98 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Rethinking flood risk communication E. Rollason et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3273-4
2. Towards thresholds of disaster management performance under demographic change: exploring functional relationships using agent-based modeling G. Dressler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2287-2016
3. The better the bond, the better we cope. The effects of place attachment intensity and place attachment styles on the link between perception of risk and emotional and behavioral coping A. Stancu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101771
4. Establishing an evidence base to inform the development of personalised flood alerts A. Walker & G. Lawson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106197
5. Flood risk perception and communication in informal settlements: evidence from Brazilian cities M. Noli da Fonseca & L. Pimentel da Silva https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2026.2745643
6. Participatory social capacity building: Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands D. de Voogt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.019
7. Moving to 3-D flood hazard maps for enhancing risk communication F. Macchione et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.005
8. An Overview of Flood Concepts, Challenges, and Future Directions A. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002164
9. Development of an inverse method for coastal risk management D. Idier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-999-2013
10. “We’re Just Sitting Ducks”: Recurrent Household Flooding as An Underreported Environmental Health Threat in Detroit’s Changing Climate N. Sampson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010006
11. Awareness-raising of flood risk and building resilience among children in Zagreb, Croatia N. Kimura et al. https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.8.64
12. A novel methodology for enhancing flood risk communication: The Nines of Safety S. Islam & I. Demir https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2026.10017
13. Alpine hazards, cultural memory, and storytelling's relevance for collective risk communication and disaster processing: A scoping review C. Mayr-Veselinović & R. Renner https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100755
14. Towards democratized flood risk management: An advanced AI assistant enabled by GPT-4 for enhanced interpretability and public engagement R. Martelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106821
15. Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps E. O’Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
16. Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review L. Cea & P. Costabile https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9030050
17. Bridging the gap in flood risk communication: a comparative study of community and organizational social media posts using natural language processing C. Salley et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1553746
18. Between adaptability and the urge to control: making long-term water policies in the Netherlands B. Restemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403
19. Reliability- and resilience-based performance assessment of urban drainage infrastructure N. Binesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2026.2755078
20. Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management D. Demeritt & S. Nobert https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.924897
21. Emerging trends and future pathways: A commentary on the present state and future of residential flood insurance in Canada L. Calamai & A. Minano https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2017.1362358
22. Flood risk management in Italy: challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) J. Mysiak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013
23. How awareness and confidence affect flood-risk precautionary behavior of Greek citizens: the role of perceptual and emotional mechanisms K. Papagiannaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1329-2019
24. Strengthening the information deficit model for disaster preparedness: Mediating and moderating effects of community participation M. Abunyewah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101492
25. Assessing social capacity and vulnerability of private households to natural hazards – integrating psychological and governance factors J. Werg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1613-2013
26. Flood Impacts on Civil Infrastructure Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Impacts, Modeling Tools, Emerging Technologies, and Mitigation Strategies R. Abegaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2477
27. An algorithm for converting weather radar data into GIS polygons and its application in severe weather warning systems H. Hu https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.898767
28. An uncertainty-based framework to quantifying climate change impacts on coastal flood vulnerability: case study of New York City Z. Zahmatkesh & M. Karamouz https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6282-y
29. How Can Community-Based Organizations Improve Flood Risk Communication? A Case Study of China Based on Grounded Theory Q. Li & Y. Lin https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020053
30. Analyzing Twitter communication about heavy precipitation events to improve future risk communication and disaster reduction in Germany L. Netzel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1878241
31. Enhancing flood risk communication in Namibia: Participatory flood early warning for early action D. Moisès & Y. Nyam https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101318
32. Cooperating for added value: Using participatory game theory in implementing nature-based flood defences H. Vreugdenhil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106507
33. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness and Communication on Real Estate Investment Decision-Making A. Oyetunji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387868
34. Place Attachment and Disaster Preparedness: Examining the Role of Place Scale and Preparedness Type A. Wallis et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211064196
35. Flood warnings in coastal areas: how do experience and information influence responses to alert services? G. Pescaroli & M. Magni https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-703-2015
36. Co-Design for Enhancing Flood Resilience in Davao City, Philippines M. Miyamoto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060978
37. Quantifying unequal urban resilience to rainfall across China from location-aware big data J. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-317-2023
38. Assessing Perception of Floods within the Framework of VULMIN Project: Methodological Remarks A. Costache et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/avutgs-2017-0013
39. Understanding the Operational Concept of a Flood-Resilient Urban Community in Jakarta, Indonesia, from the Perspectives of Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Development Agencies F. Dwirahmadi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203993
40. Can Citizen Science Promote Flood Risk Communication? W. Cheung & D. Feldman https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101961
41. Climate‐resilient water infrastructure: A call to action J. Vinke‐De Kruijf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jci3.12017
42. Discourse and practice of participatory flood risk management in Belfast, UK J. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.037
43. Saving Cork City? Place attachment and conflicting framings of flood hazards J. Jeffers https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.003
44. A new method to analyze the driving mechanism of flood disaster resilience and its management decision-making D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128134
45. Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and 2-D modelling for 3-D flood hazard maps in urban areas: new opportunities and perspectives P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104889
46. Flood Risk Communication Using ArcGIS StoryMaps K. Oubennaceur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8040152
47. A study on the relationships of place attachment and individual attributes of residents in different vulnerable districts in Taipei, Taiwan Y. Lee & S. Lin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13416-5
48. Factors influencing disaster preparedness behaviors of older adults K. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315617
49. A combined qualitative–quantitative fuzzy method for urban flood resilience assessment in Karaj City, Iran K. Khatooni et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27377-x
50. From red tape to red infrastructure—Insights from urban flood risk management practitioners in four US cities R. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ubtr.2026.100036
51. Flood experiences, resiliency and migration intentions of flood-risk residents of Tuguegarao City, Philippines https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.6.358-367
52. Influence of flood risk communication on threat and coping appraisals of individuals to enhance flood resilience S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2026.102787
53. The Association between Hydro-Meteorological Events and Leptospirosis Hospitalizations in Santa Catarina, Brazil W. Ercides Péres et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051052
54. An empirical analysis of learning and forgetting mechanisms in repeated evacuations: A panel recursive logit approach S. Masuda & M. Ikegai https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2024.2422366
55. Risk communication and community engagement as an emerging pillar of health emergency management in Iran: Achievements and the way forward M. Senga et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1097932
56. Challenges to social capacity building in flood-affected areas of southern Poland J. Działek et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2555-2013
57. The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance E. O'Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12597
58. Flood resilience: a systematic review K. McClymont et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
59. Cross-scale interactions in flood risk management: A case study from Rovaniemi, Finland A. Räsänen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102185
60. Experiencing, caring, coping: Vested interest mediates the effect of past experience on coping behaviors in environmental risk contexts S. De Dominicis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12735
61. Exploring protective decision‐making in the context of impact‐based flood warnings E. Meléndez‐Landaverde et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12587
62. Probabilistic framework for quantifying infrastructure systems’ resilience against floods A. Daneshifar & H. Kashani https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2024.2328977
63. Exploring Risk Perception and Behaviours at the Intersection of Flood Events and Private Groundwater Supplies: A Qualitative Focus Group Study C. McDowell et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233467
64. Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication E. Maidl & M. Buchecker https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015
65. Citizen engagement under climate change-local communication practice toward resilience T. Ling et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100184
66. Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change C. Oberlack https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z
67. Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience L. Jones & M. d'Errico https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104632
68. Resilience in Complex Catchment Systems L. Beevers et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040541
69. Perceptions of drinking water: Understanding the role of individualized water quality data in Detroit, Michigan A. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000188
70. International investments and businesses as enablers of globalization of local risks: A case for risk communication and climate fragility reduction P. Sivapuram V.R.K. & R. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100125
71. Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın Instagram Kullanımının Risk İletişimi Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi E. VONA KURT & Y. DURAN https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.872303
72. Exploring optimal deep tunnel sewer systems to enhance urban pluvial flood resilience in the gangnam region, South Korea S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120762
73. HydroLang FRAM: Web-based framework for comprehensive flood risk and mitigation assessment and communication M. Sufi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105735
74. The antecedents of risk perception in the context of natural hazards: A multi-level meta-analysis A. Theodorou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106281
75. READY: a web-based geographical information system for enhanced flood resilience through raising awareness in citizens R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1645-2015
76. Establishing information seeking pathways in slow and flash floods B. Ryan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.005
77. A Systematic Review of Design Elements for Risk Communication in Hurricane Hazard Maps J. Li https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261498722
78. Risk Communication after Disaster: Return Entry Following the 2008 Cedar River Flood L. Siebeneck & T. Cova https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000126
79. Quantifying Resilience and Uncertainty in Coastal Flooding Events: Framework for Assessing Urban Vulnerability M. Karamouz & Z. Zahmatkesh https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000724
80. Flood risk perceptions and coping capacities among the retired population, with implications for risk communication: A study of residents in a north Wales coastal town, UK B. Walkling & B. Haworth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101793
81. We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours S. De Dominicis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
82. Design and evaluation of a community and impact‐based site‐specific early warning system (SS‐EWS): The SS‐EWS framework E. Meléndez‐Landaverde & D. Sempere‐Torres https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12860
83. Predicting the impact of urban flooding using open data N. Tkachenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160013
84. Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda M. Bonaiuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007
85. The Effectiveness of a Large‐Scale Flood Risk Awareness Campaign: Evidence from Two Panel Data Sets D. Osberghaus & H. Hinrichs https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13601
86. Risk Communication on Floodings: Insights Into the Risk Awareness of Migrants in Rural Communities in Austria K. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00060.1
87. Towards two-way flood risk communication: current practice in a community in the UK N. Ping et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.015
88. Flash flood warnings in context: combining local knowledge and large-scale hydro-meteorological patterns A. Bucherie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-461-2022
89. Assessment of the warning system against floods on a rural area: the case of the lower Siret River (Romania) F. Salit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-409-2013
90. Cross-validation as a step toward the integration of local and scientific knowledge of geologic hazards in rural Peru A. Malone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102682
91. Risk behaviour and people's attitude towards public authorities – A survey of 2007 UK and 2013 German floods F. Mahdavian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101685
92. Evaluation of safe-to-fail flood solution alternatives and integration of safe-to-fail concept in AEC education to develop resilient coastal cities R. Rahat et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2022-0041
93. Yer Bağlılığı ve Risk Algısı Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki İ. Güler & E. Kutay Karaçor https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.402347
94. Disaster Awareness and Preparedness Among Older Adults in Canada Regarding Floods, Wildfires, and Earthquakes E. Bogdan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00555-9
95. Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management S. Maskrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12462
96. Creating effective flood warnings: A framework from a critical review M. Kuller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126708
97. Community Narratives of Disaster Risk and Resilience: Implications for Government Policy L. Drennan https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12299
98. How flood risk management projects can improve urban resilience: a combined assessment approach of functional resilience and adaptive capacity T. Doornkamp et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2024.2429226