95 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Rethinking flood risk communication E. Rollason et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3273-4
2. Towards thresholds of disaster management performance under demographic change: exploring functional relationships using agent-based modeling G. Dressler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2287-2016
3. The better the bond, the better we cope. The effects of place attachment intensity and place attachment styles on the link between perception of risk and emotional and behavioral coping A. Stancu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101771
4. Establishing an evidence base to inform the development of personalised flood alerts A. Walker & G. Lawson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106197
5. Participatory social capacity building: Conceptualisation and experiences from pilots for flood risk mitigation in the Netherlands D. de Voogt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.019
6. Moving to 3-D flood hazard maps for enhancing risk communication F. Macchione et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.005
7. An Overview of Flood Concepts, Challenges, and Future Directions A. Mishra et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002164
8. Development of an inverse method for coastal risk management D. Idier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-999-2013
9. “We’re Just Sitting Ducks”: Recurrent Household Flooding as An Underreported Environmental Health Threat in Detroit’s Changing Climate N. Sampson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010006
10. Awareness-raising of flood risk and building resilience among children in Zagreb, Croatia N. Kimura et al. https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.8.64
11. A novel methodology for enhancing flood risk communication: The Nines of Safety S. Islam & I. Demir https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2026.10017
12. Towards democratized flood risk management: An advanced AI assistant enabled by GPT-4 for enhanced interpretability and public engagement R. Martelo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106821
13. Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps E. O’Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
14. Flood Risk in Urban Areas: Modelling, Management and Adaptation to Climate Change. A Review L. Cea & P. Costabile https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9030050
15. Bridging the gap in flood risk communication: a comparative study of community and organizational social media posts using natural language processing C. Salley et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1553746
16. Between adaptability and the urge to control: making long-term water policies in the Netherlands B. Restemeyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403
17. Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management D. Demeritt & S. Nobert https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.924897
18. Emerging trends and future pathways: A commentary on the present state and future of residential flood insurance in Canada L. Calamai & A. Minano https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2017.1362358
19. Flood risk management in Italy: challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) J. Mysiak et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2883-2013
20. How awareness and confidence affect flood-risk precautionary behavior of Greek citizens: the role of perceptual and emotional mechanisms K. Papagiannaki et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1329-2019
21. Strengthening the information deficit model for disaster preparedness: Mediating and moderating effects of community participation M. Abunyewah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101492
22. Assessing social capacity and vulnerability of private households to natural hazards – integrating psychological and governance factors J. Werg et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1613-2013
23. Flood Impacts on Civil Infrastructure Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Impacts, Modeling Tools, Emerging Technologies, and Mitigation Strategies R. Abegaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-2477
24. An algorithm for converting weather radar data into GIS polygons and its application in severe weather warning systems H. Hu https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.898767
25. An uncertainty-based framework to quantifying climate change impacts on coastal flood vulnerability: case study of New York City Z. Zahmatkesh & M. Karamouz https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6282-y
26. How Can Community-Based Organizations Improve Flood Risk Communication? A Case Study of China Based on Grounded Theory Q. Li & Y. Lin https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020053
27. Analyzing Twitter communication about heavy precipitation events to improve future risk communication and disaster reduction in Germany L. Netzel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1878241
28. Enhancing flood risk communication in Namibia: Participatory flood early warning for early action D. Moisès & Y. Nyam https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101318
29. Cooperating for added value: Using participatory game theory in implementing nature-based flood defences H. Vreugdenhil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106507
30. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness Information on the Adaptive Behaviour of Residents in Flood Prone Areas in Southeast Nigeria G. Nwafor https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5159793
31. Influence of Flood Risk Awareness and Communication on Real Estate Investment Decision-Making A. Oyetunji et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387868
32. Place Attachment and Disaster Preparedness: Examining the Role of Place Scale and Preparedness Type A. Wallis et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211064196
33. Flood warnings in coastal areas: how do experience and information influence responses to alert services? G. Pescaroli & M. Magni https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-703-2015
34. Co-Design for Enhancing Flood Resilience in Davao City, Philippines M. Miyamoto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060978
35. Quantifying unequal urban resilience to rainfall across China from location-aware big data J. Qian et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-317-2023
36. Assessing Perception of Floods within the Framework of VULMIN Project: Methodological Remarks A. Costache et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/avutgs-2017-0013
37. Understanding the Operational Concept of a Flood-Resilient Urban Community in Jakarta, Indonesia, from the Perspectives of Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Development Agencies F. Dwirahmadi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203993
38. Can Citizen Science Promote Flood Risk Communication? W. Cheung & D. Feldman https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101961
39. Climate‐resilient water infrastructure: A call to action J. Vinke‐De Kruijf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/jci3.12017
40. Discourse and practice of participatory flood risk management in Belfast, UK J. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.037
41. Saving Cork City? Place attachment and conflicting framings of flood hazards J. Jeffers https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.003
42. A new method to analyze the driving mechanism of flood disaster resilience and its management decision-making D. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128134
43. Terrestrial and airborne laser scanning and 2-D modelling for 3-D flood hazard maps in urban areas: new opportunities and perspectives P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104889
44. Flood Risk Communication Using ArcGIS StoryMaps K. Oubennaceur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8040152
45. A study on the relationships of place attachment and individual attributes of residents in different vulnerable districts in Taipei, Taiwan Y. Lee & S. Lin https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13416-5
46. Factors influencing disaster preparedness behaviors of older adults K. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315617
47. A combined qualitative–quantitative fuzzy method for urban flood resilience assessment in Karaj City, Iran K. Khatooni et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27377-x
48. From red tape to red infrastructure—Insights from urban flood risk management practitioners in four US cities R. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ubtr.2026.100036
49. Flood experiences, resiliency and migration intentions of flood-risk residents of Tuguegarao City, Philippines https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.6.358-367
50. Influence of flood risk communication on threat and coping appraisals of individuals to enhance flood resilience S. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2026.102787
51. The Association between Hydro-Meteorological Events and Leptospirosis Hospitalizations in Santa Catarina, Brazil W. Ercides Péres et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051052
52. An empirical analysis of learning and forgetting mechanisms in repeated evacuations: A panel recursive logit approach S. Masuda & M. Ikegai https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2024.2422366
53. Risk communication and community engagement as an emerging pillar of health emergency management in Iran: Achievements and the way forward M. Senga et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1097932
54. Challenges to social capacity building in flood-affected areas of southern Poland J. Działek et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2555-2013
55. The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood‐Risk Perception: The Role of Distance E. O'Neill et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12597
56. Flood resilience: a systematic review K. McClymont et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
57. Cross-scale interactions in flood risk management: A case study from Rovaniemi, Finland A. Räsänen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102185
58. Experiencing, caring, coping: Vested interest mediates the effect of past experience on coping behaviors in environmental risk contexts S. De Dominicis et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12735
59. Exploring protective decision‐making in the context of impact‐based flood warnings E. Meléndez‐Landaverde et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12587
60. Probabilistic framework for quantifying infrastructure systems’ resilience against floods A. Daneshifar & H. Kashani https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2024.2328977
61. Exploring Risk Perception and Behaviours at the Intersection of Flood Events and Private Groundwater Supplies: A Qualitative Focus Group Study C. McDowell et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233467
62. Raising risk preparedness by flood risk communication E. Maidl & M. Buchecker https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1577-2015
63. Citizen engagement under climate change-local communication practice toward resilience T. Ling et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100184
64. Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change C. Oberlack https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9699-z
65. Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience L. Jones & M. d'Errico https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104632
66. Resilience in Complex Catchment Systems L. Beevers et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040541
67. Perceptions of drinking water: Understanding the role of individualized water quality data in Detroit, Michigan A. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000188
68. International investments and businesses as enablers of globalization of local risks: A case for risk communication and climate fragility reduction P. Sivapuram V.R.K. & R. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100125
69. Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Sağlık Bakanlığı’nın Instagram Kullanımının Risk İletişimi Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi E. VONA KURT & Y. DURAN https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.872303
70. Exploring optimal deep tunnel sewer systems to enhance urban pluvial flood resilience in the gangnam region, South Korea S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120762
71. HydroLang FRAM: Web-based framework for comprehensive flood risk and mitigation assessment and communication M. Sufi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105735
72. The antecedents of risk perception in the context of natural hazards: A multi-level meta-analysis A. Theodorou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106281
73. READY: a web-based geographical information system for enhanced flood resilience through raising awareness in citizens R. Albano et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-1645-2015
74. Establishing information seeking pathways in slow and flash floods B. Ryan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.005
75. Risk Communication after Disaster: Return Entry Following the 2008 Cedar River Flood L. Siebeneck & T. Cova https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000126
76. Quantifying Resilience and Uncertainty in Coastal Flooding Events: Framework for Assessing Urban Vulnerability M. Karamouz & Z. Zahmatkesh https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000724
77. Flood risk perceptions and coping capacities among the retired population, with implications for risk communication: A study of residents in a north Wales coastal town, UK B. Walkling & B. Haworth https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101793
78. We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours S. De Dominicis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
79. Design and evaluation of a community and impact‐based site‐specific early warning system (SS‐EWS): The SS‐EWS framework E. Meléndez‐Landaverde & D. Sempere‐Torres https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12860
80. Predicting the impact of urban flooding using open data N. Tkachenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160013
81. Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda M. Bonaiuto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.007
82. The Effectiveness of a Large‐Scale Flood Risk Awareness Campaign: Evidence from Two Panel Data Sets D. Osberghaus & H. Hinrichs https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13601
83. Risk Communication on Floodings: Insights Into the Risk Awareness of Migrants in Rural Communities in Austria K. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-18-00060.1
84. Towards two-way flood risk communication: current practice in a community in the UK N. Ping et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2016.015
85. Flash flood warnings in context: combining local knowledge and large-scale hydro-meteorological patterns A. Bucherie et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-461-2022
86. Assessment of the warning system against floods on a rural area: the case of the lower Siret River (Romania) F. Salit et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-409-2013
87. Cross-validation as a step toward the integration of local and scientific knowledge of geologic hazards in rural Peru A. Malone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102682
88. Risk behaviour and people's attitude towards public authorities – A survey of 2007 UK and 2013 German floods F. Mahdavian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101685
89. Evaluation of safe-to-fail flood solution alternatives and integration of safe-to-fail concept in AEC education to develop resilient coastal cities R. Rahat et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-04-2022-0041
90. Yer Bağlılığı ve Risk Algısı Kavramları Arasındaki İlişki İ. Güler & E. Kutay Karaçor https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.402347
91. Disaster Awareness and Preparedness Among Older Adults in Canada Regarding Floods, Wildfires, and Earthquakes E. Bogdan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00555-9
92. Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management S. Maskrey et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12462
93. Creating effective flood warnings: A framework from a critical review M. Kuller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126708
94. Community Narratives of Disaster Risk and Resilience: Implications for Government Policy L. Drennan https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12299
95. How flood risk management projects can improve urban resilience: a combined assessment approach of functional resilience and adaptive capacity T. Doornkamp et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2024.2429226