70 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The adaptive governance of natural disaster systems: Insights from the 2010 mount Merapi eruption in Indonesia D. Bakkour et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.006
2. Change in policy regimes for disaster risk reduction in Fiji and Nepal M. Wanner 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103030
3. The 1257 CE cataclysmic eruption of Samalas volcano (Indonesia) revealed by indigenous written sources: Forgotten kingdoms, emergency response, and societal recovery M. Malawani et al. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107688
4. Providing a framework for post-disaster resilience factors in buildings and infrastructure from end-users’ perspectives: case study in Caribbean island states S. Charles et al. 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2021-0020
5. Shared roles and responsibilities in flood risk management S. Priest 10.1111/jfr3.12528
6. Analytical Framework to Assess the Incorporation of Climate Change Adaptation in Water Management: Application to the Tordera River Basin Adaptation Plan A. Sanchez-Plaza et al. 10.3390/su11030762
7. Disasters can happen to anybody: The case of Korea K. Ha 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.002
8. Municipal finance and resilience lessons for urban infrastructure management: a case study from the Cape Town drought N. Simpson et al. 10.1080/19463138.2019.1642203
9. A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst F. Gutiérrez et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.08.002
10. Negotiating Institutional Pathways for Sustaining Climate Change Resilience and Risk Governance in Indonesia J. Lassa 10.3390/cli7080095
11. Integrated stakeholder-centered tourism crisis L. Pennington-Gray & E. Basurto-Cedeno 10.3389/frsut.2023.1209325
12. Costa Resiliente: A Serious Game Co-Designed to Foster Resilience Thinking C. Olivares-Rodríguez et al. 10.3390/su142416760
13. Lessons from the Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction from Latin America and the Caribbean M. Cabral-Ramírez et al. 10.1007/s13753-025-00613-w
14. Governing complexities and its implication on the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction priority 2 on governance R. Djalante & S. Lassa 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100010
15. Disasters and indigenous peoples: A critical discourse analysis of the expert news media A. Mosurska et al. 10.1177/25148486221096371
16. Facing and managing natural disasters in the Sporades islands, Greece P. Karanikola et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-995-2014
17. Governance in the Sendai: a way ahead? E. Raju & K. da Costa 10.1108/DPM-08-2017-0190
18. Towards a typology of adaptive governance in the digital government context: The role of decision-making and accountability C. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003
19. A Framework for Transitions in the Built Environment: Insights from Compound Hazards in the COVID-19 Era D. Mendonça et al. 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2285
20. Multistakeholder Participation, Collaboration, and Networking in Disaster Risk Reduction and Pandemic Management: Insights and Future Policy Framework S. Panneer et al. 10.3998/sdi.5989
21. Analyzing Multisector Stakeholder Collaboration and Engagement in Housing Resilience Planning in Greater Miami and the Beaches through Social Network Analysis H. Ren et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000594
22. The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method F. Siangulube 10.1007/s00267-023-01806-z
23. Perspectives for flood risk assessment and management for mega-city metro system H. Lyu et al. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019
24. BUILDING INSTITUTIONAL SYNERGICITY ON DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN ACEH H. Syahputra & A. Nivada 10.18510/hssr.2020.8436
25. Unpacking “the surprise chain”: the governance of food security during the COVID-19 pandemic in Melbourne, Australia R. Carey & M. Murphy 10.1007/s10460-024-10629-5
26. Adaptive governance as a catalyst for transforming the relationship between development and disaster risk through the Sendai Framework? M. Munene et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.021
27. Multi-stakeholder Platforms and Protected Area Management: Evidence from El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve, Mexico L. Brenner 10.4103/cs.cs_18_63
28. Adaptive governance during an unprecedented marine heatwave: case study from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary H. Henry et al. 10.1080/09640568.2025.2504516
29. Exploring Stakeholder Views on Disaster Resilience Practices of Residential Communities in South Florida M. Taeby & L. Zhang 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000319
30. The resilience paradox: Rural self-reliance and the limits of disaster recovery N. Marchetti et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105660
31. SPECIAL ISSUE OF THE SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW — ECONOMICS OF CRISES AND DISASTERS S. MANAGI & S. SHARMA 10.1142/S021759081602001X
32. Engaging diverse stakeholders in exposure data collection: Participatory tools and activities C. Scaini et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105179
33. Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience R. Djalante et al. 10.1007/s11069-013-0797-5
34. Short-Term Solutions to a Long-Term Challenge: Rethinking Disaster Recovery Planning to Reduce Vulnerabilities and Inequities M. Finucane et al. 10.3390/ijerph17020482
35. Disaster Governance for Community Resilience in Coastal Towns: Chilean Case Studies P. Villagra & C. Quintana 10.3390/ijerph14091063
36. Disaster resilience and complex adaptive systems theory C. Coetzee et al. 10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0153
37. Sustainable Development Governance in the Arctic Regions (Review of International Approaches and Research) S. Tulaeva 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-2-110-122
38. Transdisciplinary Approach: Toward Innovative Recovery and Disaster Risk Reduction M. Ishiwatari et al. 10.20965/jdr.2024.p0534
39. Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction (DRR)-Climate change adaptation (CCA) and governance: Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India B. Dash & M. Akhter 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103560
40. Participatory Multi-Stakeholder Platforms in Disaster Management in South Africa N. Ngqwala et al. 10.20965/jdr.2017.p1192
41. Multistakeholder platforms for integrated landscape governance: The case of Kalomo District, Zambia F. Siangulube et al. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106944
42. Trade-Offs, Adaptation and Adaptive Governance of Urban Regeneration in Guangzhou, China (2009–2019) B. Li et al. 10.3390/land12010139
43. The amplification effect of unreasonable human behaviours on natural disasters J. Fan et al. 10.1057/s41599-022-01351-w
44. Improving the feedback loop between community‐ and policy‐level learning: Building resilience of coastal communities in Bangladesh M. Choudhury et al. 10.1002/sd.2686
45. Spatial and temporal zoning of watershed resilience using a multidimensional composition approach P. Farzi et al. 10.1111/nrm.12362
46. Paving the way for collaborative resilience planning: Assessing patterns and characteristics of multisector stakeholder collaboration in Greater Miami and the Beaches H. Ren et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105171
47. Taking stock of decentralized disaster risk reduction in Indonesia A. Grady et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2145-2016
48. Beyond ESPREssO - Integrative risk assessment 2025 synergies and gaps in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction J. Hemmers et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101817
49. Managing hydrological infrastructure assets for improved flood control in coastal mega-cities of developing nations R. Ogie et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.09.002
50. From risk to resilience and sustainability: Addressing urban flash floods and waterlogging Z. Kaiser & F. Akter 10.1016/j.risk.2025.100011
51. Amasya İlinde Afete Hazırlık Çalışmaları: Paydaş Analizi G. YÜKSEL & T. TUNCAY 10.35341/afet.1245423
52. Situating local stakeholders within national disaster governance structures: rebuilding urban neighbourhoods following the 2015 Nepal earthquake P. Daly et al. 10.1177/0956247817721403
53. Networking in action: Taking collaborative capacity development seriously for disaster risk management J. Iao-Jörgensen 10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100311
54. Environmental governance is critical for mitigating human displacement due to weather-related disasters S. Meng 10.1038/s43247-024-01528-y
55. A Conceptual Governance Framework for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction Integration G. Forino et al. 10.1007/s13753-015-0076-z
56. Improving flood risk governance through multi-stakeholder collaboration: a case study of Sweet Home informal settlement, Cape Town I. Desportes et al. 10.1080/03736245.2015.1052842
57. Landslides in a changing world I. Alcántara-Ayala 10.1007/s10346-024-02451-1
58. Comparative urban capacity analysis for flood-prone areas: method and a case study of Sidoarjo, Indonesia D. Hizbaron et al. 10.1007/s10668-021-01249-8
59. Examining resilience of disaster response system in response to COVID-19 X. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102239
60. Multi-stakeholder dialogue and company-community relations in Ghana's oil and gas sector A. Mohammed et al. 10.1016/j.exis.2025.101656
61. Volcano alert level systems: managing the challenges of effective volcanic crisis communication C. Fearnley & S. Beaven 10.1007/s00445-018-1219-z
62. Exploring NGOs-government collaboration strategies in institutionalising child-centred disaster resilience and climate change adaptation J. Lassa et al. 10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100284
63. Social Sustainability as Social Learning: Insights from Multi-Stakeholder Environmental Governance T. Hovardas 10.3390/su13147744
64. Flooding in Cape Town's informal settlements: barriers to collaborative urban risk governance G. Ziervogel et al. 10.1080/03736245.2014.924867
65. Addressing inadequacies of sectoral coordination and local capacity building in Indonesia for effective climate change adaptation R. Yoseph-Paulus & R. Hindmarsh 10.1080/17565529.2016.1184609
66. Qanat is not a hazard M. Parise 10.1007/s12665-016-6284-z
67. Integrating Climate Change Adaptation, Disaster Risk Reduction, and Social Protection for Enhanced Resilience: Evidence from the Somali Region, Ethiopia G. Kebede et al. 10.1177/10704965241289525
68. Role of urban design and planning in disaster risk reduction K. Chmutina et al. 10.1680/udap.13.00011
69. Linking disaster risk reduction and human development J. Raikes et al. 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100291
70. A step toward considering the return period in flood spatial modeling B. Choubin et al. 10.1007/s11069-022-05561-y