67 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Relevance of erosion processes when modelling in-channel gravel debris flows for efficient hazard assessment C. Gregoretti et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.001
2. Runout modelling and hazard assessment of Tangni debris flow in Garhwal Himalayas, India R. Dash et al. 10.1007/s12665-021-09637-z
3. Evaluating the Differences of Gridding Techniques for Digital Elevation Models Generation and Their Influence on the Modeling of Stony Debris Flows Routing: A Case Study From Rovina di Cancia Basin (North-Eastern Italian Alps) M. Boreggio et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00089
4. Debris flow susceptibility mapping using a qualitative heuristic method and Flow-R along the Yukon Alaska Highway Corridor, Canada A. Blais-Stevens & P. Behnia 10.5194/nhess-16-449-2016
5. Dynamics of an outburst flood originating from a small and high-altitude glacier in the Arid Andes of Chile P. Iribarren Anacona et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3376-y
6. Propagation analysis and risk assessment of an active complex landslide using a Monte Carlo statistical approach L. Brezzi et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012130
7. Evaluation of different erosion–entrainment models in debris-flow simulation S. Lee et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01901-y
8. Debris Flow Modelling Using RAMMS Model in the Alpine Environment With Focus on the Model Parameters and Main Characteristics M. Mikoš & N. Bezak 10.3389/feart.2020.605061
9. DFLOWZ: A free program to evaluate the area potentially inundated by a debris flow M. Berti & A. Simoni 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.02.002
10. Debris flow-induced topographic changes: effects of recurrent debris flow initiation C. Chen & Q. Wang 10.1007/s10661-017-6169-y
11. Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods R. Melo & J. Zêzere 10.1007/s11069-017-2921-4
12. Forecasting inundation from debris flows that grow volumetrically during travel, with application to the Oregon Coast Range, USA M. Reid et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.07.039
13. Controls on the formation and size of potential landslide dams and dammed lakes in the Austrian Alps A. Argentin et al. 10.5194/nhess-21-1615-2021
14. Predictive simulation of concurrent debris flows: How slope failure locations affect predicted damage K. Yamanoi et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12776
15. Stochastic generation of multi-site daily precipitation for applications in risk management K. Breinl et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.015
16. A Hydrodynamic-Based Robust Numerical Model for Debris Hazard and Risk Assessment Y. Kang et al. 10.3390/su13147955
17. Emulator-based global sensitivity analysis for flow-like landslide run-out models H. Zhao et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01690-w
18. Debris flow simulation 2D (DFS 2D): Numerical modelling of debris flows and calibration of friction parameters M. Abraham et al. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.01.004
19. Field Measurements and Numerical Simulation of Debris Flows from Dolomite Slopes Destabilized during the 2005 Kashmir Earthquake, Pakistan Z. Kazmi et al. 10.1080/13632469.2013.873372
20. Characterization of wood‐laden flows in rivers V. Ruiz‐Villanueva et al. 10.1002/esp.4603
21. Modeling of Entrainment in Debris Flow Analysis for Dry Granular Material C. Kang & D. Chan 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000981
22. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. 10.3390/geosciences8060218
23. Physics and Modeling of Various Hazardous Landslides J. Elíasson & Þ. Sæmundsson 10.3390/geosciences11030108
24. Anomalous Alpine fans: from the genesis to the present hazard E. De Finis et al. 10.1007/s10346-017-0894-8
25. Dynamic hazard assessment of debris flow based on TRIGRS and flow-R coupled models Y. Nie et al. 10.1007/s00477-021-02093-y
26. Computationally-feasible uncertainty quantification in model-based landslide risk assessment A. Yildiz et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.1032438
27. Empirical relationships for the estimation of debris flow runout distances on depositional fans in the Wenchuan earthquake zone W. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123932
28. Model-based approach for design and performance evaluation of works controlling stony debris flows with an application to a case study at Rovina di Cancia (Venetian Dolomites, Northeast Italy) M. Bernard et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.468
29. Modelling future lahars controlled by different volcanic eruption scenarios at Cotopaxi (Ecuador) calibrated with the massively destructive 1877 lahar T. Frimberger et al. 10.1002/esp.5056
30. A comparative analysis of attabad landslide on january 4, 2010, using two numerical models H. Gardezi et al. 10.1007/s11069-021-04593-0
31. Impact of a Random Sequence of Debris Flows on Torrential Fan Formation N. Bezak et al. 10.3390/geosciences9020064
32. Analyzing landslide-induced debris flow and flow-bridge interaction by using a hybrid model of depth-averaged model and discrete element method W. Shiu et al. 10.1007/s10346-022-01963-y
33. Initiation and Flow Conditions of Contemporary Flows in Martian Gullies T. de Haas et al. 10.1029/2018JE005899
34. Modelling the 2012 Lahar in a Sector of Jamapa Gorge (Pico de Orizaba Volcano, Mexico) Using RAMMS and Tree-Ring Evidence O. Franco-Ramos et al. 10.3390/w12020333
35. Influence of rheology on landslide-dammed lake impoundment and sediment trapping: Back-analysis of the Hintersee landslide dam A. Argentin et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108363
36. Entrainment of bed material by Earth‐surface mass flows: Review and reformulation of depth‐integrated theory R. Iverson & C. Ouyang 10.1002/2013RG000447
37. The Debris Flow Occurred at Ru Secco Creek, Venetian Dolomites, on 4 August 2015: Analysis of the Phenomenon, Its Characteristics and Reproduction by Models C. Gregoretti et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00080
38. The importance of entrainment and bulking on debris flow runout modeling: examples from the Swiss Alps F. Frank et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-2569-2015
39. Post-Collapse Evolution of a Rapid Landslide from Sequential Analysis with FE and SPH-Based Models L. Brezzi et al. 10.3390/geosciences11090364
40. Evolution of stony debris flows in laboratory experiments I. Baselt et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107431
41. Runout modeling and calibration of friction parameters of Kurichermala debris flow, India M. Abraham et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01540-1
42. Estimation of the area of sediment deposition by debris flow using a physical-based modeling approach H. An et al. 10.1016/j.quaint.2018.09.049
43. Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow and Driftwood with Entrainment of Sediment T. Kang et al. 10.3390/w14223673
44. Multi‐Model Comparison of Computed Debris Flow Runout for the 9 January 2018 Montecito, California Post‐Wildfire Event K. Barnhart et al. 10.1029/2021JF006245
45. Topographic uncertainty quantification for flow-like landslide models via stochastic simulations H. Zhao & J. Kowalski 10.5194/nhess-20-1441-2020
46. Investigation of potential debris flows above the Koroška Bela settlement, NW Slovenia, from hydro-technical and conceptual design perspectives N. Bezak et al. 10.1007/s10346-021-01774-7
47. Forecasting of Debris Flow Using Machine Learning-Based Adjusted Rainfall Information and RAMMS Model C. Oh et al. 10.3390/w13172360
48. 2D Runout Modelling of Hillslope Debris Flows, Based on Well-Documented Events in Switzerland F. Zimmermann et al. 10.3390/geosciences10020070
49. Robustness evaluation of the probability-based HTCA model for simulating debris-flow run-out extent: Case study of the 2010 Hongchun event, China Y. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106918
50. Multi-Source Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping for Huaraz, Cordillera Blanca, Peru H. Frey et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00210
51. Mass exchange between geophysical flows and beds: Idealised computational modelling using a Herschel-Bulkley rheology S. Goodwin et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341501008
52. Does the topographic data source truly influence the routing modelling of debris flows in a torrent catchment? M. Boreggio et al. 10.1002/esp.5366
53. Large-scale simulation of watershed mass transport: a case study of Tsengwen reservoir watershed, southwest Taiwan K. Liu et al. 10.1007/s11069-013-0611-4
54. A multi-step hazard assessment for debris-flow prone areas influenced by hydroclimatic events V. Cabral et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106961
55. Landslide prediction, monitoring and early warning: a concise review of state-of-the-art B. Chae et al. 10.1007/s12303-017-0034-4
56. Experimental study on impact and deposition behaviours of multiple surges of channelized debris flow on a flexible barrier D. Tan et al. 10.1007/s10346-020-01378-7
57. Assessing strategies to mitigate debris-flow risk in Abancay province, south-central Peruvian Andes C. Rodríguez-Morata et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.06.012
58. A novel friction weakening-based dynamic model for landslide runout assessment along the Sichuan-Tibet Railway J. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106721
59. Deciphering controls for debris‐flow erosion derived from a LiDAR‐recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Roßbichelbach, Germany) A. Dietrich & M. Krautblatter 10.1002/esp.4578
60. Debris-flow modeling at Meretschibach and Bondasca catchments, Switzerland: sensitivity testing of field-data-based entrainment model F. Frank et al. 10.5194/nhess-17-801-2017
61. Investigation of erosion characteristics of debris flow based on historical cases C. Kang & D. Chan 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106767
62. Engineering geological investigation and runout modelling of the disastrous Taliye landslide, Maharashtra, India of 22 July 2021 B. Peethambaran et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-05985-0
63. A robust debris-flow and GLOF risk management strategy for a data-scarce catchment in Santa Teresa, Peru H. Frey et al. 10.1007/s10346-015-0669-z
64. Operational Estimation of Landslide Runout: Comparison of Empirical and Numerical Methods M. Peruzzetto et al. 10.3390/geosciences10110424
65. Debris flows in Lebai gully along the Yarlung Tsangpo River in Tibet: characterization, causes, and dynamic prediction of potential debris flows M. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s12665-022-10694-1
66. Torrential Hazard Prevention in Alpine Small Basin through Historical, Empirical and Geomorphological Cross Analysis in NW Italy L. Turconi et al. 10.3390/land11050699
67. A new statistical method to assess potential debris flow erosion G. Bertoldi et al. 10.1051/e3sconf/202341507003