50 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A simplified early-warning system for imminent landslide prediction based on failure index fragility curves developed through numerical analysis U. Ozturk et al. 10.1080/19475705.2015.1058863
2. Dynamic Integrated Model for Disaster Management and Socioeconomic Analysis (DIM2SEA) E. Mas et al. 10.20965/jdr.2018.p1257
3. Building damage from the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami: quantitative assessment of influential factors N. Leelawat et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1081-z
4. Framework for developing volcanic fragility and vulnerability functions for critical infrastructure G. Wilson et al. 10.1186/s13617-017-0065-6
5. Empirical fragility assessment of buildings affected by the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami using improved statistical models I. Charvet et al. 10.1007/s11069-014-1118-3
6. Tsunami Assessment and Evacuation Analysis Using Remote Sensing for Tianya District of Sanya City, China J. Hou et al. 10.1142/S1793431119410033
7. Building damage characteristics based on surveyed data and fragility curves of the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami A. Suppasri et al. 10.1007/s11069-012-0487-8
8. Changes in Tsunami Risk to Residential Buildings at Omaha Beach, New Zealand R. Paulik et al. 10.3390/geosciences9030113
9. Tsunami inundation in Napier, New Zealand, due to local earthquake sources S. Fraser et al. 10.1007/s11069-013-0820-x
10. Novel Unsupervised Classification of Collapsed Buildings Using Satellite Imagery, Hazard Scenarios and Fragility Functions L. Moya et al. 10.3390/rs10020296
11. From tsunami risk assessment to disaster risk reduction – the case of Oman I. Aguirre-Ayerbe et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-2241-2018
12. Tsunami analytical fragility curves for the Colombian Pacific coast: A reinforced concrete building example S. Medina et al. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109309
13. Field survey report and satellite image interpretation of the 2013 Super Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines E. Mas et al. 10.5194/nhess-15-805-2015
14. Tsunami Fragility Functions for Road and Utility Pole Assets Using Field Survey and Remotely Sensed Data from the 2018 Sulawesi Tsunami, Palu, Indonesia J. Williams et al. 10.1007/s00024-020-02545-6
15. Probabilistic Tsunami Damage Assessment Considering Stochastic Source Models: Application to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake K. Goda et al. 10.1142/S0578563415500151
16. Effects of a Macro-Roughness Element on Tsunami Wave Amplification, Pressures, and Loads: Physical Model and Comparison to Japanese and US Design Equations T. Tomiczek et al. 10.1142/S0578563417500048
17. A deterministic approach for assessing tsunami-induced building damage through quantification of hydrodynamic forces Y. Xiong et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.11.002
18. SATREPS Project on Enhancement of Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Technology in Peru F. Yamazaki & C. Zavala 10.20965/jdr.2013.p0224
19. Volcanic hazard impacts to critical infrastructure: A review G. Wilson et al. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.08.030
20. Tsunami in the last 15 years: a bibliometric analysis with a detailed overview and future directions N. Jain et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04454-2
21. The generation of new tsunami risk areas due to an intentionally biased reconstruction process: Case study of llico after the 2010 Chile tsunami R. Aránguiz et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101727
22. An integrated method to extract collapsed buildings from satellite imagery, hazard distribution and fragility curves L. Moya et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.034
23. Predicting building damage from dam failure using fragility curves R. Coombs 10.1680/jdare.18.00010
24. Ex post analysis of engineered tsunami mitigation measures in the town of Dichato, Chile M. Oportus et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-03992-z
25. Developing fragility functions for the areas affected by the 2009 Samoa earthquake and tsunami H. Gokon et al. 10.5194/nhess-14-3231-2014
26. Building Damage Assessment Using Scenario Based Tsunami Numerical Analysis and Fragility Curves K. Rehman & Y. Cho 10.3390/w8030109
27. Analytical tsunami fragility curves for seaport RC buildings and steel light frame warehouses S. Karafagka et al. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.037
28. Predictive Analysis of the Building Damage From the 2011 Great East Japan Tsunami Using Decision Tree Classification Related Algorithms K. Saengtabtim et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3060114
29. A multivariate generalized linear tsunami fragility model for Kesennuma City based on maximum flow depths, velocities and debris impact, with evaluation of predictive accuracy I. Charvet et al. 10.1007/s11069-015-1947-8
30. Probabilistic Seismic and Tsunami Hazard Analysis Conditioned on a Megathrust Rupture of the Cascadia Subduction Zone H. Park et al. 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00032
31. Comparison of inundation depth and momentum flux based fragilities for probabilistic tsunami damage assessment and uncertainty analysis H. Park et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.01.008
32. A Study on the Influential Factors on Building Damage in Sri Lanka During the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami N. Leelawat et al. 10.1142/S1793431116400017
33. Development of fragility curves for railway embankment and ballast scour due to overtopping flood flow R. Tsubaki et al. 10.5194/nhess-16-2455-2016
34. SPATIO-TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION MODELING OF TSUNAMI-DRIVEN COMBUSTIBLE OBJECTS RELEASED FROM DESTROYED BUILDINGS TOWARDS TSUNAMI FIRE SIMULATION T. NISHINO et al. 10.3130/aije.80.857
35. Field survey and damage inspection after the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan in The Philippines E. MAS et al. 10.2208/kaigan.70.I_1451
36. Characteristics of Tsunami Fragility Functions Developed Using Different Sources of Damage Data from the 2018 Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami E. Mas et al. 10.1007/s00024-020-02501-4
37. A comparative study of empirical and analytical fragility functions for the assessment of tsunami building damage in Tumaco, Colombia J. Paez-Ramirez et al. 10.1080/21664250.2020.1726558
38. The 2011 Tohoku Tsunami from the Sky: A Review on the Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Damage Assessment J. Sublime 10.3390/geosciences11030133
39. A comparative analysis of empirical and analytical tsunami fragility functions for buildings in Tumaco, Colombia J. Paez-Ramirez et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012008
40. Comparative assessment of nonlinear static and dynamic methods for analysing building response under sequential earthquake and tsunami T. Rossetto et al. 10.1002/eqe.3167
41. Fragility Curves Based on Data from the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Tsunami in Ishinomaki City, with Discussion of Parameters Influencing Building Damage A. Suppasri et al. 10.1193/053013EQS138M
42. Scenarios of Earthquake and Tsunami Damage Probability in Callao Region, Peru Using Tsunami Fragility Functions B. Adriano et al. 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0968
43. The use of empirical vulnerability functions to assess the response of buildings to tsunami impact: Comparative review and summary of best practice C. Tarbotton et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.01.002
44. Estimating Tsunami-Induced Building Damage through Fragility Functions: Critical Review and Research Needs I. Charvet et al. 10.3389/fbuil.2017.00036
45. Development and application of a tsunami fragility curve of the 2015 tsunami in Coquimbo, Chile R. Aránguiz et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-2143-2018
46. Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Contribution to the Inventory of Infrastructure Susceptible to Earthquake and Flooding Hazards in North-Eastern Greece B. Theilen-Willige et al. 10.3390/geosciences2040203
47. Tsunami Hazard and Built Environment Damage Observations from Palu City after the September 28 2018 Sulawesi Earthquake and Tsunami R. Paulik et al. 10.1007/s00024-019-02254-9
48. How heterogeneous coseismic slip affects regional probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment: A case study in the South China Sea L. Li et al. 10.1002/2016JB013111
49. Worst-case tsunami scenario in Cartagena Bay, central Chile: Challenges for coastal risk management C. Martínez et al. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105060
50. Field surveys and numerical modeling of the August 2016 Typhoon Lionrock along the northeastern coast of Japan: the first typhoon making landfall in Tohoku region M. Heidarzadeh et al. 10.1007/s11069-020-04112-7