—Evidence from longitudinal and insurance data D. Osberghaus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.003
30. Assessing farmers’ preparedness to cope with the impacts of multiple climate change-related hazards in the Terai lowlands of Nepal N. Budhathoki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101656
31. Implementation of property‐level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures: Choices and decisions M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1404
32. Explaining Changes in Threat Appraisal, Coping Appraisal, and Flood Risk-Reducing Behavior Using Panel Data From a Nation-Wide Survey in Germany P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165231176069
33. Multiple Flood Experiences and Social Resilience: Findings from Three Surveys on Households and Companies Exposed to the 2013 Flood in Germany C. Kuhlicke et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0069.1
34. Causes, impacts and patterns of disastrous river floods B. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3
35. After the extreme flood in 2002: changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011 S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-505-2015
36. A framework to include the (inter)dependencies of Disaster Risk Reduction measures in coastal risk assessment L. Cumiskey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.08.009
37. Analysis of 220 Years of Floodplain Population Dynamics in the US at Different Spatial Scales F. Akhter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020141
38. Designing an instrument to measure attitudes toward flood risk management in riverside populations M. Amérigo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104448
39. Detailed insights into the influence of flood-coping appraisals on mitigation behaviour P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
40. The future orientation of Austria’s flood policies: from flood control to anticipatory flood risk management R. Nordbeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1515731
41. Enhancing pedestrian evacuation routes during flood events G. Musolino et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05251-9
42. Public attitudes towards flooding and property-level flood protection measures S. Owusu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1686-x
43. Flood Forecasting and Warning System: A Survey of Models and Their Applications in West Africa M. Fofana et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2023.121001
44. Assessment of Public Flood Risk Perception and Influencing Factors: An Example of Jiaozuo City, China D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159475
45. Climate change adaptation behaviour of forest growers in New Zealand: an application of protection motivation theory G. Villamor et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03469-x
46. An integrated method for assessing climate-related risks and adaptation alternatives in urban areas Y. Andersson-Sköld et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2015.01.003
47. Power, responsibility and justice: a review of local stakeholder participation in European flood risk management C. Begg https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1422119
48. Using practical and social information to influence flood adaptation behavior M. Allaire https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018258
49. Identifying and characterising individual flood precautionary behaviour dynamics from panel data L. Berghäuser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103835
50. Factors of influence on flood risk perceptions related to Hurricane Dorian: an assessment of heuristics, time dynamics, and accuracy of risk perceptions L. de Wolf et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1303-2024
51. Panta Rhei benchmark dataset: socio-hydrological data of paired events of floods and droughts H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2009-2023
52. Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe L. Alfieri et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1401-2016
53. Flood forecasting using quantitative precipitation forecasts and hydrological modeling in the Sebeya catchment, Rwanda M. Assoumpta & D. Aja https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2021.094
54. The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses D. Chinh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12171
55. Understanding Persistence to Avoid Underestimation of Collective Flood Risk F. Serinaldi & C. Kilsby https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040152
56. Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework H. Mees et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1299623
57. From opinion to action: Impact of social networks and information policy on private adaptation to floods T. Wagenblast et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104393
58. The role of individuals’ risk representations in risk management - case-study on lahars in Arequipa (Peru) C. Heitz & M. Shimabuku https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-017-0093-x
59. Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1731-2014
60. A serious gaming approach to understanding household flood risk mitigation decisions J. Gordon & N. Yiannakoulias https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12648
61. Civil engineering works versus self-protection measures for the mitigation of floods economic risk. A case study from a new classification criterion for cost-benefit analysis J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101157
62. Quantifying urban adaptation planning in flood-prone communities of Islamabad, Pakistan: An index-based approach H. Waseem & I. Rana https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105762
63. Drivers of future fluvial flood risk change for residential buildings in Europe M. Steinhausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102559
64. Using public participation gis to understand texas coastal communities’ perceptions and preferences for urban green space development in connection to their perceptions of flood risk T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128330
65. Der Hochwasser-Pass im nationalen und internationalen Einsatz zur Unterstützung der Eigenvorsorge P. Meier et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35152-021-0617-2
66. Adaptation Measures to Drought Risk Perceived by Smallholder Crop Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: Implications for Food and Nutrition Security L. Mdoda et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411154
67. Assessing the probability of large‐scale flood loss events: a case study for the river Rhine, Germany A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12091
68. A comparative analysis of the relationship between flood experience and private flood mitigation behaviour in the regions of England M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12700
69. How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impacts H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1558367
70. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales H. de Moel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
71. Adaptation to flood risk: Results of international paired flood event studies H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000606
72. Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12151
73. Comparing Expert and Local Community Perspectives on Flood Management in the Lower Mono River Catchment, Togo and Benin E. Parkoo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101536
74. Disaster resilience: what it is and how it can engender a meaningful change in development policy A. Keating et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12201
75. Large-scale flood risk assessment and management: Prospects of a systems approach K. Schröter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2021.100109
76. A typology of responsibility for coastal flood risk adaptation S. van der Plank et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.954950
77. Identification of motivating factors to help decision-making to minimise flood risk by applying private mitigation measures A. Fouladi Semnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104038
78. Insights From Homeowners on the Impact of Flood Risk Communication on Adaptive Behavior at the Property Level From the 2021 Flood Event in Germany H. Meyer & G. Johann https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70038
79. Integrating Household Risk Mitigation Behavior in Flood Risk Analysis: An Agent‐Based Model Approach T. Haer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12740
80. Participatory Mapping and Visualization of Local Knowledge: An Example from Eberbach, Germany C. Klonner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00312-8
81. Quantifying Flood Vulnerability Reduction via Private Precaution N. Sairam et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000994
82. Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions D. Wagenaar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1-2016
83. ‘Do the resilient things.’ Residents' perspectives on responsibilities for flood risk adaptation in England K. Snel et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12727
84. Lessons Learned from the 2019 Nebraska Floods: Implications for Emergency Management, Mass Care, and Food Security E. Calloway et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811345
85. Adoption of Individual Flood Damage Mitigation Measures in New York City: An Extension of Protection Motivation Theory W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13318
86. Using Panel Data to Understand the Dynamics of Human Behavior in Response to Flooding P. Bubeck et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13548
87. From little things big things flow: the drivers of flood risk adaptation P. Kamstra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.134931
88. Efficacy of Flood relief measures - 2010: A case study of district Layyah, Punjab-Pakistan S. Bukhari et al. https://doi.org/10.33411/IJIST/2022040203
89. A Blueprint for Full Collective Flood Risk Estimation: Demonstration for European River Flooding F. Serinaldi & C. Kilsby https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12747
90. The influence of tailored risk communication on individual adaptive behaviour M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101618
91. Impacts of Climate Change and Remote Natural Catastrophes on EU Flood Insurance Markets: An Analysis of Soft and Hard Reinsurance Markets for Flood Coverage M. Tesselaar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020146
92. Flood insurance arrangements in the European Union for future flood risk under climate and socioeconomic change P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101966
93. Approaches to analyse and model changes in impacts: reply to discussions of “How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impacts” H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1701194
94. Agent-Based Modeling for Household Decision-Making in Adoption of Private Flood Mitigation Measures: The Upper Kan Catchment Case Study S. Nabinejad & H. Schüttrumpf https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142027
95. Balancing the interaction between urban regeneration and flood risk management – A cost benefit approach in Ústí nad Labem P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106276
96. Zusatznutzen und Zielkonflikte bei der Umsetzung von naturbasierten Lösungen im Hochwasserrisikomanagement T. Thaler et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00506-026-01250-3
97. Swimming alone? Why linking flood risk perception and behavior requires more than “it's the individual, stupid” S. Rufat et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1462
98. Incentivising flood risk adaptation through risk based insurance premiums: Trade-offs between affordability and risk reduction P. Hudson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.015
99. How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk? A. Metin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018
100. The failed-levee effect: Do societies learn from flood disasters? R. Collenteur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1496-6
101. Estimating changes in flood risks and benefits of non-structural adaptation strategies - a case study from Tyrol, Austria A. Thieken et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9602-3
102. Bibliometric review of human-flood interaction: Geospatial disconnects between hazard patterns and scientific knowledge Z. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2026.100431
103. Effect of CO2-assisted surfactant/polymer flooding on enhanced oil recovery and its mechanism X. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213473
104. The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China T. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2185-2022
105. Household Property-Level Adaptive Response to Coastal Flooding in Hampton, Virginia (USA): The Role of Perceived Vulnerability and Coping Capacity J. Yusuf et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2025.2494965
106. Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany S. Kienzler et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160713002
107. Capturing Regional Differences in Flood Vulnerability Improves Flood Loss Estimation N. Sairam et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.817625
108. The shifting position of homeowners in flood resilience: From recipients to key‐stakeholders K. Snel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1451
109. Differential residential perspectives on in situ protection and retreat as strategies for climate adaptation N. Schwaller & T. BenDor https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03055-7
110. Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by households J. Poussin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
111. Economic assessment of precautionary measures against floods: insights from a non-contextual approach C. Richert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2525-2019
112. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
113. Let's talk about flood risk – Evaluating a series of workshops on private flood protection A. Heidenreich et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101880
114. Exploring heavy-tailed behavior of flood frequency curves: an analysis of dike overtopping effects M. Farrag et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2026.1873312
115. Insurance engagement in flood risk reduction – examples from household and business insurance in developed countries I. Seifert-Dähnn https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2409-2018
116. Double-Hurdle Approach to Understanding Household Willingness to Pay for Public Flood Mitigation Infrastructure in Vietnam T. Vo et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2775
117. Economic Assessment of Mitigating Damage of Flood Events: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Proofing Commercial Buildings in Umbria, Italy W. Botzen et al. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-017-0065-0
118. Needed: A systems approach to improve flood risk mitigation through private precautionary measures M. Barendrecht et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100080
119. Better prepared but less resilient: the paradoxical impact of frequent flood experience on adaptive behavior and resilience L. Köhler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2787-2023